top 97 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 83 points 1 month ago (4 children)
  • [–] 2 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    Thanks, I was wondering this. I checked 70 across in the last four Sundays and it wasn't there.

    It's interesting that when tweets are shared, they almost never include the date. I wonder if that's basically natural selection? I.e., if the date is on there, people are less inclined to share it once it's outdated, so the ones that survive as memes are the ones that let people assume the tweet is still current?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    MOST social media don't have an actual date on it for a long time. Heck, look at these posts here. Most of them say "2 hours ago" or whatever relative time. Right now the OP says "1 day ago" for me. Which could be anywhere from 24-48 hours ago, or even a wider range depending on how they round those numbers.

    If someone screenshots your post, then it gets reposted in 10 years, we'll have no context for when it happened.

    When I watch an old YouTube video, it might say "6 years ago" which could be a video created before COVID quarantine, to well within the window. The UI makes it very difficult to see the actual date/time that things were posted.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 223 points 1 month ago (9 children)

    Evil that “It’s a trap” only works with Star Trek.

  • source
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 19 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    But "It's a wrap!" is a perfectly valid answer for filming either.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] -11 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    I think you meant Star Wars, since that is where the meme comes from.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 1 month ago

    If you write "Star Wars," then the correct answer is "It's a wrap," even though the Star Wars fan will likely think of "It's a trap" first. If you write "Star Trek," then the correct answer is "It's a trap!" which does not come from Star Trek.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 90 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (11 children)
  • [–] 21 points 1 month ago (5 children)
  • [–] 24 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (3 children)
  • [–] 44 points 1 month ago (4 children)

    Seems they spelled "Stargate" incorrectly. 😞

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 43 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    The real, most trolling cruelty here is that if you say "Star Wars" you can't have "It's a trap!"

    And Star Trek fans will have to endure a Star Wars meme staining their choice.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago

    I think the bigger cruelty is that you aren't going to get the across right away regardless without STAR filled in. But if you immediately get "It's a trap!" then you are going to later get trolled with Star Trek being better.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 28 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    I feel like in 2074 we're still going to be circulating this exact image

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 49 points 1 month ago (5 children)

    Yesterday in which year? This is ancient.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 16 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

    Yesterday puzzmo.com did it with "what colour was the dress". You could either answer blue or gold and it fit. But it wasn't as good as this one. And I don't think You can access archived crosswords on puzzmo.

    Edit: It was today, so You can still access it for a couple of hours.

    https://www.puzzmo.com/puzzle/2026-09-29/crossword/mini

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 29 points 1 month ago

    Props to the designer, that must have felt amazing to turn in

  • source
  • [–] 29 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    Indeed: Grap, wAist, payeTs, leaEed

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 1 month ago

    Instructions unclear i got StarWrerk

  • source
  • [–] 9 points 1 month ago

    Stargate doesn’t work, call the editor.

  • source
  • [–] 8 points 1 month ago

    Now that's pretty clever.

  • source
  • [–] 7 points 1 month ago

    Does it still work if you enter 'Babylon5'?

  • source
  • [–] 7 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    How do crossword writers make those perfect square crosswords with every letter in two words, after you fill in enough words how do you not get to a point where there are no words that fit

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 12 points 1 month ago (6 children)

    They both started good but got progressively worse with each revival until J. J. Abrams destroyed them both.

    I'll always be more of a Star Wars fan, though, since I grew up in a time when Star Wars was still good but Star Trek was already going down the toilet.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 month ago (4 children)

    Hmm. I can't imagine exactly when that is. Both of them have kinda been swirling the drain off-and-on since their inceptions. Star Trek's OG series has as many absolutely terrible episodes as great ones. This is Star Trek's MO. TNG and DS9 are some of the more consistent Trek series, but even those have their share of bad episodes. The movies are also a mixed bag. Nu-Trek is just awful, but at least the IP has redeemed itself somewhat with Strange New Worlds and the Lower Decks.

    The first Star Wars is only good thanks to some fantastic editing and effects. Empire is the only legitimately great Star Wars movie. Then the Ewoks arrived and it's been downhill since then with maybe the exception of some of the newer series (Mandalorian, Andor) that I haven't been able to bring myself to watch since I've been nothing but disappointed with Star Wars since I went to see the prequels in the theaters when they came out. I'm sorry, but whatever weird cultural significance the prequels have ironically managed to attain, they are awful movies and do nothing but shit on the already-tarnished legacy of the franchise. Then, the sequels doubled-down and made Star Wars completely unwatchable. Maybe some of the newer series are pretty good, I'll probably never find out.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (3 children)

    As someone who hates all of star wars outside of the original trilogy (and the Dark Forces and Tie Fighter games, those kick ass), and even then, is sick to death of the trilogy and the star wars IP as a whole; please watch Andor.

    It's just incredible sci-fi that happens to take place in star wars, and it's extremely relevant to our current times in a way no other show has really captured. It's extremely well written, shot, scored, acted... It's probably my favorite sci-fi thing ever, not just my favorite star wars media, and I'm a picky bastard.

    It was so good I bought a bluray of it. It was even good enough to make me curious if the Mandalorian was comparable (it was not, not even close).

    I really, strongly recommend you give it a shot despite the star wars label, I'd recommend sailing the high seas or grabbing the bluray of season 1 to avoid needing a Disney+ subscription.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    Hmm. High praise. I'll give it some consideration. Ha!

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 1 month ago

    I'll happily vouch for it too. The writing is emotional, well acted and painfully poignant in our current world, to the point that I'm surprised Disney even let them make the commentary they did. It could easily stand alone divorced from the Star Wars setting.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 6 points 1 month ago

    Obviously Stark Trek is the real answer.

  • source
  • [–] 6 points 1 month ago

    That's kind of trolling both fanbases at the same time.

  • source
  • [–] 6 points 1 month ago (12 children)

    I see "wrap, waist, payers, leased"

  • source
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • [+] -7 points 1 month ago (10 children)

    I see balls, but that's because I'm looking at a specific subset of transgender porn.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 month ago (7 children)
  • [–] -5 points 1 month ago (6 children)

    Dawg, do you even know what a fuck is in the wild? It ain't none of that Butthole Surfer shit, I tell ya that!

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 month ago (5 children)

    Oh, it's you. I forgot to check the username...

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] -1 points 1 month ago (4 children)

    It's always me. I am the only other person on this "website." It's really a case study. My name is Dr. Foöfenator. Do you like dechunked coffee?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 month ago (3 children)
  • [–] -1 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    Dude thinks he has to a be an I all the time. See how far that gets him. Boxed in bullshitter of the tinkle-toed queef-catcher. I got balls the likes of which you can't even conceive even if you were anatomically complete. Dogs don't go home at night if you give em the forth rain. Pickle it back to me, unless you greased in the pig flume, aight?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    Take your meds, dude. I'm not even trying to ridicule you. You need help.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] -1 points 1 month ago

    I am as I am as I want to be the very best and certainly am closer to that than whatever you got going on. I got more flow in my pinky toe than you do, and your crew and whole show. Bitch boy don grab boog fahben Torah got power by balls mashing. Gorm goes greep.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 11 points 1 month ago (5 children)

    I make the argument that Star Wars is not science fiction, rather a fantasy that takes place in space. Science and technology do not drive the stories, nor are they the solutions to the problems that arise. They are incidental and could just as well be replaced with actual magic. They tried to go the other way by explaining the force with midiclorians... Which was accepted by basically no one.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] -5 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    Bro, you got some weird brain worms. Not considering Star Wars as science fiction based on some technical hubbub is like calling Trump a communist because he the reginality of caucus results in his disposition to yearn for the masses. That ain't real life. This is science, bitch. Get with the God damn. It is as it are and be so it will do, so it shall.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 month ago (8 children)

    How come doctor who doesn't fit?

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [+] 2 points 1 month ago (6 children)
  • [–] 6 points 1 month ago (3 children)
  • [–] 5 points 1 month ago*

    that episode where he was captured by Romulans and transported to Tatooine to diagnose the genetic defect in Jabba's grandchild who was part Ferengi. It was fun watching Quark exaggerate a limp to try sell House's stick back to him on the Falcon

  • source
  • parent
  • [+] 1 point 1 month ago (2 children)
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

    Does Doctor Who have a franchise that it is compared to with a similar name?

    Ignore my ignorance. I misunderstood what you meant by that. It's a shame that it's one letter off.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
    load more comments
    view more: next ›