Fuck it, we ball. 3 years no arch deaths. Windows is a fuck. 1,000,000 pacman warnings.
post
Iβm here for a good time, not a long time
Also, my last Arch death was due to accidentally ovverwritimg the whole drive, so no amount of split partitions is going to save me
They call it disk destroyer for a reason. You gotta alias that shit.
alias dd='echo Did you triple check which device you picked? Of course not, dipshit. Check again'
They call it disk destroyer for a reason.
There's nothing specially destructive about dd. It's just a program that opens a file, and if you tell it to open a device file and it's got permission to write to it, it'll write to it.
You can just as easily overwrite a disk's contents with anything else that will open a file and write to it.
# cp /dev/urandom /dev/sda
will wipe your drive with random data in the same way that
# dd if=/dev/urandom of=/dev/sda
will.
You're technically right, but the way most people use dd ensures its like handling a loaded gun. How often do you cp /dev/sdwhy?
mkfs.ntfs is the silent killer, other mkfs donβt allow writing over the root partition but summoning this kind of Windows magic will happily fuck up your shit.
Surely double checked is enough
It's not. Neither is triple checking. Notice how the alias doesn't actually run dd? That's on purpose.
I quadruple check and then I still don't run it because I'm too nervous so I go and do something else instead and the item remains buried on my to-do list indefinitely.
Great advice. I rarely use dd, but when I do it always sends chills down my spine.
Lol, as someone who tried a bunch of different distros, I used the dd command a lot without ever realizing what could go wrong with it. I must have used up all my luck with that though, because somehow I ended up on manjaro of all things.
Did you triple check which device you picked?
I checked five times, actually. And then I check some more.
My last Arch death was updating my 128GB laptop after a year and breaking it with partial updates. (Iβm better at partial updates now) It also made me want to, move away from having separate /home partition. It was somewhat sad, since it was the Arch that I installed on the previous laptop and just moved the SSD when I got a new one
i mean, all the important stuff is saved to OneDrive, right?
You missed the space between one and drive⦠and you accidentally capitalized a couple letters.
Donβt correct me on this one. Please.
Why would you want your entire home folder in syncthing?
A live copy of my home folder and the few remaining secrets/configs i don't care to put into home manager.
I try not to put dangerous data into HM or my Nix configs, I just let syncthing whisk it away to my homelab, it has versioning turned on.
also .stignore is your friend
Syncthing will also propagate removals or bad edits
also, machines wipe themselves at each boot! service state data is distributed via zfs send! zfs that actually works!
Pfft.. it's been fine for the last 10 years.
Hot take: I used arch for over a decade. It never broke unless I broke it.
By all means, back up your files but rolling release distros aren't made of arsenic, you'll be fine.
I think it's very much dependent on your hardware.
I had some issues with my Nvidia drivers getting messed up when the card was relatively new. I haven't had any issues in the past two years though.
I know people who've driven drunk for more than a decade, and only crashed when they were sober. Does that mean drinking and driving is safe?
I literally had one of my devices fail to boot after an update pretty much every month, and another a few times a year. Sure, I was able to fix it with only arch-chroot, but when I switched to btrfs I didn't need to carry around a flash drive with me when updating the system...
The last few years I'm on nixos, and while it sometimes fails to update, it has not once failed to boot.
I remember daily driving Gentoo unstable in the early 2000's on my rig in college. It was like trying to beat a Dark Souls boss every time I wanted to do an update.
there are two types of computer users
- those who make backup
- those who never had a hard disk crash
- Everything is replaceable
- Assuming you do have a backup
I honestly can't think of a thing I'd want to backup. Game saves, resumes, media. Its all replaceable and not worth backing up. I dont think I have a single "important" document or picture or anything.
what are the cheap ways of setting up automatic backups?
Rsync and cron
i did rsync and cron for years. now I switched to rsync and systemd timers ππ
yes, but to what medium
my manjaro has been running the same install for 6 years on ext4 no separate home partition...
what are yall doing to brick your machines?
Right? The OP describes me (except I like to think I'm not that sweaty) and I don't remember ever having reinstalled because things were broken.
You're still using manjaro after all their drama? I jumped ship.
What happened?
zloubida explained it with the link well enough. More importantly for me, the package repository seemed to stop being maintained, because many of my packages had no updates for a significant amount of time (and they had been updated elsewhere when I checked).
Conflicts between the project leadership and the developers. I stayed on Manjaro though, this kind of things is in fact good news: it means that people in charge care, and I think things will be better thanks to that. I'll just follow the devs if things don't go better.
I remember using manjaro vanilla and breaking it in a single month of use.
No aur enabled, no nothing - it just broke, it wasn't even funny
Wherever people say "Manjaro just broke" it's good odds they tried to use it like an Arch install. Installing drivers "the Arch way", pointing the repos at Arch, using bleeding edge kernel versions etc.
It may be Arch but it's been set up in a certain way and if you mess with it it won't work. Not messing with it is the whole point of the distro.
It does have a wiki and forums etc. so I feel that if people read a bit before doing stuff we wouldn't be having this conversation.
The funny thing is that i did none of that, the hardware i was using didn't need additional drivers and i didn't add any extra repos.
Perhaps i did something wrong, or autoupdates were interrupted but i don't remember doing anything extraordinary with the install.
I live like this, it has been 10 years, no problem
My /home/$USER partition is on a separate disk. Me wicked smaht
I always back up anything that I feel is actually important, do people actually rely on the stability of their OS?
Not that Arch has caused me any issues whatsoever so far, going on 2 years now while very much a Linux noob.
*BTRFS users when you don't rebalance soon enough and run out of inodes so you can't boot your computer
How often do you need to rebalance?
When the moon is in the Seventh House and Jupiter aligns with Mars,
then peace will guide the planets, and love will steer the stars.
I think some distros have a systemd service that does it weekly or monthly which is usually enough but in rare cases it's not, just know that if you suddenly get out of space errors on BTRFS but you're not actually out of space that's probably the issue
my current openSUSE install with btrfs has lived for about 6 years now and I haven't done any manual maintenance on btrfs
This is my setup that I have been using for years. I have never had a serious Linux update issue that could not be fixed.
Well la dee da look at this guy who knows how to fix linux!
Btrfs and snapper. Only time I ever had to reload a snapshot was because of my own actions. I've been fortunate to never have any update related breaks. Maybe a couple services had hiccups, but never breaks.
I will simply reinstall and forsake my files if it shits the bed catastrophically
what's a snapshot, new kernel? lets roll!! almost 2k packages in
never really broke my arch tbh, its been serving flawlessly for 7 years now. its a decently recent thinkpad tho so stuff tends to just work and i have no gpu to bother about

top 92 comments