No nuance and characters are saying the obvious stuff, because viewers are looking at another device while watching. We’re so cooked.

top 99 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 202 points 10 months ago (7 children)

Proving that the Netflix execs don't have the foggiest fucking idea what they're doing.

You gain viewers by engaging them - by giving them something so interesting that they can't be distracted.

If you dumb everything down, the most likely outcome is that rather than looking at their phones in addition to your show, they look at their phones instead of your show.

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 38 points 10 months ago

    Have a 19 year old that cant watch an Instagram clip to completion. Im not sure if Netflix needs to adapt or correct the behavior? Unless I'm on a flight, I never watch a movie on my phone.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 26 points 10 months ago (2 children)

    I mean... have you met people? We're all collectively getting dumber by the hour. So I guess it makes sense to chase that moving target.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 10 months ago

    The other half of this proof is them being practically the only streaming service with binge/bulk releases instead of weekly. Ifs very likely this way because they're too stupid to gauge a show's success by any other metric than how much people watch in a short time.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 10 months ago

    Not really. It actually makes sense. I often look for easy movies to watch while I do dishes. I wouldn't ever sit down to watch them, and I wouldn't want to watch good movies while doing dishes because I can't get immersed.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 72 points 10 months ago* (6 children)

    They dumb down their shows because I'm on the phone and I'm on the phone because their shows are so dumb that I get bored.

    Soon they will reinvent the radio drama, but on TV with a story board or something.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 14 points 10 months ago (4 children)

    I know it's not Netflix but the last Mission Impossible movies have made the characters so bewilderingly stupid it actually makes the dumb action set pieces harder to watch.

    Like, I get it, it's mission impossible it's not the height of cinema but in the past, characters were somewhat intelligent and made rational decisions based on what they knew. Like, not just Ethan and crew but the villains all seemed like they knew what they were doing, what they wanted, and it was clear why things were important.

    The latest pair of movies dropped that ball so hard I just can't fathom how it made it out of the writing room.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 10 months ago (3 children)

    The last two movies are pure ass. Who is the bad guy? So AI or something?? I've already forgotten it was dumb as hell.

    There are dumb fun movies, and then there are just dumb movies.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 10 months ago

    The "Entity" which is a rogue AI that seemingly knows everything everywhere. And Benji is afraid to answer the most basic fucking personal questions when a nuclear bomb is threatening to detonate. Like, he's never been good under pressure but Jesus man.

    This nuke is also threatening to destroy both halves of the mcguffin that the AI also needs. It just makes no fucking sense.

    Actually I wonder if an AI wrote the script. That actually would explain quite a bit.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 67 points 10 months ago (4 children)

    The TV series, “Police Squad” was canceled because “people had to pay attention” to see/get the jokes. ☹️

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 10 months ago

    You inspired me to go to Leslie Nielsen's IMDB page to find something funny to watch.

    How have I lived my whole life without realizing there's a Mel Brooks Dracula movie starring Leslie Nielsen? I don't know, but I'm watching it tonight.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 91 points 10 months ago (2 children)

    If I'm looking at my phone it's because whatever's on the screen is not engaging my attention isn't it?

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 10 months ago*

    I watch everything on my computer which is hooked up to a couple of TVs but it's still the same problem...or not a problem. When it gets a little non-engaging, I'll start browsing on my 2nd screen. These boring parts to me usually are the scenes that spout the most exposition. Then I just have to rewind like 50 times before I understand what they just explained.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 32 points 10 months ago (3 children)

    This has been around for a long time, before Netflix. My dad and much of his generation get lonely when the TV is off, so he leaves it on at all times on whatever, while working or watching sports. Network TV does this with predictable crime dramas and sitcoms, cables got Hallmark movies and reruns of family guy, etc. Half-tune is a popular format for pretty much most age groups.

    I explicitly don't do this, but I do have podcasts for my second screen in a sense-- only I won't do them unless it's a grindy game or Minecraft or something, and usually the podcast is taking my cognitive attention. It's disruptive if it's a thoughtful activity, like scrolling social media (though I guess the fediverse is a little more engaging than slopbook or whatever).

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 10 months ago

    I used to do it back then, as soon as I got home I turned the TV on. It was like having the radio on with the difference that you could watch it when you heard something interesting. I think I stopped doing it when started to appear more themed channels, so the regular channels had less variation in their programming.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 11 points 10 months ago (1 child)

    I listen to podcasts, usually ones with minimal or no commercials.

    But I can’t stand TVs being used like that. Especially when they are blasting commercials. It’s so depressing.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 7 points 10 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

    I 100% agree. A loud TV blasting ads all day is extremely upsetting to me, you can literally feel companies groveling and begging for your money; it’s disgusting. “Hurry in!” “These deals won’t last!” then of course the fucking low-level humor that makes you feel even more brain dead. I honestly loathe being anywhere near a TV tuned into stations like that.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 30 points 10 months ago

    The enshitification of thought.

  • source
  • [–] 25 points 10 months ago (5 children)

    I'm pretty sure this is why andor flew under the radar/gets mixed reviews. Even with friends who are huge Star wars nerds like me, I get 'but it's boring!' a lot, mostly because it builds up to the climax in each three-episode arc. There isn't necessarily a huge, inexplicable 'OK time for action' scene in every episode just because. To enjoy it you need to be plugged in, absorbing the dialogue and connecting the dots scene to scene to understand how the plot got to the action and why it's important, and if you do you understand the tension buildup. Otherwise it just seems like two episodes of babbling and then some stuff happens, while you're still staring at your phone. At no point do any of the characters stop and explain what's happening before or during an important scene, it's all show-don't-tell. One of my best friends is working on his PhD, super bright guy, huge Star wars nerd. Has all the baby yoda this, clone trooper helmet that. I finally understood when we were watching something on stream once and I'm like "what's that? That noise?" It was his other screen on in the background watching a Twitch stream :( now I understand he's never not had a second screen going with a stream lmao feel like I'm taking crazy pills. We might as well pipe video of that stupid railway running coin grabber mobile game directly to the cortex of every citizen atp

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 10 months ago (4 children)

    As I've gotten older. I have completely stopped using the phrase "To enjoy [] you need to []".

    It's pointless

    Anyone who needs to do it isn't going to, and everyone who is going to do it - will do it anyways.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 10 months ago (3 children)

    Andor may also simply be a bad show, and this person's opinion an outlier.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 10 months ago* (1 child)

    Is that your opinion? Or just devils advocate? I loved andor, I don’t go looking for reviews or what people say about media I watch, but, I would agree with the person above, I thought it was one of the best things that has come out of Star Wars. At least it treats you like an adult.

    Didn’t realize people didn’t like it, but, of course, I don’t like things other people like.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 23 points 10 months ago (3 children)

    My mom stopped watching "the bold and the beautiful" for this exact reason. She was watching it from almost 40 years straight 😂

    When I went to their house for lunch I could hear her shouting "what? Need to explain again the conversation from the beginning?? It literally happened just 5 minutes ago!! Noooooo! Can we just go forward with the plot instead of explaining what happened one minute ago??"

    I watch one episode a month but indeed it's annoyingly repetitive. Not even "second screen" but something like "muted TV in a dentist waiting room with subtitles in another language"

    This is how my mom explained me why it is annoying:

    Before: ** plot twist happens ** => viewer is shocked

    Now:

    1. for 15-20 episodes before the "plot twist" is supposed to happen, characters insert "if [plot twist] happens it will be very bad for us" in their speeches.

    2. The bad guy is shown preparing the "plot twist" for another 15-20 episodes

    3. For another 15-20 episodes the characters still mention randomly in their conversations how bad if the plot twist would happen in their lives and let everyone swear that no, they can never let the plot twist happen.

    4. Obvious "Plot twist" happens in slow motion over the course of 5 episodes

    5. Characters talk about how the "plot twist" impacted their lives for 15-20 episodes

    6. After 30-60 episodes, when characters are gathered at a family reunion on the coach, start reminiscing how the "plot twist" was so shocking and unexpected

    7. For the next 15 episodes every single person present at that family reunion including some random security guard really needs to retell the "plot twist" from their point of view

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 10 months ago (2 children)
  • [–] 5 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 child)

    I asked my mom to tell me some plot, and I was like "wtf is that"

    After 30 years of not giving a single damn about her biological son (Finn), Sheila, a convicted serial killer who escaped prison, suddenly becomes obsessed with seeing him every day.

    After being told that she won't be able to join the family of his son as a loving mother because everyone sees her as a dangerous murderer, she proves that's not true by shooting both Finn and his wife, Steffy. Finn is pronounced dead and immediately cremated without an autopsy.

    Steffy survives, so Sheila disguises herself as a nurse to finish the job in the hospital. She fails for 20 episodes, gets caught, and runs away.

    Surprise! Turns out Finn isn't dead. A "miracle doctor" saved him and forged a death certificate/cremation papers just because.

    Sheila gets a genius idea to fake her death and escape prison: chops off her own toe, calls 911 screaming "A BEAR IS ATTACKING ME!", and disappears. The police find the toe and some bloody clothes. Their professional conclusion? "The bear ate every single part of her except for this one toe with a suspiciously clean surgical cut. Case closed."

    They take over 100 episodes to realize that maybe a bear couldn't have done a clean cut with the teeth.

    The "criminal mastermind" still needs to stalk the son and decides to go to her victim’s favorite restaurant with an obvious disguise (classic wig+brown coat). Nobody recognizes her with the "80s classic spy Halloween costume" in a luxury restaurant but she accidentally wore open-toed sandals. Steffy notices the missing toe, calls the cops, and Sheila is arrested.

    Everyone spends 100 episodes celebrating that she’s gone forever. Then, a judge vacates the sentence over a clerical error. Multiple murders, prison escape, attempted double homicide? Doesn't matter. She's free to go.

    Steffy lives in a villa on a cliff where people have a habit of dying by "accidentally" falling down the cliff during fights. Sheila stalks her for hundreds of episodes until they fight and Sheila falls off the cliff. Again: no autopsy, immediate cremation.

    Just as everyone is celebrating, someone remembers the body they just cremated had ten toes. But oops, too late, she’s already ash.

    Imagine all of this stretched out over hundreds of episodes with 80% filler and characters repeating the same three sentences every day.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 23 points 10 months ago*

    That explains the latest season of Wednesday.

    You could just treat it like a shitty audiobook. I half-expected characters to start describing their own facial expressions.

  • source
  • [–] 20 points 10 months ago (3 children)

    Second? Sheeyit. I'm 72 and well into third and fourth screen viewing. Mostly at work. The spreadsheets and PowerPoint crap just don't hold my fascination like the trailer park boys, Star Trek, or clash golf.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 10 months ago (2 children)

    I just read a comment on Facebook recently of a old couple that had two TVs in the same room, while also using a iPad and a tablet.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 18 points 10 months ago (1 child)

    I worked at a house where they had a large TV playing some shit reality TV show, which no one was watching.
    The guy was watching something on his tablet sitting on the sofa, but kept on pressing something that would make a very annoying jingle noise. And the woman was on a PC watching a yt channel in the corner, but also quite close to the sofa.

    The TV was at a normal audio level. The guy on the tablet would turn up the sound when the TV got loud and/or when his wife was making too much noise.
    She in turn would turn up the SPEAKERS on her PC to counter this.
    Both could've put on some headphones, but no.

    Meanwhile I'm trying to fix a leak in the conservatory whilst being bombarded with a constant battle of inane jingles, a shouting yt channel, and a backwards reality TV show. After about 10 minutes I couldn't take it anymore and I went to my van and got my ear defenders. And neither of these 2 Wall-e'esque idiots paid a blind bit of notice of a stranger in their house wearing ear defenders for no real reason.
    I felt murderous for the rest of the day. I have no idea how people can enjoy living like that.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 40 points 10 months ago (4 children)

    Netflix had some good years, then it seemed like they were starting to get pretty inconsistent, and now it seems like they're entering their straight-up slop era.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 18 points 10 months ago (3 children)

    There have been very few shows that have actually been brought to a proper conclusion instead of actually being canceled though. Maybe fewer than 10?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 10 months ago (2 children)

    Just finished Homeland. The series finale was a stunner.

    But otherwise, I agree. Most shows either jump the shark or get cancelled.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] 18 points 10 months ago (1 child)
  • [–] 18 points 10 months ago (4 children)

    Yep. There are many shows now where characters keep repeating what just happened. Great for ADHD GF, annoying for me when I'm actually trying to just do one thing at once.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 10 months ago* (2 children)

    We've done this in TV for close to a century now. You see this whenever streaming an old show for commercial breaks.

    It is most apparent in season 1 of One Piece

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 17 points 10 months ago (1 child)

    Fuck this timeline. We’re not cattle! Reclaim your time and Degoogle/big tech your life.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 16 points 10 months ago* (3 children)

    This style of writing predates streaming, though i'm sure it's more prevelant now.

    Plenty of pre-internet shows have characters ham-fistedly repeating or summarizing the situation after ad breaks, or telling rather than showing their feelings, or telling you what's at stake.

    Stupid characters who have to have the plot point explained to them in case the audience still hasn't gotten it are everywhere too, it's super common in sitcoms.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 10 months ago (2 children)

    I see this as kind of like the "loudness war" in radio.

    It's not a conspiracy or anything, it's just the networks and producers adapting (correctly) to how people actually watch/listen to stuff.

    Audiophiles can complain all they want about low dynamic range, but if you're listening to radio in a noisy environment (like a car), high dynamic range is actually fucking awful.

    Similarly, there's nothing inherently wrong with watching a show when you can't give it your full attention. Sometimes I watch TV while I'm doing chores, or even during my workday. You know what's great for that? Those stupid competition shows where they narrate everything on screen, and have five instant replays plus recaps after ad breaks. I never feel like I'm missing anything even if I ignore 80% of the show. I'd never sit down and really watch this stuff though. My brain would rot. It's just a step above white noise.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 10 months ago

    I do this a lot, put on TV as background noise while working. Really helps my ADD. I can't stand reality TV though, so I usually loop through crime shows, old scifi channel programming, and horror movies. The live channel of MST3K has been my goto for a couple years now.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 14 points 10 months ago

    I feel like nearly every Netflix original I've saw in the last few years at friends houses feel like they're made for middle schoolers with the story devolopment and over explaining what they're doing/about to do on screen as if we can't see them

  • source
  • [–] 14 points 10 months ago

    Heard about this a few times now and witnessed it too. I don't recall which movie it was, since it was forgettable, but the characters felt the need to remind me what was going on in the plot more than four times and I remember actually questioning my sanity. Like, do they think I'm this stupid and can't follow a simple plot?

  • source
  • [–] 12 points 10 months ago* (1 child)

    do things like announce when characters enter a room

    oh hi mark

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 10 months ago

    I remember seeing a Russel T. Davies interview where he said he once received a script and the very first line of dialogue was someone saying "Happy Wedding Day, Sis!" and he immediately threw it away lol.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 12 points 10 months ago

    Maybe in a few shows, but there are plenty others that turn into messes of a plot and are just poorly written. 

  • source
  • [–] 11 points 10 months ago (3 children)

    Idiocracy is slowly becoming a documentary

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 10 months ago (2 children)

    Real life: Idiocracy, but worse.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 10 months ago

    Having partaken in online discussions about Pluribus (which doesn't really do this), I can see where they are coming from (although I absolutely do not agree with it).

    You go into episode discussion threads and regularly wonder "have we watched the same show?", because people will just absolutely not know about some absolutely pivotal plot point that happened or explanation that was done.

    It's insane

  • source
  • [–] 7 points 10 months ago

    I have phone shows and no-phone shows.

  • source
  • [–] 7 points 10 months ago

    Tbf, its not just phones. At the end of the day, my mind is cooked. I just want to kick back and get fed entertainment. If I'm awake at the end of it, meh.

    Yea, my wife hates watching shows with me 😆

  • source
  • [–] 6 points 10 months ago (6 children)

    On a tangential topic, why does almost every tv series changes after the first or second season?

    Like not on just the story progressing, but the acting, the dialogue, the main "thing" stops being done and it just becomes a setting, that kind of thing.

    Like a series about work, where they work on the first season, but on the next one they never work anymore, the theme is there, but gets different, work is just a thing they say they are doing while doing other things, maybe a scene or two they work.

    Or the series keeps getting weirder and weirder, not on a change of topic, but the "events" keep getting more extreme, like they ran out of ideas.

    Idk if it is something just I notice, but I keep seeing over and over: I like the first season, it seems like the hook, but on the next season it seems the same tv series, but with a different tone, like the company just says "yeah, but now don't talk about this, do that way because this tv series did this and made money" or the ideas were all made just for the first season.

    Or I'm being dumb hahaha

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 10 months ago (5 children)

    Bc of capitalism, the same answer as why everything else is done.

    In this case, someone may have a passion project and spend literally ten whole years writing and tinkering and crafting and perfecting that first season, and then continue the natural storylines into the second season as well. Eventually though, they just start phoning it in, as they put their more creative juices into writing their next project, while they crank out season after season on a deadline. Milking the show dry, whether it has anymore left to give or not.

    And that's not even necessarily because they are greedy or otherwise want to - studio execs think that they know better than writers how to write, so whereas when a show was created it was made by writers, over time each show increasingly becomes written to please the studio execs idea of what the audience wants, rather than the artists' idea of what the audience wants.

    So of course they suck - under those conditions, how could they not?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 10 months ago (4 children)

    It certainly feels like you described. But damn, I just wanted something that didn't just gave that drop in quality from one season to another, I just quit after one or two seasons.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 10 months ago (3 children)

    I remember reading about the making of Stranger Things, on Netflix, by that pair of brothers. They swore to themselves to do exactly 2 things when they made and sold the show: (1) never sell out for the sake of money - especially don't make stupid CGI animations that suck rather than staying true to the art - and (2) don't keep the show going longer than like one season, or basically don't just make them for the sake of making them, but instead keep it tight and only make something with a purpose in mind, you know?

    And that explains why the show went off the deep end immediately, after like the first season. The brothers had a fight and I think split up even over it. One wanted the purity of the show, while the other wanted the cold hard cash.

    Money isn't wrong. Even the love of money isn't wrong. It's wanting it above all else that leads to the enshittification of everything that that attitude touches.

    Fortunately there are other things to enjoy, besides TV:-).

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 10 months ago (2 children)

    Money is bad and we should have an economy without it

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 10 months ago (1 child)

    Easier said than done.

    More generally, human nature is prone to biases, and unless we resist them we will continually fall prey to them.

    For example, just because chasing after money to the exclusion of all else is bad doesn't make communism good, and even if it were, well I don't want to get banned from this community by going further there, talking about contemporary and recent examples of nations that tried to implement that:-).

    Stay curious!

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 6 points 10 months ago (2 children)

    You don’t have to watch Netflix. Plenty of good movies out there!

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 10 months ago (4 children)

    If you watch a lot of BBC stuff, you'll find that you can generally follow the plot without necessarily paying too much attention to the screen. In their case, it's because the BBC originated as a radio broadcaster and their script culture still reflects some of those old styles and practices. The fact that they maintain a robust radio play / audio drama production focus certainly doesn't hurt either.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 10 months ago (2 children)

    What BBC shows can you watch without paying too much attention? I watched New Doctor Who and Sherlock and I think those shows require a lot of attention to understand everything that happens.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 10 months ago

    You are confusing "you can generally follow the plot" (which is what I said) with "paying attention gives you a richer, more entertaining and in-depth experience, with details you won't be aware of unless you physically watch".

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 10 months ago

    Alternatively: Use 1.5x or 2x speed if you get bored and have trouble concentrating.

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 10 months ago

    The only time I am on my phone while watching something else is when I throw on a random meme compilation on YouTube so I can get more memes per minute.

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 10 months ago

    Pathetic, frankly.

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 10 months ago (1 child)

    People should try reading more books and watch less TV/streaming precisely for this reason. Also maybe if you want to watch a movie consider watching older movies.

    This is a fascinating article/podcast that talks about this but is focused on how it impacts your attention span and has data: https://www.apa.org/news/podcasts/speaking-of-psychology/attention-spans

    Mark: So I was very surprised to learn that TV and film shot lengths have decreased over the years. They started out much longer. They now average about four seconds a shot length. That's on average. If you watch MTV music videos, they're much shorter. They're only a couple of seconds. So we've become accustomed to seeing very fast shot lengths when we look at TV and film. Even commercials have shortened in length. Commercials used to be much longer. Now it's not uncommon to see six-second commercials, even shorter than that. Now it's a chicken and egg question. We don't know if TV and film have affected our attention spans on computers and phones. We don't know if our attention spans have affected the decision-making of film editors and directors. We don't know exactly if there is any causal connection we see these two parallel trends.

    It could be the case that directors and editors are influenced by their own short attention spans when they create these film shots or it could be that they're creating short film shots because they think that's what the viewer wants to see. But this has become quite ubiquitous. In fact, on YouTube, there's a particular YouTube aesthetic which uses jump cuts. So when you're watching a YouTube film, the film becomes very jumpy. The natural pauses that people make when they speak it is removed. So the idea is to pack more content into a shorter amount of time. So we're seeing short lengths of content from all directions. It's not just what we're attending to on computers and phones.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 10 months ago

    It also applies to games. Play a SNES or PS1 era game and you need to remember, plan ahead, solve problems, map out your path.

    Play a modern game and its thirteen icons flashing showing you the exact linear path towards the NPC with the simplest dialogue to solve the simplest quest.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 10 months ago

    Soaps are a bit like that too.

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 10 months ago

    You'd think by now one of these digital media gurus would have invented some sort of feature where a user could replay a complicated scene or a subtle bit of dialog. Then their subscribers could properly appreciate more sophisticated cinematography.

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 10 months ago

    It is a circle that keeps repeating.
    Honestly there are only a few movies that I can actually watch, without doing something else.
    Be phone, sodoku, fiber arts, working out, cleaning or ironing.
    Being a non interactive medium - it has an uphill battle.
    I almost prefer visual novels over most movies, and I hate visual novels. Now, Dispatch - that's the shiznit.

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 10 months ago

    Of course they fucking do...

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 10 months ago

    I'm 100% certain that neither COVID brain damage nor social media dopamine chasing have played any part in this.

    /s

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 10 months ago

    Ahhh of course engagement. The only factor that matters on the internet. The only metric the board can understand.

    Don't make things good just min/max engagement. That way there will be maximum profits. Again the only real thing that matters.

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 10 months ago

    If they're not really watching then it doesn't matter how simple or complicated the dialog is. Watch it once on second screen mode, if it's not awful enough to be bothersome then it's worth a second watch on first screen mode.

  • source
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›