Yes, you read that correctly. Microsoft is bringing its Defender security software to Linux desktops. The company has announced that Microsoft Defender for Endpoint now officially supports Linux desktop environments, with the feature currently available in public preview.

And before anyone starts wondering whether Microsoft has suddenly decided that every Linux user needs antivirus software, there’s an important distinction. This isn’t the consumer version of Defender familiar to Windows users. Instead, it’s Microsoft’s enterprise security platform for organizations running Linux workstations.

According to Microsoft, the expansion is driven by the growing use of Linux desktops among developers. These machines often access source code repositories, cloud infrastructure, credentials, and other sensitive resources, making them attractive targets for attackers.

The idea is to give enterprise security teams the same visibility and protection across Linux desktops that they already have for Windows, macOS, and Linux servers.

As for the capabilities, Defender for Endpoint provides real-time antivirus protection, endpoint detection and response, threat investigation, vulnerability management, and centralized security monitoring through the Microsoft Defender portal.

Security administrators can use these tools to investigate suspicious activity, identify compromised machines, and respond to threats without managing Linux workstations through a separate security platform.

Interestingly, Microsoft isn’t introducing a completely new Linux security agent for this purpose. According to its documentation, the desktop version uses the same deployment packages, installation methods, and security capabilities already available for Linux servers.

The supported distributions are also the same. The list includes Ubuntu LTS, Debian, Fedora, Red Hat Enterprise Linux, openSUSE Leap, SUSE Linux Enterprise, Rocky Linux, AlmaLinux, and several others.

Desktop environment choice doesn’t matter. Whether a workstation runs GNOME, KDE Plasma, or another graphical environment, compatibility depends on the underlying distribution and kernel rather than the desktop itself.

There’s also an interesting detail regarding device identification. Defender attempts to determine whether a Linux installation is a server or workstation using operating system metadata and other system characteristics. When it cannot reliably identify a machine as a workstation, it classifies it as a server by default.

Of course, Defender’s presence on Linux isn’t entirely new. Microsoft introduced its antivirus solution for Linux servers back in 2020, subsequently expanding its enterprise threat detection and response capabilities. What’s changing now is the official inclusion of desktop workstations.

Finally, it’s also worth emphasizing that this remains a public preview, not a generally available release. Organizations interested in deploying it will need an appropriate Microsoft Defender for Endpoint subscription and must meet the existing Linux system requirements.

For more details, see Microsoft’s official announcement.

all 44 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 57 points 2 weeks ago (1 child)
  • [–] 55 points 2 weeks ago (9 children)

    All I know is I'm gonna use this to convince my boss to let me switch my work box to Linux. Then probably not install this.

  • source
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 23 points 2 weeks ago (7 children)

    Even if you end up installing it… I would take a Linux with Endpoint Protection over Windows with Endpoint Protection or Mac with Endpoint Protection any day. If this is the hurdle it takes for IT departments to allow using Linux workstations, then yes please.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 14 points 2 weeks ago (6 children)

    My CIO thinks open source means insecure and cheap

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 2 weeks ago* (4 children)

    Then he’s stupid enough to buy into such shit. “Yeah but look, Ubuntu comes as binary and Microsoft even offers tools to attest its conformance.”

    Only downside is that you have to use one of the listed distros for your argument; so pick the one that will bother you the least. As an ArchLinux (btw) user at work, if I had to switch to Debian or RedHat based I would be a bit pissed; but still better than Mac or Windows.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

    Reading 'Arch Linux at work' and imagining that just gave me a panic attack. I don't know how you cope at all. And I don't mean that shit breaks, I mean constant surprise feature updates that break my workflow.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

    The only thing from the OS that could ruin my day would be a botched kernel update. And that is countered by using the LTS kernel.

    KDE updates bring new features but don’t ruin my workflow. And if they do I just roll back to the last snapshot and wait for a fix; never happened yet.

    Dev toolchains are versioned by repo anyway. Services run in containers. IDEs are installed with their own version manager.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 47 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 child)

    Lemmy put it like this: free courses in self-defence are cool and all. But do they really have to be organised by the town's serial sex offender?

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

    On one hand the sex offender would know all the tactics he'll use to rape you. On the other hand, would he share all the tactics he would use? Or would he share just enough for you to believe him?

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 28 points 2 weeks ago

    Ironically security is one of the single most commonly used excuses for companies and governments to violate your privacy. Sorry microsoft, you can't scan all my files. Womp womp.

  • source
  • [–] 24 points 2 weeks ago

    No they don't. They want endpoint access to Linux computers. For reference, see Crowdstrike.

  • source
  • [–] 20 points 2 weeks ago (1 child)

    Then I need a tool to remove Microslop Defender safely too

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 17 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

    I was actually excited to read this because I thought if it was open source, you could just un-Microsoft the code but yeah, that was naive of me. Fucking clowns.

  • source
  • [–] 14 points 2 weeks ago

    A lot of nice sounding words when it's really about employee monitoring and control.

    This is bad news for Linux developers at work. One reason for wanting Linux is to get rid of all the privacy violating corporate spyware. Now corporate forces this spyware on you, or you can't access any corporate resources from your machine.

    Have fun developing when you need to start worrying what sudo commands you run, because some raise alerts in IT.

    I hope someone reverse engineers mdatp and documents how to limit how much of your privacy it can invade. That shit needs to be jailed into namespaces that are limited to absolute minimum necessary.

  • source
  • [–] 14 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

    LOOOOOOOL.

    Get fucked, Microsoft.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 14 points 2 weeks ago (1 child)

    Defender deletes my fucking files. Fuck defender.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 7 points 2 weeks ago

    Yeah that always annoys me. No warning, no obvious lock on a file, just gone without warning.

    Only way around it is to disable defender which makes your whole system unprotected!

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 12 points 2 weeks ago

    Microslop wants to spy on your Linux Desktop with Ofender*

  • source
  • [–] 11 points 2 weeks ago

    Ahhhaaahahahaha

  • source
  • [–] 9 points 2 weeks ago

    Please keep Defender on Windows

  • source
  • [–] 9 points 2 weeks ago (1 child)

    What chance is there that this is vibe coded? 80%? 😂

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 9 points 2 weeks ago

    This is so Linux purists can use their OS of choice in environments that require attestation so as to pass conditional access requirements.

  • source
  • [–] 8 points 2 weeks ago

    Will this somehow make IO as slow as Windows?

  • source
  • [–] 7 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

    I guess, between this, Epic Games Slopnauncher, the mass of people coining since 2025...

    Is... Is 2026, the actual year of the Linux Desktop? I know we won't get the grandiose everything is suddenly Linux, but kind of feels like we've been getting there, and now ((Popular and Trash)) companies are migrating, in some capacity

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 2 weeks ago

    Who would install a virus that protects them from other viruses

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 2 weeks ago
    [–] 6 points 2 weeks ago (1 child)

    Why is everyone pushing me towards bsd?

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 2 weeks ago

    Microsoft doing its own satirical comedy about itself . Almost feels wrong to laugh. But I will, when I get to work. It’ll go in my timesheet too.

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 2 weeks ago

    If this leads to more companies accepting Linux as a Desktop OS for their employees, I think this is actually a good move. Helps Linux to become more widespread, and maybe even non-IT people will get to know it better. This in turn could lead to more people using Linux in their private lives as well.

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 2 weeks ago

    I dont think defenders model can work on linux. I may be wrong but windows defender is powerful because its able to build a profile of windows and then look at differences across its massive fleet. There is no basic linux and the differences across all systems are pretty huge.

    So that only leaves scanning for virus signatures (clamav does this already) and detecting potentially malicious behaviour which defender has always been dogshit at compared to crowd strike.

    Maybe im missing some defender features since ive never worked anywhere that uses defender enterprise.

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 2 weeks ago*

    And I want Microslop to eat shit and shit glass.

    but we can't all get what we want, so i guess they'll just have to suck it up and cope.

  • source
  • 34 comments in c/linux@programming.dev view that post
    [–] 41 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

    "Would you like our spyware on your computer? We'll make sure we're the only spyware."

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 2 weeks ago* (1 child)

    I've seen the server version in action. It hooks into the linux audit subsystem, and traces every system action and operation. The data it collects is super detailed, and designed to track which user, which program, and which servers are connected to, which files are read and written to track and potentially halt lateral movement through networks.

    For regulated enterprise environments, it satisfies IDS/IPS/EDR requirements, and it's all wired up with their M365/Intune/Defender management portal. It makes some neat reports automatically about how data flows through a network, especially if all the points on your network are licensed ($$) and included in the defender system.

    For personal systems. Yikes. Just Yikes.

    It also relies on modern CPU features, so it would complain loudly about our older servers, and spam logs with messages about how it couldn't run, even though the system was updated to a current version of linux. It also had (last year?) some bugs that had it spinning wildly on a closed socket, which was fun to find :-/.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 67 points 2 weeks ago (14 children)

    Windows Defender is a good Antivirus, but which Linux user in their right mind would install Microsoft software voluntarily?

  • source
  • hideshow 14 child comments
  • [–] 37 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (10 children)

    VS Code is one of the most popular text editors (even among Linux users) and is developed by MS.

    I use Emacs btw.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 25 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)
  • [–] 9 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

    Isn't it just a downstream fork? So, in a sense, still MS software.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)
  • [–] 8 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

    No problemo, emacs has you covered with evil mode, so you can use vim keybindings in emacs.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

    I tried that, and it was incredibly slow for me. I tried to use eMacs because of the org mode, but eventually I gave up and returned to markdown and vim.

    I think you need a good understanding of why would you want to have eMacs with vim keybindings. Perhaps that’s super useful for someone, but I just gave up for now.

    Tried what I thought the opposite side is, Helix. Didn’t work for me either. I’m with vim for now, may reconsider at some later point, when I’d have more resources to learn and explore.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 weeks ago (1 child)

    What exactly was slow? For me it was the natural choice to use evil, since I used vim before. The biggest change was not opening and closing the editor all the time, as i did with vim. You just keep emacs open and if you absolutely need a terminal, you open one in emacs.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 2 weeks ago

    Opening was very slow: instant vs maybe 30 sec sometimes. I won’t recall. I agree, a new tool may want a different perspective and use patterns. So I don’t blame it, just I initially thought it would be the same thing, as it’s evil mode, but realised I need to invest more into the setup, and I had no resources for that at the time. May try again later.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 6 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

    the title is wrong the body of the articke is correct. this isnt for you. this is for the enterprise who are already using defrnder (for enterprise) but want to add linux workstations

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 2 weeks ago*

    I strongly disagree. I know this is the Internet consensus nowadays, but I have seen malware beating Defender multiple times. The last two times it was not zero day malware, but rather Defender failed due to architectural reasons. (not robust, reliable enough definition update mechanism & scanning stalled so the -relatively ancient- virus just disabled defender before it could've protected you) The last time happened a little over a year ago, so it's not ancient history.

    Sure, if you have a fresh WIndows install & Defender correctly updated its database, then it might benchmark very well. Detection itself will only stall under very specific circumstances that are not uncommon, but will not occur on a typical test rig.

    I have never seen such problems with Eset & Bitdefender. Even Kasparesky is doing a better job at pretending to be not spyware but an actual security suite than Defender.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 20 points 2 weeks ago

    Is this where they install the tracking ID too?

  • source
  • [–] 28 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)
  • [–] 12 points 2 weeks ago

    I bet they would like that. They can fuck right off though.

  • source
  • lol that’s gonna be a nope from me, dawg

  • source
  • [–] 8 points 2 weeks ago

    I'm good — there is nothing being installed on my systems that I don't know about, thanks.

  • source
  • [–] 7 points 2 weeks ago

    Microsoft can walk west until their hats float.

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 2 weeks ago

    It's closed source software, right?

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 2 weeks ago

    They know they're at risk of losing their market share with Windows, so they're pivoting to Linux. They don't get that they're the virus!

  • source
  • [–] 8 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

    I switched to Linux to get away from Windows, thank you very much. I also won't forget how in 2014, the remains at an African-American gravesite got moved and damaged—just so they could build another data centre.

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 2 weeks ago

    It's just another step in their EEE program.

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 2 weeks ago