One slightly different path here is socks. If a sock lives long enough for its elastic to wear out it can go to "garage clothes" category. Socks missing a mate can also go here being pair up with another sock with a missing mate. Another path for socks to "garage clothes" is if fashion trends finally evolving so far that wearing those socks will get admonishment from the gf/wife if worn out in public. However, as soon as a sock has a hole in it, it skips the "garage clothes" step and heads straight to the "rags" category.
post
Meanwhile companies like Shein encourage their customers to wear their cheap synthetic clothing a single time and then throw it in the garbage as a sacrifice to the gods of super-fast-fashion
Encourage, or just enable?
I've never heard of Shein telling anyone to do it. I just know their prices are so goddamn cheap you COULD do it if you wanted to. Some people probably do. But I suspect a lot of people just want cheap clothes and will wear them until they have holes in them (which even for Shein clothes has to be multiple wearings usually I'm pretty sure)
Having gotten some Temu clothing as gifts, there are two main materials I've seen. One feels very much like a rough cotton, like the material harem pants are made of, and is mainly in the shorts/pants I've gotten. It's a cotton poly blend, and one is the material of the shirts. They're super stretchy and elastic, like a spandex almost. The pants and shorts end up with holes quickly as they rip near (but not on) the seams, and the shirts seem to actually last even if snagged because of how stretchy they are.
I wouldn't advise buying from them or anything, just saying that they're not exactly single use.
In the German documentary I've watched a few years ago it definitely looked like their business model was selling their customers insane amounts of cheaply produced clothing by encouraging them to change their outfit super-often, hence the term "fast fashion". They even pay influencers to promote this wasteful trend as "Shein hauls". And they steal designa from artists
encourage their customers to wear their cheap synthetic clothing a single time and then throw it in the garbage
do you have a single fact to back that up?
spoiler
I just wanted to make the Deus ex reference. But I would like to see evidence
The fast fashion part?
https://time.com/6247732/shein-climate-change-labor-fashion/
The encouraging a single use part? Also in that article, but it revolves around influencers driving constant change. But also the clothes being really cheap and falling apart.
And anecdotally, there's a pile of clothes in my wife's closet that still haven't gotten their first wear.
OK, I'll put that under "exaggeration for emphasis".
Here's a video essay https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F6R_WTDdx7I
Which only further encourages the existing tendency for single-use clothing that some groups of people exhibit.
Do women not do that? Where do they get rags from?
Before that itβs a going-out shirt.
They can also be turned into crop tops
My favorite shirt is sitting on the top shelf of my closet because I canβt bring myself to downgrade it to a rag. It has a hole on the armpit that I could fit throughπ
I've started retiring sentimental shirts early so they don't wear down like that. They aren't really shirts anymore, but shirt-like objects tied to memories.
I have like a hundred shirts I got at shows in college in a vacuum sealed bag in my closet. Because one day - for sure. definitely. I am 100% going to do this. I have not been putting it off for over a decade - I'm going to turn them into throw pillows
I'm taking a different path where the holes make the clothes into fun pieces with fun patches on them (or they're turned into patches if I didn't really like the article of clothing to begin with).
You forgot the stage after garage clothes, that would be PJs. Then it gets turned into a rag.
I think PJs goes before garage clothes, not after
For me they are interchangeable. Garage clothes and PJs are often the same stage.
"Are those oily stains on your crotch, are you an octopus and happy to see me?"
The only reason I ever gave clothing away was when my fat ass got even fatter and didn't fit anymore.
Oh and when I finally left the consultant lifestyle behind me and gave away all my suits.
Some people have to realize that men usually don't waste clothes. If it's ruined in one way, we recycle it in another way.
This isn't a gender thing, it's a working-class thing. Let's not get divided unnecessarily divided.
Huh? Which part is strictly a working class thing?
There's a large spectrum between "I'll wear it until it falls apart," and, "I've never worn this but I need space for new clothes so it's going to goodwill," and working class people fall all over it.
Women generally tend to be the ones who will more frequently refresh their wardrobe. All you have to do is go to a thrift store to see the difference between genders. The women's clothing section will be massive, and the men's section significantly smaller.
I get what you are saying. But in this context this is kind of like a βdad joke.β Do we think being pedantic about the terminology is really reinforcing some kind of negative gender stereotype here? Or minimizing the working class?
Lemmy cannot stand jokes while we currently live in a world.
This is the cycle even for me and I'm independently wealthy. Wealthy as a horse, if you will.
(I have many leatherbound books.)
More like a manual labor thing tbh. Plenty of working class folks who are no less working class but don't need to cycle through clothes
Yaaaay, my mom never ever throw a shirt, clothes are so expensive, she couldn't afford a new one every time she does anything that could damage them.
(Tbh, I do the same for the same reasons)
i still have tshirts i bought in my 20s. the collars of a couple of them are starting to detach but theyre still wearable
missing an important part of the lifecycle : the origin of the new clothes.
The money saved from not buying new clothes at each transitional step ends up used for buying new clothes to start the cycle again.
I have a few subcategories like camping shirts and music festival shirts but otherwise it's spot on. The same goes for pants and hoodies.
Pretty much. Except the earth part, that's littering (even your sheep wool bamboo flax shirt has some sorts of plastic).
Best quality linen is spun from flax fibers and has no plastic.
Source: Relations farm where they grow flax for linen and plums for Slivovitz
And ultimately goes to the landfill, since no recycling facility is going to attempt to extract the plastic from your flax shirt.
So it does return to the earth. The only difference from βlitteringβ then is just the location.


top 86 comments