what are you talking about
I love mine. I watch movies on it, or use it to display recipes, or play music in my kitchen
yep, that's basically my thought.
"if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all" is what my momma taught me.
if it's malicious that's one thing, if it's free and open source who gives a rats ass how it was made.
oh no your free thing you didn't pay for gets abandoned? why don't you take up the reins?
just feels like asking a lot of people and giving them nothing in return
Fair points, I concede.
As someone who has built a lot of software it's hard to see people treat LLMs as useless when they are shooting themselves in the foot by doing so.
anecdotally, I've built a lot of projects and abandoned them because I ran out of time. With an LLM to reduce the input effort I actually think I would've maintained them longer.
do you have a source which backs up what you're claiming?
it shouldn't matter.
these tools are here to stay.
from or TO? because I have dealt with and instance restricted the ones posted to lemdro.id
it's getting handled. sorry
yes you are right and everyone else is a little uneducated for thinking this could actually be a fire risk
you are absolutely right. there is value to these in software engineering and the people who don't realize that and learn how and when to apply them will be left behind
The irony here is if you host your open source project somewhere where it isn't being scraped by LLMs your legal case might be weaker.
What an interesting idea
I think it might be hard to argue that it is a clean room implementation if the project is in the training data for the model, which it probably will have been
Captured these beauties near Olympic National Park
view more:
next ›