Prove it. List which ones are into beastiality. I want see just how big Kash Patel's eyes can pop when he has to explain it.
post
Before they leak it, they should coerce the FBI to leak the Epstein Files and then leak the FBI stuff anyway. Would be hilarious. We be top tier.
That won't work though because the federal government doesn't negotiate with terrorists*.
Instead, they do their negotiating with rich pedophiles.
You appear to have two paragraphs that are accurate.... Without a footnote. What was the * for?
:p
My favorite part is that the exploit was an Oracle issue. The Ellison family sucks.
The government needs to provide all FBI employees with 1 free year of credit monitoring. That free year is the resolution I've seen from the corporations that were hacked. Remember when a couple credit bureaus were hack multiple times and they provided this? The FBI should also provide compensation for the hack if employees sign up in time. Usually you get like $20 for the data leak.
Then years later they can claim the $4 check from the settled class action lawsuit
Maybe if our justice system actually punished people, things would be different
I think when OPM was hacked that is what employees got lol
Turns out firing all the experts and replacing them with incompetent sycophants has consequences
It’s a real shame the feds don’t hire the nerds who might’ve prevented this. The tl;dr is hiring freezes, reinstated fitness tests, and drug usage disqualifications put cops behind computers, not IT. Who saw that coming.
Smoking the Devil’s lettuce? GTFO. Into fucking dogs? You’re hired!
Right? They're gonna relax the standards for dog fuckers but not for weed?
But they do allow bestiality now.

How is this the one photo where he doesn't look like he's holding in a massive shit?
Dogs really are the best.
To me he always looks like he got caught masturbating to horse porn by his parents. I'm amazed he managed to take a decent photo as well.
Plus DOGE got rid of basically all the competent cybersecurity professionals.
Names/addresses/ages/phone numbers/applications, shit they could have just found the login for one of the hiring groups indeed profiles, lol.
Instead, they hire the people who do it.
In wandering around the entrance to the rabbit hole, I came across the Wikipedia article about The Com, which is a lose umbrella organization that includes many hacker communities, including the one accused of hacking the FBI.
There's this:
The Com is connected to a group of skinheads active in Russia and Ukraine responsible for random attacks on people and acts of murder.[14] Edward Coristine, a high-ranking employee of the DOGE, US government organization, was a former member of The Com.[15]
I honestly DGAF about the employees, I do care about the internal documents indicating what they’re collecting on innocent parties and sitting on regarding the rich and dirty ones.
Mods abusing rule 3.
Edit - pointing out that concern over data security is a moot point after a gaggle of non-security cleared Musk datascrapers at the start of Trump's term already stole untold data, and have no protocol to secure it like the government does is factual and poignant. "Be excellent to each other" is a flagrant abuse of censorship.
in fairness, you called someone "retarded". some people on here get triggered around the word "retarded", even if they were not the target of the word, they somehow felt you meant they were "retarded".
remember. don't use "retarded" use "mentally deficient".
just want to make sure everyone is aware here. even if you were talking about flame "retardant" material, it's still not acceptable. the new term is "flammably deficient".
Technically the word 'idiot' was utilised for the highest grade of mental deficiency. Do you feel that word should be banned too?
Not trolling, I'm genuinely curious.
So, "Hacked" in this case means asked Grok where they could buy a "Female Body Inspector" tshirt and Grok coughed up the personal details of everything FBI?
ruh oh...

Who are the dog fuckers and who stole from their employers or hired prostitutes?
Good for them.
Meh, these are the same fucks who breached the Canvas backend and held student data for ransom. I don't care if they target a government agency I don't like - they're just another bunch of assholes out to make a profit.
That was fucked up and they are wrong for that but if they keep going after feds I'm all for them.
Wish they could leak the Epstein files (without pics and vids).
Their talents were wasted on Canvas if they have this kind of capability.
Either that or, the FBI's database just has ultra piss poor security which sounds about right anymore.
Interestingly they are taking a different route with this data than they usually do (in the article).
" don’t care if they target a government agency I don’t like" - you should. This opens all of them up to blackmail and worse by foreign govts. Massive problem for both you, me, and everyone else. The first Tom cruise mission impossible movie was about this very same thing except it was the CIA.
Don't take a fragment of a sentence out of context to make me say something I didn't. What I said was that even if they attack someone I don't like, I still won't celebrate it because I know what their motivation is.
What you said was "I don’t care if they target a government agency I don’t like - they’re just another bunch of assholes out to make a profit." not "even if they attack someone I don’t like, I still won’t celebrate it because I know what their motivation is.".
In or out of context, "I don’t care if they target a government agency I don’t like"means the exact same thing. It's a stand alone statement not impacted by your second sentence.
Your rephrasing makes more sense and the two parts of your sentence can not be separated without changing the meaning.
In or out of context, "I don’t care if they target a government agency I don’t like"means the exact same thing. It’s a stand alone statement not impacted by your second sentence.
Incorrect on all counts. "Whether they attack someone I hate or not doesn't matter" is what the complete sentence conveys. Quit playing semantic games to make me say the opposite. Actually just get blocked for being an unserious bad faith poster.
By everyone do you mean in the globe, or is everyone limited to America.
Apparently I'm OOTL on some weird Kash Patel shit?
He really loves animals.
we had couch fucker, and now we have bear fucker.
get these two a room with a nice couch and rug and they'll have a blast.
dogs, cats, horses, sheep, goats, and cows. and the occasional domesticated ASS.
We already knew that.
Is this related to the hack? (Is it the spouse part?)
So.... How many of them had engaged in beastiality prior to being hired? 🤔
Are the hackers PETA?
This kinda sounds like the last GRDS hack maybe? Would need some proof to even say if this is new.
If it’s profitable it’s legal. Just cut Trump in on it and there will be no consequences.
Hacking is pejorative insult! Their dialup modem escaped containment after watching that hack the planet with the nice boobied goth/punk girl movie.
We've all heard about breaches in security by hackers affecting so many millions of people, but I never hear about that data leak being used against the innocents. Like, it has no effect on we the poors.
They seem to hold our data for ransom, and steal crypto directly from the rich, because of course they do, that's where the most profit is. And, that is why they're so dangerous... to the rich.
If you dig into this a little you'll see plenty of accounts of The Com associates doing awful things against children, but I suspect that's a very small part of what a few of them do, it's just hyped and pushed forward to make us hate them all. In fact it's quite possible that within the larger community, those few players are themselves, shunned, the same way Christians shun but don't condemn the more radical members of their cult. But, the only way to hear that side of the story is to be in The Com. We've all seen this happen in online communities--outsiders condemning an entire large group for the actions of a few, who are shunned within the group.
Remember, we'll never get the whole story from one side, and the story we do get will be biased in favor of the side that tells it--there will always be distortions, lies of omission, and outright fabrications and lies. The same way we're wary of content now because of AI, we should be skeptical of any claims made, and the more powerful the claimant, the more skeptical we should be that we're getting the whole story.
Now let's see which one of them is a sheepshagger
I kinda doubt the FBI of all organizations is stupid enough to stuff data on all their agents into some database, just waiting for it to get stolen. They surely got better opsec (and ITS) than that.
Yup. That tracks. They're far too busy "vetting" the child and/or animal fuckers these days to keep tabs on things like opsec.




no comments (yet)