President Donald Trump declined to endorse Vice President JD Vance for the 2028 presidential election during a press briefing in Ireland

top 99 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 160 points 3 weeks ago (13 children)

Yeah I mean Trump wants to run in 2028, why would he endorse someone else?

  • source
  • hideshow 13 child comments
  • [–] 29 points 3 weeks ago (12 children)
  • [–] 12 points 3 weeks ago (10 children)
  • [–] 32 points 3 weeks ago (9 children)

    He might endorse his own family if he doesn't run himself. All the benefits, none of the work.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 29 points 3 weeks ago (8 children)

    Don't think he cares about his family. He wants the glory for himself. But it's a good guess.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 32 points 3 weeks ago* (5 children)

    I can see Trump Jr. running on a explicit platform of "I will let my dad live in his bunker in the WH basement and make all the decisions"

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 3 weeks ago (4 children)

    Which one? Cokey McSniffles or the dumb one?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

    No, eric is the ugly one.

    I do like how we all know the one with a vagina isn't even in the realm of possibilities for them.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 72 points 3 weeks ago (4 children)
  • [–] 16 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

    I do like his pope-killing record but that's about it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 32 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

    He does seem to kill everything he touches. He went and endorsed Orban and he immediately lost the election LMAO.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 61 points 3 weeks ago (6 children)

    Trump has no intention of leaving in 2029. He isn't building that ballroom and golf course for the next guy. We're going to have to drag him out of the White House in shackles, if he's lucky.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 21 points 3 weeks ago

    👆

    When you make rules that say you can’t be prosecuted for what you do in office (fuck the SCoTUS trash that allowed that) there is every incentive to not leave office so you can keep doing illegal shit with no consequences.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 49 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

    Did Vance even say thank you ?

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 42 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

    Trump betrays literally everyone who ever trusts him.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] [S] 83 points 3 weeks ago (1 child)

    JD sold whatever soul he possessed for power, but he remains a terminal loser.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 30 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

    To be fair, I don't blame him.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 28 points 3 weeks ago (5 children)
  • [–] 25 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

    He also decided that an appropriate career move would be getting embarrassed daily as the whipping boy of a dimensia-addled pedophile.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 52 points 3 weeks ago

    “Who do you want in the White House when you leave?”

    “When I what!?”

  • source
  • [–] 25 points 3 weeks ago

    Just Dance Vance is going to learn a hard lesson about why trying to chameleon in and ingratiate yourself with a narcissistic cult leader doesn't end on a good note.

    JD should be looking at Mike Pence to understand his future. Trump will let his mob drag you to the gallows if you try to step out from under his shadow.

  • source
  • [–] 25 points 3 weeks ago

    "JD" "Vance", who called donnie "America's Hitler"?

  • source
  • [–] 24 points 3 weeks ago (5 children)

    Of course he’s not gonna endorse cuz he’s gonna run in 2028…

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

    He might not make it in this term tbh

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 3 weeks ago (1 child)

    Don’t do that, don’t give me hope…

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 6 points 3 weeks ago

    For an old fat guy there's a pretty high actuarial chance they don't make it another few years. But the point of running is that being a presidential candidate by itself makes you able to run pacs and take in bribe money. So they will be running for president for the next term no matter what.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 48 points 3 weeks ago (12 children)

    it's funny to me that people are pretending like he's not just going to run again. He wants to be a dictator just like his favorite people, pootin and kim jong un. And all his stupid mouth breathing knuckle dragging supporters will just line up with whatever dumb bullshit excuse is fed to them "but presidents are only limited to two consecutive terms!" "but FDR!" "but he's a war-time president!"

    There is no level of duplicitous stupidity these traitors won't stoop to.

  • source
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 3 weeks ago (1 child)

    I think he's likely to not run again. Why run if you can just abolish the election?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 5 points 3 weeks ago

    Even the Norks, Russia, and China hold elections it's just that they are Kabuki theater. But it helps grant legitimacy. Now mind you I one hundred percent think him and his supporters could try to cancel the election, but that would also likely backfire in some way. Probably a statement of non recognition of the feds by most states and a cutting off of interactions with the feds.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 5 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

    I think one of his kids is going to run in his stead, like Bolsonaro.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 3 weeks ago

    Yeah he's been openly suggesting a 3rd term for a while now. Selling hats and other merch. There have been multiple officials throughout the past 2 years publicly comment that they are looking for ways around the term limits. Every justification is some weasely attempt at semantics. Every criticism is met with 'he isn't serious' or some such hand wave.

    Yet here we are. Some folks still pretending like it ain't plain as day.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 3 weeks ago

    You probably already know this, but at the time when FDR ran for and won 4 terms, the two term rule was just a customary practice. It wasn't written into the constitution.

    After FDR died, Americans wrote up the two term rule as the 22nd amendment, and adopted it into the constitution.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

    Sure I think he will run again, but can you explain how he would do anything other than siphon votes off and guarantee and Democrat victory? Surely all the swing states are going to ban him from the ballot, and its impossible to win without them.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

    Um, idk man, America elected a child-raping felon. Anything is possible.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 3 weeks ago (1 child)

    Ya, I'm just trying to think about the actual mechanism he can use. To pull it off you have to get all the states to cooperate. That is near impossible.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 5 points 3 weeks ago

    Probably try to use Colorado attempting to strip him from the ballot in 24 as precedent to claim he cant be removed from the ballot in 28. Mind you there's garunteed to be far more states involved and frankly speaking the language of the constitution is clear on this one, so even if the supreme court favors Trump it's far more likely they'll just be ignored.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 69 points 3 weeks ago (4 children)

    He has no intention of transferring power peacefully to anyone.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

    Then it is up to the people of America to transfer it violently on his behalf.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 87 points 3 weeks ago* (17 children)

    Can we FUCKING FINISH THIS ELECTION FIRST BEFORE WE TALK ABOUT 2028?

  • source
  • hideshow 17 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 3 weeks ago

    Precisely. I hate to say it, but I agree with Trump here (about it being too early, not about JD being terrific)

    "It's too early," Trump responded. "I mean, it's too early. I think he's terrific. There's so many terrific people."

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 9 points 3 weeks ago (12 children)

    talking about the next election (2028) is the fastest track to acknowleding the lame-ducked-ness of the current occupant. I say speculate away.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • [–] 27 points 3 weeks ago* (11 children)

    No. We should not be talking about elections 2 YEARS IN ADVANCE! it's not fucking normal! I do not want every day of every year to be occupied by electoralism.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 3 weeks ago (10 children)

    In American electoral politics, it is ‘fucking normal’ to be talking about the next presidential election cycle following the midterms, and the midterms are in like 2 weeks. It’s ‘fucking normal’ to start marginalizing the current administration because they can’t run for re-election again and to start focusing on new people, and despite your hysterics, I think we could actually agree that paying less attention to Donald Trump would be a great thing for literally everybody, so calm your fucking tits.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 16 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (9 children)

    following the midterms

    One problem. The midterms haven't even finished. This is preceding the midterms.

    It’s ‘fucking normal’ to start marginalizing the current administration

    That's fine. But we don't need to start talking about elections! It leads to thinks like good ol' Mitch saying we can't let Congress vote on a SCOTUS position because we're a year away from an election.

    Your patronizing tone is not welcome. I don't fucking care what the status quo is, I'm sick and fucking tired of the status quo.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] -2 points 3 weeks ago (8 children)

    It’s also normal for them to put christmas decorations out in some stores before thanksgiving and you’ll still get people whining that it’s too soon or whatever. This is all just a weird complaint, because it happens every election cycle, and, we’d ideally like to move on. The zombie corpse of Mitch McConnell can read a calendar and the political reality as much as anyone. They’ll use whatever tricks they have to fuck over as many people as they can as long as they can. But we need to start talking about whatever the post-Trump era will look like, nobody wants to stay mired in this.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (6 children)

    In case you forgot, that wasn't a hypothetical. It actually occurred during Obama's admin. Enough people thought "yea that sounds right" to the point that there wasn't even a procedural change in SCOTUS selection.

    Christmas decorations being up early is one thing. Talking about electoral politics is an entirely different thing, that actually has consequences. People tune out of politics all together because we talk about elections years before they actually happen.

    Both parties absolutely love that we spend all our time with politics discussing elections, because all they do day in and day out is fundraise for their parties. Assuming that they never eat or sleep, politicians in both parties have less than 30 seconds to review bills before they vote on them, because of all the fundraising they do. The constant electoralism means that they never have to change.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 3 weeks ago (5 children)

    In case you forgot, that wasn't a hypothetical. It actually occurred during Obama's admin. Enough people thought "yea that sounds right" to the point that there wasn't even a procedural change in SCOTUS selection

    And then one of those ghouls, Barrett? was sworn in like 2 weeks before an election when it suited their needs.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 3 weeks ago (4 children)

    Yes, I know. Mitch did that one too, and has to do with Mitch weaponizing the fact that people tune out of politics because of constant electoralism. It's not just Mitch, it's not just Republicans, it's the underlying system. Part of that underlying system is constant electoralism.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 3 weeks ago (3 children)

    your thesis is that people weren’t tuned into the election 2 weeks before the election?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (2 children)

    My thesis is that electoralism is so constant that enough people agreed with him in 2016 to the point where no changes were made to SCOTUS selection, setting himself up to just do what he wanted. The Democratic party was pissed at both situations, but they saw fundraising opportunities instead of actually fucking doing something.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 3 weeks ago (1 child)

    I read that situation as the republicans had the democrats in complete checkmate and just did what they wanted to do. They made up arguments on the fly to suit their needs, and I think they will continue to do that in the future. The US is a system in which there will be constant elections, so try not to get too twisted about that?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 21 points 3 weeks ago

    It should be illegal to endorse a candidate for president before the midterms. Or to ask someone to. What an absolute non-story.

    How long do you want the election season to be? Two fucking years isn't enough? Mexico gets it done in 90 days.

  • source
  • [–] 20 points 3 weeks ago

    That may actually be good for Vance...

  • source
  • [–] 19 points 3 weeks ago

    Better get to work JD

  • source
  • [–] 15 points 3 weeks ago

    He's posturing by saying "they're all very good" in order to get the most people to pay him off.

  • source
  • [–] 9 points 3 weeks ago

    Has Jeffery Dahmer Vance tried bribing him?

  • source
  • [–] 7 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

    Article 25 the old bastard. This way trump goes down in flames (have him commuted mentallh deficient hehehe) And Vance gets an extra term which doesn't count to 2 term limit

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 3 weeks ago

    there can be only one /s

  • source
  • [–] 11 points 3 weeks ago

    Traitors DESERVE TO BE EXECUTED! By due process or civilian intervention.

  • source
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›