all 59 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 211 points 11 months ago (5 children)

How many other animals did they put through a sieve to reach this conclusion? How many?!

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [+] 75 points 11 months ago (4 children)
  • [–] 97 points 11 months ago (2 children)
  • [–] 13 points 11 months ago*

    Many, many poor little creatures with simpler or more robust or segmented nervous systems. Mostly common worms, cnidarians, starfish, metamorphosing insects, and more in that line of thought. It’s common in college bio to watch planarians unmangle themselves. Sucks for them, but they get food and relative safety, so I’ve always considered it an even trade

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
    [–] 141 points 11 months ago (3 children)

    If you mix up the grindings of multiple sponges, do they only recombine with their own cells?

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 69 points 11 months ago (1 child)

    There seem to be many of these multicellular animals who don't feel like a singular individual animal. I was commenting on a post a few months ago about the most genetically simple multicellular animal, this thing has less base pairs than most bacteria, and it can also do this trick where disassociated cells recombine into new individuals. This creature also reproduce sexually if and only if the concentration of fellow individuals is high enough, cells will just leave the body and join a new one like for fun. It really calls into question what an individual is.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 43 points 11 months ago

    I guess it makes sense that multicellularity would be more of a spectrum than a binary condition. If life evolved into it gradually, then it would make sense to find a lot of "intermediate" evolutionary states that don't feel like they're distinctly one or the other.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 68 points 11 months ago (12 children)

    How many animals have we ground up and put through a sieve into salt water to be this confident about it being the only animal that can do this? I need sources.

  • source
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • [–] 26 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (3 children)

    I mean, enough that manufacturing of homogenizers is a thing. https://improbable.com/2021/05/13/shakespeare-and-the-whole-mouse-homogenizer/?amp=1

    The ad features the comforting headline: “Only the Polytron reduces an entire mouse to a soup-like homogenate in 30 seconds”

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 11 months ago (4 children)

    I think there's nematodes that we've blended up before, but instead you get a bunch of nematodes instead of just one.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 16 points 11 months ago*

    “Hey, Bob, watcha getting up to?”

    “I’m just chopping up these worms.”

    “… Why?”

    “… sssssscience?”

    “Holy shit, they’re all functioning individually!”

    “Oh, thank fu- I mean, yeah, that’s what I was testing for. …Do we have any dogs?”

    “…”

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 11 months ago (2 children)
  • [–] 35 points 11 months ago (1 child)

    My body still repairs itself while I dissociate. Does that count?

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 20 points 11 months ago

    Ah, yes, I too read The Bikini Bottom Horror

  • source
  • [–] 19 points 11 months ago (8 children)

    Don't caterpillars turn thier cells to mush when they turn into butterflys?

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 33 points 11 months ago (3 children)

    Yeah, but I don't think it works with a grinder.

    However, apparently caterpillars retain memories from their caterpillar form when in butterfly form! That's pretty cool.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 11 months ago (3 children)

    They don’t completely turn to goo, structures are already there in caterpillar form. https://youtu.be/4RaCURU6A2o

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 11 months ago (6 children)

    What if you cut it in half first, would the ground up halves restore to half a sponge?

    Then what if you stir the sponge powder and remove half.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 11 months ago (3 children)

    So, my assumption is: separated cells with the same genetic code, or some other biomarker of "individuality" that might not technically be unique, will attach to each other given the chance.

    Super quick research suggests they don't have organs or a nervous system, but do have specialized bits like flagella to move water through their pores/tunnels. The majority of the cells just ... are. Sounds more like a colony of genetically identical cells than a single multi-cellular creature (to me), but I assume biologists have much more information and reason to consider them the way they do.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 11 months ago (2 children)

    So could we clone them and then grow them larger again, then once they regrow combine them into a super sponge!

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 child)

    I dug around for a little bit, and it seems like the answer might be yes. Take what follows with a grain of salt, as I skimmed or read a few sources focused on different things and have done my best to reproduce a full picture.

    First, some basic facts. Sponges anchor to the seabed (freshwater ones anchor to the dirt at the bottom of a lake/whatever). Sponge cells can move around each other and rearrange, part of their normal functioning, to keep water flowing through themselves efficiently for respiration and food capture.

    Next, the mechanisms of reconstruction from a soup of sponge cells. As they bump into each other and recognize their own kind, sponge cells manage to hold together and hope for ground to attach to. They flatten out, presumably both to improve grip to the ground and to provide a large surface area for more cells to join. As long as the new colony ends up with enough of two specific kinds of cells (one makes connective mesohyl, the other makes everything else), it can grow.

    The main thing I couldn't (quickly) find is specific confirmation that two healthy, stable colonies coming from a single halved source sponge can reattach, or if the reaggregation process only works following injury or during some kind of stress. Since the cells normally move around, though, it seems reasonable that this could work.

    Based on all that and assuming their aren't other factors for sponge cells recognizing each other not entirely based on DNA, then presumably clones could also be attached.

    Note that sponges don't actually stop growing. Their main limits are resource needs and predation, since some sea life likes to take nibbles or bites out of them (that's possibly a factor to why they are so adept at reorganization). So if your question involved cloning (rather than reattachment) only to get around a rough maximum size or early-life growth period that stops, it shouldn't be necessary.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 15 points 11 months ago

    Do they regrow their body or a new body made from the same parts?

  • source
  • [–] 15 points 11 months ago

    Fact: Spongebob can teleport

  • source
  • [–] 14 points 11 months ago

    Like Deadpool

  • source
  • [–] 14 points 11 months ago (3 children)

    How do they know other lifeforms do not do that?

    Answer me! How do they know?!

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 11 months ago (1 child)

    So, when they reassemble does it start with the middle finger?

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 16 points 11 months ago

    Would have been better without the dumb AI image

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 11 months ago

    TIL Deadpool is a sponge.

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 11 months ago

    So that's how Boros did it

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

    when they come back they grow 2 hands with long fingers and fused palms

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 11 months ago (1 child)
    load more comments (1 reply)