top 71 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 24 points 1 year ago (1 child)

The cheapest sort of pride is national pride; for if a man is proud of his own nation, it argues that he has no qualities of his own of which he can be proud; otherwise he would not have recourse to those which he shares with so many millions of his fellowmen. The man who is endowed with important personal qualities will be only too ready to see clearly in what respects his own nation falls short, since their failings will be constantly before his eyes. But every miserable fool who has nothing at all of which he can be proud adopts, as a last resource, pride in the nation to which he belongs; he is ready and glad to defend all its faults and follies tooth and nail, thus reimbursing himself for his own inferiority.

Arthur Schopenhauer

It may a 200 year old quote, but the only thing that has changed is that we have since found even worse things to be proud of.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago*

    I am proud of my nation and its progressive, socialist nature, yet I am fully, and painfully so, aware of it’s shortcomings and problems.

    But despite the problems, it’s extremely hard for me not to feel pride for the way we handle things within and without, especially in comparison to the rest of the world. We’ve been consistently at the top of the most socially progressive charts of the world, having also been denoted the worlds happiest country for over 5 years in row, and so on.

    I do have my own prides, things I’m not ashamed to claim being very good at, and I do have a lot of very loud criticism against my nation too. But I remain overall proud just because we dare to be, against most odds, progressive and socialist.

    I would defend my country, even picking up arms, because the chances are, the invader will simply be worse. Lead to worse overall situation here. Anyone surpassing us on either social or progressive counts, would be almost certainly not invading anyone, let alone us.

    Maybe I am the fool the quote talks about, the good-at-nothing simpleton falling back to national pride for lack of any of my own. But I do not feel like one and I certainly have a lot more, explicitly outside the concept of a nation and this specific nation too, prides and accomplishments to be proud of.

    I don’t think national pride is all that bad. I think it can be reasonable if the nation is best at its class on things most important and dear to you. Of course most national pride around the world is rooted on shitty stuff, and most nationally pride people usually being neo-nazi assholes, yet I still remain steadfast in my opinion that it need not be so.

    It can be fine. I am sure of that.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 40 points 1 year ago

    In the long run it's dumb and cringe.

    Source: I'm American and old.

  • source
  • [–] 14 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    It's hard to comment on the flavors of national pride in nations other than the one I live in, but I think if you're an American patriot, you either 1) are proud of horrendous, immoral things, 2) are proud of a mythologized nation-state that stands for liberty and justice which never actually existed.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] -1 points 1 year ago

    Eh, I'm proud to be an American. But I also generally like the people around me, and when I think of "Americans", I think of my friends who I like. I'd also note that I'm pretty proud to be a Coloradan. Our state government kicks ass!

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 44 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    This is a good commentary on it:

    It's good to want to improve the world around you, which can be given a label of patriotism. Going too far down that road leads to lots of unhappiness, though.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 11 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    I have no idea who Doug Stanhope is but I like this quote:

    Nationalism does nothing but teach you to hate people you never met, and to take pride in accomplishments you had no part in.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 11 points 1 year ago

    Never seen it not be an unconvincing cover for racism during my lifetime.

  • source
  • [–] 10 points 1 year ago* (7 children)

    It's a coping mechanism that gives people who achieved nothing in their life something to brag about

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (6 children)

    Some of my life-achievements involved contributing to my nation.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (5 children)

    Good for you man, but in this case I guess that you're proud of yourself and in the achievements that helped the people around you.
    You don't have "second hand pride with extra narrative on top" from people that died long before you were born

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    You don’t have “second hand pride with extra narrative on top” from people that died long before you were born

    The individualists in this thread are saying:

    • Your personal conduct didn't form your nation
    • And personal conduct is the only valid source of pride
    • Therefore you can't be proud of your nation

    And I don't agree with the 2nd premise at all. People are social beings and there's lots of examples of collective pride.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    Collective pride is real and there are a lot examples of it, but it works with small sized groups and when it does it feels great. Because of course we're a social species, but our monkey brain is built around tribes and doesn't conceive whole nations. And that's why, for example, when I see people cheering for an athlete just because all their parents happened to fuck within the same imaginary lines, I find it really silly.

    But I know that's me, I have no problems with people who have a healthy national pride. I'm just saying I don't and never had.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (2 children)

    You're comparing two things:

    • Actually observed collective pride in nations

    • Pride in hypothetical tribal bands that may have never existed

    And saying the first is "silly" but the second is what we're built for.

    Understanding collective pride in its actual form is less silly than pushing into some dreamed-of past.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (1 child)

    When you say "pride in hypotetycal tribal bands that may have never existed" what do you mean? You don't believe that human beings evolved in tribes or don't believe the members of these tribes felt a sense of common well-being that we call "pride" which have helped our evolution?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago

    Various tribal structures have existed and still do (I'm a registered member of a clan, was clan secretary at one point) but Rousseau's bands are a fantasy with no archæological basis.

    I see to reason to speculate on history when we have collective pride visible in our daily experience. Especially not to say the former is valid and the really-experienced one isn't.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 8 points 1 year ago

    I believe true patriotism isn't just about loving your country, it's about holding it accountable to its ideals. I love America deeply, and I honor those who sacrificed to uphold its founding principles. But I also see how words like 'freedom' and 'patriotism' have been misused, often twisted into tools for division or control. To me, being a patriot means seeking truth, learning from history, and speaking out when those values are betrayed. It's about striving to make the country better, not pretending it’s perfect.

  • source
  • [–] 7 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    I tend to agree with Schopenhauer(other than it sounding quite arrogant/condescending the way he puts it…):

    The cheapest sort of pride is national pride; for if a man is proud of his own nation, it argues that he has no qualities of his own of which he can be proud; otherwise he would not have recourse to those which he shares with so many millions of his fellowmen. The man who is endowed with important personal qualities will be only too ready to see clearly in what respects his own nation falls short, since their failings will be constantly before his eyes. But every miserable fool who has nothing at all of which he can be proud adopts, as a last resource, pride in the nation to which he belongs; he is ready and glad to defend all its faults and follies tooth and nail, thus reimbursing himself for his own inferiority.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 0 points 1 year ago

    Suffers from the same individualism as some other comments.

    Most people know how to be proud of things outside their small self. It's only that Protestant individualist mindset that denies the reality of the collective, and with it collective pride.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago

    It can be a useful political tool in the imperial periphery when used correctly. In the imperial core it is a tool of oppression.

  • source
  • [–] 11 points 1 year ago
    [–] 11 points 1 year ago

    You can be proud of the good things your country has done or is doing. So long as you don't forget the laundry list of dodgy shit it has also done.

    I liken it to being proud of yourself as a person. You can take pride in yourself and your achievements but you should never forget all the times you fucked up.

  • source
  • [+] 15 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (5 children)
  • [–] 7 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    One can be proud despite its shortcomings. Nothing is perfect in this world. But there are things worth being proud of, despite understanding its flaws and being consistently critical of it as a whole.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (2 children)

    What does it even mean in this context? Pride? You didn't do it, you were just born there and it was already done. I feel people mistake "pleased" or "happy" with "proud".

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Believe it or not, I’ve been a part of it since I was born. I didn’t just come to be in a vacuum. I’ve influenced the society as much as anyone, we work together to make it better, we are a team, we protest. We sign petitions. We vote. We talk and talk and talk and have kids that will, too, become a part of what we’ve worked hard for and against and with.

    Being proud of the team, of yourself, or the fact that you with your team are actively succeeding in not becoming a fascist shithole like the US or Russia for example. It’s not nothing. It’s worth being proud of. And takes effort, work, input every single day of every single month of every single year.

    Yeah. I’m proud of myself and everyone around me. But I’m also proud of what we’ve worked together to build. This country did not stay this way by itself. It’d be ruined by capitalism and fascism the second we, the people of this country, stopped fighting against it and making this nation something to feel proud belonging to.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • Hey, fair enough, that seems pretty reasonable. If it's an extension of the pride you feel in being a decent human being who makes his environment better for everyone and it doesn't veer into jingoistic exceptionalism, I understand and condone it. 👍

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] 10 points 1 year ago

    My question to hardcore patriots: Why the hell are you so hyped over a place? Especially a place that is governed like dogshit?

  • source
  • [–] 10 points 1 year ago (7 children)

    Patriotism is the little sibling of nationalism, and the boundaries are fluid. I will never understand why people are proud of other people's accomplishments and make them their own. Or is it because people were shat on somewhere else in the world than everyone else? Makes absolutely no sense.

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago (6 children)

    Have you ever played a team sport?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago (5 children)

    I have. And yet I never had the feeling that my club's achievements were mine, unless I had contributed to them. And even then, I was just proud to have been part of the team with which I achieved the performance. I can differentiate very well.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

    And even then, I was just proud to have been part of the team with which I achieved the performance.

    Isn't that what the patriotic people experience as well?

    They vote, they pay taxes, they're sometimes politically active. From their point of view, they've contributed to the success of their country, and they're proud of it?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    They vote, they pay taxes, they're sometimes politically active. From their point of view, they've contributed to the success of their country, and they're proud of it?

    Does that work the same way when the country performs its atrocities? Everyone becomes implicit in those crimes because they voted and paid taxes that is used to kill civilians abroad? Or it just applies for "feel good" reasons?

    Just because you do what most people do, doesn't validate being proud of other peoples hard work that actually bring change.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] 0 points 1 year ago*

    I think most people who are sensible but claim pride for some collective achievement or team or whatever, do so outwardly mostly because it’d be tiring to always include a philosophy lecture about distinction and differentiating between one’s own and others’ achievements. When we think about it actively, we can realize the faults and the details and could put them in words, but who the fuck has the patience to go in depth about all that each time they state they are proud of their team, their friends, etc.?

    It’s just easier to say I’m proud of team xyz and hope the other party has the mental facilities to understand that it’s not a simple matter when you break it to pieces and start philosophing about it, but it’s just convenient and more prudent not to go into details or full analysis mode on all that every time…

  • source
  • parent
  • wanting your country to be better if the only valid patriotism.

    thinking you're better because some arbitrary borders might as well be a mental disease.

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 child)

    I quite like regionalism that doesn't align with national borders. An example would be "limburgers" have a strong shared identity, even as parts of it lie in Belgium, and parts of it lie in the Netherlands.

    Fundamentally it comes down to this question, I think: people tend to like to be around people that've shared a same background, is that ok? And to what degree?

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago

    people tend to like to be around people that’ve shared a same background, is that’s ok? And to what degree?

    There's different ways of liking people: you don't like your mam the same way you like your friends, and you don't like your funny friend the same way you like your lover.

    I have some pretty obscure interests, and the small group of local people who share my interests are from diverse backgrounds (but homogeneous in interests). Different ways of 'liking'. Shared background is one.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago

    My take is that patriotism is a corruption of the feeling of belonging we get from community.

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago

    It all depend on how you define patriotism. Honestly, I think Colin Kaepernick kneeling during the national anthem is the most patriotic act ever. He knew people would hate him for it, but he did it anyways because he took a hard look at his own country and decided we needed to do better.

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Nationalism (and by extension patriotism) was an amazing tool to bring people together in a nation, when coming from a past of small kingdoms, city states and similar smaller communities.

    Now it's done it's job and it's time we get past that.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago

    It'll fuck your country up real bad.

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago

    I have some national pride, usually about small things that I know my country cares overly much about and some cultural quirks I care about (how to serve coffee, the structure of a conversation, obscure literary references and so on).

    I have some patriotism, as in: I want my country to be the best version of itself it can be. Keeping the good parts (not many) and evolving the rest.

    Then, I am very cynical, so the little patriotism is submerge by a distant distaste and expectation of everything to fuck up.

    (European here)

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago

    I don't like nationalism. You don't have to appeal to people's pride for things that are good.

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago

    I like it in an unintelligent sentimental way.

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

    I was raised around a lot of "patriotism" (closet nationalism) and have had to adapt the feeling now that I understand better what America actually is and has been. I found that trying to abandon the feeling altogether was making me feel cynical and alone. The parts of America that I love in fact tend to exist despite our government and dominant culture, which steals and appropriates the things I love about us and turns them into the things people know about us and dislike for good reason. I love the source materials, not the end result. As a white person born into privilege on stolen land, my existence is not entirely apart from this, but all's I can do with that is try to make something better of it.

    There's a salt-of-the-earth working-class segment of this country that's getting screwed over, knows how and why they and others are getting screwed over, and has learned to survive together in spite of it. People that make families out of communities. Rail hoppers, union organizers, queer punks, the list goes on. That spirit is not unique to this country but there do exist uniquely American forms of it. I'm more proud of these people than words can express, and that's about as close to patriotic as I can feel these days.

    Maybe I just like seeing our shitty protestant labor worship turned to something more productive. Maybe I just spent too much time in the mountains to not fall in love with the land itself. Or maybe I just love banjos.

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago
    [–] 10 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Every single person on the planet just happened to be born in some particular place, and every place has some particular set of people who at some point drew some arbitrary lines and decreed that the area within the lines was a country and gave it a name.

    The idea that happening to have been born within the confines of one arbitrary set of lines rather than another is something of which to be proud is blatantly stupid.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Patriotism is being proud of being born and grown up in a certain random place.

    This is what is left for those who never achieved anything worthy of being proud of on their own.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago

    Chauvinism?

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    It's literally a sin. Stop it.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago

    For decades, most of my life, the streets to avoid walking down, or pubs to visit, are those that year round, hang outlarge Union Jacks (UK flag) and especially those that exhibit the St Georges flag (England flag]. To many here the St Georges flag is sadly synonymous with Right wing thugs.

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago
    [–] 7 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Patriotism. It’s the food of the wise man but the liquor of the fool.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • Das ist verboten

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago

    Patriotism is really good to have, as one loves it's country and will defend it, but also sees its issues and tries to address them in some constructive way.

    This is not to be confused with Nationalism, where the thought that your country is the only richeous one and all others are shit to the point you feel superior to the citizens of other nations and don't want to admit the issues of your country or fix them in any way.

    Note: These are loosely based interpretations from me as its 3:30am and I cannot sleep.

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago

    It’s what the Olympics are for

  • source
  • National pride can be a dead end in liberation or, when, as Otto Bauer argued, applied rationally towards the end of liberation, a means by which the proletariat of the nation can gain access to and ownership of the national wealth.

    "Scholarship is able to explain to us the emergence of the national sentiment from national consciousness, the emergence of the curious national form of evaluation from the national sentiment. But it is also able to criticize this national evaluation. And this is a task of no little significance. For it is only the critique of national ideology that can produce the atmosphere of sobriety that alone makes a fruitful examination of national politics possible."

    A national consciousness emerges when we meet people from other nations. We then become aware of that feature and gain a national sentiment or pride. An evaluation of the national form creates a good member of the national. This can, without critically or rationally evaluating it, lead to racist thinking or blaming certain groups for the nation's ills. However, a class evaluation can prevent this and a rational critique of the nation can give the proletariat access to the full cultural wealth of the nation which had only been previously reserved for the elites.

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago

    It ain't worth a damn to me. Maybe if your country doesn't suck lol. There truly are things about my country I love. In some ways, we're the best in the world. An American can be white, black, asian, hispanic, arab or anything else really. It's a very beautiful thing to me. I find it deeply depressing that those in power want to strip this country of what makes it great. Also having no social safety net is not acceptable obviously. There's far more I can shit on this country of mine for than I can praise it for right now. I sincearly hope that changes. I'd like to be proud to be American. I've always wanted that. Sadly, it's never been a reality for me and millions of other Americans.

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

    first off, we need to drop this false dichotomy between arbitrary words like patriotism and nationalism. it's not as simple as "good vs bad" or "moderate vs excess". you're talking about two completely different points of pride.

    nationalism is pride in a shared identity between people; patriotism is pride in the state of a country. and you ask for my opinion: both are bullshit.

    I like how someone referenced schopenhauer. I prefer Sartre. In "antisemite and jew" he wrote about how the bigot, by putting down another group, instantly promotes himself into a group of the chosen ones, the good guys -- all without doing anything.

    that's what pride in a group identity often does. elevates yourself based on the accomplishments of others. it's a substitute for character.

    HOWEVER we cannot dismiss all collective pride this way. when a group we actually belong to and contribute to actually does something good, why not be proud of it? the trouble is, the more people you involve in this collection, the less any single individual needs to actually DO to contribute.

    that's why I honestly believe nationalism is less toxic than patriotism: because there can be many smaller groups (nationalism) within a country (patriotism).

    the anarchist perspective is that a nation is a PEOPLE and the state is a parasite. patriotism is pride in the state, not the people. why be proud of tapeworms?

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago*

    I don't attribute anthropomorphism to a country. Improve your environment(mental/physical/emotional), help others; systems of government can come and go.

    Id rather be happy than loyal to a fault.

    anthropomorphism /ăn″thrə-pə-môr′fĭz″əm/

    noun

    Attribution of human motivation, characteristics, or behavior to inanimate objects, animals, or natural phenomena.

    The representation of the Deity, or of a polytheistic deity, under a human form, or with human attributes and affections.

    The ascription of human characteristics to things not human.

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago

    It's fine. Community is natural.

    The problem comes when it stops being about what you love and starts being about what you hate.

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago*

    Pride in your country/state/etc is ok, nationalism is not. The US only knows indoctrination and nationalism. Canada is a little better about it with their buy Canadian movement, imo

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago

    Its crucial for a nation to have. Its good for citizens to unify around goals and achievements but to much can lead to a big head and losing the ability to accurately self reflect and self asess.

  • source