all 80 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 152 points 1 week ago (9 children)

At this point I think CEOs are just trying to rage bait us

  • source
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 63 points 1 week ago (3 children)

    The more we talk about AI the more he stays relevant, the longer he can prop up his stock price.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 23 points 1 week ago (2 children)

    No it's the money that keeps them relevant, not us talking about it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • To be clear I'm not demonizing us for talking about it, but that's his tactic. He says something that keeps him in the news cycle, that keeps him in the minds of investors, which keeps his valuation up, and that's the money. If he became irrelevant in the news that would mean his valuation was going down, and he'd be losing money - so yes I think him stirring the pot is to keep OpenAI relevant and talked about.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 18 points 1 week ago (3 children)

    "Please revolt. Me and my billionaire friends would like to see how our AI powered MG42s fair against a swarm."

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 104 points 1 week ago (2 children)

    Personally, I think it's quite terrible that Sam Altman isn't currently experiencing testicular torsion.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 56 points 1 week ago (1 child)

    Owning shovels is bad says shovel renting company.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 55 points 1 week ago* (2 children)

    He can rent ram from me if he thinks it's so terrible, it's the best option for those who need compute after all. I'll rent a VM with 16GB of RAM to him for let's say $1000 a month. Go ahead Sam, it's the best utilization after all. For $5,000 a month you can have a part time "spot" instance with a GPU.

    Oh but I don't work like Nvidia, Sam, you get the same terms we do with subscriptions. You miss one payment, one payment doesn't clear, you're cut off.

    That sounds about fair for how us consumers have been treated.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 1 week ago

    I've got 32GB of RAM that sits mostly unused in my main PC. I've got another micro PC with 16GB (I think) that hasn't been on for year. Laptop has only 8GB but that hasn't been turned on for sic months.

    Hoping this makes Sam upset.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 54 points 1 week ago

    It’s quite terrible for Sam Altman to have a head, and yet.

  • source
  • [–] 42 points 1 week ago (2 children)
  • [–] 37 points 1 week ago (5 children)

    I have a combined somewhere around 512GiB DRAM. I am glad to know it pisses Altmann Off.

    To answers the obvious: Homelab.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 73 points 1 week ago

    It's quite terrible for AI CEOs to keep breathing

  • source
  • [–] 28 points 1 week ago (11 children)

    Thankfully, OpenAI will barely survive 2026, and will die n 2027. We shouldn't have to hear too much more about him.

  • source
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] 17 points 1 week ago (10 children)

    I have previously posted about having a set of 20cl rum bottles, each bottle being dedicated to when I no longer have to live on the same planet as particular bastards that do their best to ruin everything they touch.

    I recently bought another set of 20cl rum bottles, and I am thinking of dedicating them to AI companies crashing and burning....

    But I am worried, they may not crash and burn, some other person will just buy them before they die completely....

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 1 week ago (9 children)

    Oh i like this idea...good excuse to get a decent whisky on stock:⁠-⁠)

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 1 week ago (8 children)
  • [–] 11 points 1 week ago* (3 children)

    I like it, however I've taken the opposite strategy and simply drink to cope with their existence in the present.

    I don't have a problem

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 week ago (2 children)

    I don't like having too many open bottles at once. Shame distilling even just for personal consumption is illegal here as I would love to make some of my own spirits to go with my mead. Easier storage for spirits too tbh.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 week ago (1 child)

    It's not wine, it doesn't go off quickly. There's this concept of the "infinity bottle" where you make your own ever-evolving blend of leftovers. It's usually associated with whiskey but can work well for rums.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 4 points 1 week ago (3 children)
  • [–] 4 points 1 week ago

    I haven't decided yet, so far the best I have thought of is "the bottle of the unknown bad guy", a bottle reserved for a when someone dies and you draw a sigh of relief.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 28 points 1 week ago

    Big talk for someone who can't get the funding for their insane spending anymore.

  • source
  • [–] 25 points 1 week ago

    i think it's quite terrible that so much oxygen is wasted on these mf'ers.

  • source
  • [–] 24 points 1 week ago (8 children)

    From a global allocation perspective, actually, it's quite terrible to have everybody have a bunch of the world's limited supply of DRAM sitting in their own computer and being used 5% of the time," Altman said. "You want maximum utilization in the cloud if you're trying to deal with this very supply-constrained environment. And somehow many people's intuition is the opposite of that.

    taken from this interview https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iMsUcCYNKqY

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 1 week ago (3 children)

    My intuition says what’s good for me, not what’s good for Scam Altman

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 1 week ago

    Yeah that's the thing about how delusional these people are. They've completely convinced themselves that what is good for them is best for everyone else, and blame us for being so shortsighted that we don't cede all control, agency, and resources to them. Fucking morons.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 16 points 1 week ago (2 children)

    deal with this very supply-constrained environment

    It's only supply constrained right now because YOU are buying all it up to try and force everyone to use AI they don't need, and increasingly don't want as they realize it's pretty useless for 99% of people.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 23 points 1 week ago (7 children)

    Sounds like Sammy sees what way the winds are blowing, and is scared

    Models are getting a lot more efficient, and the billion dollar models are going to have to compete with something basically free to run

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 1 week ago (1 child)

    Only a moron would think OpenAI was ever turning profitable.

    There were two possible ways,

    1. Subscription prices rose to a point no one would be interested to pay.

    2. Inference got so cheap, that 98% of all use cases could be run by open weight models on local machines

    In both situations OpenAi and Anthropic lost.

    The bull case has been a bear case since the beginning. Both companies will most likely stay alive, but will eventually have their costs turned down as they're going to be bought out by some of the mastodonts.

    The best possible scenario for either of them, is if a government want a frontier lab and decides to buy one already functioning. Rather than having their universities start from scratch

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 4 points 1 week ago (4 children)

    Something that has a fixed up front cost to run*

    Otherwise, YES!

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 week ago (2 children)

    Depending on your rig there will still be recurring cost (electricity)

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 week ago

    Maybe, maybe not. Phones are getting more optimized for AI and have decent RAM, so the on device models may not be great at agentic problem solving, but they'll probably meet most people's AI needs

    Plus, any reasonable gaming computer or MacBook can run models... Maybe a bit slowly and maybe just the compressed 8gb models, but they can pretty much all do it to some degree

    So I think we'll be in a place where there's little or no upfront cost after a couple more key advancements

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 23 points 1 week ago

    Quite terrible to have all that wealth in the hands of so few. We should distribute that more evenly to raise the quality of living for more.

  • source
  • [–] 23 points 1 week ago (2 children)

    Next he'll be paying off politicians to make it legal for police to come to your door and seize your RAM for 'national security'. There'll be a huge right wing media campaign, funded by the taxpayer, under the heading 'The War Against Home RAM'. People who own their own computers will be labelled 'terrorists'.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 20 points 1 week ago

    Keeping the AI bubble alive requires infinite compute resources for the hyperscalers

  • source
  • [–] 15 points 1 week ago

    Sam Altman should be hung upside down and forced to subsidize hardware prices for everybody to offset the damage he's caused.

  • source
  • [–] 10 points 1 week ago

    What a dumbass. CEO does not require intelligence.

  • source
  • [–] 10 points 1 week ago

    I took all the ram out of my computer and now it won't turn on. How do i get to ai now?

    Fuckin moron.

  • source
  • [–] 7 points 1 week ago

    "These resources make me money, so only I should have them". This is like clowning on people for owning their music instead of streaming it, or growing their food instead of going to a super Walmart.

  • source
  • [–] 7 points 1 week ago

    “Do you really need two kidneys?”

  • source
  • Get fucked, Sam!

  • source
  • [–] 7 points 1 week ago

    Fuckin give up your ram to your new god

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 1 week ago (1 child)
  • [–] 4 points 1 week ago

    How bout we ram his dumb head up his dumb ass?

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 1 week ago

    What really needs ram is his front door.

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 1 week ago

    So, so many fewer people agree with him that with the rest of us.

    It's quite terrible we're slipping into a technocracy because building my own PC is becoming cost prohibitive for the first time since the fucking 60s.

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 1 week ago

    What's terrible is that the tech industry is constantly engineering for planned failure. Nothing ever just lasts the way it should. People literally think it makes sense to buy a new phone every 2 years when that's actually bat shit crazy. There isn't any RGB, folding ass gimmick that takes away from that fact. They make it an issue because they can't just come out with what will essentially be peak for modern PC. Capitalism ruins everything.

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 1 week ago

    If I used ai, I would need a device that has ram in it to do so. I can't just yell at the clouds.

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 1 week ago

    This reminds me of the work being done on grid and distributed computing up to the mid-2000s.

    The idea is that your computer does your work but it can also do the work of others, assuming the work can be divided up into small chunks.

    And it’s not limited to processing tasks! There are grid computer implementations that distribute storage across fleets of machines to improve redundancy, reduce the need for centralised file servers, etc.

    But it was always intended to be implemented at the organisation level (work, school, uni). At home you’d be unlikely to need it, but you could always opt in.

    I think the main survivors from this era are distributed computing programs (Folding@Home, crypto mining malware, etc.)

  • source
  • 69 comments in c/fuck_ai@lemmy.world view that post
    17 comments in c/hackernews@lemmy.bestiver.se view that post