[–] 48 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Why do Democrats like Pete Buttigieg keep calling Israel our ally? Do mainstream Democrats really want to be associated with segregation, racism, apartheid and genocide? Why do they continue to defend Nazi Israel's actions?

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 1 point 2 weeks ago

    You are seeing what you've already made up your mind to see. I can point to plenty of comments of mine criticizing the right and Trump. In your binary brain, you can't comprehend someone being critical of both Republicans and Democrats. In your mind, if you criticize Democrats while they support war and genocide, then you're helping the Republicans. How has that worked out for you?

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] -2 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)
    [–] 2 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

    I don't side step anything. Democrats don't get a free pass to support a genocide just because of Trump though. That is the difference between someone like me and you. Supporting the massacre of children in Gaza while trying to point your finger at someone else is peak hypocrisy. Literally it is the ideology that helped Trump win in 2024.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  •  

    Has anyone else’s Gmail inbox just completely gone off the rails recently? At the beginning of 2025, I was getting maybe 10 to 15 spam messages a week. Now I'm easily clearing 500+ a week.

    To Google's credit, most of it does actually land in the spam folder, but calling it "spam" is letting them off the hook. The vast majority of this is straight-up phishing. Scammers are constantly spoofing real company names to target credentials—I'm seeing fakes for Apple, Ace Hardware, Lowe's, Costco, and even healthcare portals like Epic (MyChart).

    The main issue here is that Google provides absolutely zero adequate tools to limit or control this. You can't mass-report emails as phishing. You have to do it one by one. When you're getting hundreds of these, it's incredibly time-consuming, and honestly, it feels completely pointless because it’s obvious Google doesn't actually do anything with that information to stop the abuse.

    Sure, these networks have gotten a bit more sophisticated using random domains and subdomains (I see a ton of .biz, .id, and .uk domains). But at the end of the day, global IP registries exist. These blocks get allocated and assigned to specific companies and individuals. Google and other major tech orgs have direct insight into this massive increase in spam, and they know exactly which operators manage those networks. So why aren't they locating the ISPs and ranges where the vast majority of this originates and just blocking them entirely due to persistent, pervasive abuse? They should be working with the US and other governments to adequately sanction or restrict services where action isn't being taken.

    And before anyone says "just use plus addressing" (like email+spam@gmail.com)—that is totally insufficient to limit spam. It doesn't mask your real email, and anyone who knows how Gmail works can just write a script to strip the + tag off.

    The only thing plus addressing is really good for is proving who leaked your data. I was actually one of the first people to notice the massive Comcast breach because I used a plus alias. Even though plus addressing does nothing to stop spam, it gave me enough info to know Comcast had a data leak when I suddenly started receiving fake Norton and McAfee antivirus subscription invoices (which I obviously don't subscribe to) sent directly to the exact Xfinity alias I had created. I actually called Xfinity/Comcast at the time, and they were in complete denial. It took them two full years from that date to even announce the breach. That alone should have resulted in serious fines and investigations by Congress.

    These days, I rely on SimpleLogin for unique aliases, which helps limit a majority of the spam. But I still need my core Gmail account for personal use and for those annoying instances where companies actively restrict access to alias providers. Because of that, the problem on my main account has just grown rampant.

    And when you get 500+ spam messages a week, the spam folder becomes untenable because false positives start piling up. Google has been flagging way more legitimate emails as spam lately. Ironically, the emails they consistently flag as spam are verified, legitimate legal notices for class-action lawsuits against Google, just buried in the influx of junk. You'd think Google actively flagging class-action notices against their own company as spam would be a major issue to bring to class counsel and the presiding judge.

    Ultimately, this whole mess highlights a massive systemic failure: Congressional inaction and total corporate capture. Congress already permits data brokers to trade and sell our consumer info en masse. Unless you live in one of the few states with CCPA-like protections, you have zero rights.

    The US government seems completely incompetent when it comes to stopping spam and phishing. Look at the Do-Not-Call registry—it does little to nothing to stop robocalls. One can only begin to assume the government isn't addressing the issue because of corrupt companies, like the timeshare conglomerates that literally refuse to stop calling me after I participated in a discounted Vegas rental to attend a meeting. Even physical mail is screwed; the USPS is entirely captured by advertisers. I demanded to be able to opt out of the multitude of useless junk flyers I get daily, and my local postmaster literally threatened to stop delivering my mail altogether if I continued to raise the issue.

    The government neglects to understand the real-world impact of this stuff. Phishing and scams absolutely devastate the elderly. They are literally utilizing and attacking infrastructure, and many of these scammers make literal violent or financial threats against their victims—behaving in the exact same capacity and definition of terrorism. Yet, the government does nothing to actually pressure or sanction the countries harboring these operations.

    But government failure doesn't mean companies like Google are helpless. They could easily provide actual email alias solutions natively. They could give us the ability to mass-report phishing messages. They could put serious pressure on bad-actor networks by defederating actual ISPs and even TLDs if they aren't cooperative in addressing the issue.

    What really concerns me is the weaponization potential here. This influx of spam generated by a sophisticated nation-state, or even the US government, could easily be used as a way to bombard a protestor or someone they wish to create havoc for. By flooding their inbox with so many illegitimate messages, the target would be completely unable to filter through the noise without potentially missing out on legitimate, important communications as well.

    Are any of you seeing a massive spike in this targeted phishing? How are you guys keeping your primary inboxes usable?

     

    The supporter of a genocidal ethnostate wants you to know he cares about other ethnic groups in America:

    https://mondoweiss.net/2024/08/strong-record-of-supporting-the-u-s-israel-relationship-a-look-at-tim-walzs-votes-on-palestine-as-a-member-of-congress/

    FYI: You can still oppose ICE while also criticizing Walz, and most establishment Democrats, for supporting a genocidal ethnostate. You however look like a huge hypocrite when you ignore your own party's support of ethno-nationalism in Israel, and attack anyone who points it out.

    T-Mobile Sidekick iD (www.wired.com)
     

    This is one of the best phones I ever owned. You could type nearly as fast on it as a traditional keyboard. It even had a scroll ball as well to act like a mouse. The things I would do for Google to implement something like this in a modern Pixel phone. I hate even trying to respond to people these days from my phone, because of how just how bad touch keyboards are in comparison.

     

    This subject arose because I had been looking for ways to use Microsoft & Google's Family features to manage my kids in a co-parenting arrangement. I have children with my ex that I currently manage. She has other children that she manages.

    I quickly learned however that the features are only designed for parents that are still together & that don't have kids outside their relationship.

    For example, parents & kids can only be assigned to one family plan. So she, or her partner, can't maintain their own plan while still managing the kids that I share with her.

    Now I thought this was poor planning on Microsoft & Google's part to design their products around a traditional family. This might not rise to the levels of discrimination most people are concerned with, but it got me thinking.

    For example, if a company learns someone was born out of wedlock if they can refuse to hire them. One of the reasons we have protected classes is to prevent discrimination based on personal characteristics that have been held to be suspect when used as the basis of statutory differentiations. Surprisingly, there are little to no protections when it comes to people born out of wedlock.

    Even protections from discrimination by the government for children born out of wedlock is not absolute. While the Supreme Court has interpreted the Constitution to provide some protection from the government, it has been inconsistent and contains intentional loopholes that allow for the imposition of greater procedural burdens.

    https://constitution.congress.gov/browse/essay/amdt14-S1-8-7-3/ALDE_00000834/

    To me this is surprising, considering that individuals cannot control whether their parents were married or stay together, but yet are not protected by the constitution & congress has not made laws to protect individuals in such scenarios. Some states have included limited protections, but those are generally applied to the parents & are specific to things like housing, not when it comes to employment.

    view more: next ›