Pretty sure only aristocrats dressed like that.
post
There is absofukinglutely nothing stopping you from dressing like that, only yourself.
As the saying goes, "no gentleman was dressed without his sword"
Mark Zuckerberg, who dresses pretty much like the guy on the right, then adds a watch worth $100k to indicate his status.
The pants shirts an hoodies the ultra wealthy wear are also often obscenely overpriced versions of the normal clothes. Like Luis Vuitton's plain tshirt, with a same color embossed logo on the front, for 700$. Or this one by Prada for 2500$ (its casmere)
I legitimately do not understand
I think it's silly and wasteful, but I don't think it's difficult to understand. Modern aristocrats have so much money that the cost doesn't matter at all, and they probably get it for free in the hope that they'd be seen wearing it by all the wannabes who can afford it.
But even if they pay full price and pick it for some dumb reason like the color or because it's soft, with the average net worth growth these people see in a month or year, any time spent buying the thing would be far more valuable (or they would passively make far more money) than the cost of the shirt.
But silly things like transactions and opening packages of free overpriced fashion are for underlings to handle anyway.
Ah yes, the Great Male Renunciation of fashion
Fashion??? In this economy?!
If I could suit up like in games that actually have good clothing options and don't punish you for just getting every option I totally would, but for better or worse I settle for tattered hand me downs from my uncle that I have been wearing since I was 7 or so. And some hand me ups from my younger siblings that became bigger than me as a top up to the supply.
Idk what you're talking about, used clothing is both the most affordable and the gaudiest. I love it.
Flügel asserted that men "abandoned their claim to be considered beautiful" and "henceforth aimed at being only useful".
Meanwhile, still waiting on 99% of men (or all humans, really) to start being useful.
Dude on the left pulls it off, dude on the right does not, imo.
wasn't the make up meant to hide the lesions and wigs to hide the peeling scalp and hair loss?
Maybe we have grown out as a society of that childish one-upping each other with made up rules?
Don't you ever insinuate i have boring socks ever again.
Rich cunts then: 
Rich cunts now: 
Poor cunts then: 
Poor cunts now: 
Or to put it another way, nothing has changed. The upper classes still dress like wankers who sniff their own farts, and the lower classes still dress with whatever they can afford that works for them.
Who's got boring socks? Not me, sir. 😤

Rich guys wearing really dour clothes is actually a relatively recent phenomenon in history. Up to the French Revolution the aristocrats were peacocked up to the max; maybe it was fear of the guillotine that saw their successors going around in North Face jackets.
My penis would dangle out the bottom of the skirt.
I'm a bear built, and even though I just bought a skirt. I'll never look cute like that,
And you know what!
I'm a cis male, and I'm not even thinking this is any form of gender bending. I'm wearing them because when I wear them, they are manly.
I'm not against blurring gender lines, it just not my style. I just hate that make fashion is basically funeralwear.
When I die I want everyone to attend in the most colorful and creative outfits, need to make a will to ask people wearing a traditional suit to fuck off.
I don’t have breasts like that
I do find it weird there's been this resurgence of fixation on superficial motifs being associated with masculinity, but the guys who parrot these views all have an appearance that screams, "I want to blend in and be invisible!"
Nothing masculine about tepid conformity.
Oh look, a clown.
I think they dropped a word there. I think "rich" was the word they dropped......
that's a part of it, however during the Victorian time. it became fashionable for men to be stoic and boring. that's why a guy can wear the same outfit for a meeting, a wedding, and a funeral.
although wealth is a big factor. it isn't the whole story. a good suit can cost a lot and still be fashionably bankrupt.
And if you try to put some flare, they will question your sexuality and distupt the corporate dynamics.
Tbf, that (dress dark and be boring) was probably due to all the opium/morphine they were on.
we have better drugs now, why are we still dressing like we are opium addicts??
Look up "Beau Brummely" and "Great Renunciation".
US southern-prep khakis, blazer, shirt and tie, slightly longer hair is pretty much the exact look Brummely and his dandies created and socially enforced through mockery.
Some people claim that the underlying force granting Brummely the ability to do so had to do with the center of power shifting from traditional nobility to financiers.
Call me a sissy but t-shirt and cargo pants for life!
See good buddy that's why you buy yourself thrift.
I wear suits that cost me 20 bucks that look better than what the president wears. Not that that's a high bar, but a worthy comparison.
That's where you're wrong, I only wear the most clown ass socks under my jeans
The title is implicitly responding to someone who thinks, "fashion is an important part of masculinity, and it's immutable," but has nothing to say to someone who thinks, "fashion is an important part of masculinity and can change."
Pantaloons with tights aren't completely dead, just shorts with long socks need to up their sock game
My socks are not boring, excuse me!
Tbh men like me are a step away from becoming cats and I would love to just be a cat. Every step we do that progresses men becoming cats is fine for me.
Casually forgetting that they didn't shower back then.
This is a man vs bear scenario, repainted to make the modern man look like what feminazis view us as. Simple as.
frankly, im not sure what point this stupid meme is trying to make.
Also did you see King Louis XIV shoes? Dude was flair.




top 100 comments