top 99 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[+] 120 points 1 year ago (10 children)
  • [–] 20 points 1 year ago (5 children)

    I do the same but I also make sure the panel's on the top edge of the screen

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [+] 14 points 1 year ago (3 children)
  • [–] 8 points 1 year ago (3 children)
  • [–] 46 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    I changed the font size in Linux Mint. Does that count?

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 45 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    I used to skin Windows XP and loved custom icon packs for OS X. Today I run Gnome with the bare minimum quality of life extensions.

    I was going to say I don't have time to mess around with that shit, and then remembered I have spent a bunch of time curating my dotfiles and the actual OS I run is a Bootc image I build nightly on my self hosted Forgejo instance. I may actually have too much time on my hands πŸ˜…

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 34 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    5 hours? ... You have much to learn, padawan.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 32 points 1 year ago (5 children)

    You guys set a different wallpaper?

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 25 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Honestly, usually the only thing I HAVE to change. Idk why all the default distro wallpapers suck

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 9 points 1 year ago

    They do don't they.

    It's my biggest complaint about Linux, and on-boarding new users.

    The last thing a new user should see is some janky ass looking wallpaper.

    I think ElementaryOS and maybe Zorin were the only two that had clean looking OOTB theme and wallpaper.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
    [–] 19 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    I keep telling myself I’m gonna rice out my setup. That plasma is just a placeholder. But as months have become years I have started to question the value in it.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago

    I started with gnome and a handful of plugins to make it more like how I was used to, but over the years I pretty much just use stock, because once I got used to it it is just good by itself. Except for GTile. I still like to install GTile.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 12 points 1 year ago (9 children)

    XFCE + Compiz was 100% worth the effort of doing it once and then being able to just copy to a new device.

    Waiting for XFCE to complete their Wayland transition, and I'm gonna upgrade to Wayfire.

    That being said, yeah I give KDE to basically everyone else new to Linux lol

  • source
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 1 year ago (7 children)

    I agree that KDE is better for newcomers. I'll never understand why the newbie-friendly distros tend to favor GNOME.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    While gnomes simplicity looks better for newcomers, it's actually worse, I hated it, tried kde, loved it, later tried gnome again and swapped to it, had more appeal once I already was using linux and used to it. It's not immediately obvious what extensions to use and where to get them or that they even are a thing you can do. You goto settings and get turned off by the lack of customizability you've been hearing about.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

    Yeah, and the GNOME team sees people using extensions, breaks them, and says "No, you WILL use it OUR way or else!"

    Whenever I've tried GNOME, I'd say about 75% of the extensions I've seen recommended as recently as a year prior were now broken on the latest release. And apparently GNOME really hates the idea of a systray/AppIndicator even though most distros and users want it, other desktops have it, and Mac and Windows have it

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 7 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    It's a lowest common denominator kinda issue, methinks. Gnome is chasing it's own tail trying to create a single UI that will please everyone, plus have it simple to use and both similar enough yet distinct enough to/from Windows/Mac experiences. It's a noble enough goal - but honestly strikes me as well impossible.

    KDE gives you a barely updated Win95 era desktop and then becomes a tinkerer's paradise - whenever there was two or more options, they focused on making each available, but neither becomes the default.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Before Ubuntu existed, most distros aimed at newcomers shipped with KDE as the default. I'm not sure why Ubuntu went with GNOME as the default, but since Ubuntu came out, everything shifted to GNOME.

    GNOME is definitely not going for a single UI that will please everyone. They're going for a UI that you WILL use THEIR way, or else. And they WILL break any extensions you use within the next release or two. Which is an odd design philosophy for a desktop for an OS aimed at people who like to tweak.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Ubuntu was originally the Linux for people who can't tweak

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago

    Ubuntu originally came out because Debian Sarge took much longer than usual to get released, and everything in Debian Woody was woefully out of date in 2004. KDE 3 and GNOME 2 had been out for a while but the latest Debian was shipping KDE 2.2.2 and GNOME 1.4. Ubuntu's philosophy was to provide a more up-to-date distro for regular people.

    I've been using Linux long enough that I used Debian Woody.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago

    Same experience, thought desktop on linux was behind because I started on Ubuntu with GNOME.

    Luckily tried XFCE on someone's Debian install and realized GNOME just kinda sucked.

    Even GNOME 2 was a pretty standard DE, 3 and 40+ just took a weird nosedive where they enforced their idea of the perfect DE, despite it breaking a ton of rules about good UX and removing a bunch of former features.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 23 points 1 year ago (19 children)

    What does ricing mean in this context?

  • source
  • hideshow 19 child comments
  • [–] 29 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    RICE is a post-hoc acronym (backronym) meaning Race Inspired Cosmetic Enhancement. Its from car communities.

    It used to be a racist term referring to the modification of JDM vehicles, hence the post-hoc change to the definition. Its a word that came into common parlance without folks completely knowing it was racist.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] -11 points 1 year ago

    It also means to break something up into tiny parts for cooking through a ricer. Which can also be applied to ricing your computer by tweaking all the little parts

  • source
  • parent
  • [+] 13 points 1 year ago (3 children)
  • [–] 8 points 1 year ago (10 children)

    The term also confuses me. What does customising a desktop have to do with rice? Is it like beads to decorate stuff? Maybe "beading" would have a bad interpretation, but rice is just confusing.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 38 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    Uhmmmm, pretty sure it's worse than that. My understanding of the term is that it comes from cars, where cheaper Asian cars were entering the American market and were called "rice burners" (racistly), and I'm pretty sure from there the concept of decking out a cheap car with spoilers and ground kits and a wild paint job and stuff was called "ricing" because it was a thing in the Asian communities. As in "ricing a car" is "doing what an Asian would do to that car, and you know how they're all about rice"

    I'd be happy to be wrong here... but I think that's the history on that word.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 1 year ago

    Im old. It used to be derogatory against imported cars to North America. Rice Racers meant Japanese imports that were modified.

    But the meaning or rather the connotation has changed. It now is more related to the cooking term of ricing, where you pass a vegetable through a ricer to break it into rice sized pieces. You rice your PC by tuning all the pieces and making minute tweaks.

    As another commentor added the RICE term for cars is now a backcronym of Race Inspired Cosmetic Enhancements

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

    It is an extension/evolution of the idea of ricing cars. Originally it was something like Race Inspired Cosmetic Enhancements. Basically stuff that makes your car look "racier"/faster, but does nothing for performance.

    Edit to add - That is probably backronym to cover up for the mostly racist origination of that term. I can't be sure.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 1 year ago (5 children)

    I spend 3 days ricing my desktop and I did not finish. I've now been sitting with the ugliest half riced desktop for 6 months. I decided to go with a light theme in beige and its.. not good.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    I grabbed like 3 apps to apply themes and icons on gnome and got confused trying to pick the best option

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

    GNOME theming discussions are weird. A lot of people will peddle cargo culted bad (broken) approaches when asked about it, but honestly it's not that complicatedΒΉ, just restrictive:

    • Use gsettings [get|set] org.gnome.desktop.interface gtk-theme [new value] to set the theme that GTK3 apps will load. Libadwaita apps will ignore this setting.

    • Use gsettings [get|set] org.gnome.desktop.interface color-scheme [prefer-light|prefer-dark|default] to control whether Libadwaita apps (and GNOME shell) will display in dark mode. GTK3 apps will ignore this setting.

      • prefer-light makes everything light mode.
      • prefer-dark makes everything dark mode.
      • default makes apps light mode but the panel will stay dark.
    • If you insist on theming Libadwaita apps, put the theme in ~/.config/gtk-4.0/gtk.css. You can also have add an @import directive there to import a theme. Note that this file is only loaded at startup, so using this feature means that GTK4 apps can no longer respond to the dark mode toggle.Β²

    All of the applications that promise to help in theming GTK/GNOME (regardless of whether you're talking about Tweaks, Refine, the theming settings of other DEs, Gradience, etc.) just flip some combination of these settings, mostly the first two.Β³

    ΒΉ It might seem complicated based on the length of this comment, but trust me that Qt is worse.

    Β² The newest GTK version has media selectors, so if all of your applications are already updated to use the new GTK and your theme is updated to use media selectors then dark mode toggles should actually work now. Mine unfortunately haven't.

    Β³ A handful (mostly random scripts from GitHub, but also more reputable stuff like home-manager) will also try some wrong ways:

    • Setting the GTK_THEME environment variable will prevent applications from loading the default Adwaita stylesheet completely, which will break all kinds of things.

    • You can also put a theme at ~/.config/gtk-3.0/gtk.css, but this does nothing you can't do with gsettings except preventing you from changing the theme without restarting all your apps.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    The issue is that the GNOME devs have made it VERY clear that they don't want you doing this.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago*

    Yes, that is true. Curiously Qt kind of has the opposite problem of trying to be too flexible, and we have like four theming engines of which only one actually works (and it's the one that's tied to the Plasma desktop). GTK4 + Libadwaita is at least consistent in that it supports basically nothing.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 10 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    I've never bothered because less than 1% of my time I'm looking at the sys UI, let alone the desktop.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • I remember picking nice desktop backgrounds and even downloading gigabytes thereof, sorting and categorizing them, only to notice that my windows were fullscreen all the time anyway. Now I just have a background to indicate that at least some things work because a black background would mean trouble (file missing etc.).

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 8 points 1 year ago

    Default Plasma is just good.

  • source
  • [–] 7 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    It's different to work with than just about any Linux distro out there, but works kinda well with NixOS. Sure it's different than all the other Linux distros and prob has a steeper learning curve as well - but once you get into it you'll never have to reinstall again, you can apply any config with 1 command, revert to earlier build-versions if a change would break the system. Great stuff!

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (2 children)

    I'm on the verge of swapping off windows 10 to Nobara. Besides this comment do you have any points that could sway me toward Nix?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago

    Personally I probably wouldn't advise NixOS to someone new to Linux. I think it's best to get familiar with how linux does things in a more conventional setup first. And then transition to a declarative setup. But it kinda depends on the person as well, and how willing they are to learn and how comfortable they are with writing such a config.

    That said, I would be very curious how the switch straight from Windows to NixOS would be experienced by someone. So if you do so, feel free to post your experience on the NixOS community :)

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago

    I do agree with what @Decq@lemmy.world said. For most users is preferable to start of with a simpler distro. The biggest difference between other distros and NixOS is its declarative nature, and that its config files are written in the functional language Nix. This will most likely feel overwhelming, especially if your not accustomed to functional languages.

    I think a better approach would be to go with the distro you mentioned, then when you gotten more used to the ins and out, perhaps have a look at installing Nix the package manager in Nobara (the same name as the language is confusion), or perhaps Home Manager. The later manage programs and config also declaratively, but only for users and not on a system level.

    All in all, in most use cases NixOS and its declarative, immutable, reproducable and indestructive model is overkill. Its mostly only worth it if you have multiple computers that need to share config, systems that must work 100% of the time or if you're a sucker for declarative approaches (like i am, i've also daily driven Linux for 18 years, and is a hobby programmer, so it was a lot easier to get into Nix/NixOS with that I think).

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 7 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    Honestly I even get rid of the taskbar too. I'll float the system tray at approximately the same place but either let it hide behind everything or fill the space above it with a specific window (mirrored phone screen) with fixed size. Now that I'm typing it out though, I'm going to investigate auto-hiding it until a keybind reveals it in front of all windows.

    I switch programs exclusively with alt+tab regardless and KDE's launcher fulfills the super-menu functionality. I want a fresh session login to open to just my wallpaper. No icons, no task bar, no tray, nothing. An anti-rizz if you will.

    I like the aesthetic and see it as a (tongue-in-cheek) method of security by obfuscation. I pair that with completely blank keycaps on my keyboard and suddenly 99% of the population doesn't know how to interact with my machine.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Dvorak will help up that percentage

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    wonder what eventually makes everyone ragequit on the ricing part lol

    for me? it was the battery management and suspend/hibernate stuff. You need to do a lot of weird file configs to get them working.

    I riced i3wm, dwm and even exwm and suspend/hibernate problem would pop up now and then.

    On a full DE? Shit just works.

    I do miss ricing though. Especially window managers, I can just git clone my dotfiles and have everything setup in seconds.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago

    A lot of it seems like removing the automated easy parts to customize it to be faster only to realize you don't feel like spending time on that breaking or being so inflexible. Like I can switch to lxqt but now it doesn't even feel like I have a complete desktop and are spending time making it work instead of just using it

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago

    CachyOS has been great if anyone is looking for an arch based distro that's preconfigured for gaming out of the box.

  • source
  • I got out of customizing everything once I started flashing different ROMs on my first smartphone, which was the Verizon Thunderbolt

    After having three or four different operating systems on in one week, it became so obvious how much time I was wasting on that stuff lol

  • source
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago

    Some times it isn't about the destination, but about the journey itself.

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago

    fluxbox, ftw.

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (11 children)

    Hey linuxmemes, I've got a question, can I straight up install linux on a windows computer and have access to all my files as they've been laid out by windows, or am I going to have to use an external backup to move my files 'out of windows' and 'into linux'?

    Like I'm getting sicker and sicker of windows pulling their whole attitude of " Weve got an update for you, give us all your data. Give it. What do you mean "right to privacy"? That's only for companies and billionaires."

  • source
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago (5 children)

    Many linux installers give you the option of using the free space in your Windows drive for a linux partition (Linux mint is one example). Then you would have what is called a dual boot setup. It means every time you start your computer, you can choose Linux or Windows.

    Then you disable bitlocker in your windows partition, and you can access all the files there from linux.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    You can access bitlocker drives from Linux too, it's a bit of a pain but all you need is the recovery key.

    https://github.com/Aorimn/dislocker

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (3 children)

    Good to know. Though with how flaky regular NTFS support is, I expect this to be worse still.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (2 children)

    Nah, decryption is easy because it’s based on standards.

    But you’re right about the NTFS support. I only use it to read data from external drives. I tried to use it to have a dual boot setup with a shared Steam library but that had some issues.

    I’ve since completely dumped Windows, problem solved.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (1 child)

    I should do the same. Just remove the dual boot setup and stick with linux.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago

    Yup.

    I don’t regret it at all and now I have another 2TB SSD for my Steam library. I kept the dual boot setup around for a bit, just in case, but I didn’t use it once in 5 months. So when I needed more storage space, it was an easy choice.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

    The answers might have confused you due to the unfortunate phrasing of the question. Let me clarify:

    -Linux installation requires a separate partition. This can be your D:/ drive from Windows, a completely new physical drive, or a partition you free up on any drive using the Windows Disk Management. -This partition will be wiped upon installation. Back everything up from there. -All other partitions, including drive C:/, will be fully accessible from Linux. -Your Linux partition will not be visible from Windows. There are ways to interact with it from there, but they are neither convenient nor fully functional, and you probably shouldn't rely on it.

    Overall, it's always a good strategy to back up everything important before installing a new system or reinstalling old one, but you probably know this already and this is not a strict technical requirement - just a peace of mind tip.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] [S] 3 points 1 year ago

    If all of your partitions are in a single NTFS drive it probably wise to make a backup, if it in a separate drive you can access it in Linux (read only, if you want to write into it you need to install "ntfs-3g" package)

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago

    Contrary to other comments, it's actually pretty common and easy to install Linux alongside Windows, if you have a harddrive big enough for both. If you want to have both installed, it is recommend to start with Windows because Linux boot loader can recognise Windows partition and integrate it with no problem. And Linux natively supports ntfs so you can seamlessly access all your files absolutely no problem. But if it's your first time installing Linux it's easy to mess up and kill the windows partition if you aren't good with terminology yet, so backing up all your files is not just recommended but straight up required.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago

    Generally, no. You can't install Linux onto a Windows filesystem (NTFS). What you can do is one of these things:

    • Back up the files you care about (Desktop, Documents, Downloads, whatever) in Google Drive, Dropbox, a thumb drive or anywhere else that you can access later. Then you can tell the Linux installer to wipe Windows and afterwards put your important files back.

    • If you have a spare SSD you can put Linux on that. Then you can access the Windows drive from Linux. You might have to install an NTFS driver first, and you will definitely need to configure Windows to shut down properly instead of secretly hibernating, because that leaves the filesystem in a weird state and Linux won't be able to open it.

    • If you don't have a spare SSD you can still do the same trick by shrinking the Windows/NTFS filesystem and installing Linux in the now-free space on the same drive. Among Sysadmins shrinking filesystems has a bad reputation because at least historically it could (rarely) fail and destroy all your data, so I would not recommend you do it but it is possible and in most cases it works without issues.

    Each of these comes with some risk - You might forget to copy over important files onto your thumb drive, or you might make a mistake in the Linux installer and accidentally delete Windows when you didn't mean to. That said you should already have a backup strategy, because your PC could also just spontaneously die and lose the data even if you do nothing. If you have backups and you've tested them to know that you really can restore all the files you care about, then even that first option stops looking very scary.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago*

    A plasma a icon pack works wonders for my eyes. A title bar change if I am feeling like going wild. Dark mode theme pefered.Only 'ricing' I always do is a few keybinds to not go insane, and then remove hot corners before I try to move a program between 2 screens. Standard has been pretty good since that single click files feature was changed.

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (1 child)
  • [–] 10 points 1 year ago

    Ownership is cool and customizing your stuff transforms it from something impersonal or commercial into something intimate, revealing, and special. I believe the world needs to rubberband a bit back away from factory made, hyper-commercialized, and unrepairable goods to the hand crafted and human creations we all long for in the utopian media we consume.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] [S] 2 points 1 year ago

    *intensely ricing

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago

    I just have a heavily customised and themed KDE setup that I've been updating and bringing with me from machine to machine over the years, I've even set up all relevant dotfiles on a syncthing sync so any changes I make are reflected between my desktop and laptop

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago

    i like a good galaxy/space wallpaper, done. files and folders accumulate as they will. a few functional things like one-click shutdown -h now // script. had to rip out a lot of distro cruft i don't need. xfce on ubuntu. set and forget. good practice doing reinstalls

  • source
  • load more comments
    view more: next β€Ί