top 100 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[โ€“] 118 points 1 year ago (12 children)

The other day I wrote I like snaps and shot more rope than Spiderman.

  • source
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • [โ€“] 53 points 1 year ago (11 children)

    Flatpak is amazing especially with storage being so cheap these days.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [โ€“] 3 points 1 year ago* (6 children)

    I just had an issue with the vscodium flatpak, been using it for two months with no issue in an online course, got to learning GUIs, import module, doesn't exist. I couldn't figure out why it wasn't there, installed three different python versions of it three different ways, still nothing. Couldn't even get vscodium to point to a different interpreter that I knew was there (yet it doesn't say it's not there, just that some things won't work). Still nothing. Three hours later, after trying everything I could think of, I realized that it was because I installed the flatpak version when it clicked that it worked in Geany and I didn't have python 3.13 in my repos, yet that was the only one I could see in vscodium.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [โ€“] 3 points 1 year ago (5 children)
  • [โ€“] 69 points 1 year ago* (13 children)

    Okay, so, this place IS filled with furries. Cool.

  • source
  • hideshow 13 child comments
  • [โ€“] 45 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Every online space is filled with furries, especially the most furry-hostile spaces!

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [โ€“] 9 points 1 year ago (6 children)

    Is putting phone in ass a furry thing?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [โ€“] 7 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    The depicted character has a snout and cat ears

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [โ€“] 61 points 1 year ago (5 children)

    Must your climax be fueled by our frustrations? Vibrators are cheap, you know.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [โ€“] 61 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    Must your climax be fueled by our frustrations?

    Maybe that's exactly what gets him off.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [โ€“] 35 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Frankly, this should be implemented with something like a combination of:

    https://github.com/QazCetelic/lemmy-know

    Lemmy Know (let me know) is a lightweight CLI application / Docker service that monitors Lemmy for reports on posts and comments and sends notification. These can be sent to a Discord channel with a webhook or as MQTT messages (schema), which is useful for more complex setups with e.g., Node-RED.

    https://www.home-assistant.io/

    Open source home automation that puts local control and privacy first. Powered by a worldwide community of tinkerers and DIY enthusiasts.

    https://www.home-assistant.io/integrations/mqtt/

    MQTT (aka MQ Telemetry Transport) is a machine-to-machine or โ€œInternet of Thingsโ€ connectivity protocol on top of TCP/IP. It allows extremely lightweight publish/subscribe messaging transport.

    https://github.com/DevelopmentalOctopus/ha-buttplug

    Buttplug.io Integration for Home Assistant

    https://intiface.com/central/

    Intifaceยฎ Central is an open-source, cross-platform application that acts as a hub for intimate haptics/sensor hardware access

    Some collection of hardware devices from:

    https://iostindex.com/?filter0Availability=Available,DIY&filter1Connection=Digital&filter2ButtplugSupport=4

    That'd permit for, say, having message events drive a state machine to control devices or something like that.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [โ€“] 46 points 1 year ago (6 children)

    I still don't get what you guys have against Windows. Bill Gates has done so much good for the world.

    (My body is ready.)

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [โ€“] -1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Bill Gates actually was pretty cool, it's windows after Bill Gates that's terrible. I can't say there was anything Bill Gates did that I didn't like, he was like the Gabe Newell of operating systems before steamdeck.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [โ€“] 4 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Put your phone on vibrate, etc...

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [โ€“] 2 points 1 year ago*

    I don't think this statement is controversial and besides I own sex toys lol.

    Bill Gates was actually cool. The only bad thing he ever did as far as I'm aware, was lock direct X into windows. He even spends all of his time now in charity work and funding science. I think he was a great guy. This is why windows used to be the best operating system. He was smart and not overly greedy. He didn't care for spyware or corporate espionage on citizens. Windows was a relatively open system. Not as open as Linux, but very open and good, and it had excellent tools and a really good user interface. Now windows is terrible, but this is after he left Microsoft.

  • source
  • parent
  • [โ€“] 45 points 1 year ago

    Please tell me your phone has a flared base?

  • source
  • [โ€“] 147 points 1 year ago (4 children)
  • [โ€“] 44 points 1 year ago

    I fully agree. I am a user with a bit of technical background, but not a lot of detailled knowledge about the inner workings of an operating system (i know boolean logic and basic programming structures - in Pascal lol - from the 90's, what a transistor does and stuff, how to build my own PCs and handle filesystems and troubleshooting).

    With init scripts, i hit a wall pretty fast.

    With Systemd i know how to start, stop and configure services, and the suite built around it uses the same conventions everywhere, making the everyday life with Linux for someone like me so much easier and more transparent than ever before.

  • source
  • parent
  • [โ€“] 6 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Have you considered that just "reaping old process IDs" wasn't enough responsibility for an init daemon on a secure, robust system? That maybe it should be protecting other parts of the system and tracking the liveness of a desired service?

    What is the benefit of specifically doing that in init?

    If I see an argument like this then I can only assume the interlocutor doesn't do software engineering.

    Its more likely that the user simply has simple needs like running stuff at startup which any init system can do and doesn't see as much benefits as poster.

    Also who loves systemd-resolved?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [โ€“] 12 points 1 year ago

    Being able to assign a nameserver per interface with a domain wildcard is a fucking godsend. I use it every day with a hook script because my job uses some private domains but I don't want to send my entire DNS history through the VPN. Now ~job.com goes to tun0 and that's the end of it.

    systemd-resolved is not perfect but with libnss's overly rigid nature the only alternative for my use-case would be to recreate similar functionality to resolved with dnsmasq โ€“ which is just objectively worse especially when you want to use DHCP sometimes but not always. Why reinvent the wheel? resolved does its job and does it well. I had some issues with it a few years ago but have been using it for the past couple years without complaint.

  • source
  • parent
  • [โ€“] 11 points 1 year ago

    What is the benefit of specifically doing that in init?

    What's the alternative?

    Also who loves systemd-resolved?

    I don't think I will ever love anything DNS-related, but it's still the best solution I've used for name resolution on a system with many interfaces.

  • source
  • parent
  • [โ€“] 31 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

    I just like being able to use things I learn across Ubuntu, Debian, Arch and RHEL.

    Also prefixing a command with systemd-cat and having the logs go to the journal is pretty nice. Then I don't have to worry about rotating them.

  • source
  • [โ€“] 30 points 1 year ago (5 children)

    may i ask you to kindly provide the source of this image?

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [โ€“] 21 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    frenky_hw, here's the specific image: twitter (hopefully it is, twitter doesn't work for me rn)

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [โ€“] 22 points 1 year ago (2 children)
  • [โ€“] 26 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    She wants the system's D. ๐Ÿ˜

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [โ€“] 24 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

    Systemd is fine.

    Journald is fine.

    But someone pass me a mace I can beat systemd-resolved and systemd-logind to death with

    EDIT: Oh come on

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • I dislike systemd less than I dislike sysvinit, so it has that going for it.

  • source
  • [โ€“] 87 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    Systemd is the greatest innovation that Linux has ever seen bar none.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [โ€“] 43 points 1 year ago

    Since I started actually doing system administration and actually interacting directly with SystemD all of the hate for it I'd soaked up from enthusiast forums melted away. I've never used any of the other init systems so maybe I'm missing out, but I do appreciate SystemD for what it does

  • source
  • parent
  • i use mint btw

  • source
  • I don't know if I like how you're characterizing furries. Not all of us do this, and I don't do it... often.

  • source
  • [โ€“] 15 points 1 year ago

    Username checks out

  • source
  • [โ€“] 38 points 1 year ago (20 children)

    I don't get the systemd hate. The most common complaint I see is that it's too bloated, but Arch uses it, so what gives? Is it just that people dislike change? Like Wayland hate (not Wayland frustration)?

  • source
  • hideshow 20 child comments
  • [โ€“] 15 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 child)

    Generally I see a few:

    • People wanting the highly deterministic, but slower behavior of the rc scripts.
    • People liking the fact that the rc startup was generally almost entirely defined in plain script files
    • Some folks criticizing certain opinionated things in systemd, as systemd delves deeper into things like capabilities and users.
    • Systemd can sometimes be a bit weird about how it does/does not capture stdout/stderr as one might guess in some situations.
    • Some folks not liking the journald angle of binary-only files

    Mainly the last point is the only one I personally find potentially aggravating, but since I never really am in a broken system without journalctl I'm not too bothered by it. I have saved myself some effort thanks to systemd including stuff that the daemons used to provide for themselves.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [โ€“] 13 points 1 year ago*

    People wanting the highly deterministic, but slower behavior of the rc scripts.

    This is literally it for me. I got to work on an alpine system and it was like a breath of fresh air - I could edit the service script files directly. So easy, so little abstraction

  • source
  • parent
  • [โ€“] 15 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    I'm more frustrated with GNOME devs sabotaging Wayland.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] 14 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (7 children)
  • and all distros jumped into the honeypot

    As a filthy casual this is the most distressing part.

    Iโ€™ve observed the situation shift in just a few years from

    โ€œWinter Systemd is comingโ€

    To

    โ€œWinter Systemd is here, itโ€™s everywhere, and i hate itโ€

  • source
  • parent
  • [โ€“] 14 points 1 year ago (6 children)

    So people hate on systemd because they interpret it as an init system thats gone too far and has thus violated the unix principle. in reality systemd is an entire suite of tools based around a very feature rich and robust service management suite that also includes an init system. there is something to be said about the Linux ecosystem's reliance on systemd, but there are no comparable tools. this is why Arch uses systemd. if you dont want to use systemd, you can use distros like Arco Linux; however currently Gnome no longer works on Arco

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [โ€“] 14 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

    Part of the problem with it is that it is very difficult not to use it, for instance if your code uses dbus, that makes systemd a dependency and almost all of the tools are like this. Want to use alternate software with systemd init? A-OK! want to use systemd tools without systemd init? Too bad! This inter-dependence is what I think makes it break the unix philosophy, its components dont like to be replaced or used outside of the "intended" environment of systemd init, keeping it from being replaced without breakage on lot of systems.

    On my install for instance, systemd is roped in by xdg-user-dirs (and hence steam), flatpak, fcitx5, and cups. And that is just a few. So the init system isnt a problem to me, the lack of drop-in replacements for its suite of tools is.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [โ€“] 8 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    I think the biggest problem is that developing each other underlying subsystems without the rest is a hassle. As such no one has come up with a non-systemd dbus replacement. But there is a lot that can be replaced. There are some systemd services i just turn off immediately woth new installs and use something else because they're such dogshit (looking at you resolved).

    god i fucking hate systemd-resolved

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [โ€“] 5 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    +1 on systemd-resolved. dumpster fire of horribleness. i dont mind 99% of systemd subsystems, but this one tips me over the edge, hard.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [โ€“] 4 points 1 year ago

    it pisses me off so much. what do you mean theres no way to set the priority of nameservers or to force them to be resolved in a specific order? no i don't want a public nameserver thats only there as backup to take precedence over my local nameserver thats necessary for kerberos to work!

  • source
  • parent
  • [โ€“] 12 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Systemd has simplified my life on a few occasions, and it seems to be reliable from what I can tell. At the end of the day if I can get the OS to do what I want in a relatively simple matter, that's all I care about.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [โ€“] 12 points 1 year ago

    Well, that's one way to "use" systemd, I guess.

  • source
  • [โ€“] 22 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Listen, we've all done it.

    We all have bash or fish or zsh aliases to do it in command.

    We all love the feeling of a pulsing phone in our asses.

    But we don't talk about it.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [โ€“] 11 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    SystemD is that like ntoskrnl.exe?

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [โ€“] 11 points 1 year ago
    [โ€“] 11 points 1 year ago*

    I don't know what systemd is but this is pretty much how I picture all linux users.

  • source
  • [โ€“] 10 points 1 year ago

    And then the phone exploded.

  • source
  • [โ€“] 10 points 1 year ago

    Well, now I do.

  • source
  • [โ€“] 10 points 1 year ago

    Have one extra buzz from me as well. Screw RedHat and everything it does.

  • source
  • load more comments
    view more: next โ€บ