I'm glad for the game devs but this article's reporting is really confusing. 226% increase on what? They haven't released a game recently before this. Of course you're going to make money right after you release something new. A better comparison would be against the last quarter that they released a new game.
Especially if you live somewhere like the UK where we killed off all the apex predators. We need to hunt deer,or else they'll do more environmental damage.
Why though? I genuinely don't know what the use case is here. If you have a bookshelf it already has your books on it, you could take a photo of that. If you wanted a list of book recommendations, a text list would be more useful.
Just wait until you hear about scotland's national animal
That AI was clearly trained on stolen property - the angry guy is obviously meant to be Dan from "Dan Vs".
There was a lot going on this episode. Loved it
Human infested cities. Cat infested cafés. Cattle infested farms.
One big thing you need to think about is accessibility. This is something that came up in a conversation with a local representative in the UK - for children in public schools it is a requirements that any technology have good accessibility and not leave anyone behind. And accessibility tools on linux are, suffice to say, not great. Especially when compared with those on other closed systems. My local government ended up going with iPads for kids in schools, and the accessibility tooling on these was a factor in that choice.
Indie games are good, but if privacy is a concern be careful of any game developed in a big engine like unity. My firewall pings a warning every time I launch a unity game because they all send analytics data back to unity. If it's single player and you block all outgoing connections by default, you're fine though.
Worth noting that the trendline in that plot would be pointing down anyway, before you include season 4. That tends to happen for every long running TV show.
Bring on the model collapse!
Those other services are not great but they are at the very least not actively promoting AI-generated child abuse imagery. It's an incredibly low bar, but they do pass it.