FBI come la Procura di Reggio Calabria? "Abbiamo hackerato l'FBI": gli hacker affermano di avere accesso ai dati di tutti i dipendenti dell'FBI.Un campione di 5.000 presunti agenti visionati da 404 Media include nomi, indirizzi, numeri di telefono e dettagli sui coniugi dei dipendenti dell'FBI.404media.co/we-hacked-the-fbi-@informatica

no comments (yet)

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
there doesn't seem to be anything here
74 comments in c/technology@lemmy.world view that post
[–] 178 points 1 month ago (6 children)

Prove it. List which ones are into beastiality. I want see just how big Kash Patel's eyes can pop when he has to explain it.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 73 points 1 month ago (4 children)
  • [–] 126 points 1 month ago (4 children)

    Before they leak it, they should coerce the FBI to leak the Epstein Files and then leak the FBI stuff anyway. Would be hilarious. We be top tier.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 64 points 1 month ago (3 children)

    That won't work though because the federal government doesn't negotiate with terrorists*.

    Instead, they do their negotiating with rich pedophiles.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 97 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    My favorite part is that the exploit was an Oracle issue. The Ellison family sucks.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 86 points 1 month ago (6 children)

    The government needs to provide all FBI employees with 1 free year of credit monitoring. That free year is the resolution I've seen from the corporations that were hacked. Remember when a couple credit bureaus were hack multiple times and they provided this? The FBI should also provide compensation for the hack if employees sign up in time. Usually you get like $20 for the data leak.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 67 points 1 month ago

    Turns out firing all the experts and replacing them with incompetent sycophants has consequences

  • source
  • [–] 128 points 1 month ago* (12 children)

    It’s a real shame the feds don’t hire the nerds who might’ve prevented this. The tl;dr is hiring freezes, reinstated fitness tests, and drug usage disqualifications put cops behind computers, not IT. Who saw that coming.

  • source
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • [–] 37 points 1 month ago (4 children)

    But they do allow bestiality now.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 21 points 1 month ago (3 children)

    How is this the one photo where he doesn't look like he's holding in a massive shit?

    Dogs really are the best.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    To me he always looks like he got caught masturbating to horse porn by his parents. I'm amazed he managed to take a decent photo as well.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago (1 child)

    Instead, they hire the people who do it.

    In wandering around the entrance to the rabbit hole, I came across the Wikipedia article about The Com, which is a lose umbrella organization that includes many hacker communities, including the one accused of hacking the FBI.

    There's this:

    The Com is connected to a group of skinheads active in Russia and Ukraine responsible for random attacks on people and acts of murder.[14] Edward Coristine, a high-ranking employee of the DOGE, US government organization, was a former member of The Com.[15]

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 32 points 1 month ago

    I honestly DGAF about the employees, I do care about the internal documents indicating what they’re collecting on innocent parties and sitting on regarding the rich and dirty ones.

  • source
  • [+] 29 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (5 children)
  • [–] 23 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (3 children)

    Mods abusing rule 3.

    Edit - pointing out that concern over data security is a moot point after a gaggle of non-security cleared Musk datascrapers at the start of Trump's term already stole untold data, and have no protocol to secure it like the government does is factual and poignant. "Be excellent to each other" is a flagrant abuse of censorship.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    in fairness, you called someone "retarded". some people on here get triggered around the word "retarded", even if they were not the target of the word, they somehow felt you meant they were "retarded".

    remember. don't use "retarded" use "mentally deficient".

    just want to make sure everyone is aware here. even if you were talking about flame "retardant" material, it's still not acceptable. the new term is "flammably deficient".

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 37 points 1 month ago

    Release it all please.

  • source
  • [–] 18 points 1 month ago (1 child)
  • [–] 16 points 1 month ago

    Who are the dog fuckers and who stole from their employers or hired prostitutes?

  • source
  • [–] 17 points 1 month ago (2 children)
  • [–] 52 points 1 month ago* (9 children)

    Meh, these are the same fucks who breached the Canvas backend and held student data for ransom. I don't care if they target a government agency I don't like - they're just another bunch of assholes out to make a profit.

  • source
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 14 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    That was fucked up and they are wrong for that but if they keep going after feds I'm all for them.

    Wish they could leak the Epstein files (without pics and vids).

    Their talents were wasted on Canvas if they have this kind of capability.

    Either that or, the FBI's database just has ultra piss poor security which sounds about right anymore.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 9 points 1 month ago

    If they were "going after" the feds, they'd release everything they got instead of bragging about what they got. Either they got nothing or they're holding it for ransom, but if it's the latter what are their demands? None of this is passing the smell test.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] -1 points 1 month ago (4 children)

    " don’t care if they target a government agency I don’t like" - you should. This opens all of them up to blackmail and worse by foreign govts. Massive problem for both you, me, and everyone else. The first Tom cruise mission impossible movie was about this very same thing except it was the CIA.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    Don't take a fragment of a sentence out of context to make me say something I didn't. What I said was that even if they attack someone I don't like, I still won't celebrate it because I know what their motivation is.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] -9 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    What you said was "I don’t care if they target a government agency I don’t like - they’re just another bunch of assholes out to make a profit." not "even if they attack someone I don’t like, I still won’t celebrate it because I know what their motivation is.".

    In or out of context, "I don’t care if they target a government agency I don’t like"means the exact same thing. It's a stand alone statement not impacted by your second sentence.

    Your rephrasing makes more sense and the two parts of your sentence can not be separated without changing the meaning.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 9 points 1 month ago

    In or out of context, "I don’t care if they target a government agency I don’t like"means the exact same thing. It’s a stand alone statement not impacted by your second sentence.

    Incorrect on all counts. "Whether they attack someone I hate or not doesn't matter" is what the complete sentence conveys. Quit playing semantic games to make me say the opposite. Actually just get blocked for being an unserious bad faith poster.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 14 points 1 month ago (5 children)

    Apparently I'm OOTL on some weird Kash Patel shit?

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 20 points 1 month ago* (3 children)
  • [–] 8 points 1 month ago

    So.... How many of them had engaged in beastiality prior to being hired? 🤔

  • source
  • [–] 13 points 1 month ago (1 child)
  • [–] 10 points 1 month ago

    This kinda sounds like the last GRDS hack maybe? Would need some proof to even say if this is new.

  • source
  • [–] 10 points 1 month ago

    this post made my day !

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 1 month ago

    If it’s profitable it’s legal. Just cut Trump in on it and there will be no consequences.

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 1 month ago

    Hacking is pejorative insult! Their dialup modem escaped containment after watching that hack the planet with the nice boobied goth/punk girl movie.

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago

    You should see it. If you have the eyes for it.

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago*

    We've all heard about breaches in security by hackers affecting so many millions of people, but I never hear about that data leak being used against the innocents. Like, it has no effect on we the poors.

    They seem to hold our data for ransom, and steal crypto directly from the rich, because of course they do, that's where the most profit is. And, that is why they're so dangerous... to the rich.

    If you dig into this a little you'll see plenty of accounts of The Com associates doing awful things against children, but I suspect that's a very small part of what a few of them do, it's just hyped and pushed forward to make us hate them all. In fact it's quite possible that within the larger community, those few players are themselves, shunned, the same way Christians shun but don't condemn the more radical members of their cult. But, the only way to hear that side of the story is to be in The Com. We've all seen this happen in online communities--outsiders condemning an entire large group for the actions of a few, who are shunned within the group.

    Remember, we'll never get the whole story from one side, and the story we do get will be biased in favor of the side that tells it--there will always be distortions, lies of omission, and outright fabrications and lies. The same way we're wary of content now because of AI, we should be skeptical of any claims made, and the more powerful the claimant, the more skeptical we should be that we're getting the whole story.

  • source
  • 5 comments in c/technology@lemmy.ml view that post
    [–] 8 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    Now let's see which one of them is a sheepshagger

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 4 points 1 month ago
    [–] 3 points 1 month ago

    Yeah I did that in Payday 2 a few years ago

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 1 month ago
    2 comments in c/hackernews@lemmy.bestiver.se view that post
    [–] 3 points 1 month ago

    I kinda doubt the FBI of all organizations is stupid enough to stuff data on all their agents into some database, just waiting for it to get stolen. They surely got better opsec (and ITS) than that.

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 1 month ago

    Probably not.

  • source
  • 2 comments in c/technology@beehaw.org view that post
    [–] 10 points 1 month ago

    Shit or get off the pot then

  • source
  • [–] 8 points 1 month ago

    Now do ICE.

  • source
  • 1 comment in c/usa@midwest.social view that post

    Yup. That tracks. They're far too busy "vetting" the child and/or animal fuckers these days to keep tabs on things like opsec.

  • source