If the marriage is sexually exclusive, why would you care? If the marriage was open, why would you care? If you're worried about infidelity, then what gender they might choose still seems like a trivial issue.
post
"Hey I'm still attracted to you but I also find dudes hot."
"I MUST INFORM THE WASHINGTON POST!"
Can you just tell WaPo things?
The 'TLC' of journalism
So? He's made a commitment to be with you alone. If he's a decent man, then there's nothing to worry about. It's not like straight men have never cheated on their partners.
Although the fact that this subject never was broached prior to you getting hitched is somewhat concerning.
Divorce your gym, hit your lawyer, and delete your Facebook because billionaires suck.
A lot of confused people in this thread wondering why they should care.
The intention is to keep eating away at the rights of anyone not straight, male, white, and Christian. All the major papers are on board with anti-trans genocide. They have been successful enough to broaden their attacks. This is the "just asking questions" phase.
Anything but coverage on what's going on in Gaza, Sudan, or Congo
Very telling and insulting that this pointless bullshit is what they choose to publish, out of all things
Why would that matter? If he's exclusively committed to you then what's the issue?
Imho, the bisexuality wouldn't be the issue. The fact that one partner was not aware of the sexual orientation of the married, on paper lifelong partner, is. Bisexuality, in contrast to pansexuality, has a focus on the, well ... sex of the partner. The bisexual duality can not be satisfied by the binarity of one partner, leaving a lot of space for unhappiness, uncertainty and confusion, in a state where certainly might have been exspected.
The bisexual duality can not be satisfied by the binarity of one partner, leaving a lot of space for unhappiness, uncertainty and confusion, in a state where certainly might have been exspected.
This is an extremely common and extremely silly take. Bi folk aren't any more or less "satisfied" in a relationship than mono folk are. People (bi or otherwise) betray their partnership commitments all the time, but for whatever reason bisexuality seems to get conflated with infidelity / general profligacy. It's an ugly and inaccurate stereotype.
Some reason? Come on, not that complicated if you put yourself in a normal person head.
Societally normalized biphobia?
normal person
Sure, I can do that. quick question, by "normal" do you mean someone who has median characteristics across the board, or are you one of those people who define normal by their own tastes and experiences?
If you don't have an actual point to make, why are you even speaking up?
It's just am excerise in putting yourself in others shoes, why don't you take your own advice?
Lack of communication being a problem - sure. But you're conflating a few things.
- In modern terms, bisexuality and pansexuality are interchangeable, the terms have evolved over the years and most of the community rejects the old distinction.
- "The bisexual duality cannot be satisfied by the binarity of one partner" is the stupidest thing ive ever heard. They are bi, meaning their attraction applies to both (or more) genders. They aren't in heat with an unquenchable lust for sex with multiple genders. Someone can have a preference for brunettes and redheads and marry a redhead and not be "unsatisfied". The problem with closeted gay people marrying into a straight relationship is that they are denying their own sexuality, and lying to themselves. Bisexual people are not lying to themselves. They are attracted to their spouse. There is no confusion.
You mean like the sexuality of straight people can not be satisfied because there are other hotter people of the same sex as their spouse?
Obviously the husband made a mistake, you tell them in the dating phase so the trash takes itself out instead of tricking you into believing it's a real person.
Threesome?
The bisexuality doesn’t bother me. It’s the poor communication. Plus, now there are major trust issues.
Saying so after the wedding is a douche move. He probably should have mentioned it earlier in the relationship.
all 63 comments