I would say 100%. Thanks for playing the probability of past events game.

God, Trump is so excited about this too. Every time he talks about it I get this sinking feeling like he's going to order the US military to side with Russia over Europe and Ukraine.

Oh, this could be my next custom spirit for Spirit Island.

With a PhD, MD and a Rhodes Scholar he might be overqualified for the position.

After capitulating to Abbot and Trump, Whitmire: "Don't vote me out next year, I'm on your side actually!"

They were such good social markers though. It made it much easier for rich morons to tell on themselves.

Violence isn't the answer but it has to be an answer. A possibility. The last alternative. It is the reason peaceful resistance can work.

Anyone who thought Trump was going to moderate his rhetoric was definitely dreaming. Prepare for the White House to be much, much worse.

I mean, these tech CEOs went to college graduation ceremonies and said "None of you will be getting jobs, lol" and went on TV and said "AI will destroy humanity" and then ramped their data center expansion so rapidly that peoples electric bill went up by 300% and when the public hates them and their technology and votes accordingly they are "What happened? How can people be so short-sighted? Why is this so political?"

I dunno, fuckheads, maybe move fast and break things isn't a popular strategy when applied to society.

If you look at his positions over the course of his career, he is damn near always on the right side of history.

It was a gripping race, but in the end you have to hand it to her opponent.

We don't know. Nobody has ever tried it before. Common law would suggest no, but really it's anyone's guess with the current make up of the supreme court.