Wakanda is a monarchist enthnostate that tortures outsiders and even shows outright hostility to those helping them. Their leadership is determined by the most violent among them. And this society is presented a utopia.
I fucking hate these movies.
Wakanda is a monarchist enthnostate that tortures outsiders and even shows outright hostility to those helping them. Their leadership is determined by the most violent among them. And this society is presented a utopia.
I fucking hate these movies.
JK Rowling
No, Joanne!
I.e., I understand she greatly prefers (absolutely detests) being addressed that way. :D
Her opinions are old school mainstream. She's against the culture shift and if she existed decades ago, she's be more openly racist rather then transphobic.
Rowling likes to hang out with Nazis because they agree on trans rights and that's more important to her than anything else
"Alternative Facts" and opinions that do not correlate with reality (like the "opinion" that trans people or any other vulnerable group are in any way lesser beings or do not have the right to exist) are either mental derangement or straight up lies. and these lies are poisonous for communities and lead to to prejudice and violence, so they have to be called out and stopped whenever possible.
Just like yours.
Lol bro wtf
Nobody that starts to reply with WTF and LOL ever makes it worthwhile point.
Who gives a fuck if JK Rowling has a less than enlightened view on trans people? Like other than a passing fuck you on that JK rowling, is that what's really important here?
If money and fame didn't equate political influence, then yeah, no-one would give a fuck about her personal opinions.
As it is though, she's a billionaire who has helped fund and push through anti-trans (bathroom) legislation in the UK.
JK Rowling backs protest over Scottish gender bill
I read her posts about the issue and didn't find them in and of themselves that problematic if that was just some person's view. But, again, she's an influential billionaire who wants to push through laws which actively endanger trans people.

I still like Harry Potter though, but I'm not gonna fund it in any way. And haven't, for like 20 years.
I do not know all the ins and outs, I do know she also opposed Scotland going for Independence which I think was a big mistake for them not to do. She obviously does not have the best opinions or analysis. Still though I think the reaction to her has been outsized to the amount of influence she would have had if not for being constantly attacked.
These hedge fund douchebags quietly fund this stuff and cause way more damage than she does without mention for instance.
There are no shortage of villains, and she is rather small potatoes. Also though it throws people into the arms of the far right over attacking a popular persona. She would not be meeting with Far Right figures or sponsoring legislation if not for an outsized vicious attack against her shitty opinions.
She would not be meeting with Far Right figures or sponsoring legislation if not for an outsized vicious attack against her shitty opinions.

Except worse because unlike the person in the comic, JKR actually has a lot of capital and influence.
There are no shortage of villains, and she is rather small potatoes.
Fuck and deride them all, don't be a slouch, don't turn a blind eye.
She would not be meeting with Far Right figures or sponsoring legislation if not for an outsized vicious attack against her shitty opinions.
"It's their fault that I hate them and actively fund legislation to make their existence harder and more dangerous. THEIR fault!"
Oh cmon you're not even trying, Hector.
One of my points was that she would not be so hard on the issue if she wasn't attacked so hard on the issue, outside the text for what she said. She originally said she didn't think trans women were women. While a shitty thing to say it is hardly deserving of the tidal wave of vitriol she received, obviously that's going to throw any person into the arms of those that would agree with them. I do not know all the ins and outs I do not follow entertainment news but she was over attacked while those actually pushing the anti-trans stuff went by unattacked. Throwing her into the arms of those that actually pushed the stuff to defend her.
She's bringing her opinions to parliament and using them to kill people
What do you mean?
How do I hire you to provide this as a 24/7 service.
That is a good picture, I like that, I do not see how it fits here. Still is great though.
I think it references the term "sealioning," which means: someone on the internet who pops up, like a sealion, into an argument. He says, "BUT WHAT ABOUT XYZ?" which starts everyone responding and debating. But the sealion never continues the conversation. He was just there to disrupt.
She’s literally been denying the Holocaust killed trans people. She funded a court case that made it so that were I live in the UK, it would be illegal for me to piss in any public restroom.
That’s like saying David Irving was “viciously attacked for having opinions out of the mainstream.”
She is not defending herself. She is attacking. She is funding hate groups with money.
Fuck Joanne and her stupid wizard world. It’s all built on ideas of imperialism apologia anyway
I’ve had a couple friends sprout bs like this.
What I’ve done with them is I ask them to check her twitter out with me. If more than 7 of her most recent 10 tweets at any time aren’t anti trans bs I’ll agree with them that she’s defending herself.
I’m gonna invite you to whenever you see this message go on her twitter and count. Then come back and tell me if she’s just defending herself or if she made it a huge part of her personality hating a minority.
Well the funny part is that most of the "heroes" they sell are not really heroes, just defenders of a status quo america that never really existed
See also: “Marvel Defenders of The Status Quo” (2022-06-22) by Pop Culture Detective.
Zemo did nothing wrong.
Zemo literally caused trillions of sentient beings all around the universe to get erased out of existence by fragmenting the Avengers.
He did not know Thanos was a thing.
Does it matter? Petty revenge still caused trillions of deaths. Of course, hindsight is 20/20, but I still think he would still have done it even if he knew about Thanos.
Yeah, it does mater. I don't see why he would see Thanos as anybody different then any of the heroes. The biggest genocide ever with a chance of Thanos surviving and living a life of peace and comfort on a far away planet? Plus it does not solve the issues because in all that chaos basically delivers the world to the most powerful.
If they had done that it won't be for character reasons, just another attempt to tell the peasants that the establishment is important for 'safety'
It reminds me of a meme I recently saw of a preacher in front of a bunch of Indians, and he says "Before we came, you worshipped the SUN!"
And one of the Indians says "Dude, the sun is real."
He has a point. It's ironic that the only piece of "evidence" most religions have is a book written by humans.
Any belief in the sun/moon/stars/whatever.... At least you can point and say, there it is.
But Christianity is normal and not crazy at all, and believing in Ra is the crazy thing.... Sure. Yeah.
I think it's all nuts. But whatever.
the only piece of “evidence” most religions have is a book written by humans.
Evangelism typically involves more than just a book. There's inevitably some amount of mysticism - faith healing, weather events that turn the tide of a pitched battle, communing with the dead, miraculous survival stories, straight up stage magic.
Any belief in the sun/moon/stars/whatever… At least you can point and say, there it is.
There's inevitably some kind of reverse causation in these faiths. Humans are constantly asserting they can manipulate the heavens with ritual and sacrifice.
You won't find me coming to the defense of either large structured religions nor to the defense of the sun god, or his celestial counterparts.
It's all Hocus pokus.
For less insane religions and catholicism, they have centuries of philosophy and reinterpretation to fit new societal contexts to look back on.
The only piece of evidence we have for a lot of things is a book written by humans
a lot of things.
🤔
Science doesn't work that way. There's provable and repeatable experiments and proofs that you can independently verify.
Last time I checked most things that aren't metaphysical (like philosophy), have some relationship with science, and therefore, only requires that you go through the motions to prove it yourself by creating your own reproduction of an test/experiment/proof....
Science only works for scientific claims. It cannot prove that my great grandfather was in a prisoner of war camp.
Last time I checked, people didn't found their core belief system around whether prisoners of war existed or not.
Even so, there's tangible proof of him being there, by his physical body being there, when it happened. This can be proven by science. Obviously that's not able to be proven after he was released from the camp, and yes, we have to take the scribbles on a page to know it happened.
I will give you that.
For anything that is a universal truth, like gravity, chemistry, the properties of light, electricity, and all the principles behind electronics engineering, etc.... All of that is provable. Lived experiences, history, sure. We have to accept that what we're reading is true or not. But that's a choice.
Science, which defines pretty much everything that's happening, why is happening, and how it can happen, is immutable.
The idea of "God" has no basis more reliable than someone's report of it happening. For something so universal/omnipotent, the fact that the only "evidence" that it happened is in a book, yet this God has a plan for you right now, but you can't know it because God won't tell you, nor do anything outside of what physics/Science says can/will happen, isn't evidence of the existence of such a deity, regardless of what someone calls "God".
All other things that exist, the forces that act on those things, and all of the possible outcomes of that thing existing can be proven by science. God cannot be proven, by science or otherwise.
Even history, to some extent, can be proven, because the evidence still exists. You can visit auschwitz, and see where history happened from WW2. You can see the damage from bombs and gunfire in structures that were standing when conflicts happened. There's still evidence for a lot of that. And again, the same cannot be said for any book about any deity.
"Yeah well, my god is invisible!"
"Dude, you can't look at ours or you'll burn your eyes out."
Well, yeah, this is like saying Santa Claus isn’t real lol
Does Santa Clus support genocides?
Santa has an ethnicly homogenous slave workforce trapped in a secret location facing sub-zero work conditions and runs a global child surveillance system supporting an opaque punishment algorithm.
There is no way he's a good guy.
Dumbledore is Santa Claus?
Both are old, bearded, and project a friendly, wise-grandfather image.
Both lead a closed community with strict hierarchies.
Both have elf slave labor.
Both run surveillance operations: Dumbledore has the portraits, Fawkes, the Marauder’s Map (by proxy), and Santa has the Naughty-or-Nice list.
Both maintain a mystique that disguises how much control they actually wield.
However, I still think Santa is more likely to be evil.
The elves should unionize. Let's see that fat-ass Santa make a few billion gifts on his own.
For anyone who hasn't seen it, give David sedaris' "6-8 black men a listen."
Not to my knowledge, but that fucker, the Easter Bunny, Leprechauns, and Tooth Fairy all support/practice breaking and entering!
Basically every mainstream media is "We can't kill the villain"
opens history book
LMAO
And then there is Andor... 
Bill Burr shot first!
Bill Burr shot only.
And speaking of Burr, I'm happy to hear he doesn't sell out to the MAGA bastards and will call out their bullshit.
Burr continues Carlin’s legacy of walking around with both middle fingers up to society, he’s one of the few left I trust would take a deep inhale before shouting FUCK YOU! straight into the face of the big mango if they met
Fuck you, piece of shit one bridge having city guy who bankrupted a casino
This is why I loved the scene in F is for Family when Frank responds to the 'be the bigger and better person and let go' by straight up punching and knocking his abusive elderly dad after meeting up with him instead of burying the trauma further.
People are looking for a left wing Rogan. But I think we have that with guys like Bur
Bill Burr is not left. He's a true centrist. The problem with America is that the right is so far right anyone left of them is considered left.
The Gatekeepers on any sort of left moderation would have canceled the left wing Joe Rogan long before he can make a point.
Bad faith, and or lazy, mean, etc rolled into online communities where anyone disagreeing with the consensus is labeled a bigot in bad faith and misunderstood on purpose...
Our progressive champions, lazily misunderstanding what the community of bad faith pricks suggests. Great plan to take back america under that fine structure. It has worked so well until now! /s
top 92 comments