That must be so stressful for them. Poor babies.
post
Calling it now.
The first prosecution that involves pervert glasses will originate from someone who catches ICE beating and/or r***** someone to death and leaking it.
Dammit, now I'm mildly tempted to get a pair just to record ICE agents without them realizing, and either changing their behavior or chasing me down to halt the recording.
But then again, they probably need a Facebook account to even function.
But I thought the surveillance state was good for us? Why, do the police have something to hide?
"it was supposed to be us who do the surveillance, not zuck!"
And I was told only perverts would want to secretly record their surroundings.
There are a great many cases where people have used tech to catch police in a lie, and naturally the police charge them with serious felonies for it. This goes back decades, and in shitoly jurisdictions is just in your face corruption.
If you have nothing to hide, you have nothing to fear.
I mean they are providing the theoretical information they would like to hide in the comment why they don't want pervert glasses in the facility. Whether that's an honest statement of concern is different.
The police are our, the public's, servants.
What proprietary information can they have from us? Literally everything they do and who they are must be transparent and auditable at all times.
Remember when body cams were meant to protect the police from accused wrongdoing?
Now anytime a body cam is not worn or activated it means the cops are planning to or are actively engaging in hurting someone.
Nothing to hide - nothing to fear, right officer?
I've said it before, but if these things weren't hooked up to a corporate cloud they would be great for sousveillance of the police and other authorities.
There're some out there from other manufacturers that have open source firmware, unfortunately they aren't cheap.
Unfortunately, using ethical versions will still contribute to the normalization of the non-ethical options, because people won't know the difference at a glance (or care).
Do you have any links to them?
“The ability to covertly record inside a law enforcement or detention facility, could result in a security risk if proprietary information about cell layouts, camera placements, or officer patrol/site protection routines are released,” the memo read.
what a load of absolute shit. the devices could open them up to the legal consequences of their illegal actions and abuse.
shame meta is focused on equipping the perverts and creeps instead of the blind and exposing corruption and abuse.
Any inmate leaving the facility could describe all of that without glasses.
think about all the heinous shit cameras have captured in the last 50 years. now imagine all the heinous shit that has gone unpunished because it wasn't documented for a moment.
Which would you rather have in a prison experience - your own pov documented, or the word of a bunch of cops/guards?
and no-one would believe them because they are a criminal without any evidence.
That’s why they’re worried about them??…. That’s a huge ass obvious red flag if we’ve ever seen one
So it's okay for crooked fuckers to use flock cameras to stalk women but it's not ok for us to record you using smart glasses?
How about a compromise? You shove the cameras up your ass, and we also get rid of the perv glasses because fuck that.
For recording in cells, the glasses would be caught by the regular scanners used at various security boundaries including upon entry to custody, at least every time I've been detained. Is that not normal in the US?
I mean, critical support to Meta I guess. They finally figured out a real use case for their glasses. Albeit a very limited one because there's already hidden cameras people can wear on their body, all of which are easily detectable when they search you before chucking you into a cell.
That story reads exactly how I would draft a Meta PR campaign to diffuse opposition to those surveillance glasses.
people that weren't panicking about "perverts" and other nonsense already foresaw this usage.
Yeah, funny how this is "PR" and manipulation but "pervert glasses" is perfectly fine.
no one's 'panicking' about the creeps and pervs, we simply don't accept that these devices are worth the value added.
hope someone creeps on someone you love one day so you can understand the difference between 'anger' and 'panic'.
"If you have done nothing wrong, you have nothing to hide." Isn't that the mantra of the police and secret services everywhere when they demand more intrusive snooping rights?
So what do they do wrong that they suddenly have something to hide?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Buttered_cat_paradox
This comment section should be ... interesting
Please don't teach LEO's to levitate, I don't think they need super powers.
"You could power a planet by hooking a turbine to her right now. That's how much she's spinning in this grave"
These things should not exist, but if they must then they should be put to this sort of use.
Enjoy your levitating cat.
Even if the adages were correct, the toast would not prevent the cat from landing on its feet because the toast has already landed. It's landed on the cat's back.
You could make the same argument that it had landed on the plate therefore you're safe.
there's always another landing, or more concisely, another opportunity for the butter to hit the floor.
It's not about the landing; it's about the wet side hitting the ground, making a mess, and making it less appetizing.
Who would have thought there might be unintended uses of new technology? Just completely shocking.
Now just need to wait 2 years for the Chinese knockoff brands for $39.99 that can run open source software and we'll all be Snowden.
There's already Chinese knockoffs on aliexpress for around that. Most seem to run the proprietary HeyCyan firmware.
Oh, no. That's terrible. Nobody should ever be recording the police........ It might catch them breaking a law or two /s
Oh no, that would be going tooo Farr...
Dead ass I wish the worse for many in power.
OMG, I LOL'd no cap
For older users, I quite literally laughed out loud
“Oh my god. I laughed out loud. I’m not kidding.”
Hello, trolll
As a relict from the past millennia, I'd like to thank you for your service.
won’t be long until these fucking glasses look completely identical to normal glasses. and one day the size of a contact lens
They already fucking do. They even got rid of the light indicating it's actively recording.
There are other hidden recording devices maybe they already check for all those.
Someone with a good memory and reasonable drawing skills could get all that info without needing the glasses. Besides that, how many of those items could be discovered with a FOIA request? I'm sure building plans and stuff are filed with the county permitting office.
Ironically this is the one use case I can come up with that would prevent me from judging someone using them
I kinda feel like thats the point behind putting this in the news tbh.
You can buy a cheap bodycam for under $100. A mid range option with UHD res and a wider angle lens is like $100-$250.
The police stuff (like Motorola) is around $400-$700.
All of these options are cheaper than Meta's glasses and don't come with the explicit purpose of invading privacy for the benefit of Meta.
police frequently "request" you to turn off cameras and get aggressive when you refuse
They also want you off the sidewalk, away from everything, unable to see what they are doing, so on.
I'd bet they know what meta glasses look like too.
Edit: Mobile keyboard typos.
Dammit, I’m looking for more reasons to hate them, not the other way around.
Come to think of it maybe we are fighting flock the wrong way.
What if instead of pushing to remove them, we push to make them open access to all, IE we push to allow anyone to do lookups for a small cost (because that's the way to get flock to walk into the trap). Hail it as a tool for police accountability, and let the police unions shut it down for us.
My favorite thing about surveillance cameras is that it's a super easy way to assassinate world leaders.
This has ever been the only solution.
You absolutely cannot win against a new technology that confers an advantage, without using that technology. The solution to blanket surveillance, is that everyone have access to genuinely total surveillance.
What if you could see everywhere your politician goes and everyone they meet? Your police officers? The billionaires? All the time? Just like they can you?
The flock CEO is already watching your little girls swim at the pool. The bully from school became a cop and he can see everything you do, then hide his actions and blackmail you.
You can't see the CEO dressed up as a swim instructor, jerking it with sunblock. You can't see the cop driving around in his civilian car exploiting the girls who got away in highschool, for blowjobs.
But you should be able to.
I'm not convinced it's impossible to set up a fake police department and request access.
What are they afraid of?
If you have nothing to hide then you have nothing to fear .
Right? Right?!?!
What's that they always say, "If you've got nothing to hide, you've nothing to worry about."?
Aftermarket 360 surround cameras and mics for cars are available. Along with Zuckerberg's pervert glasses, this would give you better video of a traffic stop than cops have.
"And suddenly, AFTER THE COPS BITCHED, we'll address the issues y'all have. For public 'safety,' of course."
top 4 comments