Previously:

top 98 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 123 points 1 year ago (1 child)

Are these the Epstein files?! 😶

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 360 points 1 year ago (24 children)

    It's a good representation of this new regime. Tear down nature and replace it with a parking lot.

  • source
  • hideshow 24 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 1 year ago (2 children)
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • [–] 30 points 1 year ago (19 children)

    A manicured grass lawn is not nature

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 19 child comments
  • [–] 182 points 1 year ago* (6 children)

    It's more nature than what's there now

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [+] -84 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (5 children)

    Stone isn't nature? Looks like natural stone to me. It's ugly AF but both are artifical and have little to do with nature.

    Edit: it's just a joke guys, don't take it too seriously lol

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 28 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    Nothing is synthetic it's all made of stuff we have here on earth!

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 35 points 1 year ago (9 children)

    I guess a concrete lot is better in your opinion.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [+] -6 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    It doesn't require constant watering and fertilizer that leeches into ground water just so you can have perfectly green 2" tall grass fully exposed to the sun that doesn't want to live there and call it "nature".

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 61 points 1 year ago

    If you're going to get nitpicky we could focus on how much heat the concrete retains vs plant life which can absorb and use the energy. All the people with concrete or rock yards around here are super hot, my dog and I have to run by in the summer. Paving vast surfaces is a poor alternative to landscaping. The soil underneath will dry and the animals, insects, microflora, etc will all be forced out and that part of the earth will just be dead.

    But really it just looks dumb and Jackie planted some of those trees.

  • source
  • parent
  • [+] -19 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    Yeah, for this space that is frequently used to host people or filled with chairs for a press conference, it is better and makes more sense.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 1 year ago

    The problem is, have you ever noticed how much hotter you are in a parking lot on a warm day than when you are in a park? Well, now those events are happening on a parking lot and not a park. Furniture can be designed to work on turf, or temporary fixtures could be put in place to mitigate the drawbacks of furniture on lawns, but the absorbed and reflected heat will be hard to get rid of. Hopefully this area is small enough to not have a big impact on the temperature there.

    I honestly don't think it looks bad, but I suspect it's more for Trump to put his stamp on it than anything else, and to erase the efforts of others before him. And I suspect it will be more uncomfortable than it was before.

  • source
  • parent
  • [+] -11 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    I agree. I hate Trump as much as anyone else, but if a President I liked did this, it wouldn't be the end of the world.

    In principle, I don't mind if a space mainly used for events, with chairs placed there often, should be hardscape. It's not as if lawn can't be put back there in the future. Lawn isn't a heritage tree or rose shrub.

    To be fair though, the photo makes it look pretty huge as an expanse of paved area.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] 68 points 1 year ago

    There's your problem. All that grass makes for a terrible child sacrifice during their pedo parties. The blood soaks right in and you never get a chance to collect it for the Sangria mix.

  • source
  • [–] 56 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Complains windmills make Scotland ugly.

    Proceeds to pave over the Rose Garden.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 97 points 1 year ago (20 children)

    He’s like a rat gnawing on the wires of democracy and this is the visualization of his excrement. Fucking disgusting.

  • source
  • hideshow 20 child comments
  • [–] 65 points 1 year ago (16 children)

    If only someone could explain why this is happening.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 16 child comments
  • [–] 19 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    Yeah but the communists didn't manage it. Far right authoritarians like Putin, Bin Laden, and the heritage foundation did

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 25 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    What ideology they claim to believe in is inconsequential.

    Do you think of China as being actually communist?

    I don't.

    Russians managed it. No matter what -ism was or is in fashion.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Ok but it was a multinational front by a shared ideology. Sure Russia just wanted us weakened regardless of professed ideology, but there's a reason putin was more able than kruschev. Bin Laden played a huge role in this though. And the long standing American fascist movement wasn't being egged on by the 1950s Soviets.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 11 points 1 year ago

    Nonetheless, Trump is Putler's lapdog and thus Russia has done what Khrushchev said the Soviet Union would do.

    And to pretend like those are two completely distinct political entities would be bad-faith at best.

    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Links_between_Trump_associates_and_Russian_officials

    Allegedly Trump has been cultivated and recruited since 1977.

    Back then it was the Soviet Union. Back then Putin was working for KGB as an intelligence officer and did so for 16 years, before resigning when Soviet Union fell, to have a political career.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 7 points 1 year ago (10 children)

    I really don't think the funny shoe man from the 60's is to blame for this.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 19 points 1 year ago (9 children)

    He didn't say "I", he said "we". And the "we" in that sentence was Soviet Russia. Soviet Union is clearly no more, but modern day Russia has inherited a lot of policies and values from them.

    At which point do you think they just gave up on thinking the US as their enemy?

    Because there was a small conflict that went on for literally decades after Khrushchev's death.

    So idk why you're trying to pretend like "funny shoe man" was waging a personal war against the US when he was the leader of a world power?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (8 children)

    Because you posted him with no context. It wasn't clear you meant Russia.

    but modern day Russia has inherited a lot of policies and values from them.

    I'd disagree with that. They inherited autocracy, but it's not even a vaguely similar model of it. In a lot of ways current Russia is a backlash to the USSR, although they shoehorn communist stuff together with Tsarist stuff and everything else from even earlier to pretend they have some kind of ideology.

    They still see the West as enemies or at least competition, though, that's true.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Yeah modern Russia scrapped everything of value from the Soviets.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

    Well, they kept a few of the design bureaus, I guess.

    When their whole economic model was obviously failing, I think the West thought they'd give up on Marx, when in reality they just decided to become the bad guys from Marx.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago

    You're being downvoted because I think they think you're a Tankie - but as a Russian - you're 100% correct about the ideology bit.

    This image is from 2023. Everyone who has a brain and some grasp on historical truth should immediately find this deeply absurd, so let me explain.

    Imperial Russia and RSFSR (Russian Country in USSR) are two opposed entities who would sooner let Germans make gains on their territory than take men away from fighting each other, and if you think about it - it makes perfect sense, and is also quite literally what happened.

    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/February_Revolution https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Russian_Civil_War

    So why are the three flags together?

    Well, imo - Putler's Fascist Russia is nationalist first and foremost, which is inherently very right-wing, but of course a lot of their glory days were at least under the pretense of leftism, and plenty of Russian nationalists wish for Soviet revival, when in reality they'd be first in the gulags for being rightoids, or if for nothing else - optics.

    So putler has a choice, just memoryhole Russia at its most successful as RSFSR both in evil (imperialism, authoritarianism) and good ways (science, technology, welfare) and embrace Romanov lineage Revanchism, or attempt to work in the optics of the soviet union into the national imperial image.

    Unfortunately for everyone, Surkov, Dugin and the lot chose post-truth. The Russian "Federation" has no ideology, other than power and maintaining the economic and political capital of its oligarchs and their ability to steal from the Russian people and anyone else unfortunate enough to get in the way.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    no context. It wasn't clear you meant Russia.

    Uh, it's literally the First Secretary of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union from the time that he was in power.

    "No context"

    Fkin lol. You can't be serious?

    You'll probably disagree with Putler being wanted by the ICC for warcrimes as well? Or at least make some excuse for how he's not responsible or how the ICC or the UN are somehow the bad guys or smth?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

    Yeah, and I was wondering if this was a "commie democrats" thing. Russia isn't my first association, or even my second. He was even from Ukraine.

    You’ll probably disagree with Putler being wanted by the ICC for warcrimes as well? Or at least make some excuse for how he’s not responsible or how the ICC or the UN are somehow the bad guys or smth?

    No, Putin is shit and I hope he ends up in the Hague where he belongs.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (2 children)

    No, Putin is shit and I hope he ends up in the Hague where he belongs.

    Thank you for confirming that. I know it's a bitch when people assume shit, but you know, you can never know. So, thanks. Even if you are Russian. Or rather especially if you are. Like I doubt it, from context, but if you were.

    Khrushchev may have been originally Ukrainian, but that doesn't really mean that much.

    Who the fuck wouldn't associate Khrushchev with Russia or the Cold War in general? Who would be the "we" in that if not Soviet Russia? Stop writing in Bad Faith. And I capitalise that on purpose.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Because it's an incantation to you?

    I'd be inclined to respond and explain further, but I don't think learning and understanding is the point of this exchange anymore. Bye.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago

    Let me help you learn something. If I posted about a random person who know-one knows, saying something random, that would be "without context". However if I posted a picture of Obama saying "we will find Osama Bin Laden", you probably wouldn't say "there's no context we can't know who the 'we' is in that quote", would you?

    So I'm puzzled why you'd make such a bad faith argument over this. Did you know really not know who Khrushchev was?

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 10 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    My rats were pretty intelligent and they didn't shit where they ate or slept. And they weren't in the Epstein files. So this comparison doesn't fly at all.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 137 points 1 year ago

    They paved Paradise and put up a parking lot.

  • source
  • [–] 47 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    Between this and the ballroom it would be a minor blessing if Canada burnt the place down again.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 44 points 1 year ago (9 children)

    This and the ballroom are Trump trying to leave a permanent mark on the White House behind. If nothing else, he'll die of natural causes within the next decade, and he knows his name will be cursed from then on. If you have to call it "The Donald J Trump Ballroom", then he still has something.

  • source
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 16 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    I will make sure to always call it the "Fuck Donald J Trump Ballroom" in his memory

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    Rename the ballroom to whatever, but name the restrooms the "Donald J. Trump Shit and Piss Closets"

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 89 points 1 year ago (18 children)

    When this asshole finally dies or goes to jail (please), we might as well burn the place down and start over. You ain't ever getting the stench out the walls...

  • source
  • hideshow 18 child comments
  • [–] 57 points 1 year ago (10 children)

    Give Canada a call - we did it once before for you guys... 😏

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago (5 children)

    I'm not familiar what's the history there?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 14 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    War of 1812. They burned the White House.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 20 points 1 year ago (5 children)

    Outside the various shitty adjustments he's making now, we cannot forget something perhaps bigger. Because of him, an enemy state flag (the flag of the Confederacy) was flown in the White House.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago (4 children)
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    No. Though if I got a nickel for every time Trump is associated with the Confederate flag... it'd be a rich man.

    I was specifically speaking to the Jan. 6 intersection attack. https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/justice-department/kevin-seefried-confederate-flag-capitol-jan-6-sentenced-rcna69784

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 40 points 1 year ago

    Like a tacky outlet mall

  • source
  • [–] 40 points 1 year ago

    wierd amount of people coming out of the woodwork to defend the concrete pavement by trump.

  • source
  • [–] 38 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    what was once lush, green, and beautiful, is now a grey, ugly, boring looking stain.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 33 points 1 year ago

    "Pave paradise and put up a parking lot"

  • source
  • [–] 32 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

    Of all the things he's changed about the country, I bet something like this is what he cares about the most. I can just imagine the tantrum trump will throw when the next president* digs this up and returns it to grass, or better yet, an actual garden.

    * if we get another president.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 20 points 1 year ago

    Oh they are all petty twits.

    Regan pitched a fit and removed the solar panels Carter left on the roof when he left office. This is just more proof the regressive party has no taste.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    If there ever will be a next US president I expect him to first tear down that new gold wing, then to dig up this shit.

    Anything else can wait

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • [–] 27 points 1 year ago

    Let me guess… these were democrat, woke roses?

  • source
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›