This is from a regularly scheduled Everglades Bike Club weekend ride in Key Biscayne, USA, on a 10km stretch of road, and all the drivers know to expect it will be there in the mornings.

top 93 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 84 points 1 month ago (7 children)

Wouldn't the road be closed for cars? At least no one died

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 32 points 1 month ago (4 children)

    That's exactly what I was thinking how the fuck a car got in there the roads should be closed or marked. It seems to be a Highway to boot so there shouldn't be a lot of options left. The guy in the car was dumb yes but the organization incompetent.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 17 points 1 month ago*

    Yes I don't know if this is a governmental issue or an issue with the event organizers.

    Like obviously don't drive in the median and break traffic laws, but this kind of event not being appropriately managed is going to increase the likelihood of accidents. Mostly from assholes driving poorly

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 7 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    Based on other comments in here, this isn’t an organized event. It’s just a group of bikers that do this every single weekend.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 1 month ago* (1 child)
  • [–] 2 points 1 month ago* (1 child)

    Why? Bikes are completely legal for road use. Even when there's more than one of them. Just like cars!

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago

    What I'm reading is that this isn't a formally organized event, and taking up the whole road (when it isn't blocked for that many riders) would not be legal there.

    This driver is am idiot, but so is the club for not formally organizing and working with the city.

    Am cyclist, want people to be smart and safe.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 39 points 1 month ago

    Actually admire some one taking a mini back to its rally roots

  • source
  • [–] 32 points 1 month ago (11 children)

    Know what solves this. Protected bike infrastructure that segregates car and cycling traffic. You all are making good points on both sides. But if the two types of traffic never interact this becomes a non-issue.

  • source
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 month ago (6 children)

    Even with segregated bike lanes these people will still drive on the road. There have been many times people drove their cars into groups of them where I live because of frustration. (I live in Western Europe where there's great bicycle infrastructure). So yeah, as long as they drive where they are supposed to drive it's fine, but it doesn't magically solves it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    Can I ask? Where you live are the bike paths "lanes" or are they "physically" protected from car traffic? Do cars have to knock down steel bollards and jump concrete barricades to enter bike lanes or is it some paint and the honor system? Because if it's the latter I'm not surprised at all. And if they are protected I'm wondering about the failure points or if people are just jacking up their cars to save five minutes? I'm genuinely curious - please let me know.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago

    Said western Europe. So probably proper bike lanes. I live in western Europe, Spain specifically. There's the road, then a steel railing, then the river-like trench along the road, and then the bike lane.

    The bike lane is completely empty, there's 3-4 "cyclists" in Lycra using the road.

    Because real cyclists use the road and wear lycra. The bike lane is for the noobs.

    Actual cyclists that use the bike lane to move from one town to the other do use the bike lane and don't use Lycra though. They're probably the butt of the joke for the lycra dudes, because they didn't even pay 10k€ for there bikes, most probably it was just 300€ for the bike lane-capable bike.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] -1 points 1 month ago (3 children)

    Look how many are biking, a bike lane wouldn't help here, they are taking over the whole road like they own it

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    Cyclists have the right to use the full Lane. Imagine if each of these people were in their own car.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 17 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    Maybe they have to shit really bad.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 15 points 1 month ago (3 children)
  • [–] [S] 8 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    From what I've found, yes, these larger group rides are held every weekend, in addition to much smaller ones practically every day

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 1 month ago

    It is key to remember that if it was one person or a handful of people the cars would still be beeping as they passed, driving way too close, and endangering the cyclists. Safety in numbers is real and in this situation anyone sane stays behind the group of cyclists or finds another route. It really is an effective strategy.

    Also, if each of those people was in a car it would be absolute gridlock. That car would not have been getting where they were going faster in that case.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 34 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    Was anyone else hoping he would have hit a hidden ditch and wrecked his car?

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 12 points 1 month ago (7 children)

    When they close the road for races here the cops are on every corner. This dude would've gotten the shaft real quick.

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 1 month ago* (6 children)

    That's not a race, that's just a big and well organised group ride.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 1 month ago (5 children)

    Huh! That's actually crazy cool. I imagine they don't have good bike paths?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 month ago*

    Rarely. But that doesn't stop shitty drivers (which I don't consider op). My cousin lives a bit north of this, he got hit-and-run'd by an old lady driving on a grass-seperated sidewalk riding his bicycle to a fishing spot before sunrise.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    I don't think that group would fit on most bike paths safely. The speed difference for other users is too high to navigate a route like that safely. Best place for them would be a nice quiet country road, but sometimes you have to take the annoying roads to get to the good ones.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 1 month ago

    Best place for them would be a nice quiet country road, but sometimes you have to take the annoying roads to get to the good ones.

    Especially on a barrier island where that highway is literally the only thru-road.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 11 points 1 month ago

    What a dickhead

  • source
  • [–] 21 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

    Devils advocate theres a pregnant woman in the backseat but also a hijacker has planted a bomb in the car and if they go under 50mph the car blows up

  • source
  • [–] 51 points 1 month ago* (36 children)

    Based on most of the comments here so far, you all hate cyclists more than cars.

  • source
  • hideshow 36 child comments
  • [–] 23 points 1 month ago (6 children)

    I'm a cyclist and when I'm on a bike I try to use the road responsibly. If I'm no a long climb going 10km/h with cars behind me I try to stop when possible and let them pass safely. I don't ride next to someone else chatting and blocking the entire lane. I don't ride on roads with speed limits over 60km/h. I would never do what they are doing in the video. It's just disrespectful and causing unnecessary tension between drivers and cyclists.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 month ago (3 children)

    If I’m no a long climb going 10km/h with cars behind me I try to stop

    Imma stop you right there. That's not "being respectful", it's being a fucking pushover. The last thing you want to do while on a climb steep enough to drop you to 10 km/h is pull over and stop. Pull across to the side of there's enough room for them to pass, sure, but keep that momentum at all costs.

    That said, if this ride is on open roads, then road rules should be followed. Where I live that means two abreast (plus more if overtaking), but a blob that's at least 5 wide in parts.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    keep that momentum at all costs.

    Who am I racing? It changes absolutely nothing for me. I'm not stopping in places that are bad for it but if there's a road where I can get of the road for 5 seconds and then start again it costs me absolutely nothing to do it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    Who said anything about racing? It costs a huge amount. Starting on a 10% grade hill is an enormous amount of energy compared to just keeping going as you were, and it puts you in significant danger as you do it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago

    I already explained that "being able to stop" also means "being able to start later". I have no idea why you're so worried about my energy expenditure. Don't worry, I will get back home even if my mountain times will be terrible.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 5 points 1 month ago (20 children)

    Personally speaking because I am both. Cyclists don't obey the rules of the road to the same rigor as a car. Both parties are open to hate.

    Now that said, only one of them is in a 2 tonne death machine.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 20 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 1 month ago (6 children)

    maybe its my metro area but I feel motorists are more likely to not follow the rules. There is cyclists but its a pretty low percentage. The ones that do though really do and make themselves a nuisance. There was a guy that would just ignore the red light on a major intersection. like two four lanes. during rush hour because I guess he felt since everything is slowed up he can just fuck right through.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    Depending on your local that could be perfectly legal. It's called an Idaho Stop. You can treat stop signs as yields and red light like a stop sign. You're not supposed to treat a red light as a yield so if he's doing that it's illegal everywhere as far as I know.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 4 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    My 2 cents is the closer to a downtown you get the better the drivers are because of proximity however the cyclists are shit at obeying rules. Outside downtown cars are horrible in respecting cyclists who usually end up better at obeying laws because of the speeds.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 4 points 1 month ago

    You're actually right and it goes down to how drivers respond to their surroundings. Areas with narrower streets, more traffic, and more pedestrians encourage drivers to be more observant passively.

    When you have a wide, clear, straight road people pay less attention.

    It's a psychology thing and some people are trying to design roads around the concept

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 6 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    Nah, you're correct. Any time a study is done on this it finds that either drivers and cyclists break the law at similar rates, or drivers break it more.

    There's also the difference in why they do it. Drivers break the law out of convenience. Because it's easier to do, or because it gets them where they're going faster. Cyclists sometimes do that, but far more than drivers, they're likely to do it because it's safer. Because laws are often made for car drivers in ways that aren't appropriate to cyclists, and so breaking the law is often safer. The classic example is treating stop signs as give way signs in places that haven't implemented an Idaho Stop rule.

    Sources:

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 14 points 1 month ago (5 children)

    Indeed, why should they? The rules of the road where made expressly for cars, not bikes, and there are several states which sensibly make carve outs for bicycles and motorcycles.

    But, as you point out, the risk for breaking the rules--real or perceived--fall entirely on the cyclist, so I absolutely see no equivalence.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 1 month ago (4 children)

    Ya don't break a rule; the car runs you over because distracted driver.

    Ya break a rule to avoid distracted driver; you get ran over because your rule breaking in your tiny and light bicycle triggered the road rage of someone in a SUV whose control was entirely based on spite and the fact everyone else should follow rules without exception (that the state legislature carved for cyclists to try to minimize their deaths).

    Being a cyclist commuter is fun, much recommended.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 1 month ago (3 children)

    The problem with cars is that they immediately make every other form of transportation incredibly shitty.

    Pedestrians and cyclists get killed. Buses get stuck in traffic.

    I hate cars, but what am I supposed to do? Getting out of my car is just an invitation to get killed by one. And if I wanted to live entirely without a car, I'd have to move to a city, where I would never be more than 12-feet away from cars and have to cross a road every block, risking my life because of shitty fucking cars.

    When we say, "We're not saying get rid of cars, we're just saying we need options", to not scare the carbrains, well, the only way to have real options (ie safe roads) is to have roads entirely without cars.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    YUUP YUP YUP!

    We have to get rid of these 'reforms after reforms' for car centric infraatructure and for car company, oil company, and plastics companies lobbyists because they will mever make us all happy. We CANNOT reform society in its current form to allow us to use cars and for all other people who use other forms of transportation to also be happy inside most municipalities. We are doing this right now and most of us are unhappy about our transportation. Car users get stuck in traffic, create traffic, and those who dont use cars get mowed down by them like its air.

    WE NEED COMPLETE REVOLUTION. Reform will nnevevr work. We. Need. Revolution.

    We have to completely revolutionize how we use our roads , transporarion paths , and transportation methods , and how we construct or even demolish different transporation infrastructure.

    Making reforms around cars will lead us nowhere. Cars have always been a deadly or time consuming problem for all other people who use other forms of transportation...so.....revolutionize society so that cars are so rare that ONLY the governmental officials or people out in VERY open areas using cars recreationally ever get to use them. Ban cars from the majority of the innards of EVERY municipality. YOU DONT HAVE TO BUILD CAR-CENTRIC INFRASTRUCTURE CITIES AND TOWNS WHEN IT IS PRACTICALLY ILLEGAL FOR CARS TO BE OPERATED INSIDE THEM.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago

    I think this creeping incrementalism definitely has a limit. I think the goal is to build enough of a political constituency that you can push for the big changes... but for real change, you eventually have to TRULY inconvenience drivers. Look how the fucking freak out about barriers... like there was a barrier protecting a bike lane that kept getting hit by cars... so they removed the barrier!! The best we can do is paint and stick strips that cars always drive over or park on, and they're still furious. So, yeah, we have to start defeating them on the local level, in places where it IS possible to live without even a drivers license--the kinds of places where the people with cars drive into for work and therefore don't have a direct vote.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 1 month ago (3 children)

    Cyclists don’t obey the rules of the road to the same rigor as a car

    Bullshit

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago (1 child)

    Spend a few years downtown in any metropolitan area and see if you change your tune. The amount of cyclists (myself included) who drive through lights or advances, don't indicate directions, wrong way on a one way street, cutting through parking lots or alleys the list goes on and on.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 1 month ago

    No, it's objectively bullshit. It's been studied many times and the result always proves that carbrained nonsense to be bullshit.

    Drivers break the law all the time. They run blatant reds. They fail to stop when safe to do so at a yellow. They speed. They ignore stop signs. They fail to give way to pedestrians. The pass cyclists too close. They fail to indicate correctly at roundabouts more often than they do it correctly.

    The only difference is people are too carbrained to even notice these. Oh, and the reasons for it (cyclists tend to break the law for their own safety unlike car drivers who do it for convenience) and the consequences when they do (cyclists endanger nobody except occasionally themselves, drivers endanger everyone around them).

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago

    "Cyclists don't obey the rules of the road to the same rigor as a car."

    Because you don't need a license for a bike, the rules are there because cars and motorbikes are incredibly dangerous compared to walking or biking (for everyone involved). A large part of people who bike don't know the rules because they don't need to, just the basic stuff and having situational awareness is enough. The issue is that many in all above mentioned kinds don't have that, they're either too dumb, thinking about something else or using their phones etc. But it's way more important for the people who are in control of the most dangerous vehicles to be the ones who know and follow the rules.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 1 month ago (5 children)

    there's a lot of vroom vroom apologists who spend their days on these threads. it's wild.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago (4 children)

    Its like those people who go to the childfree forums and act like a 'genocide' is being committed against parenrs and wanna-be-parents ...

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago (3 children)

    jfc forreal? that's a thing?

    how do these fucks have so much free time?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago (2 children)

    bro hit up childfree lemmy or even r/childfree on reddit iif you can stand the new reddit and see for yourself.

    Survey after survey shows that most people are currently parents or want to be parennts in the future.... WHAT GENOCIDE?!

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 1 month ago (4 children)

    South Parks season premiere hasn't aged at all

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 month ago (3 children)
  • [–] 43 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    All the LOCAL drivers know to expect it. If someone is from out of town they would have no way of knowing that happens on that road unless there are signs posted or something. The dude is still a dipshit though.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago*

    This road is also literally like 1 mile long. In this clip I'm pretty sure the group is approaching the causeway that takes them off the little island they're touring and back into Miami. Lil Cooper just had to wait like 2 more minutes and he could have preserved his undercarriage.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 25 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    "Share the road" goes both ways. It's a two way street so to say.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 24 points 1 month ago (4 children)

    I see the highest throughput of people that road had all week now that it isn't blocked by cars for once.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 1 month ago (3 children)

    Is it the highest throughout actually? Density sure, but lower density of people (in a car) per area or length of road at higher speed is still a higher throughout. Fast roads absolutely have a high throughout. Even during heavy traffic you often still go faster than bikes and the whole road is packed with cars at that point.

    So... is it actually the highest throughout?

    Bikes are not replacing cars 1:1, we instead need shorter distances etc. and reduce the required throughout to begin with.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    Let's say they go around 1/4th of the speed limit (they go faster than that for sure) and let's say a car on this road is occupied by 2 people on average (which is generous).

    To get the same throughput with cars, you need to put one car on the road (with safety distances) for every eight cyclists. No way that's feasible in this example.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 32 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 child)

    Is this an officially sanctioned event that has been authorized to take over a whole road?

    If not, slower traffic should keep to the right. Share the road. Don't be a dick. It's not hard.

    Edit: just realized where I am. This could have all been avoided with better public transportation. Fuck cars.

    Edit #2: as a society we should absolutely be building public transportation and protected bike lanes. However, there are a shocking number of people talking about "entitled" this and "entitled" that and have no idea what the actual laws are for sharing the road using the current existing infrastructure in this video.

    This video appears to be an asshole in a car passing some assholes on bicycles.

    Florida Statute § 316.081(3): On a road, street, or highway having two or more lanes allowing movement in the same direction, a driver may not continue to operate a motor vehicle in the furthermost left-hand lane if the driver knows or reasonably should know that he or she is being overtaken in that lane from the rear by a motor vehicle traveling at a higher rate of speed.

    Florida Statute § 316.2065(5)(a): A person operating a bicycle upon a roadway at less than the normal speed of traffic at the time and place and under the conditions then existing must ride in the bicycle lane or, if there is no bicycle lane on the roadway, as close as practicable to the right-hand curb or edge of the roadway

    Every cyclist in the left lane blocking the faster traffic should be written a ticket.

    Unless they've gone through some kind of permitting process then they have no more moral ground than the street takeover assholes that go around shutting down roads to do donuts.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 0 points 1 month ago

    THANK YOU.

    If an evernt is not officially sanctioned ? In my opinion ANYRHING, AND I MEAN ANYTHING, can happen in there and I wouldnt care. Unless there are kids there? I dont care for anyone there. Sorry. If anyone wants to hold a. massive event that will DEFINITELY clog up a public road or area? Yooooo you better fucking get that bitch approved first. Like the only massive public event that doesnt need to be approved is a massive public violent protest ... and thats it.

    I remember watching this one video of a guy who crashed died during one of those unofficial 'street takeover' events and he ended killing a few other people there who were happily watching it and also clogging up that road and the comments were so sad for them....

    uhhhh....

    I find it very hard to feel sad for adults who dont tell anyone that they will clog up the public areas that WE ALL PAY TAXES FOR, , intentionally clog up a road, drive their cars in circles at irrantionally dangerous speeds, race each other on unofficial race tracks , and then end up learning the valuable lesson that 'Moving really quickly has never been a problem, its just the stopping really quickly.'

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›