"You can ask chatgpt how to wipe your ass since you're unable to think for yourself."

Oh wow, that's so cool. Definitely worth the $2 trillion spent on AI so far.

This is less meaningful than filling bookshelves in Skyrim.

fill the shelves based on what it knows about you

The results on her shelves:

• Do you struggle to be creative?

• How to steal art

• EXTREMELY ONLINE

You can tell she outsources all of her brain activity to ChatGPT just from her not questioning the placement of books.

Also, most books are not presented on bookshelves like that. Spine out, usually.

And like, why have to take a picture of an empty bookshelf? Just have your slop machine generate the shelf too

"we swear we didn't train on copyrighted works but for pure coincidence we can generate an exact copy of the cover of such copyrighted work"

Don't we already have perfectly good recommendation algorithms? Not to mention the more social alternative of asking for recommendations...

Absolutely devastating to have "Extremely Online" on the list.

These are just marketable books, which makes sense for statistical model blob.

Wow! I guess AI was worth all that water!

...seriously, what's the point of making it an image aside from posting a (probably unpaid!) ad on Twitter?

Best new relationship I've formed this year is with my local bookstores owner. She knows what I've been reading and we talk about what I'm looking for. My favorite books I've read recently have come from her. Humans > machines

No book reader would store their books like that you fucking moron. They'd have as many as they could fit crammed in there. Maybe if you actually read more you wouldn't need AI to do your thinking for you.

Is there a Venn diagram for people who are into Ai like this and people who go to strip clubs and think the stripper is "into" them?

That's just a shotgun blast of random books.

Generating a list of books isn't hard or impressive. Taking the known cover art for those books and displaying it in a layout doesn't require fancy ai either.

Also not sure why you'd want this beyond just the list

I read this a bit differently. How much does the AI agent actually know about me? It probably has internal directives to not disclose exactly how much information it - or the parent company- has profiled, but prompts like this might be a workaround to learning how much they've really got on me.

A publishing executive just creamed his pants and just fired his whole marketing and sales staff to buy promotions from chatgpt. OpenAI executives cream their pants now it's confirmed they control what people buy and read from now on.

Yikes

OK, but literally why would you do that? Genuinely baffled. Like, is this someone that doesn't read trying to convince others (or themselves?) that they're avid readers or something?

"Ai bro gets recomended the book "steal like an artist" by the ai itself"

Such an amazing self own

The perspective and reflections make no sense either.

Yeah, but the librarian won't know which anime you've cranked it to.

I don't know what people are doing with their fucking time man. 🤦

An orbital ring or a machine that can generate generic book covers. Hmmm.

you could literally just use. an actual recommendation algorithm

Yup, it's like people are just ignoring that you don't need GenAI or social media.

You can do all of these things in analog. Those of us who existed before the Internet know that very well.

Why though? I genuinely don't know what the use case is here. If you have a bookshelf it already has your books on it, you could take a photo of that. If you wanted a list of book recommendations, a text list would be more useful.

Steal like an Artist Psychopathic Silicon Valley Billionaire

@destructdisc No human would put their Books on the shelf this way. But a clanker wouldn't know.

Justine's bookshelf is a boring person's bookshelf. AI makes you boring.

I can turn my head to the left and see my massive library instead

"Tomorrow and tomorrow and tomorrow"

Title created by predictive text.

"Today I am not a psychotic nympho destroying the same as a lot of the same time and effort again and the same thing again and the same thing again and the same thing again..."