top 100 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 242 points 10 months ago (33 children)

Yep. Intel sat on their asses for a decade pushing quad cores one has to pay extra to even overclock.

Then AMD implements chiplets, comes out with affordable 6, 8, 12, and 16 core desktop processors with unlocked multipliers, hyperthreading built into almost every model, and strong performance. All of this while also not sucking down power like Intel's chips still do.

Intel cached in their lead by not investing in themselves and instead pushing the same tired crap year after year onto consumers.

  • source
  • hideshow 33 child comments
  • [–] 104 points 10 months ago (19 children)

    Don't forget the awfully fast socket changes

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 19 child comments
  • [–] 45 points 10 months ago (2 children)

    And all of the failures that plagued the 13 and 14 gens. That was the main reason I switched to AMD. My 13th gen CPU was borked and had to be kept underclocked.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] 1 point 10 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 child)
  • [–] 3 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

    It would cause system instability (programs/games crashing) when running normally. I had to underclock it through Intel's XTU to make things stable again.

    This was after all the BIOS updates from ASUS and with all BIOS settings set to the safe options.

    When I originally got it I did notice that it was getting insanely high scores in benchmarks, then the story broke of how Intel and motherboard manufacturers were letting the CPUs clock as high as possible until they hit the thermal limit. Then mine started to fail I think about a year after I got it.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 10 months ago

    In the 486 era (90s) there was a not official story about the way Intel marked its CPUs: instead of starting slow and accelerate until failure, start as fast as you can and slow down until it doesn't fail.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • [–] 21 points 10 months ago (8 children)

    Even within the same socket family, looking at you lga1151, can you run into compatibility problems.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 30 points 10 months ago (7 children)

    I think AMD also did a smart thing by branding their sockets. AM4, AM5, what do you think is going to be next? I bet it's AM6. What came after the Intel LGA1151? It wasn't LGA1152.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 10 months ago (3 children)

    Yea, for the customer it really doesn’t matter how many pins a certain socket has, only is it compatible or not.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 10 months ago (2 children)

    AMD tried the Intel thing too by stopping support of past generation CPU on latter AM4 boards though. Only after public outcry did they scrap that. Wouldn’t put it past them to try it again on AM5.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 10 months ago (1 child)

    Are there a lot of people wanting to plug Zen 1 chips into B550 motherboards? Usually it's the other way around, upgrading chip in an old motherboard.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 10 months ago

    It can happen if the old motherboard failed, which was more likely than the CPU failing.

    There was talk of not providing firmware update for old chipsets to support new gen CPU as well, which is relevant to the cases you mentioned.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 16 points 10 months ago (2 children)

    As a person that generally buys either mid-tier stuff or the flagship products from a couple years ago, it got pretty fucking ridiculous to have to figure out which socket made sense for any given intel chip. The apparently arbitrary naming convention didn't help.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 10 months ago (1 child)

    It wasn't arbitrary, they named them after the number of pins. Which is fine but kinda confusing for your average consumer

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 11 points 10 months ago*

    I just read the other day that at least one motheboard manufacturer is bringing back AM4 since DDR4 is getting cheaper than DDR5, even with the "this isn't even manufactured anymore" price markup. That's only even possible because of how much long-term support AMD gave that socket.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 10 months ago (2 children)

    Or the 1200 different versions of CPUs. We just got some new Dell machines for our DR site last year and the number of CPU options was overwhelming. Is it really necessary for that many different CPUs?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 53 points 10 months ago (6 children)

    They really segmented that market in the worst possible way, 2 cores and 4 cores only, possibility to use vms or overclock, and so on. Add windoze eating up every +5%/year.

    Remember buying the 2600(maybe X) and it was soo fast.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 24 points 10 months ago (5 children)

    The 2600k was exceptionally good and was relevant well past the normal upgrade timeframes.

    Really it only got left behind because of its 4C/8T limit as everything started supporting lots of threads instead of just a couple, and just being a 2nd Generation i7.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 10 months ago (2 children)

    Coincidentally, that’s the exact cpu I use in my server! And it runs pretty damn well.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 10 months ago

    Really it only got left behind because of its 4C/8T limit as everything started supporting lots of threads instead of just a couple, and just being a 2nd Generation i7.

    Past me made the accidentally more financially prudent move of opting for the i7-4790k over the i5-4690k which ultimately lasted me nearly a decade. At the time the advice was of course "4 cores is all you need, don't waste the money on an i7" but those 4 extra threads made all the difference in the longevity of that PC

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 35 points 10 months ago (3 children)

    All of the exploits against Intel processors didn't help either. Not only is it a bad look, but the fixes reduced the speed of the those processors, making them quite a bit worse deal for the money after all.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 19 points 10 months ago (2 children)

    Meltdown and Spectre? Those also applied to AMD CPUs as well, just to a lesser degree (or rather, they had their own flavor of similar vulnerabilities). I think they even recently found a similar one for ARM chips...

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 18 points 10 months ago (1 child)

    Only one affected AMD, forget which. But Intel knew about the vulnerabilities, but chose not to fix the hardware ahead of their release.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 4 points 10 months ago

    Yea that definitely sounds like Intel... Though it's still worth pointing out that one of them was a novel way to spy on program memory that affects many CPU types and not really indicative of a dropped ball. (outside of shipping with known vulnerabilities, anyways)

    ... The power stuff from 12/13th gens or what ever though... ouch, massive dropped ball.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 122 points 10 months ago (7 children)

    Worse product and worse consumer practices (changing sockets every 2 generations) made it an easy choice to go with AMD.

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 10 months ago* (6 children)

    DDR4 compatibility held on for a while though after AM5 was full DDR5.

    The only real issue they had which has led to the current dire straits is the 13th/14th gen gradual failures from power/heat which they initially tried to claim didn't exist. If that didn't happen AMD would still have next to no market share.

    You still find people swearing up and down that intel is the only way to go, even despite the true stagnation of progress on the processor side for a long, long time. A couple of cherry picked benchmarks where they lead by a miniscule amount is all they care about, scheduling / parking issues be damned.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 22 points 10 months ago (5 children)

    Oh hell naw, the issues with Intel came up much sooner.

    Ever since Ryzen came out, Intel just stagnated.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 10 months ago (4 children)

    I don't disagree that intel has been shit for a long time, but they were still the go to recommendation all the way through the 14th gen. It wasn't until the 5800x3d came along that people started really looking at AMD for gaming... and if you're not doing a prebuilt odds are you wanted the fastest processor, not the one that is most efficient.

    I had a 5800x because I didn't want yet another intel rig after a 4790k. Then I went on to the 5800x3d, before the 9800x3d now. The 5800x was behind intel, and for me it was just a stopgap anyway because a 5950x was not purchasable when I was building. It was just good enough.

    As someone who lived through the fTPM firmware issue on AM4... I can confidently state that the tpm freezes were a dealbreaker. If you didn't use fTPM and had the module disabled, or you updated your firmware after release you were fine - but the ftpm bug was for many, MANY years unsolved. It persisted for multiple generations. You could randomly freeze for a few seconds in any game (or any software) at any time... sometimes only once every few hours, sometimes multiple times in the span of a few minutes. That's not usable by any stretch for gaming or anything important.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 10 months ago* (1 child)

    and if you're not doing a prebuilt odds are you wanted the fastest processor, not the one that is most efficient.

    strongly disagree. Prebuilds are mostly overpriced and/or have cheap components and in worst case proprietary connectors.

    I build for the best bang for bucks, and at least in my bubble so do others.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • Somehow I think you misunderstood my meaning.

    Prebuilt have all kinds of hardware and unfortunately many users go with those. I offered to do a 265k 5070ti build for my brother’s girlfriend but he instead spent the same amount on a 265k 5070 32gb 5200mhz prebuilt. He does some dev work and she does a tiny amount of creative work and honestly I think he wanted to make sure her system was inferior to his. 1 year warranty and you have to pay to ship the whole system in if there’s any issues. He wouldn’t even consider AMD or going with a custom build like I do for myself and others (just finished another intel build over the weekend for a coworker, diehard intel even after the issues…)

    In the custom build world I think you find more gamers and people who want the fastest gear they can afford, which is why we see gamers picking up AMD x3d chips today. They aren’t beaten and aren’t just the most expensive option.

    AM5 as a platform still has issues with memory training, though it’s largely set it and forget it until you reboot after a month or dont have memory context restore enabled in bios.

    I’m less familiar with the intel side nowadays despite literally just doing a build. They seem to win on boot times unless you accept the instability of AMD’s fast boot memory check bypass stuff. Getting a government bailout though is enough to make me want to avoid them indefinitely for my own gear so I doubt I’ll get much hands on with the current or next gen.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 10 months ago

    I've had AMDs since forever, my first own build with Phenom II.

    They were always good, but Ryzens were just best.

    Never used TPM, so can't comment on that. And most people never used it,

    But yes, so many hardcore Intel diehards, it's almost funny if it wasn't sad. Like Intels legacy of adding wattage to get nothing in return.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 53 points 10 months ago* (7 children)

    Intel until they realized that other companies made CPUs, too

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 30 points 10 months ago (3 children)

    They also bring a "dying transitor problem we don't feel like fixing" to the party, too

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 20 points 10 months ago (2 children)

    And a constantly changing socket so you have to get a new motherboard every time.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 10 months ago (2 children)
  • [–] 46 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (5 children)

    I remember, it was a huge issue for programs. Developers were just not supporting other chipsets because Intel was faster than the competition and mostly cheaper. Then they got more expensive, did some shitty business to MINIX and stayed the same speed wise.

    So now we see what actual competition does.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 45 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (4 children)

    I do want them to stay alive and sort themselves out though. Otherwise in a few years it will be AMD who will start outputting overpriced crap and this time there will be no alternative on the market.

    They're already not interested in seriously putting competitive pressure on NVidia's historically high GPU prices.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 10 months ago (2 children)

    Not only that, but (as an American) I do want the US to have some fab capability. A strong Intel is in our national security interest.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 10 months ago (1 child)

    Yeah, if Taiwan is ever invaded, having US-based fabs will be crucial for world supply. Absolutely want to see Intel survive and TSMC continue to build factories here.

    Nothing would say 'get fucked' like Intel going belly up and Taiwan exploding. The supply of any new computer parts would be a dumpster fire for years.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 42 points 10 months ago (4 children)

    I switched to AMD because of Intel's chip stability issues. No problems since

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 10 months ago (3 children)

    When I updated my wife's computer for Windows 11 I went AMD for that reason as well. They released 2 generations in a row with now well-documented hardware bugs that slowly kill the processors. 13th and 14th gen CPUs simply will have zero resale value if they last long enough to hit the second hand market. I briefly worked at an MSP at the beginning of last year and the amount of gaming computers that came in via noncommercial walk-in customers for stability issues that ultimately turned out to be the Intel CPU bugs was incredible

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 10 months ago (2 children)

    I initially got the 13 series, got a 14 series as the warranty replacement. Even with updated bios firmware the 14 series also began suffering from the same instability issues, sooner than the 13. Switched after that because two chips in a row, different generations is not a small mistake. Just happy I didn't have to pay for that 14 series only to see it have the same problem

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 10 months ago (1 child)

    That is insane. I know that's what's been happening because I've both seen it in the news and in the real world through work yet I still struggle to comprehend that this is what's actually happening with these processors

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 10 months ago

    Yeah it was highly disappointing. I'd always used Intel CPUs just because I picked one chipset and stuck with it. I even put up with the instability issues from the 13 for a while. At first I figured something else in the PC was dying on me. Until it reached a point where I literally couldn't run certain applications because it would always crash that the news articles started coming out about the chip issues.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 34 points 10 months ago (1 child)

    Pretty wild to see. Glad to see it though. Hope to see the same thing happen with GPUs against Nvidia as well.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 32 points 10 months ago (4 children)

    I know we shouldn't have brand loyalty, but after the near decade of quad core only CPUs from Intel, I can't help but feel absolute hate towards them as a company.

    I had a 3770k until AMD released their Ryzen 1000 series and I immediately jumped over, and within the next generation Intel started releasing 8 core desktop cpus with zero issues.

    I haven't bought anything Intel since my 3770k and I don't think I ever will going forward.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 10 months ago (3 children)

    The 3770k was legendary. I used it for so long. I upgraded to a 7600k almost a decade ago and now just ordered my first AMD chip (Ryzen 9700X). The Intel chips were solid, did so long with them, I hope this AMD system will last as long.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 10 months ago

    Yep, I kept the 3770k until I bought a 7800x3d. It lasted that long, and I gave my son the 3770k system and it was still overkill to play the games he wanted. Rocket League, Minecraft, fortnite etc...

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 10 months ago

    I still have my 3770k but it's in storage.

    I bought a 1700X and was using that until upgrading to a 3700X, which I'm still using today in my main gaming desktop.

    I think you'll be fine!

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 31 points 10 months ago (3 children)

    So the editor asked AI to come up with an image for the title "Gamers desert Intel in droves" and so we get a half-baked pic of a CPU in the desert.

    Am I close?

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 68 points 10 months ago (13 children)

    I've been buying AMD since the K6-2, because AMD almost always had the better price/performance ratio (as opposed to outright top performance) and, almost as importantly, because I liked supporting the underdog.

    That means it was folks like me who helped keep AMD in business long enough to catch up with and then pass Intel. You're welcome.

    It also means I recently bought my first Intel product in decades, an Arc GPU. Weird that it's the underdog now, LOL.

  • source
  • hideshow 13 child comments
  • [–] 14 points 10 months ago* (5 children)

    AMD almost always had the better price/performance

    Except anything Bulldozer-derived, heh. Those were more expensive and less performant than the Phenom II CPUs and Llano APUs.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 10 months ago*

    To be fair, I upgraded my main desktop directly from a Phenom II X4 840(?) to a Ryzen 1700x without owning any Bulldozer stuff in between.

    (I did later buy a couple of used Opteron 6272s, but that's different for multiple reasons.)

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 10 months ago (3 children)

    I've got an FX 8350, sure AMD fell behind during that time but it was by no means a bad CPU imo. Main PC's got a 7800X3D now but my FX system is still working just fine to this day, especially since upgrading to an SSD and 16GB RAM some years ago. It can technically even run Cyberpunk 2077 with console like frame rates on high settings.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 10 months ago* (2 children)

    I mean… It functioned as a CPU.

    But a Phenom II X6 outperformed it sometimes, single thread and multithreaded. That's crazy given Pildriver’s two generation jump and huge process/transistor count advantage. Power consumption was awful in any form factor.

    Look. I am an AMD simp. I will praise my 7800X3D all day. But there were a whole bunch of internet apologist for Bulldozer back then, so I don’t want to mince words:

    It was bad.

    Objectively bad, a few software niches aside. Between cheaper Phenoms and the reasonably priced 2500K/4670K, it made zero financial sense 99% of the time.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 10 months ago (2 children)

    I've been buying since the the Phenom II days with the X3 720. One could easily unlock their 4th core for an easy performance boost. Most of the time it'd work without a hassle.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 10 months ago (1 child)

    I decide every upgrade which one to go with. Try not to stay dedicated to one.

    Basically - Buy Intel cause it's the best last I checked... Oh, that was two years ago, now AMD should have been the right one.

    Next upgrade, won't make that mistake - buy AMD. Shit... AMD is garbage this gen, shoulda gotten Intel. Ok, I'll know better next upgrade.

    Repeat forever.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 20 points 10 months ago (4 children)

    Just upgraded from an i7-6600k to an RX 7800x3D. Obviously a big upgrade no matter if I went AMD or Intel but I'm loving this new CPU. I had an AMD Athlon XP in the early 2000's that was excellent so I've always had a positive feeling towards AMD.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 10 months ago (2 children)

    AMD has had a history of some pretty stellar chips, imo. The fx series just absolutelty sucked and tarnished their reputation for a long time. My Phenom II x6, though? Whew that thing kicked ass.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 19 points 10 months ago

    The United States government owns 10% of Intel now.

  • source
  • [–] 11 points 10 months ago (1 child)

    I wish AMD has better pcie pass through for the iGPU than Intel. My jellyfin is on Intel because I have hardware encoding support.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 10 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

    I bought into AM5 first year with Zen 4. I'm pretty confident Zen 7 will be AM5. There's got to be little chance for DDR6 to be priced well by the end of the decade. Confident that I'll be on AM5 for 10+ years but way better than the Intel desktop I had for 10 years because I will actually have a great update path for my motherboard. AM4 is still relevant. That's getting to almost 10 years now. It'll still be a great platform for years to come. Really if you bought early in the life of first gen chips on the socket for AM4/AM5, you're looking at a 15 year platform. Amazing

  • source
  • I have to lower my 12th Gen cpu multiplier to stop constant crashing when playing UE games, because everything is overlooked at the factory so they could keep up with AMD performance. Fuck Intel.

  • source
  • [–] 7 points 10 months ago

    Intel and their last couple of processor generations were a failure. AMD, on the other hand, been consistent. Look at all these tiny AMD APUs that can run C2077 on a 35W computer that fits in the palm of a hand? Valve is about to drop a nuclear bomb on nvidia, intel and microslop with Gabecube.

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 10 months ago

    Also lot of handheld options like Steam Deck use AMD as well. Not sure how big of a factor this is overall.

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 10 months ago

    That second number....

    :: needing to fertilize a tree intensifies::

  • source
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›