top 99 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 125 points 1 year ago (8 children)
  • [–] 71 points 1 year ago (7 children)
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    It's true. The Ford mustang suv is an abomination

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (2 children)

    Yeah, the other mustangs call you unnatural when you put 600 foot-pounds of torque down to the ground in an instant, and not spin out of control into a crowd.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 82 points 1 year ago*

    Car manufacturers skirting emissions regulations by selling "work trucks" instead of regular cars.

    The increased size of these trucks directly causes more fatalities

  • source
  • [+] 101 points 1 year ago (4 children)
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (2 children)

    Now that would be useful data. Can we confirm that?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Not quite what you're looking for, but I never can resist an opportunity to post these:

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago

    Sure, those pictures are always shocking yet have clear meaning.

    But cellphones happened everywhere, and people get distracted by them. I’m sure that’s _a_cause of increased accidents almost everywhere

    But the truck issue is purely US (or is Canada infected too?). So comparing trends for is data vs other countries is a cheap way of separating the effect of cell phones vs the effect of excessive trucks

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 31 points 1 year ago* (4 children)

    I vaguelly remember reading how SUVs are 70% more deadly in collisions with pedestrians than conventional cars.

    (Because their front is flatter and taller, so pedestrians are less likelly to roll over the hood and instead tend to be projected away)

    I believe those kinds of cars started taking off back then.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    People buy SUVs because "safer" but they kill more pedestrians - and they're not strictly safer for occupants either. Big SUVs have rollover risk. Crossovers aren't necessarily any safer in a collision because it turns out that what really matters is the "area" of the car (length x width) and since crossovers and SUVs often cost more, you end up getting a smaller vehicle by area for the same amount of money. You literally get less for your money and it's also less fun to drive and probably requires more fuel. I honestly don't see why people without back issues get crossovers over wagons.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    I am mostly in agreement with you but why would the area of the car matter? You can potentially have bigger crumple zones, but that'd exclude the space that is used for passengers. Other than that, the energy transferred in a collision is relative to the mass, where the lighter vehicle receives a larger proportion of the energy than the heavier one.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 22 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (15 children)

    I just checked the data for Germany and it doesn't reflect the same trend. Could be that Germany is more pedestrian friendly. There is no upwards trend visible from 2007, when smartphones became mainstream. But, you can see a clear drop in pedestrian deaths accidents caused by traffic during the pandemic.

    Edit: Little mistake from me, this statistic shows pedestrian accidents, not deaths. Still comparable though.

  • source
  • hideshow 15 child comments
  • [–] 48 points 1 year ago (11 children)
  • [–] 40 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    Its physically painful to look at.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

    Could also be a mentality thing, if you can mentally put down the phone and not text. Or hell an automatic/manual transmission thing, can't use the phone if you have to shift.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 15 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    2007/8 financial crisis had gas spike up to $5-8/gal in some instances. This caused a lot of people to sell their SUVs and get more economical vehicles.

    In the mid 2010's, gas prices came down substantially, and everyone bought more SUVs and traded in their economic vehicles.

    SUVs kill pedestrians like bug zappers kill mosquitos on a damp, hot night in the swamp.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 1 year ago* (2 children)

    Drop starts in 1980, which was before SUVs, and after introduction of SUVs and popularity increase, kept dropping. I prefer the phone explanation, but don't know why it started dropping in 1980. Maybe exodus to suburbs, and no pedestrians in suburbs?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • I believe you might be trying to apply logic to the dates assuming there's only one or two variables changing across all those decades. The truth is there are multiple strongly correlated reasons pedestrian deaths declined sharply in the US over the years.

    In the 1980's and 90's it was largely the safety standards being improved in vehicles. ABS being standard helped with stopping before hitting people. Road safety standards and road designs improved to allow for more pedestrian walkways away from the streets. Automatic headlights at night turning on, better road conditions, better tires were introduced to handle different weather patterns more easily (e.g. in the rain or snow where traction loss could lead to pedestrian deaths) as well as standards to increase vehicle inspections and what safety standards were being checked during those inspections.

    In the 2000's, while many safety standards were still being improved and tweaked, a lot of the impactful ones had already been instituted, so the changes were less and less dramatic over the last 20ish years.

    The specific question the OP was asking for was around the 2010 drop, and that is strongly correlated with high gas prices leading to sell-offs of SUVs, and SUVs are the leading cause of pedestrian deaths by far with modern cars with modern safety standards. Largely for the reasons others in this post have mentioned (larger, heavier, hood height, etc.).

    I was very much a car nut during those years, and the gas prices drove many, many people to trade in their SUVs, trucks, etc. that had poor gas mileage. Gas prices were nuts, and a huge shock to everyone's budget when it jumped up suddenly. This wasn't really an inflationary thing, this was caused by a multitude of factors, but it stayed high for a long time due to those conditions.

    When those conditions reverted, gas prices started falling like a rock, and everyone went back to thinking: "well, maybe I can afford that SUV again". And they did. SUV sales rose sharply once gas prices fell. So pedestrian deaths have gone back up as a result.

    Today, it's also multiple factors, with the vehicle type being one of the large ones (hood height has been linked as a giant increase in the liklihood a pedestrian dies in a collision), but the other factor that rose sharply was smartphone use while driving from about the mid 2010's to today. It's probably the leading cause of vehicular deaths in general (I haven't checked, but I'd throw $20 at it being distracted drivers).

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago

    We children of the 80s were out there in them streets, walking and biking to our friends' houses and dodging the cars. Over the years our skills grew, and the numbers were finally on our side. And while it was sad on the rare occasion that we lost a friend to the streets as if they were an Oregon Trail character, it did help the numbers even more!

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 15 points 1 year ago (6 children)

    Not just smartphones, dashboards with flat touchscreens. Now, you have to look at the dashboard. Prior, you manipulated all the controls by touch.

    Honestly though, I don’t understand the smartphone thing. Set your playlist, book, podcast and go. Leave if alone until you park. Why is that hard?

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] [S] 7 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    I'm with you. Maybe I'm getting old, but I still treat texting/messaging as asynchronous communication. It's not a "live" conversation, and if I'm driving or doing something else in between messages, then it's going to be a bit before I can respond again.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    I like texting well enough, but it’s also a way to leave a message without all the steps of voicemail. Agreed, face to face conversation is best.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago

    I still like apps that can use both voice and text messages but in a text like conversation.

    The removal of dialing and waiting for the ringing to stop (as well as those fake-out voicemail messages where they spoke as if answering followed with "just kidding! Leave your message..." Fucking hated people that did that shit) did a lot for it, and sometimes you only have time to say one thing before getting back to something else without the paranoia of them answering and having to deal with the pleasantries and hoping they wouldn't be impossible to get rid of after you finished whatever you had to say.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    It's hard because people are addicted to their phones. Tech companies have spent billions making social media as addictive as possible. Americans also have no other choice of transportation. If you want to go somewhere, you generally must drive

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago

    Again, I don’t get it. For starters, driving is a great time to reset and decompress. More than simply walking through a doorway. It’s time to purge your brain of anything sordid in your day, like work. Distance happens, physically and mentally.

    You leave work, there’s a good book, or good music, you, and the road. Why would you let calls or texts interrupt that?

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 14 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    My brother got his drivers license that year.....

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 13 points 1 year ago* (5 children)

    Smartphones in general happened. Suddenly, everyone could look at porn anywhere, anytime and were distracted.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    Smartphones happened in Europe too, but deaths kept going down here.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (2 children)

    Sex isn't as taboo in Europe so being able to see porn all the time didn't have an impact.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 63 points 1 year ago (8 children)

    "Why is this happening" asks car obsessed, SUV infested country.

    Compare with similar data in other countries and you'll see the issue is not smartphones, and likely has more to do with your huge cars.

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    So what happened to all the huge cars in 2010?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    we all rode bikes and walked everywhere in 2010 then they released cars 2

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago

    There are probably several factors. I doubt there are as many people using a smartphone while driving in other countries. If someone wants to sit on their phone while commuting elsewhere, they can walk or take the train/bus/subway. In the US, you have to drive no matter what

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

    Counterpoint, I wonder how much American culture makes people more willing to be in their phone while their vehicle is moving. The toxic work culture, the disregard for others, and so on likely contributes to a higher use of phone at dangerous times. Especially since larger cars are more about lethality.

    What other developed countries have a 60+ hour work week in this day and age?

    Edit: thought of a few in Asia but they all have public transportation so they can safely have their 1 hour "me time" commute. If Americans wanna play their mobile games to relax they have to do it in a car, oof.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (1 child)

    60+ hour work week

    You honestly believe that about America?

    I haven't worked 60 hours a week for over 20 years, and I was a contractor then, my time, my money. I've never met anyone that works 60 hour weeks, and no employer is paying that overtime. Maybe if you're on salary at some insane tech startup? Maybe 2-3 people at my last gig (software dev) worked hours like that, but that was because they loved what they were doing. And HR frowned on that.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago

    Most of the time they pay salary to avoid overtime, but that's just in middle income scenarios. I didn't say they were working only one job. People I know work two or three jobs to afford rent, easily taking up 60+ hours of their lives (or, a side hustle as they call it).

  • source
  • parent
  • that's also about the time "infotainment" systems started becoming common if not mandatory in cars. My 2003 S10 has physical switches for all of its controls, I can set the clock by feel. Newer cars with touch screen interfaces take drivers' eyes off the road more than cars used to.

  • source
  • [–] 20 points 1 year ago (7 children)

    [https://www.statista.com/statistics/199980/us-truck-sales-since-1951/](If anyone is searching for an answer why.) Funny how it is almost the same curve.

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    Correlation is not causation

    There could be a 3rd driving force that's causing both trends, among other possible explanations

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 1 year ago

    I've not seen people mention what probably is the actual case: the US government failing to handle the big changes in traffic like phone usage, change of vehicles sold, etc..

    Different countries handled similar changes appropriately and deaths decreased, while the vehicle centric US did nothing to protect pedestrians/cyclists/...

    The government, probably under influence from industry, is 100% to blame.

  • source
  • The size of cars exploded and bigger cars are less safe for pedestrians.

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    thought I was in fuckcars with all these comments.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago
    [–] 5 points 1 year ago

    Apropos of nothing, but yesterday I saw a guy in a lifted pick-up truck two thumb type during a fucking zipper merge. Who needs eyes to drive, anyway?

  • source
  • [–] 13 points 1 year ago (4 children)
    1. People walking into live traffic while texting.

    2. People driving while texting.

    3. Police doing fuck all about it.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    While those are all contributing factors, I'd argue cars getting bigger has added two additional major factors:

    1. Impacts are far more likely to be deadly due to the higher hood height knocking the victim to the asphalt/concrete, rather than them going over the hood

    2. Higher hood heights have far less visibility, giving less time to react, if the driver sees the victim at all

    Combine that with people generally being distracted by smartphones, and we get the current situation

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    I'd assume that also cars having higher performance (power? What's even the correct expression here?), as in quicker accelerations even after a full stop plays a role. Someone walking over a red light for pedestrians probably wouldn't get hit fatally by most 2000s cars, but by a more modern car. EVs also have absurd accelerations.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • Thanks Obama

  • source
  • [–] 9 points 1 year ago

    Trucks which are the most popular vehicles in the US got taller in the front

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago

    Thanks Obama

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago

    2010 was the year after Michael Jackson & Farrah Fawcett died, so in 2010 there were no pedestrians anywhere because everyone stayed home or drove cars or rode buses.

    /bullshit

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago

    LED headlights that blind everybody in front of them

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago (4 children)
  • [–] 16 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    Neither Germany (other comment) nor UK show such a trend, both keep going down.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    because those countries have good transit systems and no trucks designed to kill people.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • Also borderline psychotic road safety adverts. If you didn't grow up in the UK or Ireland and have not experienced these ads it's well worth seeking out a collection on YouTube, if for no other reason than to see what we were damaged with as kids.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago

    Thanks Obama!

    /s

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago

    I bet a big part of this is the opioid crisis. Lots of people driving high as fuck.

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    We lost the headphone jack. Jk

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments
    view more: next β€Ί