top 100 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 162 points 9 months ago

Good. The Mastercard and Visa tax never made any sense. We deserve better.

  • source
  • [–] 154 points 9 months ago* (8 children)

    Good. Make it hurt.

    I want to see CEOs from the sky.

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 50 points 9 months ago (4 children)

    They would be tiny from way up there

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 23 points 9 months ago (3 children)

    I like the way you think, get them to terminal velocity.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 124 points 9 months ago (5 children)

    Hello, friends in civilized lands, especially those of you who work at financial institutions...

    Some of us in the states are excited to watch you do some damage to the entrenched middlemen that have been skimming from all of us for so long. Please do consider letting us sign up for the new stuff. Our money is still worth something, for now!

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 44 points 9 months ago (2 children)

    I agree 100% but also this is like when you watch your brother punch your dad to make him stop hitting your mom, and you know you're going to get the shit kicked out of both of you later for it.

    ...unless one of your grabs the crowbar and goes for broke...

    Hey blue states...

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 305 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (36 children)

    I wonder how many trillions of dollars the Trump dumpster fire will end up costing American business.

    You'd think our corporate overlords would remove him.

  • source
  • hideshow 36 child comments
  • [–] 59 points 9 months ago (1 child)

    At this point, I wouldn't be surprised if they're working on it. He's destroying their bottom lines.

    That said, if you go after the king, you'd best not miss.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 128 points 9 months ago* (14 children)

    Let's say the pre-Trump economy is worth $100 trillion, and a particular billionaire's share is $2 billion. Let's say Trump catastrophically decreases the economy's value to $50 trillion, while increasing corruption such that that Trump is getting more power, and the billionaire's share is $10 billion.

    This is followed by a collapsing market that creates a dip in share prices or private valuation, the assets of which can be bought for pennies on the dollar, eventually leading to that billionaire having $30 billion in a total economy worth $20 trillion.

    Win/win for Trump and the billionaire, at the cost of everyone else.

    That's basically what's happening, and will continue to happen.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 14 child comments
  • [–] 22 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (10 children)

    I'm not an economist, so here's my ass talking, but I don't think your example scales out. I think you're making the mistake of equating the stock market to the economy. It isn't.

    Not everyone wins in a failing economy. If one billionaire makes out, three more lose money.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 27 points 9 months ago (4 children)

    Not everyone wins in a failing economy. If one billionaire makes out, three more lose money.

    No, yeah, that's true. But the billionaires are also competing with each other in a (perceived) zero-sum game and they believe the ones who are cozying closest to Trump will be the best ones positioned to make money - either in a corrupt or a failing economy. But every recession has been a golden opportunity for billionaires.

    Heck, in post-collapse Russia, this is how oligarchs first appeared - the "shock therapy" of the 1990s transition to a market economy dropped the value of resources to nothing, and the rich at the time bought them and became the ultra-rich. Some didn't make it. ( Like a super-bacteria forming from the ones not killed by antibiotics, the ones that survived were even more resistant to control.)

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 14 points 9 months ago (3 children)

    Good example, especially given that it looks like a Russian oligarchy is where we've been headed since 2016

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 9 months ago (2 children)

    Good example, especially given that it looks like a Russian oligarchy is where we’ve been headed since 2016 since 1776

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 9 months ago* (1 child)

    Nah, since the 80s at the earliest. The wealthiest were taxed up to 90% and corporations didn't get the tax loopholes they have now until Reagan took office.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 9 months ago

    That's where you're wrong my friend, for while we had a progressive period in the 20th century, the united states were built by and for rich white land owners, so they could continue to benefit off that which they owned.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 12 points 9 months ago* (3 children)

    I just want to inject here my experience in Britain during the 2008 Crash and its aftermath:

    In Britain, the Finance Industry was 17% of GDP, so when the Crash happened the country was disproportionally hit.

    After the crash the autorities chose to protect Asset Owners above all:

    • Interest rates were lowered to 0%, thus protecting lenders (i.e. those with the money to lend or ownership of Banks which in the modern system can de facto create money: if you don't believe me, read the paper "Money Creation In The Modern Economy" from the Bank Of England) from debt defaults, also indirectly protecting Asset Owners by avoiding asset firesales from collateral confiscated after a default thus avoiding the associate asset price falls, most notably for Land and Housing (in the UK the Housing bubble never really stopped being inflated and Land Ownership is the core of Old Wealth)
    • Banks were unconditionally saved by the state taking a share in them. That Public share was then put under management of a group made up of bankers "so that the government doesn't interfere in the market". De facto pressure for changing from the very practices that had cause the Crash was removed and most of the people having the blame for the failures of the Crash kept their positions of privilege.
    • All this was paid by most people through Austerity. Public services were cut, Social Security (aka "Benefits) were reduced, salaries stagnated. The poorer one was the worst they got hit.

    By 2015 the incomes of the top wealthier 10% of the population were growing in real terms 23% per year whilst the bottom 90% were seeing their incomes fall 1% per year in real terms.

    This was roughly how things went for about a decade after the Crash. UK inequality is nowadays huge, social mobility near non-existent, average incomes when measured in a currency other than the pound - which went down following Brexit - have stagneted, overall economic growth is anemic and concentrated in highest wealth layers since that "growth" told by official GDP numbers is mostly asset prices going up.

    This is the process by which the billionaires make sure they win: everybody gets hit more or less in a Crash, but in during the subsequent period when the state is supposedly trying to fix it, you get also sorts of "extreme measures required by extreme times" that, "curiously", help the billionaires the most, so some years later everybody but the wealthiest slices of society are worst of whilst the wealthiest are much richer even than before the Crash.

    I expect the plans of the billionaires who are cozying up with Trump is exactly to end up richer via this process.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 9 months ago

    This is spot on, and pretty much how it went down everywhere, not just the UK. Just to clarify: it's workers, not capital, who create wealth. The staggering rise in inequality, pricing people out of cities and the housing market is having a significant negative effect on productivity which is why Europe is falling behind.

    This means lost time where we have not been producing anywhere near our potential, and by consequence also not honing our skills to produce anything in the future. We can't just win this time back by political change now, it's lost forever, and young people who should have been at the forefront of developing the economy and making families will never win this back.

    We need to be way more angry than we are, and every day that we don't fix this we're letting it get worse.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 9 months ago* (1 child)

    I'm pretty sure this is exact same thing that happened in USA.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 9 months ago*

    Yeah, I believe so based on what I saw from affar, but I'm more intimatelly familiar with Britain - especially the more subtle elements of politics and policy - since I lived there from before the Crash until Brexit.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 13 points 9 months ago* (2 children)

    This is followed by a collapsing market that creates a dip in share prices or private valuation

    I am not a billionaire, just an average joe lucky to be able to borrow a few thousand from my Roth 401k in order to buy oil stocks in March 2020 at 90% off.

    I earned between 15x and 20x what I invested and paid off my student loans when the market recovered.

    It's not just for the billionaires, but you're right, all of this is intentional and the wealthiest will profit the most.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 16 points 9 months ago (2 children)

    The question is incomplete. They will cost trillions, but the presidency, the party fixing elections right now, will cost the country the dollar itself. They will max out borrowing, then print money to pay off the debt and de facto default. They will turn all of those dollars into very much less valuable things.

    Presuming no one stops them.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

    Most of those overlords don‘t care about their business anymore. They want to get the bag now. It‘s how Oligarchies operate. They burn billions to make millions. Or in this case delete trillions to make billions. The goal is have proportionally much more money than us pathetic peasants.

    The way Trump operates in particular is unsurprisingly dull. He flips the table and ruins the game for everyone. Then he waits and whoever says some flattering words to him and gives him a hefty bribe is excluded from his bullshit. Suddenly they see their competition crippled while they themselves can do business as usual. That‘s all there is to it. Trump was never the brightest bulb and probably thinks his obvious scheme is brilliant.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 9 months ago*

    24 trillion. the culture war bs with the right is thier best chance of maintain power in the us, so no, they might have accept less to hold on to that power. Or they just stir up the right wing in other countries, alongside with russia.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 9 months ago

    It's kind of a weird game theory thing, because the industries affected aren't consistently losing. A decision he makes on Wednesday can help the finance industry but hurt the tech industry, and then he can reverse it on Thursday and now the finance industry is tanking but the insurance industry is up. It's tough to know who would work together to pull him out of office, because between any two given days, the people who have the money have different opinions on how he's doing.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 9 months ago* (2 children)

    I wonder how many trillions of dollars the Trump dumpster fire will end up costing American business.

    USAian business does great under fascism. Just look at the MIC. Both "parties" just voted on a massive handout for genocide, etc.

    Business will be fine! The right/rich people will be bailed out. Etc.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 90 points 9 months ago (21 children)

    come on canada start taking notes

  • source
  • hideshow 21 child comments
  • [–] 19 points 9 months ago (17 children)

    At least we have e transfers and debit unlike down south. I for one will be jumping on the first non us credit card however.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 17 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 9 months ago (2 children)

    As an American, I just may do the same.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 9 months ago (4 children)
  • [–] 1 point 9 months ago (3 children)
  • [–] 3 points 9 months ago (8 children)

    We have debit. And etransfer for things like PayPal or Venmo. 

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 9 months ago (1 child)

    How does debit work for fraud? Are banks more willing to refund when theres5fraud? In the US it feels like it's mostly on the user to bear

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 5 points 9 months ago

    Depends on your bank, some have insurance on debit (like a credit card) but a lot in Canadian banks are moving to visa/MasterCard debit cards (since a bunch of our banks moved into the us market and are therefore tainted).

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 9 months ago (5 children)

    Ha, venmo is such a scam. And paypal is just as bad as MasterCard

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] -1 points 9 months ago (4 children)

    How the fuck is venmo a scam? Jesus Christ what Idiocracy.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 9 months ago (3 children)

    How is it not? They take a part of every fucking payment. Jesus Christ would not like it at all.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] -1 points 9 months ago (2 children)

    You mean like every company that charges a fee? That's not a scam, that's called business. Jesus Christ it's like people want everything for free and don't understand that it costs money to run a business. Credit cards charge interest, your bank charges fees, businesses price stuff over their cost. That farmer you pay for their vegetables charges more then it cost them to produce. These aren't scams. They are the cost of having services and good provided to you. 

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 9 months ago (1 child)

    How much is the fee? Because last I checked it was not like an etransfer (included in most banking plans).

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] -1 points 9 months ago

    Unless I am using my business account, being paid for some sort of goods or services, or doing things like instant transfers into my bank account I've never been charged a fee on Venmo. I use Venmo to transfer money between me and my significant and other all the time,c I send money to my friend all the time. Hell I've used Venmo to pay my employees through my personal account and never had any issues.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 7 points 9 months ago*

    A lot of countries in Europe already have their own country-wide payment systems.

    What we're seeing now in Europe is the stage where those multiple country-specific systems become interoperable and a new international payment system appears.

    Canada only needs the kind of thing which has been not just available but actually dominant for decades in countries like The Netherlands and Portugal.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 9 months ago

    Canada has Interac but turned it in a for profit.

    The Bank of Canada has considered a digital CAD but not started anything yet. Maybe they are taking notes?

    Meanwhile, we could give biz the option to lower their prices and in exchange pass down the cards fees to customers (transparently of course, big display: Visa +n1%, Mastercard: +n2%, ...). The current system makes all prices higher but cards provide rebates or other benefits. That's pretty much a tax on the poor who can't access "high end" credit cards.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 148 points 9 months ago* (3 children)

    reminds me when Brazil launched their Pix payment system nationwide, which is free for individuals, and the US launched an investigation into unfair trading

    potential unfair advantaging of Brazilian payment services over US competitors was cited

    Brazilian President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva has accused US president Donald Trump of being "bothered by Pix" because it "will put an end to credit cards"

    lol get rekt

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 49 points 9 months ago (2 children)

    Against what? Against consumers that don't need to pay fees? Against the Brazilian government who is behind the pix?

    Poor US companies with billionaires yatches bills to be paid.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 14 points 9 months ago* (1 child)

    Becoming independent from the US empire‘s dollar or oil is a serious crime that gets punished with dictatorship. It‘s no coincidence the US is launching a cascade of fascist think tanks and lobby groups against Europe right now.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 62 points 9 months ago (8 children)

    I'm all for Europe doing their own thing. I'm an American and even I hate seeing the US use it's position for bully politics. No citizen of any other country should ever thing that an American company or govt will treat them with dignity or respect. Look at how we treat each other.

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 17 points 9 months ago (7 children)

    Why do Visa and MasterCard exist? The middleman that jacks up the price while offering the end user nothing? Thanks capitalism.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 9 months ago (4 children)

    Before smartphones, credit cards were the cashless option.

    Now that we all have a more than capable payment terminal in our pocket, Visa and mastercard are obsolete

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 9 months ago (2 children)

    Sorta. Whomever does payment on your behalf has to be willing to extend credit for an immediate transaction while the very slow process of exchanging money happens at a delay. This is especially so if the transactions are international. I truly wonder how the phone with just an ordinary bank account does this. Is it Google/Apple who extend credit? If so, is that better?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 9 months ago

    Most other countries don't have to rely on the antiquated network the US uses for resolving those bank to bank transactions. In South korea, Street vendors have what looks like a phone number posted on signage around their Wares or snacks and people just make effectively debit pushes from their bank to the merchant's bank in real time with zero margins.

    I kind of expect this is how the rest of the world operates and it's only the us then sits on using its own infrastructure which it made one time, in the 1960s, and has refused to move off of since. This created a lot of the market need for a bunch of private companies to make their own little piggybacking solutions like venmo, zelle, square cash, and all the others.

    Too be fair, a lot of major businesses in the US now just exist as financialization institutions extending debt to their large-scale clientele, under the guise of being manufacturing or data services. Like GM. Or Oracle.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 57 points 9 months ago

    Love to see it.

    Anything that diminishes Visa and MC's power is probably a good thing.

  • source
  • [–] 47 points 9 months ago* (11 children)

    We've had this in Australia since the 90s at least. All debit cards are dual network: They support both Visa/Mastercard, as well as the local network (called EFTPOS). EFTPOS is noticeably cheaper to process - around 0.3% fee, compared to ~1% for Visa/Mastercard debit in Australia, ~1.5% for credit, and ~3% for Visa/Mastercard in the USA. The profits stay in Australia rather than going to a US company.

    That's only for debit cards, though. EFTPOS doesn't support credit cards.

  • source
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 9 months ago (1 child)

    Same in Norway and I think same in many countries, biggest issue is across borders inside of Europe. Most payments online also.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 9 months ago

    Thanks for the info! The only two countries I'm familiar with (in terms of payment processing) are Australia and the US, so I didn't want to make assumptions about other countries.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 8 points 9 months ago (3 children)

    Does anyone outside the US even use credit cards?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 9 months ago*

    They have far fewer perks, so it's not as common.

    In Australia, most credit cards have an annual fee, and they pretty much all just offer frequent flyer miles. US cards have much better perks: Quite a few offer 2% cashback, cards with points offer more points than Aussie cards, they almost all include extended warranty and rental car coverage, some include mobile phone protection, etc. If you pay it off in full every month, you get these perks for "free".

    Of course, merchants pay the price for these perks, given the high fees to process credit cards. They can make merchants pay a 3% fee, pay 2% cashback to customers on some of their cards, and still make more money from card fees than they would in other countries. Visa and Mastercard used to require merchants in the US to not charge any extra fees for accepting credit cards, but after a big lawsuit, this is no longer the case. Stores are slowly becoming like Aussie stores - charging extra if you pay by card.

    In the US, it's also very important to build up your credit score, as this affects loan rates for mortgages, cars, personal loans, etc. Most people build their score by getting a credit card as early as possible and using it often.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] 1 point 9 months ago (2 children)

    Yeah that's not what we're talking about here. Debit cards already have their own circuits, like Bancomat here in Italy. This is about credit cards.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›
    37 comments in c/futurology@futurology.today view that post
    30 comments in c/futurology@futurology.today view that post
    26 comments in c/canada@lemmy.ca view that post
    5 comments in c/buyeuropean@feddit.uk view that post
    4 comments in c/hackernews@lemmy.bestiver.se view that post
    3 comments in c/progressivepolitics@lemmy.world view that post
    1 comment in c/world@lemmy.world view that post