top 100 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 287 points 1 year ago (14 children)

Safety concerns aside, you should trust your partner enough to not need to track them

  • source
  • hideshow 14 child comments
  • [–] 130 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    If a partner demand they have it on to prove they're not cheating, then they should be looking for a different partner.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 88 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    Exactly. My girlfriend will disappear for an entire day and not come home until 10pm. I usually have no idea where she is or what she's doing (mainly because I forget due to having ADHD), but I don't worry about it because I know she'll never cheat. How can a person even be with someone who they don't trust? Without trust, there is no relationship IMO.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 1 year ago* (2 children)

    There is the case of the worriers. People who, when not given positive confirmation otherwise, assume the worst. I'm not talking cheating, but like accidents. "He's 5 minutes late, maybe he got in a car accident and died!" It's not healthy, but it is common and isn't a trust issue.That said, my partner doesn't get to track me, and I have no interest in tracking them.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    For me, knowing my spouse’s location is just convenient for knowing ETA without bothering her. It’s not really about trust at all

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago

    Same. We both follow each other and neither of us care. We mostly have it enabled for the “just in case” scenario that anything happens to one of us. We can make sure that we know of our last known location.

    I’ve also had her use it one time I was away from home in NYC. And I was too drunk to figure out which subway to take to get back to my hotel. So she walked me through step by step while on the phone with me. It fucking rocked.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 119 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    If you can't trust your spouse without location, tracking, find another spouse.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 57 points 1 year ago (7 children)

    If this was demanded of me, I would end the relationship immediately. That's absolutely not worth it.

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 36 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    And what if you broke your leg and were lying in a ditch while chipmunks were eating your spleen, eh? How would anyone ever find you huh? Bet the egg is really on your face now!

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 32 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Well then that's just too bad for me, isn't it?

    Obviously I have my phone on me so I could just dial 911. If your phone breaks when whatever occurs to you, then your spouse or whatever isn't going to be able to track your location and you're not going to be able to call 911 either. So either way you're fucked.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Yep. This is one of those hard lines for me. And I feel like it's a red flag for anyone who demands it from a partner.

    I trust my partner and they trust me. I actively encourage them to do things without me, because I want them to be an independent person. I want them to have friends that I don't hang out with.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 45 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    if you believe the only reason your partner isn't cheating is that you'd find out via location share; what the fuck is the point?

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 33 points 1 year ago

    My wife and I work different schedules. on the rare day off that were both home, she's often out of the house when I wake up. She's not great at replying to texts. I never know when she's going to be home, and usually have no clue what she's out doing or where.

    But I know who she's doing while she's gone- no one. Because I trust my wife. I know who she is as a person, I know what our relationship is like.

    I have no particular desire to know her location at all times. I'm sure if I asked, she'd share it with me, and I'd do the same for her. I might occasionally do that when I'm off hiking or something in case there's an emergency, but half the time I wouldn't have a signal anyway.

    We are two humans with our own lives. Those lives are very intertwined, but we're both allowed to go off and have our own adventures, occasionally some secrets, and we don't need to know where each other is 24/7

  • source
  • [–] 33 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Man I took my kids off location sharing when they got their first phones at 12. Shit is creepy.

    Just communicate!

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 63 points 1 year ago (11 children)

    The main reason my wife and I don't have location sharing set up isn't because of trust or lack thereof between each other, but because I don't trust proprietary/commercial location-sharing services.

    I've been meaning to set up a self-hosted system (mainly because it seems like Home Assistant could do some neat automations with that info), but haven't gotten around to it yet.

  • source
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] 23 points 1 year ago

    One of my gf's friends went through a pretty nasty breakup, moved and whatnot and most of her friend group were trying to make sure that the ex and his friends didn't have their location anymore and I'm just sitting here like "its wild that you have to go through that" well a couple weeks later 3 of her tires were stabbed with a screw driver or something, and while there's no concrete evidence that they learned where she moved, I'm still over here trying to get them all to be more conscious about online privacy and location sharing, but nothing works....

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 10 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    Yeah we use it with home assistant, and Bluetooth beacons to turn on the garden lights when we get home, and turn on interior lights if neither of us are marked as home. Also turn on the electric blanket if we are out and heading towards home after 9pm. Also the person detection camera only alerts us if we aren't home.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Also turn on the electric blanket if we are out and heading towards home after 9pm

    Make sure it defaults to OFF after power loss. My colleague had a close call when the smart plug with the infra panel plugged in decided to turn on after the power outage.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Would you mind sharing your automation yaml for the garden lights? I'd love to do more with Bluetooth beacons but don't know enough about how they work to do anything with them.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago

    We have it hidden in the letterbox. The mobile app has a Bluetooth beacon setting where you can have it report either specified beacons to HA, or all of them and you can filter for the ones you want at that end.

    The automation looks for the beacon to be reported from either of 2 devices and then switches the lights on, quite basic.

    We have a separate automation that turns the scanning for beacons setting in the phone app on at dusk and off at 3am. And another that turns the garden lights off after 10 min triggered by them being switched on

    description: ""
    mode: single
    triggers:
      - value_template: >-
          {{ state_attr('sensor.phone1_beacon_monitor',
          'b5b182c7-eab1-4988-aa99-bd9_1_2') != None  }}
        trigger: template
      - value_template: >-
          {{ state_attr('sensor.phone2_beacon_monitor',
          'b5b182c7-eab1-4988-aa99-bd9_1_2') != None  }}
        trigger: template
    conditions: []
    actions:
      - data: {}
        target:
          entity_id:
            - switch.garden_lights
            - switch.deck_light_table
            - switch.deck_light_bbq
        action: switch.turn_on
      - event: beaconDetected
        event_data: {}
      - if:
          - condition: numeric_state
            entity_id: zone.home
            below: 1
        then:
          - data: {}
            target:
              device_id:
                - b5c12ce8343fda7810b69c24f
                - a71515f86d7d34ef570acbe8
            action: light.turn_on
    
  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    You don't need anything other than home assistant though, right? the companion apps already just do that

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 30 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Starting this by saying: Using tracking apps to see what someone's doing 24/7 or worrying about them cheating is insane and is a solid NO, full stop.

    But I do understand why people use tracking apps, and I wish we had good FOSS alternatives. A tracking/location sharing app where the trackee can turn it on/off anytime they want (after using a password/biometrics, to prevent others from messing with it), so loved ones can be sure you made it to your destination.

    I don't want people stalking their kids, judging their friends for the places they go, surveiling if someone's a cheater, or worst of all, having their data be sold by the shitty companies that run these services.

    I've read stories that have scared me and made me wish I could do something like that when I'm out late. I had to (unfortunately) use Live360 during a field trip in another country cause the teachers needed to keep track of us. I understand safety-wise that these apps are vital

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago

    I've setup Hauk for my dad to broadcast his location while delivering. It is only activated when he activates it, but it also works if you want to share location with a specific group of people. It has an app and a website, and can be password protected. It also records history and speed, but history can be turned off.

    It is not very robust or particularly well coded, but it is a nice little FOSS app that works, but has to be self hosted.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 102 points 1 year ago (8 children)

    Of all the dystopian things, this is probably the most dystopian thing I’ve read lately.

    This is horrible.

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 74 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    People my age have their whole friend groups on location sharing apps like that, it's awful.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Witch your age group. Do you mind giving examples where it's been helpful and maybe examples when it's not been so helpful?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago

    Like 16-17, I don't talk to the people that do that too much because they're not the type of person I like hanging out with, so I don't really know why they do it.

    It's like an extension of their group chats, on snapchat.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 51 points 1 year ago (7 children)

    I can’t believe the number of people in here with paranoia and shitty relationships that can’t communicate with their “partner”

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 1 year ago (5 children)

    My wife only asked me to 'follow' her with location sharing because there was a creepy dude in the area who was approaching women. Otherwise we trust each other enough and actually communicate about the things we do. Plus we don't cheat on each other - there's enough stress in life without adding to it lol.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [+] -7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (5 children)
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (4 children)

    You realize you are also sharing your location with third parties or you havent figured that out yet? lmao

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • [–] 51 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    If you have to use these things in a relationship, then you already have a problem.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 70 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Isn’t it strange that “trusting” someone now, means letting them constantly spy on you?

    I talked to some late teens about it some months ago. They see it as an “I give you permission to see my every move” kind of thing, as in they have nothing to hide. And they do it pretty early on in relationships, as a show of commitment.

    I got my SO to turn off location tracking on Snapchat because I got a message from a family member about his location. She had screenshotted his location from the snap map, searched the address, found the person living there, searched him up, found out he’s also gay, and wondered if I knew he was out with another man?! FYI we attended a dinner party at the guys home.

    That’s the level of insane some people get. Constant surveillance, mixed with insecurities and stories of cheating, and you’ve got a shitty ass cocktail.

    Me having location shared with my partner of 20 years is one thing. But sharing it with anyone else? Fuck no.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • I wouldn't even share my location with my SO of 10+ years. Why? They don't need it, and there's tons of potential negative things with that (phone manufacturer sells it, gov't takes it w/ backdoor deals, breach reveals it, etc).

    I don't want my SO's location information, and they shouldn't want mine. If I'm doing some high risk activity, like doing a long hike alone, sure, but it's going off immediately after.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 48 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    I don't want to share my location nor have anyone else's shared with me.

    Friends and partners can text "I'll be there in 5"

    My friend shares her location with her mother. Her mother then nags her with like "Are you seeing someone new? You're spending a lot of time in north brooklyn now." Like, who needs that, or even the temptation of that?

    A tech solution is not going to fix a social/mental problem like fear of cheating.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Hell, my wife generally knows where I'm going when I go out but only because I want to tell her and usually invite her. I'd hate for her to be able to ask why I'm at a restaurant instead of the bar I said I was going to, even if I'll tell her about it when I get home

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago

    My partner and I share locations. We check sometimes how far away from home they are when walking the dog, or coming from work. Also handy when one of us "loses" their phone and the other can see it's at home/in the car/at work. But we have trust, and don't need to check where the other is spending time.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 48 points 1 year ago (8 children)

    "safety is certainly a big part of the appeal for many users – so I allow the app to alert him each time I reach my front door." I'm finding that people are irrationally paranoid these days. They see random acts of violence in the news and think it might happen to them but its so statistically unlikely given these are already unlikely events and these people usually middle class people living in nice areas.

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 19 points 1 year ago (5 children)

    Humans are awful at accessing risk and chance, one of the reasons casinos and lotteries thrive.

    Look at fear of flying for an example, all statistics say you are many many many times over more likely to get into a car accident on your way to the airport, than during the flight. Even when the ride to the airport is usually short and the flight very long. Yet people are afraid of flying, but not going by car. By percentage, there are of course those, rightly so, afraid of cars as well.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    the flight very long.

    IIRC most accidents happen during take-off/landing.
    Once you're up there it's chill.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago

    It doesn't really matter how you measure it, number of flights, duration, distance traveled, etc.. No matter which, air travel is by far the safest option. The only other that comes anywhere near is trains. Going by car is bad (though motorcycle is even worse), but so many are afraid of flying that they instead takes the car. Which is among the worst things you could do from a safety point of view.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago* (2 children)

    Risk assessment is probability and severity. The probability can be vanishingly low, but if the severity is astoundingly high then acting like a high risk situation could be appropriate.

    Take asteroids. The last planet killer to hit us was 94million years ago. A rudimentary estimate could put the probably as 1:94mil. The severity of an asteroid impact of that magnitude is off the charts, so it is reasonable to consider it a risk and act accordingly to spend resources to search for and track asteroid trajectories.

    The severity of abduction, murder, and rape is probably pretty high for most people, so considering it a risk even with a very small probability is not unreasonable.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Location sharing doesn't prevent any of that though?

    Like, no criminal who would want to rape/murder/abduct you knows whether you are sharing your location with anyone. They would do so regardless before anyone can arrive to help you.

    Also, no kidnapper on this planet is stupid enough to take your phone with them. You have a slightly higher chance for authorities to be alerted sooner but that's about it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 46 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Jesus fuck, what did people do with their spouses and kids before phones? Trust them?

    Sounds unlikely.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 20 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    I noticed this becoming more common. Young people do so enjoyably. Old people I hear talk about it, it sounds controlling and bordering on unhinged paranoia. Those young people will be old someday too along with whatever sorts of paranoias they develop like all people seem to do

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 19 points 1 year ago

    People don't have the emotional maturity to deal with this tool.

  • source
  • [–] 18 points 1 year ago

    I kind of don't want to send my location to "location sharing" companies to sell to data brokers.

  • source
  • [–] 17 points 1 year ago

    Sounds like trust issues

  • source
  • [–] 97 points 1 year ago (10 children)

    My girlfriend and I share our locations mainly for convenience and safety. It’s nice to know that she’s 3 tram stops away from home so I can start cooking dinner for example. She’s also terrible at responding to texts and calls though lol

  • source
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 39 points 1 year ago

    Yeah I know many who just use it as a practical tool in the day to day.

    Even know friend groups who use it between themselves (they all live close together)

    SnapMap is also very popular, obv less accurate but nice to see who is in town

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 17 points 1 year ago* (5 children)

    Same with my wife. I even have it set up for my mother, so I know she’s safe. I don’t understand what the big deal is, as you say it’s a safety and convenience feature, it doesn’t mean you spend the day looking at the app to see where the other person is.

    It’s not something I would do in a casual or new relationship, but if I’m with somebody for years, I value their safety over my (perceived) privacy.

    And for the people who think this would prevent or bust cheating: lol. They can just turn it off and complain of bad reception, or leave their phone in their car, while they “shop at the mall”. Or just get a second phone. This app is not a substitute for trust

    Regarding tech privacy: it’s not like other apps on your phone are not already tracking, I doubt anybody has their GPS constantly turned off. They already know your location, this one feature doesn’t make a difference.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    For one, it wrecks your battery life.

    Secondly, everyone I know my age keeps GPS off unless using a mapping program.

    Finally regarding app privacy, people do care about that which is why grapheneos and other privacy focused OS's exist.

    The fact that you don't care about privacy and want the government and corporations to have every sext you've ever received or sent doesn't mean that others don't care as well.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] -3 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    Google map's location sharing does not even impact battery life.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (1 child)

    that might as well be AI generated. there are no numbers, just some dumb matrix with arbitrary reasoning and now evidence. I'm all for evidence to the contrary, but this is not that

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago

    While I can't find any source to back up my claim that it certainly drains some amount of battery, can you provide any evidence that it doesn't impact battery life? Given that GPS uses significant processing power

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] -2 points 1 year ago* (2 children)

    She could text you, no? It seems like getting her to be better at that is better than opening the can of worms involved with location sharing. For example, here's some bad stuff that could happen:

    • phone sells that data to advertisers
    • gov't gets that info and you trigger an alarm (maybe you went hiking a little too close to a sensitive area)
    • data breach happens and now crooks know when you're not home
    • SO's creepy friend sees your location and is secretly stalking you

    Etc. Those probably aren't super likely, but being able to avoid it all entirely with a little better communication sounds a lot better.

    Sometimes it's worth it, like you're going hiking alone or going to a bad part of town.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 16 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    We only share our locations when for example my wife is coming home from shopping groceries so that I know when to go out to the parking lot to help carry the groceries home.

    I had no idea people share locations constantly.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 7 points 1 year ago

    My friend shares her's with me continuously. I do not share mine. I see no point. I don't even know why she shares her's with me. I've only found it a bit useful two or three times over the years. And more of in a "I don't have to walk around this area to find her" way. If I didn't have her location I'd just walk around a couple minutes to I spotted her.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 15 points 1 year ago

    My wife and I have location sharing enabled in case something happens to one of us. We usually don't use it, but its good to have when we need to meet up at an unfamiliar place after something goes sideways for one of us.

    But if your SO doesn't trust you enough to allow you private moments and would accuse you of cheating, your relationship isn't based on trust and thus is very weak.

  • source
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›