You Were Unloved, Unwanted, and Utterly Absurd
Applies to 3LON perfectly
You Were Unloved, Unwanted, and Utterly Absurd
Applies to 3LON perfectly
Utterly Unfathomable.
So these dumbshits are not only stuck with a fast depreciating asset, they won't be able to repair it in the near future.
Bet they turn out like the Delorean. After 30 years they will be a niche thing that only people with money can keep running.
Existing Cybertruck owners will have fun sourcing parts as they break down.
Me:

It's gonna be hilarious when they can no longer get parts in 5 years. They'll still swear to the quality of Tesla though.
They’ll just have to buy another new Tesla.
Are they still blocking people from selling used cyber trucks?
Are they still blocking people from selling used cyber trucks?
wat?
Cybertruck purchase agreements prevented re-selling the truck for a year. It was an anti-scalping measure
Turned out there wasn't enough demand for the trucks for scalping to be a problem. It was only seen as necessary because of production delays and low production numbers, which probably contributed to apparent demand
It is a little funny to think about in hindsight. Tesla was worried demand would be so high scalpers would be buying up vehicles to flip, but demand ended up being so low the line had to be stopped within 4 years
The original delivery agreement for the Foundation Series (initial 1000 built) when they first launched required you to get Tesla's permission to resell the vehicle for the first year.
Which is common for limited availability vehicles upon release from basically every manufacturer. The average person is never buying limited edition vehicles so it's not relevant to 99.9% of the population, and something they've never heard of. Ford does it with every limited release Mustang variant for a common example.
The two primary reasons are essentially to prevent scalping, and so they can guarantee they receive back any vehicles with initial production run issues so engineers can study them. But facts don't stop media reporting, especially when it comes to headlines about Musk.
Some manufacturers keep ownership limitations like that in place indefinitely. Ferrari famously sued Deadmau5 because of his Purrari modifications, so he had to remove them and sold the car, replacing it with a Meowclaren instead.
He specifically got in trouble for replacing the badge with a prancing cat and the Ferrari name with Purrari:

One of the easiest and most common changes people make to their cars is changing or removing badges like that. Can't with a Ferrari though.
Not like I'll ever want or be able to afford a Fertari, but fuck that.
I pay money for something I own it. I do what I please with my own possessions.
That's one of the requirements for choosing to own one of those. Don't like it, get a different brand. That's literally what Ferrari says about it. L
So Deadmau5 got a McLaren instead. Nissan also offered a GT-R as an option to replace the Purrari. Because they cared more about him driving one of their vehicles than onerous limits.
Ferrari has always had their heads up their own ass. It's literally how the company was founded and why Lamborghini was founded.
I would say I would never buy a Ferrari (which is true anyway) but I also wouldn't consider that to even qualify as actual ownership, so even if I did pay for one, I still wouldn't be willing to call it "buying".
Tesla banned you from ever buying a new Tesla if you sold your cyber truck, and had a clause to sue you for $50k or the amount you got from the sale, whichever was greater.
I guess they stopped doing this at some point, but if you bought it when it was new you weren't allowed to resell it for a year
It’s got a massive battery pack that can be used for backup power. I’d totally buy one that doesn’t move and put it on blocks in front of my double wide.
How massive is it? My Silverado is 200KWh and can power the home in an emergency...
122.4 according to Car & Driver https://www.caranddriver.com/news/a46010154/tesla-cybertruck-battery-capacity/
Not as much but with depreciation it might end up being cheaper per kWh
There are a lot of unsold Cybertrucks. The only reason so many even sold was because Musk used SpaceX to buy much of the inventory
If there's demand for the parts, they'll be able to get them for a good while
end of an error
Ha!
Rest In Pieces
If it had actually been a decent vehicle then at least it’d have that. But no, it’s full of problems, recalls, and traps people inside and burns them to death.
The Ford Pinto was killed for less. It’s not like we don’t know how to make safe cars, yet somehow Tesla is allowed to get away with so much.
They were such good social markers though. It made it much easier for rich morons to tell on themselves.
As Musk moves on, another failure behind him, chasing the next shiny upon which he'll never deliver. Let's pour one out for future investors who will continue to pour money into his ketamine fuelled Ponzi scheme. Chasing returns, thinking of the future, not the trail of broken promises.
This is a product that shows why there shouldn’t be any billionaires: These people live completely detached from reality—and their narcissistic hubris makes them a danger to any civilized society. Musk, like all the other PayPal billionaires—Thiel, for example—is the best example: They are mentally ill individuals who feel validated by their financial success.
This is by no means their achievement, but rather a flaw in the system that grants power to these people, who have done nothing more than happen to be in the right place at the right time with money. They simply should never have this kind of power, because they are antisocial in the truest sense of the word.
It was never allowed to drive on the road in Europe so I only ever saw it once at a car show. It was uglier up close. We were not allowed get close or touch it unlike all other cars on that show. My guess is that greasy fingers are not good for the body and hard to clean.
There are a least five near where I live that I see. They all look ridiculous, but the ones that haven’t been wrapped look horrible. The stainless steal is definitely not stainless.
The only one that makes a little sense is owned by a sneaker shop and has a branded wrap. They use it to tow their showroom trailer to various events and using it for a billboard that tows seems reasonable.
Maybe I'm a bit obsessive but I can't help but think of any tesla owner as a fascist.
Don't care if you bought one before Musk went mask off.
These things are much worse in this way than the sedans - it's a very public approval of musk, because they were his personal project or whatever.
I'd never buy anything from that shoe shop for this reason, and I don't think I'm alone.
There's two in the parking lot at my work. They're an eyesore. One is even a founders edition or whatever it's called. We have some really gullible smart/rich people
There's a guy in my town that has one. I've never seen anyone but him in it.
I will continue to flick off every one I see until I never see one again.
My main issue with the Cybertruck (before Elon revealed himself to be a total ass) was that ITS NOT A TRUCK. How can you call it a truck without a truck bed?
It oddly matches a lot of other current day trucks in that regard. Auto manufacturers keep making them with bigger cabins and smaller beds.
Unfortunately true. They sell more to people who do less. There's no shame in owning a big van that can do the same things but still service a family.
I'll say it's not that odd to me, as someone who used to work retail in a store environment that sold TVs in the US 75% of truck owners never use their truck for 'truck' purposes. Of the remaining 25% the majority still maybe do once a year typically as a favor for someone and not for personal use. Hardly anyone ever had something basic as bungee cords in their truck let alone ratchet straps when we would recommend keeping the TV upright and strapping it down. Literally after a while we just stopped even bothering to ask and we just broke company policy and would lay it down flat even though it risked it being damaged because we were tired of getting bad customer surveys about it when we would tell them if we lay it down and it is broken they can't return it.
Basically the vast vast vast majority of truck owners should it best just own an SUV (and don't get me started about how many don't understand how big their vehicle is when it comes to driving or parking; these days I drive a Ford t250 work truck for work and truck drivers continue to drive me insane)
it will always make me think of that simpsons where homer designs a car.
I respect them for attempting something so different but holy shit that thing was literally a dumpster fire
If you offered me a El Camino crossed with a DeLorean that was also an EV, I'd be hyped. The Cybertruck is neither of those things. It's a lowploy SUV.
edit: Actually. Give me the Gadgetmobile where the back is reconfigurable with different modules.

I don't. It was a trash idea created by a trash man who believes everyone's a sucker.
It wasn't always on fire. And when it was you could usually find at least someone willing to piss on it to try (and fail) to put it out. Hell, often when it wasn't on fire, even.
I always called them the village idiot.
Driving by one "There goes the village idiot.", walks by one parked, "Village idiot must be out shopping."
I've seen a few of these dumpsters on wheels in my area.
They're just a badge of shame for anyone who bought one.
So they are ending production of the vehicle nobody wanted in order to replace it with production of the vehicle no one will buy. Yeah I wouldn't be getting into Tesla stock right now.
Why don't they just make more cars the people actually want?
Cybercabs will be for those businesses run by other wealthy billionaires so they can shuttle employees execs and high profilers around, overtake Rideshare companies, and can be sold in bulk vs consumers who've turned on Musk.
Here comes the next auto industry bailout, T-Minus 10-12 years.
I think the model Y and 3 are still selling well. Im not sure how much variation you can really have with an EV considering most other cars are segmented by performance. Perhaps they could make a giant SUV or something but those people are already buying Tahoes, Yukons, and Escalades.
Unlike most people it seems, I personally like the look of the cybertruck. But that is where the liking it ends.
I'm with you there; well the concept images at least. The version that made it to production was not as good.
I saw one in person once; way too big for NZ roads; certainly not nice looking.
But Musk went all Nazi and the thing falls apart....so even if they fixed all the issues and made a smaller one; I'd still not be in the market for one.
I don't agree with you, but you do you.
This place can be too toxic. You get a vote for liking what you like and not being afraid to express it appropriately.
Well, the 48V accessory system instead of 12V is also a good idea. Lets you use much lighter wires to carry the same loads, just requires components practically no one is making compared to 12V. But it would be a good thing for all cars to go to. Would save a some weight and a lot of materials.
But that's about it.
I wonder how long they'll make parts for it. I'd like to see them disappear as soon as possible.
So they’re swapping it out for the car that they NHTSA is starting to look in to because of the lack of a steering wheel.
I got a lot of freudenschade from it though.
While that is a shitty car 'invented' by a shitty human, I wish more car companies would dare to create cars that look different. It's 2026 and our cars still look like they did 20 years ago.
A lot of that's because there's a finite number of ways to shape a car that is aerodynamic, fits people, and has efficient collision behavior.
People like interesting shapes until they find out it's less safe, uncomfortable, more expensive and loud.
I was recently in Japan and was in awe of how cool their minivans look. They have more of a "cab over" design with really aggressive looking front ends.


There's way better examples of visual innovation than the Tesla Cybertruck though
Because most car companies want vehicles they can sell outside of North America and most other countries have laws.
If you want to innovate you still have to make sure that the vehicle meets minimum standards for things like materials, edge angle, position of bumpers, lighting design (none of this let's use the brake lights as indicators nonsense), and weight restrictions. The cybertruck violates all of them.
all 4 comments