top 99 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 201 points 8 months ago (38 children)

A vegetable wouldn't hurt you.

  • source
  • hideshow 38 child comments
  • [–] 62 points 8 months ago (5 children)

    It would if it fell on your head. Checkmate atheists.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 14 points 8 months ago (2 children)
  • [–] 23 points 8 months ago (9 children)

    Potatoes could. The leaves, sprouts, and underground stems (tubers) of potatoes contain a toxic substance called glycoalkaloid. Glycoalkaloids make a potato look green when it's exposed to light, gets damaged, or ages. Eating potatoes with a high glycoalkaloid content can cause nausea, diarrhea, confusion, headaches, and death.

    Also, the sentient mutant vegetables on Atrack of the Killer Tomatoes will definitely want to do harm toward OP.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 8 months ago (2 children)

    From what I understand, green potatoes are rendered harmless by boiling, as the poisons are water soluble. Though they are not rendered inactive by boiling, they are diffused through the water, rendering it inadvisable to reuse for boiling other foods. Following that, harvesting these poisons is relatively easy and a good way to get Cheney, that asshole, to keep to his own fucking food.

    Not disagreeing, trying to keep food waste down.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 16 points 8 months ago (9 children)

    I'm a vegetarian once removed. A lot of the animals I eat were vegetarians.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 8 months ago (7 children)

    A chicken would eat you if it could

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 8 months ago (2 children)

    Hey I didn't say all of them, and the chicken that defeats me in single combat is welcome to feed upon my corpse.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 8 months ago (3 children)
  • [–] 9 points 8 months ago

    Wheat grain is strictly a vegetable, being an edible plant part. But people usually use the word to refer to a socially-constructed category which is completely feels-based. Membership tends to be determined by flavor profile, nutrition content, and whether the given part falls into another popular sub-category (such as fruit or nuts). This is why fruits like the tomato and pumpkin are usually sorted as vegetables separately from fruits with generally sweeter flavors like the banana or orange.

    Vegetables like grains, legumes, and certain tubers will often be grouped together as "carbs" due to their high carbohydrate content which distinguishes them from low-calorie, high-fiber vegetables like spinach or broccoli.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 8 months ago

    When I was on a strict diet, I actually bought 5 dollar rotisserie chicken and made a stir fry of sorts with broccoli, spinach, carrots, peas. I'd skip breakfast just to be able to have a big dinner and be satisfied going to bed. I'd try to get close to 120g of protein a day, (I'd eat half a chicken a day) and technically as much veg as I could stomach. I figure I was eating around 1500 calories a day. It worked but it was boring.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] -3 points 8 months ago (2 children)

    Most vegetables are poisonous just saying

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 64 points 8 months ago (2 children)

    Even in the 1960s eating a whole chicken would have been a luxury, this isn't peasant food, that's the gout inducing diet of a king

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 58 points 8 months ago (4 children)

    Soft white bread? Nobody but rich upper class people could afford soft white bread until well past the industrial revolution.

    That's also a pretty large roasted bird that's being eaten in complete absence of stew.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 8 months ago (2 children)

    fun fact: whole-grain bread is probably healthier than soft white bread anyways due to an increased content in fiber, so there's that ...

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 117 points 8 months ago (16 children)

    Would a medieval peasant have access to that much meat?

  • source
  • hideshow 16 child comments
  • [–] 79 points 8 months ago (1 child)

    King Richard I was once captured for ransom while traveling undercover trough Austria.

    His cover was blown specifically because he tried ordering a roast chicken.

    There are a few variations of the details in this story though, a peasant could definitely have owned a chicken and eaten it when it died but it was probably way more valuable to sell it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 37 points 8 months ago (6 children)

    Doubtful, most common meal for peasants would have been a sort of stew of vegetables and oats called pottage.

    A whole chicken would have been prohibitively expensive either to purchase or in lost money from sale at market, same for pork or beef.

    Fish though would be plentiful and cheap and a valuable source of protein. Oysters were considered peasant food until pretty much the 20th century.

    Wheat bread similarly would have been a rare luxury, especially made from refined white flour, rye and buckwheat, roughly ground would be far more common.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 8 months ago (2 children)

    A roasted bird? Why not? Y’all are making assumptions that this is a chicken and the peasant a small farmer but why not a traveling mime trapping pigeons from the square?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 48 points 8 months ago (12 children)

    Skyrim ass meal. need a wheel of cheese with it.

  • source
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 8 months ago (11 children)

    Try a ploughmans meal - bread, cheese and pickle. Awesome as a lunch.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (5 children)

    Btw, that "ploughman's lunch" was created in the 1960s by british marketing executives. It has nothing to do with medieval times, it's just meant to evoque that vague feeling.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 8 months ago (2 children)

    The branding of ploughman's lunch was invented in the 60s but that same Wikipedia page states it had been a common meal for rural labourers for centuries.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 8 months ago (1 child)

    Thank you for this info. I wouldn't have thought to look into such a thing. It reads to me like it was created by marketers, though, not politicians. It says "the Cheese Bureau, a marketing body affiliated with the J. Walter Thompson advertising agency" created it in the '50s.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 40 points 8 months ago (2 children)

    Oh damn, that's a fucking feast! Peasents can't afford that shit.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 38 points 8 months ago (1 child)

    "What is the charge? Eating a meal? A succulent chicken meal?", "Get your hand off my baguette!"

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 36 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (6 children)

    Peasants? Even many nobles didn't eat like that every day.

    People think that the typical nobleman in the Middle Ages ate like King Henry VIII. That isn't true. Did you know that they determined that at least at a few points in Vlad the Impaler's life he was basically living on a vegan diet? They ate a hell of a lot of vegetables and grains because meat was still expensive for everyone involved.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 8 months ago (2 children)

    This. You had a steady diet of vegetables and bread. Maybe eggs if you had chickens and some small bit of land. Those times were harsh as fuck

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 8 months ago

    Also they weren't guzzling wine and ale at all hours and when they did drink it was usually cut with water or what they called 'small beer' and very young wine (which didn't have time to properly fermented and reach full potency) that had limited alcohol content. Also they did drink water. In the same way that in places in the world where they have limited water treatment facilities they still drink water even if it isn't the best.

    Again... they weren't stupid. They might not have had the depth and breadth of modern medical technology on how alcohol affects you, but people knew what it did and they know what addiction is (even if they made it out to be a personal weakness) and how terrible it was.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 33 points 8 months ago

    More like a medieval king.

  • source
  • [–] 31 points 8 months ago (4 children)

    You're eating like Final Fight.
    (Hits a trashcan)
    Roasted chicken.
    (Hits some tires)
    Bread.
    100% health let's go!!!

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 28 points 8 months ago (1 child)
  • [–] 21 points 8 months ago

    If by "peasant" you mean "knight of the fucking round table" then yes

  • source
  • [–] 18 points 8 months ago

    A medieval peasant would be wishing they could est like this.

  • source
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›