What we have called “motorcycles” should actually be called “enginecycles”. Also, the engine on enginecycles is a four-cycle engine.

top 96 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 54 points 9 months ago (1 child)

Enginecycles? If you specifically refer to internal combustion engine (ICE) then it'd make sense to call them icecycles. It sounds weird, maybe icicles?

But seriously EU has a definition of what an ebike is, it's not just a bicycle with motor, there's max allowed power, max assistance level, and importantly it should only assist when pedalling. Anything beyond that, yes, is classified as a motorbike.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 9 months ago

    So does the US, with tiers though so it's a bit less straight forward, and some state laws like in NJ are doing some wacky things. In any event, OP just didn't educate themselves before posting.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 46 points 9 months ago (25 children)

    I'm a bit triggered by this, so let me apologize in advance for the incoming rant.

    You might be kind of right etymologically, but bikes, e-bikes, motorcycles, and likely in the near future e-motos, are specific things defined by law. The confusion between these vehicle classes is causing harm.

    An e-bike is a pedal powered bicycle with an electric motor that assists the rider while pedalling up to 25km/h. You might be able to switch modes between more assistance and less assistance but there is no throttle.

    If you purchase a cheap walmart / k-mart bike, swap the rear wheel with a powered hub from alibaba and strap on a battery from temu, that's not an e-bike. They have a throttle and no limiter and in most cases can propel a 12 year old idiot at 50km/h but some times more than 70km/h. This is not an e-bike and more accurately described as an unregulated electric motorbike.

    The frame isn't built for this kind of stress, and the riders often have no capacity to understand the danger they're imposing on themselves and others - zipping past kids playing and so on.

    It's an emerging disaster in Australia and I imagine other places as well. It's turning the population against e-bikes when they're not the problem.

    We urgently need more appropriate legislation drafted to clearly define the classes of vehicle, and we need police with the right skills and equipment to enforce those laws.

  • source
  • hideshow 25 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 9 months ago (8 children)

    This is the correct take.

    My feeling is that if it's controlled by a throttle, then it's a motorbike and it should be registered and require a driver's licence to operate, and it shouldn't be on bike paths or footpaths.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 9 months ago (6 children)

    Yeah that's the implication, but it's complicated.

    e-scooters are controlled by a throttle, so I think there's a debate to be had as to whether that's a defining factor.

    IMO the throttle is less critical than speed limiting. Anything you can pilot without a license should be restricted to 25km/h.

    The problem is these limitations can easily be removed.

    That's why I say it really needs proper policing. You need cops on bikes, and some kind of strategy to establish whether a bike is compliant.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 9 months ago (5 children)

    My bro in Berlin mentioned that infrequently the police will see up a rolling road device to stop ebikes, electric scooters etc (anything that by law is speed restricted).

    They do it on a one way road where you can't see them, with police at the top end to stop anyone that's clearly seen and turned around to avoid it

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 9 months ago (2 children)

    Yeah I've seen photos of something like this. The one I saw was UK police I think.

    This might work in high traffic areas but where I am there just isn't enough people on bikes to set up something like this.

    If the po-po stop a kid on a bike they believe is illegally modified, just confiscate and impound it where it can be assessed.

    No one cares if a bike can propel you 3km/h over the limit because you changed the tyre diameter. Even if you updated the software to remove the limiter, that's not really going to make much difference to safety if I'm honest. It's the bikes with throttles and big hub motors that spin you up to 20 or 30km/h over the limit that are the problem.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 9 months ago (1 child)

    Yup, agreed. I'm out in the sticks too, years back I tried to commute the 17 or so miles each way on a gravel bike with a conversion but keeping legal with a 250w motor it just didn't do anything as there was no stop:starting and I was generally travelling at over the 15.5mph limit so just carrying extra weight.

    Not sure why I mention as it's a use case error on my part but I do wish I'd got a meatier motor, derestricted it and taken my chances.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 9 months ago

    Yeah I have a big heavy cannondale cargowagen.

    It's a long tail, so both my kids can sit on the back. System weight is probably 150kg with all three of us on board. By the time we wind up to 25km/h the torque provided by the motor is pretty minimal honestly.

    It's comfortable at 40km/h on a downhill slope.

    I would've already figured out how to remove the limiter if I thought it would be helpful but... I just don't really think it would make much difference.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 9 months ago (1 child)

    Fatbikes, you mean? They're no longer eBikes.

    OP has made this quite clear. Do y'all read?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 9 months ago*

    No, I mean ebikes. I made no reference to fat bikes. An ebike is legally allowed on the roads of most of Europe (this includes fat bikes) providing they meet certain criteria. That includes speed and power restrictions. Where they exceed those that are illegal and the authorities are making efforts to impound them.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 9 months ago

    My country has this legislation and my electric scooter is technically illegal sure to it. As you control the throttle with your thumb.

    Now they make really uncomfortable scooters that only power of you move your leg past a sensor as then it would be 'kick assist'. Also those scooters cost the times the amount of regular scooters that are legal in most of Europe.

    It's s terribly bad legislation. Speed should be the main differentiator.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 5 points 9 months ago

    Your statement is only partially true. In Florida, where I live, yes Florida, I know . . .there are three classes of ebikes. Class 3 ebikes must have pedals but can have a throttle and can operate without pedaling. By law, it IS still an ebike. So I believe it comes down to jurisdiction.

    The rest of what you said is pretty much true and it's a problem here too. I absolutely love riding my ebike. Mine has gears and is every bit a bike. For me the assist helps with hills (yes we have a few small ones here) and mostly wind. But it also serves another purpose. Making the ride either easier since I'm getting older or faster means I'm more likely to use the bike than a normal bike. I believe for these reasons I actually get MORE exercise with my ebike than my normal bike, at least until someone hits me with a car. So yeah, these guys with their over-powered "ebikes" are going to ruin it for the rest of us by getting us banned from trails and such.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 9 months ago

    Yeah the entire nomenclature does a terrible job of differentiating what really matters in vehicle type as a law regulation category. As far as i can see the main factors should be:

    1. Number of wheels
    2. Size dimensions
    3. Weight
    4. Top speed
  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 9 months ago (4 children)

    Your definition is just yours - I see ebikes doing 35mph+ on the sidewalk all the time.

    How do I know they're going that fast? Because that's how fast I'm going on the street, and I'm not passing them.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 9 months ago (2 children)

    Sorry you may not have understood me correctly.

    In Australia and most other jurisdictions an "e-bike" is defined by law as a bike with pedal assist up to 25km/h.

    If a bike has an electric motor which is propelling it faster than that, then it is by definition not an e-bike. It's most likely an unregulated electric motorbike, or e-moto. They're incredibly dangerous for everyone involved.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 9 months ago (1 child)

    In Australia and most other jurisdictions an “e-bike” is defined by law as a bike with pedal assist up to 25km/h.

    I'm pretty sure they're intentionally conflating them to either downplay the risks of unregulated electric motorcycles, or as some odd kind of anti-bike push, depending on the person making the argument.

    The news is constantly bemoaning the dangers of e-bikes, while actually talking about motorcycles, too many times for it to be accidental.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 9 months ago (1 child)

    I don't know if I've ever seen a kid riding an actual e-bike, they are never pedaling when I see them ..

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 9 months ago

    Me neither. There's probably several reasons you wouldn't buy a child a proper e-bike.

    Mostly just the cost I guess. A proper e-bike is twice the cost of a home made e-whatever. Also less fun than their friend's e-whatevers.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 9 months ago (2 children)

    I've been following the surron and talaria bikes. These are electric dirt motorcycle. Half the vidoes I've seen are ppl riding them on the street. They've gotten so fast. They write all over their websites its for OFF ROAD USE ONLY. I want one so bad. Im sure if I ride them slowly on the sidewalk for my commute. I shouldn't get pulled over.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 9 months ago (1 child)

    Depending on where you are you might be able to get a road legal one. Talaria and Surron have both sold road legal versions of some of their models here in Australia, I believe they've also done so in the UK and I did read something about some US states letting you register them once appropriate lights are installed.

    Of course this does require you to treat them as a motorbike and keep off footpaths, have the appropriate licence, etc. Once you've got the licence you can ride other motorbikes as well though so I don't see this as a downside (it's an enjoyable method of transport and more people should do it).

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 9 months ago

    I'm at the uncool end of that trend in the UK. I dumped my car 4yrs back and got an electric vespa-shaped vehicle. I already had my full bike licence which helped make it an easy decision but even in our weather really enjoyable and nsanely cheap motoring

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 9 months ago*

    There are also fully electric, battery powered, full-on, full-size motorcycles, like those by Zero.

    https://zeromotorcycles.com/

    There are also ... I don't even know what you call these, mini-bikes? Mini-motorcycles?

    Like the Honda Grom:

    https://powersports.honda.com/motorcycle/minimoto/grom

    Which, as you can see, are pretty dang close to the same size as some E-Bikes.

    Which one is street legal, where?

    What exactly is each of these things categorized as, legally, colloquially?

    ... who the fuck knows!, basically.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] -1 points 9 months ago (2 children)

    The confusion between these things is causing harm

    Seems like one possible solution should be calling motorcycles enginecycles so there's no confusion.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 31 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (8 children)

    Upvote for the main thought, but

    1. A gasoline engine is a type of motor. You are making a distinction without a difference. A motor is just something that produces mechanical motion. Motor. Motion. Motivate. All come from the same root as “move”
    2. An “engine” can be the whole apparatus that does the work, not merely the thing that provides the power, and could be powered by a water, beast, or even manually such as the cotton [en]gin[e]. A lot of that usage comes from pre WW2, but it survives in things like “train engine” (the vehicle that pushes or pulls a train) and “game engine” (the program architecture that manages the processing power provided by the computer to convert user interactions, game assets, etc. into something that we recognize as a game).
    3. It’s not a four-cycle engine. It is a four-stroke engine: each piston makes four strokes each complete engine cycle.
  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 9 months ago

    I didn't know what to say but you nabbed it.

    Also reminds me of the motor effect: electromagnetism causing motion. Perhaps that's why the name 'electric motor' became so dominant...

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 9 months ago

    To your point, "engine" at one time referred specifically to an electrically driven device, and "motor" referred to something combustion driven.

    Etymologically, engine means "mechanical device" and motor originates in Latin meaning "mover".

    I do agree with OP that a 2 wheel contrivance with any kind of motor/engine is a motorcycle (motorized cycle) from a regulatory perspective, though I'd never call one a motorcycle.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 15 points 9 months ago (9 children)

    Really? Because I don't remember pedaling my Honda 750.

  • source
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 9 months ago (6 children)

    I don't remember pedaling my eBike, either. With a big enough motor, they're all but completely vestigal.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 9 months ago

    It's true that there are different classes of ebikes. Class 3 ebikes with enough power can be basically motorcycles disguised as bikes. Mine is a class 1 and very much a bicycle. If the distinction can be made that some ebikes do not require pedaling and are therefore motorcycles, by extension it is equally valid to say that ALL ebikes must have pedals so all ebikes are bikes. The truth is really somewhere in-between. Not sure how important that is to a shower thought though.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 9 months ago (4 children)

    eBikes require pedaling. I don't know what you had, but it wasn't an eBike.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 9 months ago (5 children)

    The Honda Goldwing is a six cylinder outdoor Campervan Winnebago.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 9 months ago (4 children)

    Does it smell like a steak and seat 35?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 9 months ago (1 child)

    Don’t tell that to e-bike fans. They’re very vocal and easily triggered.

    And don’t dare suggesting helmets or licenses. They will crucify you.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 6 points 9 months ago (2 children)

    Really unfortunate this classification system has happened. What you're thinking of is an electric moped, but it's all getting lumped together. Check this out.

    https://youtu.be/bB6hBLmBhPA

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 9 months ago (1 child)

    The differentiator is max speed in Canada. Regardless of how they are built. If you can exceed a certain speed, license required.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 9 months ago

    I think that's a good system. I have a pedal assisted bike and it feels like it'd be ridiculous to need to license it (it does have a "full throttle" mode, but I don't think it can even make it up to 20mph).

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 6 points 9 months ago

    Upvote for the thought.

  • source
  • [–] 10 points 9 months ago

    This is actually a really good one.

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 9 months ago

    Not all motos are 4 stroke. My buddy rides a two stroke KTM and that thing cooks.

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 9 months ago (3 children)

    Is an e-scooter a motorcycle?

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 9 months ago (2 children)

    In Australia at least, e-scooters are classed as a 'personal mobility device' which is the same classification that motorised wheelchairs are in.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 9 months ago

    Huh, I guess that makes sense. I don't think they fit into any category in Denver, CO. They aren't allowed on the sidewalks so that makes them a vehicle. But they really aren't a vehicle and are sort of pedestrians in the road.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 6 points 9 months ago (6 children)

    Isn't it the electric equivalent of a moped?

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 9 months ago

    You're right but the word "moped" has lost meaning in most countries.

    Here in the UK I suspect the majority of people asked wouldn't appreciate it originally had pedals and would point to a vespa image if asked.

    I have an electric vespa-shaped vehicle (goes about 80kmh) that as you can see i really struggle to name as "electric scooter" most people think of one of those stand on things so I've landed on calling it an "electric moped". It works as equally in no way can someone accuse me of trying to make it sound cool :)

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] -1 points 9 months ago (4 children)

    No. Because you have to pedal.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 9 months ago (2 children)

    Mopeds used to have pedals as well. The term comes from Swedish words motor and pedaler

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 9 months ago

    History is a circle.

    First we had bicycles. These then got helper motors. Then we got motorcycles and the two stroke engines had helper pedals to start. Then the pedals were removed.

    Now we still have bicycles. These then got electric helper motors. Then we got electric bikes, that still have pedals, but people hack them to run entirely on the motor.

    Make up your minds already. Everyone of these changes upsets the elderly.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 9 months ago (1 child)

    Not actually sure on this one, because the terminology for motorcycles is... Weird.

    Motorcycles are what we're all thinking of, Harleys, Kawasaki's, Yamaha's, etc. Mopeds and scooters look the same, and both usually have manual transmissions, but have a floor in them. I don't know that there's a word that encompasses both, much less including ebikes? Maybe motorbike

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 9 months ago

    My friend said something similar to me a long time ago. I said, General Motors.....?

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 9 months ago (1 child)

    Some motorcycles have starter motors, these are hybrids now.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 9 months ago

    Not all the time. My engine cycle has a three cylinder 2 stroke. It's scary fast.

  • source
  • [–] [S] 2 points 9 months ago

    ITT: y’all be taking my random before-bed shit thought way too seriously.

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 9 months ago (1 child)

    Well first off, whether or not an internal combustion engine is called a motor or an engine differs by region for English-speakers and in fact in my language there's only "mootor", for both electric and combustion engines.

    Secondly, the engine on an enginecycle could also be a two-cycle engine, that's common in small engined dirtbikes and moped particularly.

    Thirdly, this may depend on your local legislation, but where I live, a low-power e-bike would be a moped and a high-power e-bike would be a motorcycle. In terms of the license requirements anyway. If it's limited to 25 km/h and requires pedaling, then it's an assisted bicycle and requires no license and no helmet (provided you're over 16).

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 9 months ago* (1 child)

    Etymologically speaking, "engine" means any invention, whereas "motor" means specifically something that makes things move. A gasoline engine is a motor; an electric motor is an engine.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (6 children)

    The difference is in power and control. Ebikes are speed capped. There are two types, pedal assist and throttle control. Pedel assist are ones that only turn on the motor when you are pedaling. Throttle control ebikes are speed capped even more than pedal assist. I think they should be banned because of jailbreaking and it puts you in the mental state of operating a machine rather than pedaling a bike.

    Also, the engine on enginecycles is a four-cycle engine.

    Electric motorbikes are a thing too.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 9 months ago (5 children)

    You can buy e-bikes on amazon that weigh more and travel faster than a Honda Cub, a registerable motorcycle. They're in Grom territory. This idea, at least in the US market, that they're fitting into the two classes of safe e-bike is disproven with 30 seconds of observation in any city or adjacent suburb. The only riders pedaling are the leisure riders in parks.

    Fortnine has two videos on the topic, one of the 60mph e-bike and one of converting a Cub to EV, making it faster than stock.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (4 children)

    Yes you can buy illegal things and break the law. Like really?

    Or you're talking about electric motorbikes, which are not ebikes they are electric motorbikes.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 9 months ago (3 children)

    No, I'm talking about non-registerable electric bicycles with pedals as intended by the post. I'm not talking about highway-legal electric motorcycles like Zero. Yes, you can buy illegal vehicles. People do. The laws are not enforced in the US. So if a law bans highway-speed bicycles but no one is around to enforce it and users continually break this unenforced law, then the distinction about the safe versions of e-bikes being woefully slower than regulated motorcycles is moot. The actual e-bike user base has demonstrable overlap with highway-legal motorcycles.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 9 months ago (2 children)

    So back to my first point:

    Yes you can buy illegal things and break the law. Like really?

    JFC.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 9 months ago

    Depending on State, a small enough engine on a bicycle doesn't count as a motor vehicle.

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 9 months ago

    Anything is everything if you blur the lines enough.

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 9 months ago

    I live in south east asia and motorbikes are the dominant transporation tool here and yes fast e-bikes are absolutely motorbikes. They would be treated here the same way and law wise but the adoption is very low because compared to a motorbike it's mostly a meme/entertainment vehicle as good ol motorbike is far superior and actually cheaper vehicle.

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 9 months ago

    If it can go on the highway it is a motorcycle if not it is a moped.

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 9 months ago

    ice cycles. I really am not fond of ice on so many levels.

  • source
  • [–] -4 points 9 months ago*

    Uh, no. Maybe check the definition of a word before you accuse people of using it wrong?

    Besides, there is literally no benefit to this kind of approach. The most popular use of a word is the definition of the word, not the other way around. And yes, this means it will change over time. So even if motor didn't literally refer to a certain type of engine, the definition of the word motorcycle is not dependent on the definition of the word motor. Even if there was a contradiction between the definition of the two words that's literally irrelevant. There's no point getting all annoyed about it, that's just how language works. But you will not help anything by trying to force people to change how they're using a word. It'll just cause confusion and make communication even less clear.

  • source