top 63 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 35 points 1 year ago

Both hobbit and space hobbit defy all odds to inexplicably save the day. It’s apt.

  • source
  • [–] 28 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    I'd have picked Tom Bombadill over Gandalf to line up against Q

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 28 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    I'd have made Quark a space dwarf (loves gold pressedlatinum, short in stature) and I'd have made romulans space goblins (descended from space elves, evil).

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago

    Romulans could also line up against the Black Numenoreans, fits the split from the good line of Numenoreans, Vulcans. Either is good though

    I can see the Quark thing, especially with the Dwavern rings enhancing their lover of material things

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 16 points 1 year ago (4 children)
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Wesley certainly is annoying for his first couple appearances, but I don’t really think we should hold season 1 against any TNG character. He has good moments later, and The First Duty is a straight up excellent episode.

    On the other hand, hobbits aren’t annoying either. They didn’t ask to get roped into all that nonsense. Elves are the annoying ones in LotR.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 1 year ago (5 children)

    I would argue that overt mysticism is what, largely, separates fantasy from science fiction. So something like Star Wars would, in my mind, be far more space fantasy than Star Trek.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    Mind melds, Q magic, and the Prophets from DS9 are all overt magic. Like why can only Vulcans do mind melds? If it were science you'd be able to create a technology that would be able to do it. But nah in Star Trek, they don't even try to develop technology to do mind melds because it's something everyone knows only Vulcans can do... because it's magic.

    When Q was temporarily human, he mentioned being able to change physics constants. Geordi wasn't like "holy shit that totally changes how we think about science" he's just like "we can't do that because we aren't Q."

    The powers that aliens have in Star Trek is treated as being magic by the people in the universe. Some aliens just have magical abilities and nobody questions it.

    Meanwhile in Star Wars, all of the powers the Jedi have are explained by microscopic organisms that can be measured with a device. Sure nobody likes that, because we actually do want Star Wars to be fantasy and not science fiction. But (for better or worse) Star Wars is more science fiction and Star Trek is more space fantasy.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 1 year ago

    Vulcans are telepathic and there are technologies in the Star Trek cannon that can allow mind reading or inhibit telepathic ability.

    The Q and the Prophets are higher dimensional beings.

    These powers are never treated as magic just not currently achievable. In fact there are whole episodes of each series (TNG’s Who Watches the Watchers is one) that deal with the idea that not understanding technology doesn’t make it magic. Most of the crew of Deep Space 9 refer to the Prophets as ‘Wormhole Aliens’ specifically because they don’t believe their powers are magic or godly.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago*

    they arnt using magic lol, Q and prophets are multidimensional beings that can alter reality/change dimensions. its equivalent to a higher tier civilization like type 6-7 ish. also explains some of them like the prophets, organians, douwd are beings that were original organic but evolved to beings of pure energy and thought. star wars on the other hand uses actual magic, look at night sisters.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago*

    There are human telepaths in Star Trek, too, Miranda Jones comes to mind.

    There’s also Landru, who built a telepathic computer that controlled the entire population.

    Pretty sure the universal translator and combadges all work off telepathy, but that could just be my head cannon.

    I do agree it’s all basically space-magic; though.

    Also, the engineering in Star Trek is largely more likely than in Star Trek. (For example, warp drive violates causality,)

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 11 points 1 year ago (4 children)
  • [–] 11 points 1 year ago

    *hot space elf

  • source
  • [–] 21 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    Scotty might be a space dwarf, but O'Brien is a space hobbit through and through.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 1 year ago

    Every true Scotsman knows about space

  • source
  • [–] 7 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    The human one made me chortle.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 7 points 1 year ago* (3 children)

    Would make more sense to compare LOTR to Star Wars because it’s usually given the space opera fantasy title. Star Trek is just regular science fiction.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] -3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Only Star Trek fans that think it being science fiction makes it better than space fantasy keep saying that. But really both Star Trek and Star Wars are space fantasy, with Star Trek being more fantasy than Star Wars. It's basically Homer's Odyssey but with space ships. They're constantly meeting magical beings that put them into moral quandries.

    In Star Wars there's only one magic, and in canon it's the result microscopic organisms that can be measured with technology. Yes it's treated as a religion, but science fiction is about how things affect a society, and people having mind powers probably would be considered like a religion. It's actually strange that (other than the Bajorans) nobody in Star Trek develops religions around the magical powers ever other alien race has.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago*

    star trek is star wars but with more stem relevancy/ potential theoretical future application, while star wars is sci fi with drama and has Magic/ metaphysics, not the same, which scifi abhors using in thier drama. star wars is more closer to MCU/dcu(where there is magi-tech, a little of unexplainable science plus the christian god themes) than star trek actually.

  • source
  • parent
  • Star Wars does have more than one sorta mystical religions too. It’s not just relegated to the force or mideochloreans. The Nightsisters of Dathomir have their own magic (makes them force sensitive as well) they get from the planet itself; is a good example of this.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 13 points 1 year ago

    As a Scotsman I should be insulted but I always play a dwarf in D&D so I'll allow it

  • source
  • [–] 12 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (11 children)

    Side rant, Lord Of The rings Orcs are problematically categorized as evil yet are sentient and at least in the movies (I haven't read the books) that is never examined beyond providing the heroes cannon fodder and evil army to pillage the hero's home.

    Klingons on the otherhand have been immensely fleshed out as a vibrant complex species with many subcultures that still exhibit a capacity and willingness to engage in violence that feels decidedly inhuman (but also of course quintessentially human too) and Star Trek subverts and confirms the stereotype of Klingons in a confusing way that only truly subversive storytelling bothers to.

    Klingons could "just" have been Lord Of The Rings Space Orcs, but the writers of Star Trek have consistently chosen more interesting possibilities to expand behind the initial facade of who Klingons appear to be at first glance. For one humans don't win against the space orcs, they find other ways to end the war/wars that leverage an understanding of Klingons and making political gestures that are salient to their culture.

    I don't mean this as a huge takedown or critique I just think the juxtaposition is interesting.

    Same thing with the ferengi at least in DS9.

  • source
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (1 child)

    Same thing with the ferengi at least in DS9.

    I dunno about LOTR goblins specifically, but the general mythology of them is pretty similar to Ferenghi culture. But I bet they allow their women to work and wear clothes.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago

    Idk, goblins in other fantasy maybe but in the LOTR movies they are just ugly evil creatures to fear and kill.

    The ferengi are very complex despite their initial comically campy hyperbolic space alien shtick of being hypercapitalist.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 12 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    never read the book

    ARRRGGGGG!!!!!

    dies inside

    OK, yes in the films the Orcs make little to no sense and are nothing outside of comic relief cannon fodder, but in the books they aren't like that at all. In the books almost everything "evil" is an artificial or evil magic version of something else as a way to counter it, like the Nazgul were an attempt to fight against Eagles. Orc were actually the first elves to come into existence, and the evil bad guy who was Sauron's boss corrupted and tortured them until they were orcs. They are meant to be a counter to elves, but making people out of evil motives and discordant thinking isn't that great an idea, so they aren't very good at this. but they do have their own language and family units, not weird birthing pits, and make their own choices, there's a few longer parts in the books where you're just following the orcs along. after the war the orc's are pretty pissed they got roped into the whole evil army thing, and vow to never follow "big bosses" again. Also Aragorn gives them their own lands. The humans and other beings that fought for Sauron were all roped into it with his lies and cunning, and were pretty upset when they found out all the horrible shit Sauron was up to, in the books no one's really THAT evil, and the orc's and goblins can be pretty goofy, but also very normal humanoid type of things.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago

    Fairly sure that the orcs were able to be compelled of Sauron focused on them and wanted them to do something; as a result of morgoth’s corruption.

    After the war, they were freed and could now make their own choices.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago* (2 children)

    To be fair, Klingons were "just" Space Russians in the TOS era. It wasn't until after after Praxis/Chernobyl when the Soviet allegory ceased being topical, that they had to find other themes for them to embody.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Shadow of Mordor and Shadow of War actually explore orcish culture and morality, the latter game more than the former. Ultimately, they've spent all their lives in a Morgoth and/or Sauron cult. The ones that don't buy into it are more chill, and some show signs that they could be decent or even heroic in different circumstances. Eltariel is able to make some progress deprogramming a couple, but siding with Talion, Celebrimbor, or even Eltariel mostly just has the orcs cast them as their new Dark Lord. It's probably possible to get the bulk of the orc population into a better place, but it would take many generations of concerted effort at a massive scale. They'd have to replace their entire belief system and most of their way of life just to leave the cult. Additionally, even when not following a Dark Lord, the orcs culturally favor bloodshed to settle conflicts. This isn't too big of a problem with other orcs since they can take shockingly large amounts of punishment without dying, but it's a huge problem when interacting with anyone else. And even that's probably solvable without wholesale destruction of orcish culture, but everything would take so damn long that it's well beyond the scope of LOTR.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago

    Should've picked Pippin as the example for fantasy hobbits when you go for (nuisance).

  • source
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago

    Humans are the real space orcs

  • source
  • I just figured I tend to like epic quests with funny looking people.

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago (10 children)

    Don’t ruin Star Trek for me. Seriously.

  • source
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (9 children)

    Star Trek sems to be doing a pretty good job of ruining Star Trek these days.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago* (2 children)

    you can thank KURTZMAN and paramount for doing it. kurtzman said he dint care about continuity of star trek, hence why the 3 series is so wierd and out of place, and SUPER LAZY.

    enterprise for what its worth was starting to get better in the last season, but LES MOOVES destroyed the franchise, because he hated the show. and then came the jj-abrams era, which nutrek copies now.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (4 children)

    Don’t know what you’re talking about; aside from that Section 31 movie, all recent series have been stellar. Not perfect, they each have their flaws—just like the original series…

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (3 children)

    I'm glad you're enjoying them. I kind of noped out of Star Trek after the second J.J. Abrams film, and have only really been keeping up on them via Redlettermedia's reviews, so that may have coloured my view. :) They just seem to lack the optimism of the Roddenberry era. I reckon we could use some of that these days.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago

    Glory, not even once.

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago

    How dare you to be so accurate!

  • source
  • 40K did it better.

  • source
  • [–] -1 points 1 year ago

    .....eh, not really.

  • source
  • 6 comments in c/lotrmemes@piefed.social view that post
    [–] 5 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    "Mr. Eagles, two to beam up."

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago (1 child)
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago* (1 child)

    Is the nuisance Wil or Wes?

    ... Yes.

    ^ only teasing. love me some wil^

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment