top 99 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 204 points 1 week ago (9 children)

Jesus, that's a bad headline. She wasn't sentenced for the home birth; she was sentenced for her part and cover-up of her husband raping and impregnating their daughter. The lack of proper medical care is just part of the cover-up.

  • source
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 61 points 1 week ago (8 children)

    every conservative is like this. this is the world they want. this is their utopia.

    🎯 2
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 41 points 1 week ago (5 children)

    This is why they want homeschooling, much easier to abuse children away from prying eyes

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 20 points 1 week ago (4 children)

    This is sad, but true.

    At my first teaching job, a first-grader told her teachers and the principal that the bruises on her legs were from her mom hitting her with a belt. We reported it to Child Protective Services, and when they followed up, the mom pulled her out of school to "homeschool" her instead.

    Covering up physical abuse is one of many reasons why homeschooling needs more oversight.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 1 week ago (3 children)

    Isn't CPS supposed to be a sharp sword of the state?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 week ago (1 child)

    It's why they act like boots are so delicious. Not because they enjoy licking boots but because they see it as a necessary downside to a hierarchy existing that gives them full power over what they see as their domain. It might be their household, their land, their business, their social group.

    It's why they get so upset at the idea of someone sharing information and think everyone should mind their own business (eg when cheating). It's behind the "no snitching" mindset (though that one also has a dose of "not all laws are just" and my personal pov is that it is right to inform to help someone being hurt but it is not right to inform to hurt someone who is breaking some law without a real victim or a "victim" that themselves are hurting people but through legal means, which is why I hate thieves but don't care about shoplifters at big chains). Though there's also a tribalism aspect to that, where it's acceptable to expose some cases of cheating if your loyalty to the victim should be higher than to the cheater, in their mind at least. And for some reason the idea that their own values can determine that loyalty others give them breaks their mind (eg "BuT fAmilY!" or "bUt waS yOUr frIeNd fIIIrst!").

    It's a worldview that puts power above everything else, while the left cares more about how power is used with an emphasis on justice. And the reason that it's an eternal conflict is that neither side are objectively wrong. Those with the most power do make the rules and can even break those rules because one needs power to enforce them. But also if the majority puts aside their own lust for power and works together for each other, than can overpower the powerful individuals and rule for justice instead of their own greed. But even then, opportunists will always be seeking their own power.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 120 points 1 week ago

    Things I wish I could unread.

  • source
  • [–] 59 points 1 week ago (1 child)

    Such a difference between this and Epstein, while the subject of sexual abuse of minors is roughly the same. I guess the lesson is, if you're gonna rape and pillage, first be filthy rich.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [+] 113 points 1 week ago (13 children)
  • [–] 88 points 1 week ago (2 children)

    i thought the post title was bad enough.. but daaaaaaamn. they sure do go the extra mile.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 36 points 1 week ago* (4 children)

    "Brotherson" is a word I had never expected to learn, and in retrospect one I had hoped to never know.

    Edit: The article is vague, so I suppose "sisterdaughter" is another word I can add to the list of words I don't want to think about.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • [–] 21 points 1 week ago (1 child)

    That's not even the worst thing said in that article:

    "This child is traumatized. She's been through a horrific ordeal," [Assistant District Attorney Janet] Hutson previously said in an interview with Tulsa CBS affiliate KOTV. "Not only has somebody gotten her pregnant, but she gave birth at home without medical assistance, and this will be her life for the rest of her life."

    "This will be her life for the rest of her life"??? I know it's the job of the prosecutor to frame things in the worst way, but fuck everything about that. Whoever is left of her family needs to do everything they can to try to help her get past this trauma. And that baby is not her responsibility, either, and never will be.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • [–] 102 points 1 week ago (11 children)

    What's even weirder is that they gave the mother 7 consecutive life sentences, but the father who actually impregnated the child only got 1 life sentence + 42 years.

    ☝️ 1
  • source
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 1 week ago* (2 children)

    It also said that he was charged with the same 6 counts of child neglect though. So either the article was unclear on his actual sentence also being multiple consecutive life sentences or the charges of neglect didn't all stick for some reason.

    I don't have any specifics but it could be that the father was not in a position to actually be responsible for her care at some point. Maybe the mother kicked him out or something. I'm just speculating, though. No idea really.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] -5 points 1 week ago (1 child)

    It's simple. In the USA, and many other counties, rape of any sort by a man isn't as bad as anything a woman/mother might do wrong. I didn't read the article however I wouldn't be surprised to find out that the husband was also beating, raping or otherwise abusing his wife.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 1 week ago (5 children)
  • [–] 12 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

    It's mostly what it sounds like. Prison until you die. But, unless given a life sentence without the possibility of parole, once you've served a minimum number of years (and that number varies on the crime, state/federal law and judge's applied minimums) you can become eligible for parole. What that means is a parole board can determine later that you have sufficiently served time for your crimes, that you are remorseful for them, and that you no longer pose a danger to anyone, and release you from prison before your death.

    When it comes to sentences with specific years attached, like this guy's 42 year sentence, it is a bit different. They can also end early with a parole decision, but there is a minimum time served for each sentence before you are eligible for parole. That minimum scales with the full sentence. It is, I think, usually 1/3rd of the full sentence, unless the judge sets a higher minimum.

    Also you can be given multiple years long sentences, one per guilty verdict, but depending on the judge's discretion or if those crimes are statuarily required to be served consecutively (i.e. one after the other), sometimes those sentences are to be served concurrently (i.e. at the same time). What that means is, if you get sentenced to two 1 year sentences and a 3 year sentence to be served concurrently, you're really only serving 3 years. But if you have to serve them consecutively, you'll be serving all 5 years in total. And your parole potential starts, thus, later.

    So it's kind of complicated. Sometimes you see someone getting a life sentence and they're released in 20 years. Sometimes you see someone get a dozen sentences but they're all served concurrently and they're out in a few years too. Sometimes someone gets multiple sentences to be served consecutively and ends up with like 200 years in prison and are essentially guaranteed to die in prison before they are eligible for parole, despite none of their crimes carrying a life sentence potential.

    Also this dude's 42 years and life sentence are consecutive, so he must serve the minimum of both before possibility of parole. But that is probably about 35-40 years from now at minimum. I'm unclear if the mother's 7 life sentences are consecutive or concurrent, but since they didn't say, probably concurrent.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 1 week ago (1 child)

    Thanks for all that explanation. It ended up in me being even more confused what the point of 7 concurrent life sentences is.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

    Sentences are concurrent by default unless the specific law they are convicted of breaking requires their sentence to be served consecutively or the judge specifically rules that they are to be consecutive. I am not really sure on the history of why that is though.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 8 points 1 week ago

    From a technical standpoint, getting multiple life sentences means if one gets removed on appeal, the others still stand.

    For the victim(s), especially if there's multiple victims, each life sentence acknowledges each crime committed against them and validates them.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 36 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (5 children)

    This entire article and some clarifications in the comments make me feel sick. This entire story is fucked up and i wish I hadn’t read it. Poor child is traumatised for life

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 18 points 1 week ago (3 children)

    Sadder still, society will expect her get over it and carry on. Society doesn’t understand that there’s no “normal” for her any more.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 week ago (2 children)

    Hopefully she can get a lot of help and therapy while she's still young. Once you're an adult no one gives a fuck what you've been through or what you're going through.

    The bills won't pay themselves. Food won't magically show up just because you're too mentally or emotionally fucked up to function like a normal adult.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 16 points 1 week ago*

    Thank you for this warning.

    Someone once wrote a comment on the internet which i read, which said something like, " when you have a choice to look at something traumatic or not, you don't have to look. "

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 34 points 1 week ago (8 children)

    Why was an 11 year old pregnant?

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [+] -12 points 1 week ago (2 children)

    when a dad and a daughter love each other very much........

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 32 points 1 week ago

    Jesus Christ Oklahoma

  • source
  • [–] 26 points 1 week ago (2 children)

    So this child rapist gets life in prison, but the one doing it at scale gets… the Presidency.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 26 points 1 week ago

    I hear people say Oklahoma is the most free state in the union, and yet they won't let you rape your own child and force her to give birth? That's not the America my ancestors had nothing to do with building.

  • source
  • [–] 22 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

    Yep, the news from the Oklahoma Oblast no longer surprises me. Certainly the Orange Pedo Shitstain will pardon the sick bastards because that is why he is mentioned over 38,000 times in a certain set of files.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 1 week ago (1 child)

    Certainly the Orange Pedo Shitstain will pardon the sick bastards

    He doesn't have pardon power over state charges. But, it is Oklahoma. So, Republican governor Kevin Stitt will still probably give it. After all, the Republican position seems to be that abusing children is a good thing.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 35 points 1 week ago (6 children)

    Mom goes to jail, father gets a seat in Trump's cabinet.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 week ago* (3 children)

    Article says he was sentenced to life+42 years before her. Good thing Trump's got pardon powers, huh? 🤮

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 1 week ago (2 children)

    Presidential pardons can't touch state-level convictions, only federal. That said, there's nothing stopping the Oklahoma governor from issuing a pardon...

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 17 points 1 week ago (1 child)

    The headline: oh that sounds horrible.

    The description on this post: even worse than I thought it would be.

    The article: not a single picture of the husband, who is also serving a life sentence. I wanna see what that mistake of a person looks like.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 16 points 1 week ago

    (╯°□°)╯︵ ┻━┻

  • source
  • [–] 56 points 1 week ago (5 children)

    Oh gosh oh gee, I wonder who they voted for?

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 87 points 1 week ago (4 children)

    Really? Come on. That's quite a stretch you're making here - really grasping at straws to assume they might have voted for anyone other than Trump. The nerve.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 1 week ago (2 children)

    No it can be just non political where the republican is too moderate so they don't vote or only vote for a random third party. There are plenty of hard right people that don't vote especially in deep red or non competitive areas.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 24 points 1 week ago (1 child)

    There’s no hate like Christian love.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 24 points 1 week ago (1 child)

    I have a 12 year old. Wtf is wrong with people

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 11 points 1 week ago

    Sweet home Oklahoma

  • source
  • [–] 10 points 1 week ago (4 children)

    Why was her husband given less of a sentence?

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 23 points 1 week ago (3 children)

    Less?

    Walker's husband, Dustin Joel Walker, already received a life sentence after pleading guilty earlier this year to one count of sexual abuse of a child under 12 and six counts of child neglect.

    King sentenced the father to life in prison plus 42 years, ordering him to serve the 42-year sentence before beginning the life term.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 19 points 1 week ago (1 child)

    Mom was given seven consecutive life sentences, so I guess that's technically more. Both will die there.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

    You're right, I missed the "seven consecutive" life sentences part. I hope they're not served at all concurrently somehow (though 'consecutive' would seem to indicate not), just because.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 10 points 1 week ago (1 child)

    Justus is facing one count of child neglect.

    But will Justus be served?

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 19 points 1 week ago

    Yeah, the story isn't about a mother giving shitty medical care to her daughter. It's about how she got pregnant in the first place...

  • source
  • [–] 8 points 1 week ago

    On the plus side, she could still have a future doing campaign commercials.

  • source
  • [–] 13 points 1 week ago (3 children)

    Seems like there’s often a Maxwell when you find an Epstein.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 week ago (1 child)

    Maxwell is currently in a minimum security club med prison with a therapy dog and Internet access, right? After making a deal with the US government that seems to have resulted in no extra prosecutions?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • That's a dad who spent way too much time "thinking about the children"

  • source
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›
    2 comments in c/childfree@lemmy.world view that post