I wasn't aware that I was talking to a lawyer, apologies

A backup is a "break in case of emergency or unforeseen circumstance," a plan-b if you will. The last time I checked, destroying something on purpose is neither accidental nor unforseen.

Yes, the backup still exists. What is also true is that you gave your original away or destroyed it intentionally, as it is in this case, so you lose the right to the backup.

Please explain

Except that TDK is fiction, so the billionaire has morals

And I've also been explaining to people that destroying the book means losing the rights to the contents of said book for an entire year. Yet, here we are

Weird how when I buy a book, the "license" for the content is tied to the physical object, but when a company destroys the book and OCRs it, it's perfectly ok

I honestly don't know more than that, sorry

Oh, noses are involved all right

I can't say it better than the person working on it

https://github.com/uBlockOrigin/uBOL-home/wiki/Frequently-asked-questions-(FAQ)#filtering-capabilities-which-cant-be-ported-to-mv3

On the off chance that you're not being sarcastic: blocking the other crap like trackers

I don't have time to read this now, but I wanted to offer you thanks for reproducing the text in the body of the post instead of a long screenshot