you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 27 points 9 months ago (4 children)

Not everyone wins in a failing economy. If one billionaire makes out, three more lose money.

No, yeah, that's true. But the billionaires are also competing with each other in a (perceived) zero-sum game and they believe the ones who are cozying closest to Trump will be the best ones positioned to make money - either in a corrupt or a failing economy. But every recession has been a golden opportunity for billionaires.

Heck, in post-collapse Russia, this is how oligarchs first appeared - the "shock therapy" of the 1990s transition to a market economy dropped the value of resources to nothing, and the rich at the time bought them and became the ultra-rich. Some didn't make it. ( Like a super-bacteria forming from the ones not killed by antibiotics, the ones that survived were even more resistant to control.)

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 14 points 9 months ago (3 children)

    Good example, especially given that it looks like a Russian oligarchy is where we've been headed since 2016

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 9 months ago (2 children)

    Good example, especially given that it looks like a Russian oligarchy is where we’ve been headed since 2016 since 1776

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 9 months ago* (1 child)

    Nah, since the 80s at the earliest. The wealthiest were taxed up to 90% and corporations didn't get the tax loopholes they have now until Reagan took office.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 9 months ago

    That's where you're wrong my friend, for while we had a progressive period in the 20th century, the united states were built by and for rich white land owners, so they could continue to benefit off that which they owned.

  • source
  • parent