you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] 37 points 2 months ago (9 children)

This isn't a gender thing, it's a working-class thing. Let's not get divided unnecessarily divided.

  • source
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [โ€“] 18 points 2 months ago (1 child)

    Huh? Which part is strictly a working class thing?

    There's a large spectrum between "I'll wear it until it falls apart," and, "I've never worn this but I need space for new clothes so it's going to goodwill," and working class people fall all over it.

    Women generally tend to be the ones who will more frequently refresh their wardrobe. All you have to do is go to a thrift store to see the difference between genders. The women's clothing section will be massive, and the men's section significantly smaller.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [โ€“] 14 points 2 months ago (3 children)

    I get what you are saying. But in this context this is kind of like a โ€œdad joke.โ€ Do we think being pedantic about the terminology is really reinforcing some kind of negative gender stereotype here? Or minimizing the working class?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [โ€“] 25 points 2 months ago (2 children)

    Lemmy cannot stand jokes while we currently live in a world.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments