I moved to Linux entirely because of how shit Windows is, but I do not, in general, get higher fps. It's very case-by-case, but in general, my performance seems to be ever so slightly worse.
post
Title implies a big move, pretty far from the steady growth their sources say and that they explain throughout the article. But I guess a more honest title like "Linux among gamers sees new record after continuous steady growth" isn't as click-worthy.
Why the hell is Gates on that image?? The guy stepped down as a CEO 26 years ago, and left the board of directors six years ago.
The enshittification is all Nadela's baby.
You somehow made me aware Gates had to use either an UNIX derivative (iPhone) or a Linux derivative (Android) daily.
I'd assume that for the majority of his career he was using something like Series 20 OS (Nokia's proprietary OS) or the BlackBerry OS (before it was rewritten to be based on UNIX-like QNX).
But since then, yeah. There are literally no other options since MS killed Windows Mobile with prejudice.
Did you ever use windows before XP?
I saw in a recent Youtube video that between web services and AI, Windows licencing is only about 10% of Microslop's business.
IDK if that number is true, but it sure would explain how much they've put into user experience. Does anyone use Windows because they like it?
Azure has support for Linux servers. They’ve even made an effort to port Dotnet to Linux. A majority of their cloud infrastructure is Linux it seems.
That 40% isn't for Windows Server, is it?
I wouldn't be surprised. Desktop revenue has been a pretty small slice for their revenue long before AI was a thing. Their main drivers were server products and O365, and now AI and Azure are also pushing a lot of revenue.
I don't think the number is indicative of quality. The office suite is their bread and butter (alongside Azure) and Teams is a steaming pile of shit.
I did back in the XP days. Long, loooong ago...
XP was alright, but I'm mostly just nostalgic for the aesthetic of 95/98/2000
Vista was the reason I switched to Linux
I'm mostly just nostalgic for the aesthetic of 95/98/2000
Boy, have I got some KDE themes for you!
Hardware was definitely the issue. What got me to first install Linux was my wireless card just randomly stopped working. People were recommending that I do a full reinstall of Vista to get internet working again. I installed Ubuntu instead and never looked back.
Changing the graphics driver model at the same time as making the desktop graphically demanding was probably a bad idea
none of the other popular desktop operating systems cost money at all. I don't know why Microsoft is doing half of the things that it does
88 comments and nobody has noted that the article itself looks like AI slop?
Lots of signals here: the writing style, bland and wishy-washy use of statistics, bullets and formatting that arbitrarily organize without adding value, the rule-of-threes clauses, and redundant details, the intro summary list, the lack of sourcing links, and "written" by an author whose bio specifically mentions AI.
I specifically looked for backup to the assertion about higher FPS and it's just a random unsourced percentage. Maybe it's true but this article has no value as a source.
Did this last May & haven't missed much. I don't play AAA slop though.
I'm thinking about going dual boot mode soon, as Manjaro is a godsend so far on my ThinkPad.
Just remember to have your installs on independant hard drives, not just partitions.
If you have set your mind to Manjaro I don't want to dissuade you, but if you are not yet strongly convinced of the distro I always like to point out that there were some issues with the distribution in the past (someone collected them here).
If you're just after an Arch-like distribution I think EndeavourOS is a very friendly distro without adding their own repositories on top of Arch. But again - if you're happy with Manjaro by all means also stay with it.
I have been over 1 year in EndeavourOS and I can't complain, no issues at all except when I screw up.
I've only been using it for a few weeks now, but I'm having a great time with EndeavourOS. I've tried Linux every now and then for over 20 years now, but always bounced off for one reason or another. This time, I've never felt any desire to go back.
For me, my use case, and my hardware, EOS has been significantly less of a headache than Windows 11 was.
What does screwing up mean in this context?
EndeavourOS, CachyOS, and Bazzite are back-up options in case I need to distro hop.
Which distro did you end up going with? Wanted to change my tower over from Windows. Guessing bazzite is appropriate?
I'd suggest trying a couple through live ISOs to see what works best out of the box with your hardware. I settled on CachyOS and definitely recommend it. Bazzite is ok, very stable, but keep in mind it is immutable which may hamper its abilities as a full desktop.
Oh it's immutable? Damn.
That explains some shit.
How do I go about switching to CachyOS? Just wipe the NVME and run an installer?
Yeah I'd wipe it if you're going to switch, always less headaches that way. CachyOS has a lot of options so I'll throw my 2 cents out there, I set it up with btrfs file system and the limine bootloader because it automatically sets up snapshots so you can roll back if something gets borked. It's also easier to get secure boot working with limine if you're trying to dual boot.
Arch was described as hard mode but I installed EndeavourOS with KDE Plasma about a month and a half ago and it's been smooth sailing. Given all the programs I use have native linux clients and I don't play kernel level anti-cheat games at all.
The ArchWiki is the best hand-holding that you're going to get on Linux, it's the finest system administration documentation that the OS has available. But Arch doesn't "do things for you automatically", that's not their ethos. So it's hard mode until you've developed enough sysadmin skills to understand what the docs are telling you, and then it's easy mode because it all works great together and you've a phenomenal reference source.
We run SUSE at work; and when SUSE is working, it's a damn fine Linux - secure by default, up-to-date, efficient. But if it stops working, man alive, I wish we were using Arch instead. (Admittedly, we just redeploy anything on SUSE that stops working, which takes moments, whereas fixing Arch takes a while but at least you can fix it.)
Not OP. Around same timeline. Went with bazzite for gaming. Have been using bazzite daily since. Stuff just works super easy to install. Also tried and have mint still installed on another partition but haven't used it much besides the initial installation. And installed dual boot bazzite and mint on my old gaming laptop. Use mint on there daily for internet browsing and such, no gaming. But I'm certain it would work just fine as it's all pretty much the same besides Debian (mint) Vs Fedora (bazzite).
I don't play AAA slop either, and a few older easy anti cheat games don't work. Such as Fawkes revival of Defiance.
Everything else works pre installed with Steam+ proton, Or Ludis + wine, Or the Heroic launcher for GoG, Amazon and EGS.
I do get higher FPS and better temps and less hardware usage than I ever did on Win11 for the same exact games.
What does Bill Gates have to do with Windows nowadays?
I honestly hated W11 so much that I jumped onto Linux whether I’d be gaming on it or not.
It runs great, but even if it didn’t I wouldn’t go back.
top 100 comments