top 65 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 249 points 11 months ago (5 children)

Reverse engineering, a.k.a. looking at something. Now illegal, brought to you by capitalism

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 32 points 11 months ago (1 child)

    Reverse engineering prohibitions are the dumbest things.

    Let's say I do this. Arduino sues me. Okay. Now what? What money are they going to take?

    Hell, this would be a perfect time for everyone to form an LLC and purchase Arduinos as the LLC and then release your research under your corporate name as CC0. If your LLC has no revenue, you as an individual are legally protected.

    Arduino can try to put the genie back in the bottle but good luck.

    Better companies than Arduino have tried to prevent hardware reverse engineering and have failed. Apple being the biggest company I can think of that have tried to sue people for releasing schematics of their motherboards.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] -2 points 11 months ago

    It's still legal in Australia, at least, we never got the anti-circumvention rule the US media companies got into the US trade agreements

    Or rather we did, but they have exceptions that cover just about every otherwise legal use case. I can legally decrypt media to play on my Linux machine, for example. I think the only thing we can't legally do is circumvent controls to do copyright violation

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 140 points 11 months ago (24 children)

    Maybe it's just what I've been noticing, but I feel like Arduino was already losing its share of the hobbyist market. The plethora of small, cheap esp32 devices have already been taking Arduino's place.

  • source
  • hideshow 24 child comments
  • [–] 75 points 11 months ago (9 children)

    Same with raspberrypi really.
    companies just can't seem to know how to grow without line go up mentality.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 84 points 11 months ago (2 children)

    That's just it, you don't need to grow. Just sell a useful product at a reasonable price.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 43 points 11 months ago

    In capitalism, the consumer isn't the target audience. A business exists to make money. The more money you make, the more shareholders you gain, the more the shareholders demand BLOOD!

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 22 points 11 months ago (2 children)

    They seem to forget that "line go up" isn't the primary objective. If you make a good product and give half a shit about your customers, the line goes up as a natural consequence.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 11 months ago (2 children)

    companies just can't seem to know how to grow without line go up mentality.

    That's like saying "people just can't seem to harness the advantages of cancer without dying"

    If you never take money and get hooked by outside sources, you can just slowly grow, with no debt, beholden to no one

    If you take the money with any strings attached at all, you basically have to grow like cancer or your company will be sold for parts. It's inevitable at that point

    Don't take the money kids. If you have to take a business loan in the beginning - fine,

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 11 months ago (1 child)

    was the comma a typo of a period, or did you have more to say here? if you have more to say i'm eager to listen

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 5 points 11 months ago

    I meant to delete the comment to keep things simple, but what I was going to say is something like

    fine, but debt is like gambling. There's situations where it makes sense, but it's addictive. It's mortgaging your own future, even when it maths out it's a risk - shit happens

    And if you over leverage and under perform, it's over. If you can pay yourself and your employees, you're better off never taking on debt again.

    Like Wegmans. It's the very best grocery store, everyone who goes there agrees. They grow slowly because they only open new locations when they have the cash to do so, and so they never have to compromise on quality in any way

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 26 points 11 months ago (3 children)
  • [–] 6 points 11 months ago (2 children)

    Odd that the newer RP2350 has a lower clock speed, while being improved in most other respects. Is that why the RP2040 is still seemingly the community preference?

    Feature RP2040 RP2350
    Package QFN-56EP QFN-60EP or QFN-80EP
    CPU Cores 2 × ARM Cortex-M0+ 2 × ARM Cortex-M33 (w/FPU), 2 × Hazard3 RISC-V
    CPU Clock 200 MHz[5] 150 MHz
    SRAM 264 KB, 6 banks 520 KB, 10 banks
    Flash None None (RP2350), 2 MB (RP2354)
    OTP None 8 KB
    DMA 12 chan, 2 IRQ 16 chan, 4 IRQ
    PIO 2 (8 state machines) 3 (12 state machines)
    PWM 16 24
    ADC 4-chan 12-bit ADC 4-chan 12-bit (QFN-60EP), 8-chan 12-bit (QFN-80EP)
    DAC None None
    HSTX None One
    Engines ? RNG, SHA-256

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RP2350

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

    Personally, I never really counted the RP2350 as a successor. It's a different animal completely. A 2040 successor would be something like 4x cortex-m0's or a faster clock with more ram or whatever, the 2350 has completed different capabilities and components and can live along side the 2040.

    I feel like the preferred one is the 2040 simply because it's cheaper, and capable enough for the vast majority of use cases at this point.

    Edit: yes I know RPI called their board using the 2350 the pico 2, but the 2040 chip itself is used in more places than just the pico and not every one used the 2350 as a v2.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 6 points 11 months ago

    Cheap. Also, a large part of the tinkering community never moves past soldering or perf board + lack of cheap 2354 boards. 2040 is already good enough for keebs and most projects. 2350 had eratta E9 published (gpio lockup) which killed its initial adoption rate for more advanced projects PicoLogicAnalyzer, protocol emulation, etc.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 11 points 11 months ago (2 children)

    I'm getting into meshtastic and learned how those esp32 devices are everywhere! They seem pretty neat

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 11 months ago (1 child)

    Nice! I have a couple too. There's a community if your interested:

    !meshtastic@mander.xyz

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 11 months ago*

    Hey thanks! I was wondering what my alternatives were. Bought RPis, having remembered that name from a decade ago, and then read the posts here about how those are getting worse. Glad to see something that could take their place for my next project :) This is the kind of stuff I come to programming.dev for.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 11 months ago* (1 child)

    I love the ESP32, was onboard with the ESP-8266 (might have the numbers wrong, it was the predecessor), but I thought the real difference between the ESP-32 and the Rpi was that the Rpi has an OS with a possible desktop even (and all that Libux has to offer basically), as the ESP is more of a uProcessor you program in C/C++?

    Edit: Plesse disregard, I mixed up the posts and posted one levet too high too...

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 11 months ago (2 children)

    But how many of those esp32s are programmed using the Arduino IDE and Arduino libraries?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 61 points 11 months ago (11 children)

    Arduino is dogshit, I will not elaborate.

  • source
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] 22 points 11 months ago (6 children)

    Arduino has its place for self-taught hobbyists. For a lot of projects, a simple code is more than enough, so there is no point of going into the more advanced mcu like esp32 or stm32.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 19 points 11 months ago* (5 children)

    Not since the pi pico came out.
    It's cheaper, more capable, and you can still use arduino code if you want.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 11 months ago (4 children)

    I can find an arduino nano clone for 3$. There are use case for ultra cheap electronics like that.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 11 months ago

    You are not wrong. Took a trip down that path for a friend, helping him create some items, which was frustratingly limited.

    It is, however, super easy if you don't want/need much.

    I hate to see options disappear, even if we have other reasonable options available.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 11 months ago

    All the open hardware and software and ecosystem was pretty cool. It was cool you could just buy hats, or whatever they're called, to add functionality, rather than designing a custom PCB and spending hundreds of dollars to get a few boards made and populated. I'm not a fan of their software stack or their choice of uC's, but they did make it easy to just kind of plug stuff together in hardware and software.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 54 points 11 months ago (16 children)

    Arduino has been irrelevant for a while. There are better alternatives for everything they offer. For a start, take a look at Raspberry Pi’s microcontrollers.

  • source
  • hideshow 16 child comments
  • [–] 25 points 11 months ago (4 children)

    Up next: Raspberry foundation enshitification.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 11 months ago (1 child)

    The closest they've come so far is prioritizing industrial customers and compute modules for a while during a chip shortage, to my memory. Hopefully they stick to their roots in the hobbyist/educational sector.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 5 points 11 months ago

    To be fair, if most of your funding (source needed) comes from industrial customers, not supplying them is a good way to lose their patronage.

    So even if it sucked for hobbyists at that moment, keeping a big player like RbP viable for the long term might not be too bad of a tradeoff.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 11 months ago

    ST looming in the background, NXP desperately trying to smash their own kneecaps with a hammer and failing. ESP getting hit with a lightning bolt every time they try to read documentation they printed out but not when its digital...

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 16 points 11 months ago (3 children)

    I stay away from all the micro tech drama and I feel like two years ago, that community was bitching that raspberry pi sold out and everyone should switch to arduino.

    I don't have a side. I just pick whatever is easiest to make a emulation station.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 16 points 11 months ago* (2 children)

    RbP created a publicly traded company for their hardware, which is almost-wholly-held by Raspberry Pi Foundation, which is a charity.

    That sort of thing ought not be allowed, ever. It’s similar to the path Arduino took to get here. There are still other competitors, but for the time being I’m happy enough with RbPi’s dirt-cheap microcontrollers. Their mini-PCs are a different story. We’re already seeing enshittification and price gouging there. It’s just a matter of time.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 11 months ago

    Yeah, I remember when the prices were high for a raspberry pi, I think it was $45, I went on Newegg and found a full size motherboard for $50. I mean, if you are looking for small that's no good, but if cheap was all you were going for at that time, the pi wasn't that great.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 5 points 11 months ago

    You can also use the Arduino hardware without their IDE or libraries. You just need avr-gcc, avr-libc and a makefile. The AVR microcontrollers are very easy to program. The Arduino libraries really just get in the way once you need to do anything with timers.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 11 months ago* (4 children)

    True, but you can't just port arduino code to python or whatever language the raspberry picos compile from. An arduino project would have to be completely rewritten, as far as I'm aware.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 11 months ago (3 children)

    you can program a Pi Pico with the Arduino IDE in C++. Some projects will just compile if you aren't using some AVR specific features like the built-in EEPROM that the RP2040 doesn't have.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (2 children)

    the Arduino IDE in C++

    That's actually pretty cool, but aren't the majority of Arduino projects written in Arduino (Java superset)? At least all of mine are, as that is how I was originally taught to program it.

    edit - Please don't downvote people for seeking information. There was nothing disingenuous or underhanded about my comment, you're either downvoting because you dislike people asking questions or don't like something personal about my experience, which harms this community directly and also make the site feel unnecessarily hostile. This isn't reddit.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 11 months ago (1 child)

    TL;DR: The Arduino language is C++ with an automatically included library, but it's descended from a Java project with an automatically included library.

    Processing is a graphics and art based graphics library/IDE that uses the Java programming language. It basically includes some classes and methods by default on top of Java that makes programming graphics and even simple games a bit more straightforward.

    Processing's IDE was forked by the Wiring project for the purposes of microcontroller hardware programming. Because the Java Virtual Machine is a bit much to ask a 16MHz 8-bit AVR to run, they switched the language to C++ which compiles straight to machine code that runs on the bare metal. Again, it's just C++ with a library included, under the hood it uses gcc to compile and avrdude to program the chip. I believe the IDE itself is still written in Java.

    Arduino took Wiring and painted it teal. They've extended it quite a bit since then but in the early days Arduino was really a hardware project. They've since added support for non-AVR boards to the Arduino IDE, including ARM-Cortex and ESP32 based boards.

    Raspberry Pi offers C and C++ SDKs and a MicroPython interpreter for the Pico series. Someone contributed support for RP2040 based boards to the Arduino IDE; I don't believe that was done officially by either RPi or Arduino.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 11 months ago

    You can get an arduino clone for a lot cheaper than you can get an rpi clone.

    Sometimes, you just need something very simple and a cheap arduino is the right choice.

    Arduino is also a lot more user friendly for newcomers.

    It's a shame that Qualcomm will be the end of it.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 16 points 11 months ago

    capitalism.

  • source
  • [–] 14 points 11 months ago

    If you buy one of the knock-offs, will the terms still apply? Cause I think I'm seeing an out here.

  • source
  • [–] 11 points 11 months ago

    Qualcomm doing Qualcomm things

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (2 children)

    I remember watching a video where they talked about the changes. Apparently most of the language people are really upset about applies specificly to their website and forums. I can't find the video, probably because I am sick and have barely slept in the last 4 days. I miss sleep ... and not coughing.

    Edit: changed "can" to "can't"

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments