[–] 2 points 6 minutes ago

It's not just a rebrand. It's an attempt to invoke National Security Concerns (TM) in the arch lawsuit. And then they'll say the the judicial branch should not scrutinize the National Security determinations of the Executive branch.

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 24 minutes ago

    and the separation of affidavit ballots could result in ballots being separated from their envelopes, putting voters' right to a secret ballot in jeopardy, said the Colom campaign.

    This seems like it's not accurate. As long as ballots are in the envelopes, their contents can be associated with the individual, right?

    The normal procedure is to verify the voter's eligibility without looking at the ballot inside the envelope. Then, if eligibility is accepted, tear the flap off the envelope and mix it with a bunch of similar envelopes. Then open the envelopes and count the ballots after they have been separated from the identifying information.

  • source
  • [–] 10 points 15 hours ago*

    Be more disturbed that the Minuteman III missiles, one leg of the nuclear triad, rely on the big 8 inch floppies in their launch control systems.

    The replacement missiles will not enter service until the "early 2030s."

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 26 points 15 hours ago (1 child)

    All those people who were just elected need to step up and keep their eyes on the ball. Because there's still at least two quarters of antifash left to play.

  • source
  • [–] 14 points 15 hours ago (1 child)

    Fuck Whitmire. He could have signed this order any time before the election, but he didn't.

    And then he went ripping up bike lanes that we had already paid good money to install. How the heck does that make any damn sense?

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 13 points 1 day ago (1 child)

    I think the whole strategy is to win the provisional ballot fight and get the secretary of state to trigger a recount on the main ballots and hope that recount goes really well for them and shutdown any further recounting after that and then somehow keep the provisionals from ever being counted.

    I think it's a lot of hopium.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 68 points 1 day ago (8 children)

    Provisional ballots are created when a voter shows up at the poll, but there's some kind of problem with their registration that prevents them from voting. On election day the provisional ballots are tossed in a metaphorical pile labelled "in case of close race, open me."

    In most elections, the margin of victory is high enough that no one needs to open the provisional ballots or check their eligibility.

    But in this race, it is close enough, so they now need to check whether each individual provisional vote is really eligible to vote or not. This is called "chase and cure," and it usually involves tracking down and talking to the voters and others (the chase) and getting whatever documentation is missing to establish the eligibility (the cure).

    The Republican party doesn't want these ballots to be cured or counted, because they expect the votes inside to skew heavily Democratic. So they will oppose. Partly because they caused a bunch of the provisional ballots by kicking people off the rolls wrongly.

    However, I think this is a pretty good position for Colom, if he has an 1,800 lead or so, and he expects any added votes to skew to him.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  •  

    This is the third time that the Supreme Court has decided this question on the emergency docket. The Court had some words for the 8th circuit panel that necessitated this decision.

    But on September 21, 11 days after this Court’s most recent order, the U. S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit ordered the District Court to enter a permanent injunction in effect requiring use of the 2025 map instead of the 2022 map in the 2026 election. Given this Court’s two prior orders in this litigation, our conclusion that this was error should come as no surprise.2

    The final two sentences are also extremely blunt by Supreme Court standards. (Also, notice the belt-and-suspenders wording: do not prohibit, and do not require).

    The District Court and Court of Appeals should not enjoin or otherwise prohibit the use of the 2022 map in the 2026 congressional election in Missouri. And the District Court and Court of Appeals should not order or otherwise require Missouri to use the 2025 map in the 2026 congressional election in Missouri.

     

    The Trump administration has dropped its case against a former Olympic canoeist charged in connection with damage to the Reflecting Pool, acknowledging their allegations against David “Davey” Hearn don’t hold water.

    officials obtained information that undermined “the evidentiary basis for the indictment” against Hearn.

     

    After the supreme court denied Trump's petition for cert in the $5 million defamation case, the district judge has ordered the clerk to pay out the now $5.8 million judgement to E Jean Caroll's lawyers.

    The original judgement was for $5 million, and it earned about $800k interest during the appeal. The money is coming directly from the court because Trump earlier paid the full amount into the court registry in lieu of posting an appeal bond.

    Trump immediately appealed the pay-out order. But since there's no stay, it's still effective.

    E Jean Caroll also has a separate judgement against Trump for about $80 million. That case is still on appeal.

     

    Washington, DC resident Sam O'Hara noticed a couple of national guard soldiers patrolling the streets, and he decided to follow them around playing the Star Wars "Imperial March" on a portable speaker.

    For this he was handcuffed and detained for about 20 minutes. Now he has reached a settlement where the government will pay him an undisclosed amount of money in compensation.

     

    Breaking now, Judge Emmet Sullivan has granted a preliminary injunction that orders the Department of Justice to either release a number of specific Epstein files to the public, or to "show cause" why they shouldn't.

    The government has until July 2 to file responses.

    Lawyer and journalist Katie Phang filed suit to enforce the Epstein Transparency Act. The judge has evidently determined that she has suffered harm from being unable to report on the unreleased files, and therefore has standing to sue.

    This decision seems like it might be headed for an appeal, but Judge Sullivan declined to stay, or delay implementation, to allow the government time to appeal. So the clock to July 2 is currently ticking.

    Bates numbers that are mentioned:

    Ordered to unredact names:

    • EFTA00749245
    • EFTA01187999
    • EFTA01930501
    • ETFA01928255
    • EFTA00628112
    • EFTA02648868
    • EFTA02504630
    • EFTA01022356
    • EFTA01703108
    • EFTA00038227

    Ordered to produce underlying FBI notes:

    • EFTA01245620
    • EFTA02858481
    • EFTA02858491
    • EFTA02858495

    Opinion: https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.dcd.291779/gov.uscourts.dcd.291779.16.0_2.pdf

    Full court docket: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/73246595/phang-v-blanche/

    UPDATE: July 2 is now here. In a move that should surprise absolutely no one, the government decided to produce no additional documents, and they filed a lengthy response explaining reasons why they should not. Short version:

    • All of the redacted email addresses are either victims; or the email address appears in both the name and email fields (like "jsmith@gmail.com" jsmith@gmail.com); or in one case Thomas Massie already outed the guy, so there's no need for the government to comply with the court order (?)
    • The government claims that they count people as "victims" if they started out as victims, but later performed reprehensible acts (according to the files)
    • One indictment was over-redacted, but they claim it's okay because they unredacted some of the same names in some other documents. Another indictment only contains redacted "victims."
    • No need to produce FBI interview notes because the FBI always types up exactly the stuff in their notes into the final report.
    • Reviewing foreign language documents for release is just too darn hard to do.
    • The government plans to publish the redaction log as required, but the law doesn't put a deadline on that, so the judge shouldn't either.
     

    A lawyer working with the Minnesota attorney’s office said she just wants some sleep, after working so hard to try to get ICE to follow court orders.

    “I wish you would just hold me in contempt of court so I can get 24 hours of sleep,” Le said. “The system sucks, this job sucks, I am trying with every breath I have to get you what I need.”

    Edit clarification: This attorney works for the federal government, not the State of Minnesota.

     

    Over the weekend, Judge Nachmanoff made it clear that a large amount of discovery material is to be delivered to James Comey today. The prosecution team from North Carolina seem to be engaging in a series of stall tactics to delay this.

    The eastern district of Virginia is known informally as the "rocket docket" because of its fast resolution times for cases.

    view more: next ›