At this point I think CEOs are just trying to rage bait us
post
Personally, I think it's quite terrible that Sam Altman isn't currently experiencing testicular torsion.
Owning shovels is bad says shovel renting company.
He can rent ram from me if he thinks it's so terrible, it's the best option for those who need compute after all. I'll rent a VM with 16GB of RAM to him for let's say $1000 a month. Go ahead Sam, it's the best utilization after all. For $5,000 a month you can have a part time "spot" instance with a GPU.
Oh but I don't work like Nvidia, Sam, you get the same terms we do with subscriptions. You miss one payment, one payment doesn't clear, you're cut off.
That sounds about fair for how us consumers have been treated.
I've got 32GB of RAM that sits mostly unused in my main PC. I've got another micro PC with 16GB (I think) that hasn't been on for year. Laptop has only 8GB but that hasn't been turned on for sic months.
Hoping this makes Sam upset.
Missed payments should be a suspension with a fine, plus late fee, plus convenience fee, plus admin fee, plus intrest on the late payment, plus reinstatement fee.
I have a combined somewhere around 512GiB DRAM. I am glad to know it pisses Altmann Off.
To answers the obvious: Homelab.
I have a combined somewhere around 512GiB DRAM
aka your savings for retirement.
I've got at least 256 in sticks lying around. Maybe another 128 or so in SBCs and laptops with soldered ram.
I have 512GB of ECC in one server, 64GB of DDR5 in my desktop, and probably another couple of hundred GB or so of DDR4 from previous desktops in a box on my shelf.
Starting to worry about a home invasion by one of the AI companies.
Thankfully, OpenAI will barely survive 2026, and will die n 2027. We shouldn't have to hear too much more about him.
I have previously posted about having a set of 20cl rum bottles, each bottle being dedicated to when I no longer have to live on the same planet as particular bastards that do their best to ruin everything they touch.
I recently bought another set of 20cl rum bottles, and I am thinking of dedicating them to AI companies crashing and burning....
But I am worried, they may not crash and burn, some other person will just buy them before they die completely....
Oh i like this idea...good excuse to get a decent whisky on stock:-)
This is my current setup:

I like it, however I've taken the opposite strategy and simply drink to cope with their existence in the present.

I don't like having too many open bottles at once. Shame distilling even just for personal consumption is illegal here as I would love to make some of my own spirits to go with my mead. Easier storage for spirits too tbh.
It's not wine, it doesn't go off quickly. There's this concept of the "infinity bottle" where you make your own ever-evolving blend of leftovers. It's usually associated with whiskey but can work well for rums.
What is the Gran Anejo to?
I haven't decided yet, so far the best I have thought of is "the bottle of the unknown bad guy", a bottle reserved for a when someone dies and you draw a sigh of relief.
Wait, sorry, I thought you ment the last bottle....
The Gran Anejo is dedicated to Rupert Murdoch, one of the true media ghouls
Big talk for someone who can't get the funding for their insane spending anymore.
i think it's quite terrible that so much oxygen is wasted on these mf'ers.
From a global allocation perspective, actually, it's quite terrible to have everybody have a bunch of the world's limited supply of DRAM sitting in their own computer and being used 5% of the time," Altman said. "You want maximum utilization in the cloud if you're trying to deal with this very supply-constrained environment. And somehow many people's intuition is the opposite of that.
taken from this interview https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iMsUcCYNKqY
Tayloristic Calitalism has become everything that they warned you Marxist Communism would be
My intuition says what’s good for me, not what’s good for Scam Altman
Yeah that's the thing about how delusional these people are. They've completely convinced themselves that what is good for them is best for everyone else, and blame us for being so shortsighted that we don't cede all control, agency, and resources to them. Fucking morons.
Clammy Sam Altman? Clamuel?
deal with this very supply-constrained environment
It's only supply constrained right now because YOU are buying all it up to try and force everyone to use AI they don't need, and increasingly don't want as they realize it's pretty useless for 99% of people.
Sounds like Sammy sees what way the winds are blowing, and is scared
Models are getting a lot more efficient, and the billion dollar models are going to have to compete with something basically free to run
Only a moron would think OpenAI was ever turning profitable.
There were two possible ways,
-
Subscription prices rose to a point no one would be interested to pay.
-
Inference got so cheap, that 98% of all use cases could be run by open weight models on local machines
In both situations OpenAi and Anthropic lost.
The bull case has been a bear case since the beginning. Both companies will most likely stay alive, but will eventually have their costs turned down as they're going to be bought out by some of the mastodonts.
The best possible scenario for either of them, is if a government want a frontier lab and decides to buy one already functioning. Rather than having their universities start from scratch
Something that has a fixed up front cost to run*
Otherwise, YES!
Depending on your rig there will still be recurring cost (electricity)
Maybe, maybe not. Phones are getting more optimized for AI and have decent RAM, so the on device models may not be great at agentic problem solving, but they'll probably meet most people's AI needs
Plus, any reasonable gaming computer or MacBook can run models... Maybe a bit slowly and maybe just the compressed 8gb models, but they can pretty much all do it to some degree
So I think we'll be in a place where there's little or no upfront cost after a couple more key advancements
Quite terrible to have all that wealth in the hands of so few. We should distribute that more evenly to raise the quality of living for more.
Next he'll be paying off politicians to make it legal for police to come to your door and seize your RAM for 'national security'. There'll be a huge right wing media campaign, funded by the taxpayer, under the heading 'The War Against Home RAM'. People who own their own computers will be labelled 'terrorists'.
Keeping the AI bubble alive requires infinite compute resources for the hyperscalers
Sam Altman should be hung upside down and forced to subsidize hardware prices for everybody to offset the damage he's caused.
I took all the ram out of my computer and now it won't turn on. How do i get to ai now?
Fuckin moron.
"These resources make me money, so only I should have them". This is like clowning on people for owning their music instead of streaming it, or growing their food instead of going to a super Walmart.
Fuck that guy
So, so many fewer people agree with him that with the rest of us.
It's quite terrible we're slipping into a technocracy because building my own PC is becoming cost prohibitive for the first time since the fucking 60s.
What's terrible is that the tech industry is constantly engineering for planned failure. Nothing ever just lasts the way it should. People literally think it makes sense to buy a new phone every 2 years when that's actually bat shit crazy. There isn't any RGB, folding ass gimmick that takes away from that fact. They make it an issue because they can't just come out with what will essentially be peak for modern PC. Capitalism ruins everything.
If I used ai, I would need a device that has ram in it to do so. I can't just yell at the clouds.
This reminds me of the work being done on grid and distributed computing up to the mid-2000s.
The idea is that your computer does your work but it can also do the work of others, assuming the work can be divided up into small chunks.
And it’s not limited to processing tasks! There are grid computer implementations that distribute storage across fleets of machines to improve redundancy, reduce the need for centralised file servers, etc.
But it was always intended to be implemented at the organisation level (work, school, uni). At home you’d be unlikely to need it, but you could always opt in.
I think the main survivors from this era are distributed computing programs (Folding@Home, crypto mining malware, etc.)

all 80 comments