I think he might just have a fetish for losing.

top 94 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 172 points 2 months ago (19 children)

Please be the republican nominee.

  • source
  • hideshow 19 child comments
  • [–] 138 points 2 months ago (17 children)

    Keep in mind that is exactly what I thought when Trump announced his candidacy in 2015.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 17 child comments
  • [–] 17 points 2 months ago (12 children)

    Hmmm.

    You make a good point.

    On the other hand, look at the history of presidents and their parties. It ALWAYS swaps parties unless there is a particularly popular vice president. Literally, back to Washington.

    The US isn’t like Japan where the LDP wins consecutive elections for decades on end.

    The republican candidate was GOING to win in 2016.

    We are now in a time of chaos. I feel Dems will probably sweep the midterms and maybe win in 2028, but it’s unclear. We’ve only had one nonconsecutive president before.

    I wouldn’t put money on James (Vance).

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • [–] 37 points 2 months ago (4 children)

    Remember when the Supreme Court interfered in the presidential election because of hanging chads and effectively kept Gore from winning, thus leading somehow to the death of Harambe and bringing us to the bad place dimension where everything always gets worse and almost always in the worst way possible?

    Yeah.. like you said, history likes to repeat itself.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 2 months ago (3 children)

    Oh yes; I remember the Brooks Brothers riot.

    Begging the question — was Al Gore a particularly popular vice president?

    Having lived through it, I would say no.

    Which doesn’t mean Dubya was wildly popular. Only that Al wasn’t.

    Whether Dubya won legitimately, the national mood wasn’t four more years of Clinton.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 2 months ago

    Between the two, you had one that constantly made shit up like "I made the internet" and one that couldn't pronounce nuclear.

    The fact that it got down to the chads are a better indicator to our split as a country.

    At the time climate was a hot topic and we pushed hard to get gore in as best we could.

    IIRC the chad was in Florida, which is pretty handicapped red.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 2 months ago (1 child)

    Not really though, post civil war there was a 40 year pause where no democrats were president iirc until Wilson won due to Teddy Roosevelt splitting the vote

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 0 points 2 months ago (3 children)

    That's because both sides are shit and just keep the rich and powerful, rich and powerful, in exchange for money.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 2 months ago (2 children)

    This is the shit that is put out there to keep people from being involved in politics because "why bother if both sides are the same?" and to deflect blame from the fact that the right is objectively worse in every fucking way. The Democratic party has a lot of problems and is in need of of a huge pull to the left, but it is better than the alternative. Dismissing it this way solves nothing.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago (1 child)

    Well we could always keep doing like the past dozen decades and endlessly have the population flopping back and forth between two parties and always pissed and screwed but never doing anything real about it other than "you have to vote guys. That will fix everything". The system is corrupted. Voting isn't going to fix it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 2 months ago

    Nominees don't matter anymore. They won't let anyone who will make a meaningful difference in. If someone meaningful gets in, they'll be blocked from making any changes.

    we lack the pitchforks and the will to do jack all about anything.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 2 months ago

    Right. Standing up there and yelling "there's that f__ talk again!" as some kind of response, ala Idiocracy would be a huge selling point for the Tribe That Rub Shit In Their Hair. The pig people loooove that kind of stuff - they are intimidated by competency, expertise and people that are smarter than them. An idiot like donnie or Petey are their idea of "common sense" politicians.

    That, combined with enough of the apathetic staying home as well as the armchair "leftists" that love to tell everyone how it is useless to vote, (at least to actually vote for a candidate that can actually win) and you'll get Petey in office...

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 59 points 2 months ago (2 children)

    Guy who lost a war with Iran wants to be president.

    Must be the type who has failed upwards his entire life.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] -10 points 2 months ago*

    There's no "war with Iran". When did it begin? When did it end?

    In reality it's been decades/centuries of genocidal imperial terrorism in an attempt to violently control the region, the people, and resources there.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 56 points 2 months ago (3 children)
  • [–] 26 points 2 months ago (5 children)

    That man deserves life in prison for his war crimes.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 26 points 2 months ago (4 children)

    So you're saying he's got a shot?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 23 points 2 months ago (1 child)

    So this is his Dmitry Medvedev?

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 64 points 2 months ago (7 children)

    You guys laugh, but there seems to be enough wannabe-macho small-penis dudebro idiot voters that could get the loser elected. Do not assume it won't happen.

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (4 children)

    I'm not from the USA, neither an English native speaker, but is Peter Hegseth in any way charismatic? I find Trump totally repulsive, however I can understand his "charism" that attracts people to vote for him when he's there mumbling his rampts and narcistic histories. So far, since 2025, that I can remember, anytime I saw any video of Peter Hegseth speaking he seems to have the same charism as a door.

    This, would, of course, be important for a presidential candidate If there is any "democracy" left during the election time, since Trump's popularity is decreasing, his government does not seem too promising on having "good results" to show when the election time comes, therefore the transfer of charism and therefore votes that Trump would be able to execute would be limited, and the new candidate would have to work on his own.

    Given the current state of affairs, as an external observator and not too familiar with USA real politics dynamics, I find it's easier for Trump and republicans to continue the rampamt breaking of laws and just really push for a 3rd term, as he's been publicly "teasing" since his 2024 campaign...

    P.S.: Just to finish up, there's also the fact that Trump is old as f*, and seems to be becoming more senile by the minute (i.e.: his almost at the age his dad was diagnoses with dementia iirc), so maybe the thing is they would just be forced to move on from him and the "3rd term" thing would really just not come to fruition due to bad timing (Trump going full demented, dying, etc...). Or maybe if his popularity keeps going down, who knows if the democracts can obtain any majority in the midterm elections and put up an impeachment on both houses this time, this would also chance the outlook of things and force the republicans to choose a new candidate sooner than later.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 2 months ago

    The only thing hegseth has going for him is his 'TV look' and willingness to eat shit if it owns the libs (our conservatives have no shame, and love embarrassing themselves to get a reaction from 'the left')

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 5 points 2 months ago*

    He’s not charismatic, he just spouts hateful fascist ideology that hateful fascists crave.

    None of these guys are. Elon “Nazi Salute” Musk, Rupert Murdoch, Zuckerberg, Thiel, Bannon, Bezos, and the entirety of Trump’s cabinet. They are social idiots and have zero charisma.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] [S] 3 points 2 months ago

    I’m not from the USA, neither an English native speaker, but is Peter Hegseth in any way charismatic?

    Not at all. Even the military personnel I've spoken with think he's an absolute moron with no charisma or leadership ability. Officers who are ardently non-partisan have made semi-public remarks that have been critical.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 2 months ago

    is Peter Hegseth in any way charismatic?

    In the sense of making me want to punch him in the face, yes.

    I find Trump totally repulsive

    Likewise. I had to be streetwise to survive when I was young, and I can spot a wrong 'un from a mile away. Everything about Trump sets my red warning light blinking.

    But Trump's character and appearance and Hegseth's bellowing imbecility function like the typos in a 419 scam email. The gullible and oblivious ignore the warning signs.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 19 points 2 months ago (8 children)

    Trump vs Hegseth, who is worse?

    I vote tie.

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 60 points 2 months ago (7 children)

    Hegseth is worse because he will live longer.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 2 months ago (3 children)

    That's a valid point. I don't think he could win though. He's a drunk.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 21 points 2 months ago (2 children)

    I recall hearing the same thing about George W. Bush and we all know how that turned out

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 18 points 2 months ago (1 child)

    Does Pete Hegseth’s liver know it’s expected to make it all the way to 2028?

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 15 points 2 months ago (1 child)

    The boy ain’t even fit for T-ball.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 15 points 2 months ago

    President Kegsbreath..

  • source
  • [–] 15 points 2 months ago

    We all thought the current president was going to lose in 2016 when he was dicking up the republican primaries. Don't discount these hacks. RFK would be the strongest challenger if not for his speech impediment, how is he going to run a nazi rally with that voice?

    Vance won't get it, Rubio won't get it.

  • source
  • [–] 14 points 2 months ago (3 children)

    Wonder if he and Trump are going for a Putin/Medvedev situation.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 2 months ago (2 children)

    Didn't Putin allegedly get a little mad at this situation ? Trump couldn't mentally survive not being officially the big guy for a day.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 2 months ago (1 child)

    That is likely true. I can't imagine him calling anyone else "sir" or "Mr. President."

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 13 points 2 months ago (4 children)

    Hilarious, because we all know it's just going to be the orange pedophile again.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 2 months ago (1 child)

    I just have a hard time believing they can keep him both alive and sufficiently lucid enough to be viable for 2028. He's struggling to hold it together through an entire Nazi rally now.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 4 points 2 months ago

    Sanity and competence are not requirements. As long as he's hurting the right's designated scapegoats du jour, they'll support him even if he's no more than an amorphous blob of protoplasm in a jar.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago (1 child)

    That’s gonna be a hard sell to a lot of people. I’m moderate and I wouldn’t vote for either one of these dudes. They need to pick someone sane? Or is the insanity the selling point, and I’m just out of touch?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 2 months ago

    Or is the insanity the selling point

    Yes, why would you vote for a politician who is just going to line their pockets when you can vote for a lunatic that says it's okay to say slurs who is just going to line his pockets? I mean, what's life if you can't say slurs to people? Other people in my trailer park need to know they're lesser than me and Nancy Pelosi stock trades gender fluids transmission imported beef participation trophies nobody legal wants to work and all the illegals are not working and taking all the jobs and welfare for $9 lattes avocado toast. I will either hang myself from my F350s lifted trailer hitch or vote for Trump. What's it going to be, liberal?

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 32 points 2 months ago (2 children)

    Do it! Dems need any help they can get.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 2 months ago

    Over trump's dead body (literally).

    Trump is not planning to willingly leave in 2029.

  • source
  • [–] 11 points 2 months ago*

    Oh fuck, I need to keep my wallet closed. Last time a person who obviously cannot get elected became the GOP candidate, I bet a lot of money against his win. :(

    Fortunately, I did the same 4 years earlier when the same happened :)

  • source
  • [–] 10 points 2 months ago

    Iran war didn't go well, now he planning to be the boss? Well, let's see how it goes for him.

  • source
  • [–] 9 points 2 months ago (7 children)

    Actually, I hope he does run. He would make it easier for progressive to win because everyone hates him.

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 21 points 2 months ago (6 children)

    What are you talking about? You do realise this is the country that elected Trump twice, right?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 2 months ago

    Again, you could only say that if the US was a democracy.

    It's a one party system with rampent voter disenfranchisement and first past the post.

    Trump has never had more than 40% approval. He didn't win the election. He stole itbin a rigged system.

    If the US had a democracy, he never would have been able to steal the Presidency. Because he had never been the candidate of choice.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 2 months ago* (1 child)

    Assuming we do have free elections at the time, nah. MAGA has been whittled down to about one-third of the voting bloc. They’ll get decimated by populist progressives. Establishment Dems will also get wrecked in the primaries.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 2 months ago

    If I've learned anything these past 10 years, it's never underestimate the idiocy of the average american voter.

    Just because MAGA is smaller than previously, doesn't mean the voters who don't like MAGA anymore, don't still prefer republicans.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago

    Hegseth isn't Trump. MAGA is a classic Cult of Personality, and it is ALL about Trump. Once he assumes room temperature, MAGA is finished.

    Some of his followers, especially the politicians, will try to keep it going, but 90% of street level MAGAs were on board because of Trump, and once he's gone, their interest in politics will wane. None of his henchmen or children will be acceptable, even though there will be many who will claim to be his chosen, or logical, successor, but NONE of them will attract the Trumper.

    Besides, MAGA is down to less than 30%. It will be far lower after Trump croaks. Even if they could rally around a MAGA candidate, there won't be the support. And of all the MAGA figures, the guy that helped Trump break his America First promise definitely won't be the guy. Neither will Vance. Rubio has the only shot, because he still has non-MAGA creds, but he will also be tainted with MAGA, so it won't work.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 9 points 2 months ago

    Completely normal for a genocidal empire that murders schoolgirls with impunity.

  • source
  • [–] 9 points 2 months ago (1 child)

    Wow. Cocaine really is bad for you, huh?

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 8 points 2 months ago

    Did someone convince him that he can just command everyone in the armed forces to vote for him? Then again, he does have the Fox News crowd locked down. No matter how bad he is at his job, they'll vote him over any liberal.

  • source
  • [–] 15 points 2 months ago (3 children)

    Gonna try and pull a Putin with Trump?

    Take Trump as his running mate, then if he wins resign so Trump can be President again.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 14 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (2 children)

    That is against the constitution. The 12th amendment says if a person is ineligible for president they are also ineligible for VP

    Only thing possible is running for congress and then being speaker of the house, then both VP and President resign.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago (1 child)

    Ah you're right. I had to go back and read the specific text. Been so long since I have sat down to read any of it I had forgotten that was covered.

    I stand corrected

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago*

    There’s still merit to what you said. Trump is a convicted felon. That alone he should have been impeached and removed but they let it slide. If they let that go who’s to say they don’t let other stuff go too.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 13 points 2 months ago (4 children)
  • [–] 6 points 2 months ago (2 children)

    I still laugh when someone watching him doing his manly macho bigly boy warrior ethos "exercise" and they shouted "all the way down, all the way UP!", LOOOOoooool.

    I wonder if they kept their job or if they could cover and say they were directing that at others there out of shot.

    Anyway, I remember coaches and gym teachers that would STOP COUNTING when counting reps and you did bad form. Whoever was counting for little Petey here should have done that. He was not doing anything useful here. I think I counted two actual reps out of the supposed 40-something, LOL.

    https://www.newsweek.com/pete-hegseth-mocked-by-critics-over-workout-video-fitness-experts-weigh-in-12066692

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 2 months ago (1 child)

    I remember coaches and gym teachers that would STOP COUNTING when counting reps and you did bad form.

    The military does the same thing during testing.

    “44…45…46…46…all the way down…46…46…”

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 2 months ago

    Haha, yeah, makes sense. That's what I've heard from people in the military. They should have done that for little Petey there.

    I wish the guy yelling "all the way down, all the way up!" had added - "this means YOU, Pete!" 🤣

    Forgot to add: it would always make me laugh when they stalled the counting, and it made doing things even harder when coaches or teachers would do this. 😂

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›