top 94 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[+] 124 points 1 year ago (2 children)
  • [–] 50 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Classic: https://www.youtube.com/shorts/0dKrUE_O0VE

    The Katy cost a mere $7 billion and it's still often a glorified parking lot. It's got less throughput than a single train for moving people, but I'm sure adding another lane will fix it. https://www.youtube.com/shorts/o-F-7Yc-A8U

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 50 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    It's the bike lanes! 😡 /s

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [+] 84 points 1 year ago (16 children)
  • [–] 48 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

    I've looked it up and the Katy Freeway on the picture has an average of 219 000 vehiclra using it per day. Let's be very generous and assume an average of 1.5 person in each car, so around 329 000 people are moved each day thanks to this highway.

    A single metro line or two tramway line moves more people per day than that.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 23 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Its crazy. At its widest it has 26 lanes. It amazes me that they just kept widening it, instead of thinking "We've added 5 lanes, we should probably find an alternative solution".

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    In the city where that exists, they really isn't much else that's viable. Decades of bad urban planning mean that comprehensive public transportation is not cost-effective in that area. And "not cost-effective" doesn't just mean "expensive", it means "would cost an order of magnitude more than the city budget". So the only real solution for them in the short term is to build the world's most ridiculous laughingstock of a road.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago

    Key phrase being "short term" - nobody seems to build with a 20+ year plan to improve the city in America, whereas in European cities every time I visit one I haven't been to in a decade, I usually notice I'm reaping the benefits of major infrastructure improvements which take decades to plan and build. Short term, selfish (what will get me elected again, or what will pay me the biggest bonus) thinking, and corruption, is what keeps American cities shitty

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 16 points 1 year ago (9 children)
  • [–] 15 points 1 year ago (8 children)

    people argue that japan has an easier time doing public transport because it's a slim island that's roughly linear from north to south, so it's easy to serve it by one public transport line.

    But the same is true for the US, where most people live either on the east coast or on the west coast. You basically have two slim, linear areas that can be served by 1 line of public transport each.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] [S] 11 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    It's even worse in Canada where 50% of the population literally lives in a straight line in Ontario/Quebec

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    And we've been "studying" high speed rail in that corridor for roughly 40 years now. One of these days we'll build it, I swear!

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • I think the big problem with Canada, the US, the UK, and other former British colonies is that the legal system gives private property owners a lot of rights.

    In places like France or China the government can just say “we’re building this” without a lot of public input. But the second CA put out their high speed rail proposal it was met with hundreds of lawsuits over eminent domain.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    Another problem is that the US has stupidly strong private property rights. Everyone whose land is going to need to be confiscated to build the railroad tracks will try to bilk the high-speed rail authority out of every dollar they can, and because the US has a very strong civil court system which strict procedural law, it only costs a landowner a few thousand dollars to cause millions of dollars worth of legal headaches for the rail authority

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    isn't that also true for highways?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    The difference is that most highways were built in the past before such things like environmental studies were required and before many of the attack vectors used by property owners and other obstructionist parties to block construction were discovered or created. The US no longer builds major roadways, and merely widens existing ones, which in many cases do not require more land to be requisitioned.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (1 child)

    interesting. here's a short reminder that railway tracks existed before highways (even before combustion engines in general). it's sad that they were neglected so much. maybe they can be built directly adjacent to existing highways? at least along the coastlines ...

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago

    This idea has been adopted to some degree. The Brightline West high-speed rail project (in construction since 2024, planned to open 2028) connecting Las Vegas with Los Angeles uses existing land along the existing I-15 expressway, which is extremely congested.

    I believe it was during the presidency of Ronald Reagan that private rail operators were relieved of service requirements for passenger trains, as long as the companies maintained the tracks and gave priority to passenger trains operated by Amtrak, the American state rail operator.

    The companies have completely neglected the tracks and many are in poor condition from heavy use by freight trains, and as a result, maximum speeds have been drastically lowered to maintain a level of safety. Many ordinary trains in the US run at around 80-90 km/h, which is miserably slow.

    In addition, Amtrak trains are supposed to be able to overtake slower freight trains by using splits in the track (where a section of track splits into two temporarily, the slower train taking one side and the faster train taking the other to pass it). However, as freight rail operators have realised, the number of engineers and conductors needed to run the trains is directly proportional to the number of locomotives, and thus they prefer running fewer, longer, trains than many shorter ones. As a result, freight trains are unbelievably long, some are a good few kilometres in length, which is longer than the entire sections of split track, making such sections worthless as it is impossible to use them to bypass the slower trains.

    Where Amtrak has complete control of the tracks, such as in the northeast, service is comparable to European rail providers. For example the Acela service, which runs between Washington (DC) and Boston with stops at Baltimore, New York City, and Philadelphia. There are 20 trains per day and it reaches a top speed of around 250 km/h. The total journey takes 6.75 hours and travels 735 km (12 stops) meaning the average speed is a comfortable 109 km/h.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 13 points 1 year ago*

    It's sprawl. Building up costs too much via some combination of building taxes, NIMBYs, and construction overhead, so people build out instead. Building out means more and more miles of infrastructure (Roads, water, electric, natural gas, signs, gas stations, etc., etc.) per capita.

    Then when the people in the sprawled-out suburbs want to visit the city centers anyway, because that's where jobs and shopping inevitably are (People live where people live), they have to build massive roads to get in and out.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 74 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    "Can I sit in the recliner at work?"

    "No. You have to leave it outside so that poor people can't have apartments there."

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 57 points 1 year ago (11 children)

    How did this happen?

    Convenience and Capitalism, what a wild duet!

  • source
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] 24 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    And it’s not even convenient…unless you purposefully destroy existing infrastructure and aggressively promote individualism in your society such that nobody has any other real choice! Walking distance? Never heard of her.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Yeah whats actually convenient is being able to step out your home, jump into the tram, read the newspaper for 15 minutes, jump out and have teleported to work.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago

    And also I can walk 5min to grocery store or 10min to a haircut, I can have a drink and don’t need to spend Uber money to get home, all travel time is the same because there’s no such thing as rush hour on a metro or with a bicycle(actually with the metro it’s faster because it comes more frequently at those times), etc.. It’s all winning, basically.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Trains are much more convenient.

    This one is fully on capitalism.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (1 child)

    Trains are convenient until you want to go somewhere without rails :( which I guess could be solved with more rails...

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 16 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    America has LUNGS and ARTERIES whereas
    Europe has mere wimpy BRONCHIOLES and CAPILLARIES

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Those arteries are pretty congested, cars are ld cholesterol, trains are hd cholesterol, and we are eating a diet of trans fat up in here.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 14 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    It's my comfort box. Everyone is subject to my comfort box.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 1 year ago* (1 child)

    I can have the comfort box with the high end everything or the misery box that mostly functions as I'm broiled alive sitting in traffic. But we're all stuck on the same Turnpike together. It isn't as though I have an alternative to the twelve lane interchange.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 26 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Linking the page for my favorite hair pulling topic on traffic: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Induced_demand

    By hyper subsidizing car road infrastructure we make it almost impossible to use anything else and competing infrastructure (trains, planes, seperated bus traffic) appears more expensive by contrast forcing more people to use cars.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 1 year ago

    We all now how

  • source
  • [–] 9 points 1 year ago (5 children)

    What if we made two separate sections that you could add or remove? Even better, let's add a special vehicle to the front, with a trained driver. To aid the driver; rails. Oh, more people want to join? Let's add a hitch system to the front and back of each "car" so we can add as many as we want.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    Why did my brain go to motorcycle sidecar when you said a separate section you can remove? But yeah trains are the correct solution, this is coming from someone who loves his 01 Tacoma.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Yo, not bad.

    Check it; double rail.. side by side connectable trains. Somehow.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    That's a lot of lanes. I've never been anywhere more than like, 10 wide and that's counting both ways, and that's in the city.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 1 year ago

    What I learned in Texas is that almost everything is a toll road too. So you have to pay to use the roads each time.

  • source
  • [+] 7 points 1 year ago (1 child)
    [–] 14 points 1 year ago (14 children)

    Modern American society, mind you

  • source
  • hideshow 14 child comments
  • [–] 34 points 1 year ago (10 children)

    Even though the USA is clearly the worst, still almost all countries have about twice as many people driving as taking other forms of transit, and in many more, the majority. So the image applies to the majority of people in most countries.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Even the Netherlands. poster child of biking 😔

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    I mean, 40% of the population biking to work is nothing to sneeze at, compared to the US's 6-or-so %

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago

    It's huge, but it's still fewer bicyclists than car users. But, at 40% it means that bicyclists have a stake in every decision being made, and people will listen to them. Car drivers will probably still win more than their fair share of contests, but at least they're not unopposed.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    I wish the statistic include motorcycle/moped, then show the statistic from Asian country like Taiwan or Philippines or Malaysia, car and motorcycle have equal share on the road yet it still a fucking mess here(at least in Malaysia).

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago

    And for most of the countries that don't have a lot of cars, it's not because they've decided to invest in public transit and bike lanes, it's that people are poor and can't yet afford cars. Like, India and Brazil aren't places where people love public transit, they're poor.

    What happened to China is likely going to happen to them as they get richer. Even if the world switches over to electric vehicles that's still vast resources plowed into massively inefficient sofas on wheels.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago

    Very anecdotal so feel free to disregard, but I've traveled across the whole Europe and haven't seen anything like that in the picture.

    Maybe the closest thing was a toll gateway somewhere in France where road widened up to about 20 booths. But then it immediately narrowed back to three.

  • source
  • parent
  • almost all countries have about twice as many people driving

    No country except the US, according to your own graphic. 67% or more of "Own car" is the criterion.
    Unless, of course, by "driving" you also mean motorbikes, boats etc. and there's a sizable portion of these in some countries. The graphic doesn't show that.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    With all those luxuries, why not just live in this thing and avoid rent?

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 14 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    Everybody wants a back yard, nobody wants buses or trains

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 22 points 1 year ago

    I don't want a back yard. What I want is the noise isolation and the feeling of safety and personal space. I also like having the ability to use that space for personal projects if I want to.

    I have seen condos and other urban spaces that are well-built enough to provide the same benefits that I see from a back yard. But they're very expensive.

    My basic point is that people sometimes forget what they really want, and instead focus on something that has given them those benefits.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 15 points 1 year ago

    I wouldn't mind living in an apartment building, so long as it's equally co-owned by the people who live in it, and by nobody who doesn't. And that it has a green space on the property for recreation and a community garden.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 9 points 1 year ago

    I don't want a backyard, I want a park within walking distance.

    I don't want an expensive hunk of steel and plastic, I want a train that picks up every ten minutes.

    I know a large number of people who feel the same way. But none of them have billions of dollars to lobby my mayor or governor or President. Hell, even when we do get a bit of outright bribery to bend things our way, a single petty asshole can foul the whole project.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 8 points 1 year ago (7 children)

    Our entire continent has been given almost wholey over to the automobile, and despite it being a wasteful, ultra expensive, and inefficient way of transporting people and goods, because of entrenched interests we cannot well improve on it with even interstate freight and passenger rail being opposed by oil companies and car companies and probably Road repair companies and everyone else.

    A real popular government would rally the population to overcome those entrenched interests and make a viable Interstate freight and passenger rail, it will not get any easier in time and it has to be done.

    It would be a proper use of borrowed money as it would pay for itself many times over and lower the cost of living and doing business and make the us more competitive.

    Without needing automobiles we could have higher standards of living with vastly lower expenditures.

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 1 year ago* (6 children)

    This biggest argument i see is people somehow think things like transit will remove their freedom of mobility, when in reality it vastly improves mobility, especially for those who can't or don't want to drive.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

    It blows Americans minds when they hear about how people go skiing in Switzerland, taking public transit from their front door to the foot of the ski hills.

    On the way back, they can warm up with a gluhwein before taking public transit back. No worries about driving drunk since they're not driving.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Buts it not possible to play any sports without the dodge ram 3500 extra cab mega box extra large big horn edition.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago

    The dodge ram commercial shows some guy driving offroad, smashing through snow, then climbing out and going skiing.

    Some sucker buys the truck and spends 3 hours stuck in traffic slowly driving to the ski hill with his skis in the back.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago

    My grandmother was trapped inside her house for years at the end of her life. All she could do was wait for people to visit her because she couldn't drive.

    When I lived in a small city in Japan, if I went out during the day, there were ancient people all over the place who had taken the bus into town.

    Anybody who would say that the American way of throwing elderly people to the wolves is better... Well, anyone who says that is just an inhuman monster, aren't they?

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago

    Relying on the automobile has made us exceptionally vulnerable. At any time our only means of achieving an income can be removed. We spend magnitudes more money than we could otherwise and everything from building infrastructure to support so many cars everywhere, to the cost of cars and repairs, too the ability of others to take that away from us at a moment's notice.

    With designed cities we could have housing on a direct line to our business sectors on a public transit, which would free up a substantial portion of our income, while if the housing was constructed intelligently and fairly we would free up the better part of half of our costs to live.

    Also remote work could Free People from the commuting nightmare in White Collar work.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago

    "Cars are freedom!" ... so long as you register it with the government, insure it with a private insurance company, carry a photo ID from the government. Where a train you just pay and get on, or a bike you just ride.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago

    Hey at least you also wind up doing your job mostly over the Internet with people that aren't anywhere near your office when you get there.

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago*

    How is that picture 1200x0, but I can see it?

    Edit:oh wait they just named it that. I'm not always smart.

  • source
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›