U.S. Navy could soon be escorting commercial ships through the Strait of Hormuz, where maritime traffic has effectively stopped due to the current conflict with Iran, according to President Donald Trump. Doing so would demand that American naval vessels transit through the Strait, shifting them away from other duties. More importantly, it would also mean putting them right in a super weapons engagement zone full of Iranian threats that could include cruise and ballistic missiles, one-way-attack drones, explosive-laden kamikaze boats, and naval mines.

“If necessary, the United States Navy will begin escorting tankers through the Strait of Hormuz, as soon as possible,” President Trump wrote in a post on his Truth Social social media network.

“Effective IMMEDIATELY, I have ordered the United States Development Finance Corporation (DFC) to provide, at a very reasonable price, political risk insurance and guarantees for the Financial Security of ALL Maritime Trade, especially Energy, traveling through the Gulf,” he also wrote. “This will be available to all Shipping Lines.”

“No matter what, the United States will ensure the FREE FLOW of ENERGY to the WORLD. The United States’ ECONOMIC and MILITARY MIGHT is the GREATEST ON EARTH,” he added. “More actions to come.”

U.S. Central Command declined to comment when reached for more details. TWZ has also reached out to the White House.

...

This is not the first time that the United States has been faced with this predicament or decided to start escorting commercial vessels through the region as a result. The U.S. Navy did just this in the late 1980s during the Tanker War sideshow to the Iran-Iraq War. At the same time, that experience underscores the immense amount of resources such a campaign could require, as well as the risks.

At the peak of those operations, there were some 30 American warships escorting commercial vessels to and from the Persian Gulf. Aircraft, special operations forces, and other assets were also deployed in support. The risks to American service members, as well as the ships they were tasked to safeguard, were very real.

...

all 43 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 64 points 8 months ago* (3 children)

US citizens can't get out of the middle east, but we gotta protect our oil.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 36 points 8 months ago (2 children)

    Have we figured out yet how our oil got over there in the first place?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 28 points 8 months ago (2 children)

    that is the plan. it’s straight “manufacturing consent” while he tries to make a gulf of tonkin lie

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 28 points 8 months ago (5 children)

    Don’t worry, this is an ordained holy war, so Jesus will protect those ships.

    Jesus, take the wheel!

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 8 months ago (3 children)

    Can't do: Jesus was picked up by ICE and deported.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 8 months ago (1 child)

    Why would Jesus return in the USA. He's already been murdered by Israel last year where he was labeled a "Hamas" operative while feeding the poor and the homeless.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 19 points 8 months ago (2 children)

    He wants them in the cross hairs. He wants escalation.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 8 months ago* (8 children)

    Narrow water passage controlled by opposing faction, hmm? Ask the British about Dardanelles and see how it worked out for them. It doesn’t t need to be a complete closure; an occasional artillery barrage or rocket would suffice.

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 8 months ago (3 children)

    Yeah. Iran can just shoot at anything passing by with minimal risk. The only way to stop them would be to land troops as push them out, but even then you would have to push them back quite a bit to stop missiles from hitting the straight. And of course, landing troops is going to be bloody, very very bloody. Can the US afford it?

    But don't worry, all those ships sunk by the Iranians can just be replaced by the shiny new Trump class battleships.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 8 months ago (3 children)

    I am surprised they didnt have underwater mines to drop in on day 1.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 8 months ago* (1 child)

    Not sure if relevant but it’s deep through there - 60-100m.

    I’m not a marine engineer but I think mines would need to be anchored. Might be cheaper to have drone boats hidden in every bend in the coastline.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 22 points 8 months ago

    The spice must flow

  • source
  • [–] 10 points 8 months ago

    Ah yes, this genius is going to fix everything.

  • source
  • [–] 9 points 8 months ago (1 child)

    Why wouldn't the US navy be in the crosshairs anyway? If you start a war you don't get to pick which branch of your military gets attacked.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 8 points 8 months ago (1 child)

    We make you pay for a shitty solution for a problem we created ourselves

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 8 months ago*

    But it's a very reasonable fee! And a beautiful plan. The most beautiful, some people say.

    Remember that if you don't pay I'll increase the tariffs on your no good, very bad countries that are acting un-americanly!

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 6 points 8 months ago

    Makes the area dangerous, asks the people doing business there to pay for protection because it is now dangerous...

    Man this sounds so familiar for some reason.

  • source
  • [–] 6 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (4 children)

    Its also just obviously stupid.

    It can't possibly reliably work.

    We don't have enough interceptors to do that.

    Our THAAD radar arrays that would track incoming high altitude missiles ... already got taken out by Iran.

    https://defencesecurityasia.com/en/irgc-destroys-second-us-thaad-system-uae-radar-qatar-early-warning-iran-missile-dominance/

    We'd have to do convoy escort formation kinda like fucking WW2, (or the more modern parellel would be the Tanker War of the 80s) and use our naval defense systems... to intercept anything incoming... which would run us out of that kind of ammo even faster...

    ... and also potentially just still would not work against very high altititude, very fast missiles...

    ... meaning that then after maybe a month or three of that, oops, we lost a fucking aircraft carrier.

    Thats why nearly none of the ships have moved, despite this 'guarantee'.

    See all those clusters of red and green dots?

    That's everybody just parked in a holding pattern.

    https://www.marinetraffic.com/en/ais/home/centerx:56.8/centery:25.6/zoom:8

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] [S] 3 points 8 months ago (3 children)

    Sal's What's going on with Shipping? Channel did a video that adds to your points, while covering other things that happened in between too.

    We don't have the destroyers to so this, let alone the stocks to keep them full. Last time we tried something similar with the Houthi when we stood off and bring them down along the Red Sea we ran out.

    The best we might be able to do is the 5 or so US flagged vessels. Apparently France is going to do the same for their vessels. All the rest of them are probably just going to wait for the War insurance to get sorted and then start running it again (like some of them are apparently).

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 8 months ago* (2 children)

    Good of you to link him, I watch his stuff regularly, and I guess was arguably just sort of badly summarizing / riffing off him, lol.

    As the saying goes:

    Ship happens.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] [S] 2 points 8 months ago (1 child)

    Ship be happen' now

    I just watched his newest video and Sal's doing it daily right now. Not much new in broad substance, but details are developing.

    I went back and looked twz reported 770 missiles expended over the 9 months of their Hohthi protection. This is all missiles, so it's unclear how much of this was offensive vs defensive, but:

    Many of these weapons were used in direct defensive actions to protect commercial shipping and U.S. Navy and allied warships operating in and around the Red Sea and Gulf of Aden. While there is no price on human life and even a drone packed with explosives could severely damage an American destroyer, putting it out of action for months and possibly injuring or killing members of its crew, it’s interesting to put a price tag on what these weapons might have cost. This is becoming an increasingly important issue as the U.S. evaluates its own stockpiles and what would be needed to sustain a conflict in the Pacific against a foe exponentially more powerful than the Houthis.

    Without knowing the exact breakdown of the missiles and other munitions employed during the IKECSG’s recent deployment, it is impossible to put a dollar figure on all of the weapons expended. The unit price of a single Block V Tomahawk is $1.89 million or so, so launching 135 of those missiles would have cost the Navy $255,150,000.

    So stockpiles, resupply, and production becomes a big issue, beyond the astronomical cost of this.

    (All for the fucking ego of a Cheeto.)

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 8 months ago*

    (All for the fucking ego of a Cheeto.)

    Cheeto's got an ego at least partially 'cuz he's the chosen instrument of God on earth.

    Holy War ain't gonna fight itself:

    https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/trump-hosts-pastors-from-across-us-at-white-house-as-faith-leaders-pray-over-him/ar-AA1XCWcw

    I think in the last 24 hrs, at least 5 prominent US political figures have just outright said this is a religious war, Mike Johnson, Lindsey Graham, etc.

    Ya'll Qaeda, ya'll!

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 5 points 8 months ago

    Sounds like an AI strategy.

    Great Idea! Would you like me to write up a quick invasion plan for you?

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 8 months ago

    Trump is a fucking idiot

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 8 months ago (1 child)

    Article fails to highlight complete impotence towards Iran's impositions on Straits of Hormuz. Even if Iran could not see the traffic flowing, it can already reach with cheap drones, it is rumored to hold in the tens of thousands, targets that are farther than the ports the ships would load/unload from. While strikes on Israel are censored, they and ones in Gulf are still penetrating daily.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 4 points 8 months ago

    Do it tRump, it will be fun to watch

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 8 months ago

    Trump's plan... F**k's sake. Quick someone ask him about the ballroom before he starts again.

  • source
  • 28 comments in c/world@lemmy.world view that post
    [–] 63 points 8 months ago

    not without putting American warships in the line of fire

    Did anyone check the definition of a "war" before starting one?

  • source
  • [–] 16 points 8 months ago

    Let's dump the Trump admin in the Hormuz strait

  • source
  • [–] 28 points 8 months ago* (1 child)

    Great, so we can add a "strait of hormuz incident" to the bay of pigs, gulf of tonkin, and other body-of-water-based US military disasters

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 11 points 8 months ago* (4 children)

    Does Phalanx work for a convoy or just the ship on which it is deployed?

    I guess we will also learn how well it works against cheap drones.

    I don’t think any of that works well against artillery shells, and oil tankers are not well armoured.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 8 months ago

    An American destroyer has a large number of area defence interceptor missiles, not just the CIWS. The question is, will the interceptors be completely effective if Iran is able to launch a saturation attack on them, and will they have enough interceptors left by the time they get out of the shooting gallery. Personally, I think even they aren't stupid enough to try it, but I hope I'm proven wrong.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 8 months ago*

    Phalanx is self defense only. The weapons used to protect nearby ships are ESSM and SM-2 missiles. Which should to work fine to intercept cheap drone, artillery and ballistic missiles. (Tho very expressive to intercept artillery with missiles)

    The navy has used those systems recently to defend ships during the Houti crisis in the red sea.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 8 points 8 months ago (2 children)

    Huh. I was expecting the strategy to be bombing the sites that would launch attacks on shipping, not to actually escort and try to defend the ships.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] 7 points 8 months ago (3 children)
  • [–] 8 points 8 months ago (1 child)

    With Iran already being economically isolated for years before this war, there's not enough new risk of further economic damage to cause a market crash.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • [–] 5 points 8 months ago

    Well you see that's where Trump's level of genius shines. Don't shoot the archers, shoot the arrows (it looks way cooler and people think you're so badass).

    Sure you might lose a naval vessel or twelve when US capacity to build more ships is really low, but that's a sacrifice this level of genius is willing to make (totally unawares, probably).

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 6 points 8 months ago (1 child)

    How much of our air defensive stockpile do you think our russia backed regime can expend protecting the wealth of the royal house of saud?

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 6 points 8 months ago

    Especially after the US torpedoed the Iris Dena? Fun times.

  • source
  • [–] 6 points 8 months ago (1 child)

    There seriously is not enough alcohol for this administration.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 5 points 8 months ago (2 children)

    Other than Israel responding by glassing all of Iran, what's to stop Iran from waiting until the wind is blowing the right way and launching a dirty missile at Israel? If it gets intercepted it still spews nuclear material over the country right?

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] [S] 8 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 child)

    There is nothing to stop this from escalating, I don't think abrupt, nonsensical nuclear war is off the table for the US or Israel and I don't think the centrists of the world are ready for that (which terrifyingly, is really one of the few "gotchas" Trump and Netanyahu have left to flip the script, all the other non-existent international norms people believed in are already destroyed, nuclear weapons are the only one left.).

    We have never been closer to nuclear war in my lifetime and it is almost entirely the fault of the US and Israel.

    Let me ask you a question, if every accusation is an admission, what is Trump loudly admitting he is about to do?

    This conflict leads directly to the use of "tactical" nuclear weapons because this is the first bullshit war in a long time in US history where the existentiality necessity of using nuclear weapons can be invoked without the immediate fear of nuclear retaliation as a consequence, at least according to how the leadership of the US and Israel see it.

    There are not many off ramps left here...

    Iran could easily end up doing that if things keep escalating, but I think what the US and Israel do will be far more catastrophic for everybody.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 8 months ago

    US warships have already been hit. There is massive censorship in place.

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 8 months ago (1 child)

    Sweet, let’s watch some navy ships go down.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 3 points 8 months ago

    4D Chess irl.

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 8 months ago