top 81 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 165 points 1 year ago (16 children)

considers altering entire network stack to trick a Switch 2 into thinking it never leaves EU soil

"Nah, I'll probably just not buy one. Fuck em."

  • source
  • hideshow 16 child comments
  • [–] 62 points 1 year ago (15 children)

    Steam Deck, nothing more than Steam Deck...

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 15 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 1 year ago (7 children)

    I kind of want to pick one up, but i can't get a clear picture on if I should wait for a steam deck 2. From what I could find, they want to wait until there's enough of an upgrade to be worth it. At one point that suggested around 2025, but more recent stuff makes it seem like they're not even working on one, and other stuff hints that they are.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 1 year ago

    Get a Steam Deck OLED if you want a Steam Deck. Don't wait for a hypothetical next version. I have both the LCD and OLED, and while both are excellent, the OLED is a slight improvement in a few days (lighter, less bezel, 90hz instead of 60hz, obviously you get an OLED screen, and the CPU/GPU are a tiny, tiny bit beefier).

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 8 points 1 year ago

    if I should wait for a steam deck 2

    there will alaways be The Next Device. There are no real hints that it will release anytime soon.

    So if you're interested in picking one up, now is a good of a time as any. You can also save some money by getting a refurbished 64GB model and upgrading the ssd yourself (takes just a couple minutes, a screwdriver and a thumbdrive with usb C to reinstall steamOS)

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    they have said they're not working on a version two because they don't feel the need to upgrade their hardware right now.

    this is a low powered handheld gaming device. i use an LCD model as my daily gaming device and it kicks ass. i am unsure what upgrades are going to make it more "worth it" beyond what they've already done with the steam decks they are making and selling.

    it works well and plays games right now, is my point.

    i advise that you stop waiting to buy the next Shiny New Thing™️ and just get one if you want one. they're fun and life is short. enjoy yourself!

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago

    The best/worst part is that I was worried about battery life, and then I realized that I only have so much time as an adult and it doesn’t matter as much, for most games I’d want to play on it anyway.

    A power bank for the exceptions. Not perfect but it’s okay.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago

    I picked one up a few years ago and I love it. When I have the opportunity, it's so nice to chill in a waiting room and game instead of just doom scrolling.

    Like the other poster said, I'm happy with the regular deck. Given there's no news about the 2nd one, I'd grab it and enjoy.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago (5 children)

    Are there switch 2 emulators yet?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Switch 1 was feasible as its CPU was similar to the ones found on a $200 android tablet from 2018 so even a Chromebook can emulate that.

    Switch 2 is comparable to a mid range modern gaming PC so we have to wait at least a decade for full speed emulation, if not more

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago

    Switch 2 GPU is similar in spec to a laptop RTX 2050 with more vram and better DLSS, I wouldn't say that's mid range gaming PC.

    I'd say something decent will exist by the end of the decade if Nintendo can't stop development of emulators.

  • source
  • parent
  • [+] -15 points 1 year ago* (2 children)

    Seriously? It's been out for a few weeks, obviously there aren't any. And since Nintendo spent a lot of time and money to shut down most original Switch emulators I doubt we'll see S2 ones anytime soon. The increased S2 hardware power, also obviously, means you'd need a current or even future top-end PC to be able to handle the emulation.

    Your comment is on the level of a 5-year-old asking if they can play Switch 2 on their phone or something. The answer is so incredibly obvious.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 1 year ago*

    I get how it can be shocking that someone doesn't know as much as you about something that seems like common knowledge to you,

    XKCD comic about avergae familiarity

    But tbh I'm like pretty certain the firmware is mostly the same, and it can't be that different if Switch 1 games can be upgraded to Switch 2 games. I doubt they went back and ported every single game to a new system if it wasn't easy to do so. So tbh I don't think its going to be that long for emulators to come out.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 82 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    better consumer protection says what

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 25 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    It says "Sign the Stop Destroying Videogames initiative if you can"

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 89 points 1 year ago (36 children)

    prevent access to online services...that's all they should be allowed to do. I don't think I'd be able hold back on any company that decided what I do with MY hardware.

  • source
  • hideshow 36 child comments
  • [–] 14 points 1 year ago (7 children)

    Online services includes firmware updates, and many new first party games require the newest firmware as of release to be installed

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago*

    Those do typically come with the firmware update bundled in the cart.

    Ironically this is a security measure because it also closes security loopholes and jailbreaking exploits.

    Of course for that you need a cartridge that actually has something in it or whatever, but that's the idea. You're more likely to have a firmware update in a physical game than the full playable game.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago

    Checking, downloading and installing irmware updates is the only thing that works on a banned console. Of course they are not allowing it because they're nice, just because they want to close eventual exploits

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago* (4 children)

    Don't they include the firmware updates on the game carts now?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 14 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    You mean the game carts that only include the key to download the game?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] -2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    No, I thought some game carts actually had system updates included on the cart that would install if your system was offline, for example. Looks like this is only for ps4/ps5 actually, though.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Nintendo has pulled some shady shit with this system release... While it's possible for the manufacturer to put the games on the carts, and apparently some are... They have the ability to put just a key on the cart which allows you to download the game... But it still requires you to have the cart in your system to play it..

    At least from my understanding...

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago

    Yes that is a thing. The game cart basically acts as a digital key and you have to download the game. You also have to have the game cart in the system to play the downloaded game. Thankfully the boxes that have this are clearly labeled. One benefit of this is you can resell these games which you couldn't previously do for any digital game. Not a fan of the practice and having plastic junk for what is essentially a digital game, though. Seems these virtual game carts are selling poorly so hopefully publishers will start using actual full games on carts going forward.

    That wasn't what I was referring to in my original comment, though.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 12 points 1 year ago (25 children)

    That is what they do. It's an online ban, you can still use a banned console offline.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 25 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago

    False, too many games require internet access for the first start to download the actual games

    Banned console = you can only play 1st party games as almost all 3rd party devs ship empty cartridges with no game inside

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 9 points 1 year ago (22 children)

    Untrue, full console disabling is possible rendering it unusable for any content online or offline

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 22 child comments
  • [–] -4 points 1 year ago (21 children)

    They've only ever done online bans. There's a lot of misinformation being spread around about bricks, but that isn't what is happening.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 21 child comments
  • [–] 19 points 1 year ago (17 children)

    What they have done (so far) and what they are capable of doing are two entirely different things.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 17 child comments
  • [+] -6 points 1 year ago (16 children)

    No one has had their console remotely bricked. If it happens, we can talk, but until then you're just getting mad at imagined hypotheticals.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 16 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (5 children)

    I found one of the many for you

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MqFY3rICDWs at minute 7.15

    He can't play Yakuza 0 and puyo puyo tetris, because it can't download the mandatory update, it can't launch games. Technically it's not bricked, but because it can't launch legally purchased games, it's effectively bricked.

    It doesn't even show the game icon on the screen!

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    That is a ban from online services. The word 'brick' has a specific meaning, this isn't a brick.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (3 children)

    If a device has a single purpose, which is playing games, and it can't play such game, how it's not a brick?

    "It's not a brick, it's just a paperweight!"

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Some games might not be playable. But other games still are. Calling the system a paperweight is not accurate.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (1 child)

    Your comment, paraphrased:

    Nintendo is Nintendo and they can never be wrong, I will defend them and ask for proof. Then deny any proof given.

    You asked proof of a brick, I showed you proof of a brick.

    Ah yes, sorry, it's not a brick. Because it turns on and, because it doesn't even show the icon of those legitimately purchased games that are unwrapped in front of the camera, you can go to settings, then you can, uh, toggle between dark mode and light mode. Yes, totally not a brick. People pay $450 for a game console not for playing games, just to stare at the empty screen.

    it's from switch 1 but it renders the idea

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 15 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    Worst argument ever.
    Why wait for it to happen instead of acting proactively?

    Why did they feel the need to implement that in A their legal speak and B partly acted on it (users of the MIG-cartridge got already hit by that).

    Because they will at some point use the power. Why even risk that?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] -1 points 1 year ago* (2 children)

    Because regardless of what some boilerplate legalese says, they are instead doing online bans. Fixating on a hypothetical when it's the opposite of what's actually happening borders on misinformation.

    Scroll back up, this conversation started with the top comment saying it should just be online bans, I said that it is, and then y'all come at me saying it's actually bricks. It's online bans.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    The actual text of the EULA states:

    "You acknowledge that if you fail to comply with the foregoing restrictions Nintendo may render the Nintendo Account Services and/or the applicable Nintendo device permanently unusable in whole or in part.”

    So no, it's not misinformation, Nintendo is straight up telling you legally that they can and will do this. This is not a hypothetical. They may not have done it yet but there is no uncertain terminology around their ability and willingness to do so. The fact that they can even threaten this in their EULA is a huge warning flag that everyone in this thread is correct to be upset about.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] -2 points 1 year ago

    Because regardless of what some boilerplate legalese says, they are instead doing online bans.

    Let me rewind to the start of this conversation.

    prevent access to online services...that's all they should be allowed to do. I don't think I'd be able hold back on any company that decided what I do with MY hardware.

    That is what they do. It's an online ban, you can still use a banned console offline.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago* (5 children)

    Before it happens they put it in EULA which they did.

    You acknowledge that if you fail to comply with the foregoing restrictions Nintendo may render the Nintendo Account Services and/or the applicable Nintendo device permanently unusable in whole or in part.

    It couldn't be any clearer.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (4 children)

    You're fixating on legalese boilerplate, I'm talking about what they're actually doing.

    Go back to the start of this conversation. OP said it should just be online bans, I said that it is, and you're umackshuallying over what hasn't actually happened.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    The "legalese" explicitly stated in clear words that they have right to brick your device. If they had no intention of doing it they wouldn't put that in.

    This was added so once they brick it they can argue in court that you agreed to this when purchased your switch.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    OP said it should just be online bans, I said that it is, and you're umackshuallying over what hasn't actually happened.

    If it ever happens, we can resume this conversation, but until then?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    What do you expect? Disable console first, then put things in EULA?

    Why put something like this in EULA if there's no intention of doing it, especially as they didn't put it for EU where such practice is outright illegal?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 15 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    You acknowledge that if you fail to comply with the foregoing restrictions Nintendo may render the Nintendo Account Services and/or the applicable Nintendo device permanently unusable in whole or in part.

    It seems hard to believe, but that's the threat being made. Time will tell whether that's bluster or if they're really prepared to do so.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago

    Nintendo has track record making threats that are not technically feasible, like if a PR/LAW person has written it with no knowledge on what technically really is possible. They just formulate it, so that they have the most possibilities later on the law site.
    They would even include coming to and get the physical switch from you, if lawfully feasible. And they would only check later if the physical act is really feasible for them after.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 37 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Well, their shitty attitude towards consumers is why I won’t be getting a switch 2. So they can try bricking my asshole.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 75 points 1 year ago

    Common European W

  • source
  • [+] 40 points 1 year ago (2 children)
  • [–] 64 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    I secretly hope they screw up and brick all the switch 2 devices by uploading a bad update, and are forced to send replacement units, potentially crippling finances of their company.

    Doubt it'll happen, and I'd feel bad for people and kids just wanting to enjoy some Mario and stuff on their weekends (which makes me sorta hope it doesn't happen at the same time), but... Nintendo needs to be hit very hard for their constant BS.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 29 points 1 year ago

    Or some “bad actor” will figure out a way to upload and push the bricking update. Forcing probably a recall and/or a costly class action. Maybe that will make them think about putting a kill switch on there in the first place.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 21 points 1 year ago

    In 2008, someone did the math. Just from 2 years of Wii sales, just the hardware, not the games, Nintendo could stay afloat for 163 years based on the ecconomy at the time.

    So, lets adjust for inflation that we know it is today, and call it 110 years.

    I don't think it's been 110 years since 2006. I could be wrong though. Covid screwed up everybodies internal clock.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 14 points 1 year ago

    yo ho, all hands, hoist the colors high,

    heave ho, thieves and beggars, never shall we die.

    The current management of nintendo will never figure it out. Piracy is the competition. It's not about getting the thing for free, it's about getting a better service. I'd buy mario 3 again (again) if that meant I'd get a rom I could run on my pc through FCEUX and enjoy all the features/enhancements that software offers. There's a handful of gamecube games available on switch2, but all of them are better through Dolphin than what official hardware can offer. Nintendo's refund policy is a joke. The eshop is unpleasant to use. Even ignoring all of that, the original switch only had a handful of actual first party titles, not enough to justify the console's price tag (and each those were merely ok, not enough to justify buying a console for one game).

    sega sells their games on steam, and while I don't like the emulator they use I can at least say that I own a legal copy of sonic spinball.

  • source
  • [–] 47 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Because in the US, you guys aren't really consumers (which would give you a status), you're merely walking and vaguely sentient (hopefully enough to click on "add to cart") wallets that the corporations pluck money from at every opportunity. This is your legally enforced reality.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 12 points 1 year ago

    Nintendo: "you bought our hardware, but we will brick it if you don't use it in exactly the way we like!"

  • source
  • [–] 19 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (7 children)

    Nah, they can, but likely won't risk it w/European owners’ “rights.”

    Change the headline a little bit.

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 26 points 1 year ago (5 children)

    "litigation" is not really how we usually talk about consumer's rights in Europe though. As the article clearly states:

    the legal framework in Europe is much more protective of users. The corresponding laws understand that disabling a device for unauthorized access to software is an excessive and illegal measure.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] -5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Edited, and quoted, because I can see European states arbitrarily litigate rights.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    That's ... not how it works. If they did brick the consoles Europeans own they'd likely be breaking EU wide laws, which at the end would end up with the highest court in Europe - the EUCJ.

    There's nothing arbitrarily about this. Our consumer protection laws are quite strong.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 9 points 1 year ago

    I started pirating my Nintendo needs last generation and it runs so much better. Never buying from this anti-consumer company again.

  • source
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›
    46 comments in c/piracy@lemmy.dbzer0.com view that post