cross-posted from: https://piefed.world/c/tech/p/1432229/your-car-is-a-smartphone-on-wheels-a-team-of-researchers-tested-21-vehicles-and-found-th

Data sent by vehicles and companion apps included locations, VINs, and other identifiers. Amazon, Google, Meta, and Microsoft were among the top receivers of driver data.

all 84 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 32 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (10 children)

Researchers connected each vehicle to a custom WiFi access point and logged all outgoing traffic.

The article talks about both apps and the vehicles themselves. I would really like to see more info on what the cars do when you take the apps out of the equation. Are there any that don't phone home unless you explicitly give them internet access?

A study about the results will be published this week.

I look forward to reading this.

Edit: actually there's quite a bit more detailed info at https://automatictransmission.khoury.northeastern.edu/

  • source
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 16 points 1 month ago (8 children)
  • [–] 3 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    I'm still not sure if those require giving the car a WiFi/cellular connection or if it'll just use it's own... I've heard that cars use their own SIMs to phone home, but I don't actually know how prevalent that is

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] -2 points 1 month ago (5 children)

    That graphic is less than useless without any source to back it up though...for all we know this could be AI garbage you just generated.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 22 points 1 month ago (4 children)

    It's in the article that they were responding to. So you are just wildely throwing out negativity without any comprehension.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [+] -7 points 1 month ago (3 children)

    That edit with the link came after my comment it seems

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 61 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (12 children)

    We just bought a new car this year (Kia) and I completely confused the sales lady when I told her we were not going to use the "connect app" or activate connect on the car itself. She was like "lets get you setup in connect" and I was "no thanks"

    We have a nice 🚫 symbol with a radio tree behind it, so I 100% know the car is still connected to the cell network but it is not registered/connected to us, and no app installed.

    Sure, we lose some functionality (remote start, and access to in-car wifi) but all of that is paid subscriptions. Sure they first x months are 'free' but after you gotta pony up $ to continue.

    Note: I'm under no illusion tracking is just not happening for us now... I just want to make it harder where I can.

  • source
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 month ago (4 children)

    My wife just got a newer car last week so I'm asking you because you know more than I.

    We never connected a phone to it but the GPS worked right off the bat. Do cars have standalone GPS now? As long as we don't connect a phone, it can't reach the internet, right?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 20 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

    Cars have had standalone GNSS (GPS) for quite a while. GNSS itself doesn’t require internet. Its output is coordinates and elevation - it’s the “gotta have internet to load the map in which I’ll show you the coordinates” that makes people associate GNSS with internet. Offline maps solve this.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    Unless it has local maps like mine that are now a decade out of date. It's completely useless now but i refuse to pay several 100 for the update.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 1 month ago

    Ya a lot will have gps built in but as others have said, the map will be static (whatever version was put in when built). Unless you have it updated by connecting it or buying an updated USB or whatever is required for your car

    So ya it's likely yours has both a gps antenna and navigation built in.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago (6 children)

    It must have a sim card somewhere right? How else is it phoning home?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 month ago (4 children)

    eSIM. Gotta gut the modem and hopefully not break anything

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 month ago (3 children)

    Maybe start with removing the fuse for the modem to make sure nothing essential breaks?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    Worth a shot. The question is whether the modem has its own fuse and isn’t integrated into the head unit

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 month ago

    Oh ya for sure it has a sim.

    If it were my daily driver I'd dig in, find the antenna and shunt it to ground so it could not communicate

    My wife is already not fully onboard with my need for privacy from these companies so I won regarding not activating the car but not sure she'd let me start pulling panels to find and kill the antenna.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 43 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    My car isn’t because it’s old and stupid.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 25 points 1 month ago (9 children)

    Would REALLY love to de-surveillance my vehicle if anybody has any tips (please quietly make the "buy an old car instead" jokes to yourself)

  • source
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 1 month ago (3 children)

    Find and disconnect the telemetry antenna. If the telemetry is in a discrete unit delete that too.

    Don't do anything irreversible in case the manufacturer has booby trapped the car to go in to limp mode without the portable flock setup.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

    Okay, but how do they fill the giant hole in the middle of the dash now?

    (/srs can just cut off all antennas but this will make the computer waste battery trying to connect so the car may not start after a while if it's combustion engine)

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 1 month ago

    In many cars, the modem that phones home with your data may be a separate unit. Depending on your make and model, you can sometimes buy cable adapters that will connect power to everything except that subsystem. The term to search for is a "DCM bypass plug".

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 1 month ago

    Many cars have the modem / LTE as a module that can be disabled. On my car, a 2018 Chevy, the LTE antenna plugs into a networking module in the footwell. I bought an antenna cable and dummy load resistor on Amazon for ~$10 and simply unplugged the LTE antenna in the car and plugged in the dummy antenna. That disables all cell network connectivity but doesn't effect things like Bluetooth. It's also easily reversible if someone wanted to do that for some reason.

    You can probably Google something like "year make model disable LTE" or "disable telemetry" to get an idea of how hard it would be on your car. Some make it very cheap / easy and some make it very difficult.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 6 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

    (please quietly make the “buy an old car instead” jokes to yourself)

    That's not a joke, it's sincere advice. My newest car is a 2008 (I think) model. I'd love to have an EV, but I don't because I haven't figured out how to have one that isn't infected by "telemetry" and other enshittification. I have hopes for the Slate Truck, but it doesn't actually exist yet, so I wait.

    (Also, yes, as a mod of the place I'd be remiss if I didn't second the other reply and suggest adopting a non-car-dependent lifestyle to begin with.)

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 12 points 1 month ago

    The one time I'm happy that Toyota was so far behind the competition - I've a 2020 Prius and its infotainment looks a decade out of date but that means it's very offline.

  • source
  • [–] 11 points 1 month ago

    Would rather drive a rust bucket. I do drive a rust bucket. I'm not affraid of scratching it. I don't feel I have to always keep it pristine clean. I'm not affraid of working on it myself. I'm not being charged robbed subscriptions for equipment already installed. I'm not wondering wether I'm being tracked by sick fucking creeps.

  • source
  • [–] 9 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    I'm driving my crv until the wheels fall off and then I'm gluing them back on

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago (1 child)

    my '08 (that a bought a '12 to replace) is a rusty pos that needs a lot of high-mileage maintenance and regular maintenance (rusty af everything, gas tank is gonna start leaking soon, pretty much the entire suspension is shot, power steering starting to leak, some sort of engine issues that I'm not sure what exactly is causing it, rusty exhaust headers causing some of the engine issues), but since I can't get any money for it, I'm not sure when exactly I'm going to get rid of it. might as well keep it around until I know for sure I don't want to fix it

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • I hope the study specifically publishes the data on the Model 3. I bought one before I became much more privacy conscious, but I've done my best to mitigate the leakage from that. In doing so, I read through all of Tesla's terms and conditions upon opt out and sending any of my information or information that can be used to identify or profile me, should never be sold to advertisers. I write software licenses for a living so I'm pretty confident in my reading on this. It would be interesting to see what can currently be mitigated by changing some settings and what cannot.

  • source
  • [–] 8 points 1 month ago
    [–] 6 points 1 month ago

    2006 car with manual transmission. There's exactly enough computer in it to run the ignition and oil change timer.

  • source
  • [–] 6 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    And if I were to use a screwdriver to pop a component off of the motherboard, which website would tell me the component to target for my make/model?

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 5 points 1 month ago (4 children)

    The ECU in my 1991 Chevy k2500 is little more than a desk calculator that can turn throttle position into injector duty cycle and ignition timing. Good luck advertising companies.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 month ago (3 children)

    OBD1 sucks, though. 1995 through 2010-ish (i.e. OBD2 but no telemetry) is much better.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

    OBD1 is fine if you know how to deal with it. The second generation throttle body fuel injection from gm is crude but works as are most of the obd1 systems... They're usually simple enough that no advanced diagnostics is ever needed.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago (1 child)

    OBD1 is fine if you know how to deal with it.

    You should tell that to the multiple mechanics that have just flat-out refused to work on my '94 Toyota because it isn't OBD2.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 8 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (3 children)

    I have a 2008 car, it doesn't even chime when I don't put my seatbelt on.

    After driving a 2024 Subaru, I realize that I am a very fortunate person, and I live a life of silence and peaceful reflection.

    2010 models at the latest, I am only going to own old vehicles until this beeping madness ends.

    How long until new models show advertisements on the dash related to your conversations? Three years, tops.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

    I have a 2011 Silverado 4wd that I lucked into real cheap right before covid. I ripped the OnStar out of it and I hope it never dies 'cause I won't ever be able to afford anything like it again.

    Inb4 the anti truck bitchfest. I live in the sticks, and use it the way a truck needs to be used.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

    Interesting to see Subaru at the very bottom - barely anything, but Toyota is the opposite, sucking up big data like they're General Motors

    Edit: can confirm my car isn't doing anything - when I upgraded my head unit, I discovered unconnected wires where a telemetry module would be

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 child)

    Doubly interesting because the Subaru Solterra is a Toyota. But I guess Subaru has their own infotainment in it? I haven't really test driven one.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago

    Subaru definitely uses the same hardware, but I know their software is different. Even the PCM performs very differently on the dinosaurs, even though they use the same Denso computers as Toyotas - just look into how aggressively Subarus fast idle when cold for an example... how many cars do you know of are programmed to hit fast idle come hell or high water? Most cars will cancel fast idle if you engage a gear, or limit the fast idle throttle, but the Subaru will send it if you try to keep the RPM below fast idle when cold. Also the "clear flood start" feature that deliberately doesn't fire the injectors when you put your foot to the floor when starting the engine.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 6 points 1 month ago

    I hate this style of titles. I'm a gearhead and own 5 vehicles and a motorcycle. None of them are a smartphone on wheels, the newest one is newly 20 years old.

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    I just need to get from point a to point b. I don't need some goddamn home entertainment system connected to everything else.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 month ago (4 children)

    While I have a 2024 Honda Civic, it doesn't have a cell connection (though it does have a form of GPS). I'm fine with that, but I'm surprised that it didn't even have that option.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 month ago

    Sportier cars seem to somewhat have escaped that trend. Subaru BRZs have had pretty much the same interior for a while. First gen 2013-2020 had no built in internet. The second gen looks similar, although I'm not sure if it still is as basic.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 1 month ago

    I have a 2001 car and a 2024 Grom motorcycle. Absolutely no telemetry or such. I'm keeping them for as long as possible.

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 1 month ago

    Just get yourself a '97 4Runner, there are no trackers in a '97 4Runner.

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    No it's not. You don't know what my car is and is not.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago

    One person's supposed convenience is another person's menace. That said, I'll take any vehicle that contains electronics only for the stereo, the ECU and electronic fuel injection.

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago

    Slate truck will have no telematics module by default. No phoning home. You can buy one as an option, but I suspect the only people buying slate who want it connected will be businesses

  • source
  • [–] -1 points 1 month ago (9 children)

    How are they doing this? Do they have their own little simcard the Chinese govt pays out the ass for?

  • source
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    Not Chinese, but yes, every modern car has a data only cellular connection of some sort. They can easily afford it because they're selling your data to anyone who will buy it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 month ago

    Not only that, they're double dipping! You're paying $30/month for bullshit features like remote start or temp controls, meanwhile they also make money on your data!!

    1. People need to stop being dumb enough to pay for this shit, and
    2. People need to push back on all the surveillance happening.
  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 23 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (4 children)

    From what OP posted of the article why do you think it is Chinese companies doing this when it's clearly american. We live in the shit hole you have been made to believe China is

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    Y'all do know you're allowed to open and read the article, yeah?

    The top recipients of driver data included many of the largest tech companies operating in the U.S., including Alphabet (which runs Google), Amazon, Meta (which runs Facebook), Microsoft, Pinterest, and Reddit, among dozens of others. Many of these companies play two roles in the driver data ecosystem, as both providers of software (such as the Android Automotive operating system) and as operators of advertising “auction” platforms that marketers use to target specific types of customers. As such, the companies that collect driver data are often the first node in a vast personal data ecosystem.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 0 points 1 month ago (1 child)
  • 62 comments in c/privacy@lemmy.ca view that post
    4 comments in c/tech@piefed.world view that post