A high profile hacking group claims it has breached multiple FBI-related services and stolen data “on all FBI employees and applicants.” A representative of the group, called ShinyHunters, told 404 Media the data includes FBI agents’ names, home addresses, phone number, and information on their spouse.

The data breach could be massively significant and may have all sorts of national security and counterintelligence implications. Criminals from the same ecosystem as ShinyHunters have previously used hacked data like phone records to track, intimidate, and harass the FBI agents investigating them. The highly sensitive data could also be a boon to foreign intelligence agencies who want to better understand how one of the most important law enforcement and intelligence agencies in the U.S. operates. And if the data fell into the hands of more criminals, FBI agents and their spouses could face serious threats to their safety.

“We hacked the FBI. We hold data on all FBI employees and applicants,” the representative of the group told 404 Media.

The representative provided 404 Media with a sample appearing to contain the personal data of 5,000 FBI employees. That data included an alleged address, phone number, date of birth, and in some cases details on their spouse.


you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] -1 points 1 month ago (4 children)

" don’t care if they target a government agency I don’t like" - you should. This opens all of them up to blackmail and worse by foreign govts. Massive problem for both you, me, and everyone else. The first Tom cruise mission impossible movie was about this very same thing except it was the CIA.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    Don't take a fragment of a sentence out of context to make me say something I didn't. What I said was that even if they attack someone I don't like, I still won't celebrate it because I know what their motivation is.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] -9 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    What you said was "I don’t care if they target a government agency I don’t like - they’re just another bunch of assholes out to make a profit." not "even if they attack someone I don’t like, I still won’t celebrate it because I know what their motivation is.".

    In or out of context, "I don’t care if they target a government agency I don’t like"means the exact same thing. It's a stand alone statement not impacted by your second sentence.

    Your rephrasing makes more sense and the two parts of your sentence can not be separated without changing the meaning.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 9 points 1 month ago

    In or out of context, "I don’t care if they target a government agency I don’t like"means the exact same thing. It’s a stand alone statement not impacted by your second sentence.

    Incorrect on all counts. "Whether they attack someone I hate or not doesn't matter" is what the complete sentence conveys. Quit playing semantic games to make me say the opposite. Actually just get blocked for being an unserious bad faith poster.

  • source
  • parent