What did yall end up settling on?

top 98 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 98 points 3 months ago (14 children)

Am I the only one here that uses their computer instead of fucking with it?

  • source
  • hideshow 14 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 3 months ago* (1 child)

    Ubuntu -> Mint.

    Mint works for me. So, I use Mint.

    I suppose it's partly because I'm old and have built something like nine PCs for myself over the years, and the novelty of all that wore off long ago. I just want something that works.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 4 points 3 months ago

    I used to distros hop a bunch, not so much anymore.

    Not really much point for me these days, arch based distros are so well documented that I can change basically anything I want without reinstalling the os, and Debian is similar for my homelab servers.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 101 points 3 months ago (1 child)
  • [–] 21 points 3 months ago (5 children)

    I started on pop!_os and now 6 years later im on... pop!_os

    Yeah, I didn't really do any distro hopping :p. Though I've tried a bunch of distros in VMs

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 3 months ago* (2 children)

    Same with endeavour lol. VM test drives before β€œbuying” ol’ reliable is the way to go ;)

    Although I do use SteamOS on my deck, if that counts as a hop.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 3 months ago (1 child)

    A side hop if anything :3 I wouldn't count secondary devices as distro hopping, especially something like the steamdeck, but I suppose someone might

    Speaking of steamdecks tho, I've thought about picking one up. I just wish I travelled more to actually be able to justify the price lol. It's a cool piece of kit

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 16 points 3 months ago (1 child)

    Ubuntu -> Debian -> Linux Mint -> Fedora -> Arch -> Manjaro -> EndeavourOS -> SuSE Linux -> NixOS

    I'm pretty happy on NixOS now...

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 15 points 3 months ago

    Debian for the 72fth time.

  • source
  • [+] 14 points 3 months ago (3 children)
  • [–] 3 points 3 months ago (1 child)

    Haha, I feel that switch to LTS only releases. I was upgrading to every release in the beginning as well but it started to get old real fast. I run Mint nowdays. In the early days I loved testing new distros and tweaking around with my system, but after over a decade working in tech the last thing I want to do in my free time is have to fix my own computer.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 3 months ago

    Yep. I do love to play around with my computers (which does risk breaking things)... but when life gets hard, and have too few spoons, it's an important choice for health and sanity, to have something that "just works". It's Devuan for me, when I need[ed] that.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

    Hell yeah! I was using Ubuntu 10-14 in college and now back on the train with 24, 25 and 26. Everything just works every time and all the professional apps I need are first class citizens and well supported.

    Ubuntu Server, FreeBSD and OpenBSD are my server distros of choice as well. FreeBSD for a NAS. Gotta pick the right tools for the job!

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 13 points 3 months ago (6 children)

    Mint > Ubuntu > Lubuntu > Arch (desktop) / Debian (server)

    I switched away from Canonical the first time I saw an ad when running apt update & apt upgrade, fuck them forever.

    I'm sticking to Arch because its easier to install something myself than to rip apart something prepackaged.

    I'm curious about trying Void.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 3 months ago*

    I used Void for a bit. I wouldn't recommend using on your main system unless you really hate systemd for some reason. Try adding the CachyOS kernel and repos on your Arch system. It will be like having a newer better Arch. No reinstall required.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 3 months ago (1 child)

    Since when has apt had ads? That's horrendous. How have I never heard of this?!

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 3 months ago

    Big love to void. It was my go-to to install for the longest while. Still always a cornerstone of all my systems. Still my first go-to to get packages from, and is surprisingly well stocked for such a "little"(?) "new"(?) distro.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 13 points 3 months ago (4 children)

    I started with like, nothing, linux 0.99 on 8 floppies and X11 on like 12 floppies... then some kind of LFS, then Debian, then Ubuntu, then Mint, then MX with Xfce (since almost 10 years)

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 3 months ago (2 children)

    Can't tell if joking or old or both...?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 3 months ago

    I started using un*x on mainframe (aix, irix, hpux, etc). On a regular PC you could have SVR4, BSD, Minix, things like this, then linux came, in the 90s we had no CD, we downloaded the floppies images from ftp on the university server, then rushed to home to install linux on a 486, we did a lot of compile ourselves, no choice back in time. I used some distro after, like Mandrake (I'm French) but always liked the DIY thing, but it was more and more complicated and long... this is why I started using Debian in the days...

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 3 months ago*

    I'd forgotten about LFS. Not sure if it should even count, for me at least, it's not like I actually used it to daily drive. But I did use the knowledge from it to make a mini bootable "rescue" distro that I would put on backup disks so they'd be self-sufficient.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 11 points 3 months ago (6 children)

    Do people actually do this serial distro hopping? When such a meme is posted even now most people say they switched only a few times at most

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 3 months ago

    Probably going to get hate for this and reveal my age a bit, but i've been on Ubuntu since 2006 back when they'd actually mail you CDs for free. My desktop's hardware has been a ship of theseus since then, and no dist-upgrade really ever broke things, and I think the last time I did a full OS reinstall was in like ~2011 when I got an SSD that was a smaller side than my old HDD, so I couldn't just clone the drive with dd. Everything works well for what I need it for, and don't need the bleeding edge.

  • source
  • parent
  • For reasons unknown even to myself, I hoard my old hardware and run it till it won't run anymore. All of my servers are my own old machines, corporate castoffs, and a few that were literally pulled out of a dumpster, so I have a lot of test subjects. I like to experiment with distros and will probably never stop. I like seeing all the cool stuff people make. And driver support has gotten good enough that it's not that painful to switch nowadays. I run through the installer and boot up, and everything more or less works. It's a good time to be a distrohopper.

    For my main rig and "important" servers I generally stick with debian; if I need to fix something I don't want to be learning the guts of a new OS while I'm trying to figure out something else. Everything else is frolics.

  • source
  • parent
  • [+] 11 points 3 months ago (3 children)
  • [–] 3 points 3 months ago (2 children)

    What are the advantages of nixOS? I have a Ubuntu Server but plan to run Fedora KDE on my desktop when I build it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 3 months ago

    Not the same dude, but I assume the Nix reproducible declarative build and deployment system. It's what interested me the most as a former Arch user, though the poor documentation threw me off at the time. Don't know if it improved or not.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] 10 points 3 months ago (1 child)

    Ubuntu -> Mint -> Arch -> NixOS

    Ubuntu really drove me away for some time. Only when I got to Mint, I felt that Linux could be a daily driver. Arch made me strangely reinstall it every few days. Not by not working but by having the feeling of dirtying the machine on use.

    NixOS is really what I want to use the rest of my life. Very complicated on first use but definitly worth it (for me).

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 9 points 3 months ago (1 child)

    Arch. Would love to find something better but I can't.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 9 points 3 months ago

    No hopping. Debian.

  • source
  • [–] 9 points 3 months ago (1 child)

    I'm a gamer who recently switched to Cachy and honnestly it is by far my favourite yet. It runs so smoothly without feeling bloated and it's perfect for someone like me who feels too noob to try pure Arch.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 3 months ago

    Pure arch is fine, don't let internet idiots scare you. Just archinstall it, you don't have to do a manual install. I reckon have a crack at a manual install for learning purposes if your curious.

    I had a look at cachy in a VM it seems very similar to me. I used that Shelly gui thing I kind of like it but every now and then I like to manually install the vulnerabilities directly from AUR and npm.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 8 points 3 months ago (1 child)

    Fedora ended that for me. It has mostly what I want and is just kinda comfy to use.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 7 points 3 months ago

    Redhat > fedora > Debian > Ubuntu > mint > fedora. Been there for years now.

  • source
  • [–] 7 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

    At least we can distro-hop. Different needs, different preferences, and we can choose what works best for us. Heck, you can even go hardcore with Yocto and create your own distro!

    Compare that to the poor sods on the Apple and Windows side of the fence. They have to cope with whatever some bigwig thought was best for them. A mediocre one size fits all solution, stuffed to the brim with whatever they fancy. Including ads, malware, and AI everywhere.

  • source
  • [–] 7 points 3 months ago

    Linux mint and often LMDE.

    is funny, I always end up back at mint.

    It just good, it just works yet let's me customize.

  • source
  • [–] 6 points 3 months ago

    CachyOS. Everytime I stray away from Arch, it always finds a way to pull me back in.

  • source
  • [–] 6 points 3 months ago*

    Fedora - arch - nixos - arch - Debian - arch - debian

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 3 months ago

    EndeavourOS is home. πŸ’œ

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 3 months ago (1 child)

    I went from Windows to Mint and have been using that for almost a year now. Haven’t run into any issues that would make me want to switch: it does what I want it to now.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 5 points 3 months ago (3 children)

    I tend to use macOS on the desktop (I know, booo) so I’ve landed on Alpine Linux for just about everything else.

    I love that you can be on the bleeding edge but also not have tons of baggage everywhere. The downside is of course a lot of times I find myself doing things from scratch.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 3 months ago (2 children)

    I started with Mint. My next and last stop was Alpine. I started trying to host my own website on a Raspberry Pi and ended up switching my laptop over to Alpine so that I could consistently learn on one operating system

    I also found a side hobby in making POSIX portable scripts which goes nicely with self-hosting. It's great having a lean and customized desktop just for myself even if it took a long time to learn how to make it all work

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 3 months ago (1 child)

    Yes! I’ve found myself doing this both personally and professionally. At work we’re using Docker and Kubernetes but the old way of thinking is assuming everything is Debian or Ubuntu so a lot of Bash scripts just break on Alpine-based containers.

    But even for those scripts we execute primarily on macOS, I’ve taken the liberty of making them POSIX compliant because you never know who’s using Bash, zsh, sh or what have you.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • I do like the challenge of POSIX scripts.

    I've remade a handful of GNU extensions as POSIX scripts/functions. I also just enjoy trying to be as minimal as possible and building my own tools. It helps me understand how operating systems in the process too

    Most of my work is on codeberg

    It can be a challenge though since all searches default to bash/GNU extensions

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 5 points 3 months ago (2 children)

    No one?? Really?

    72nd* time!

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 3 months ago (3 children)

    Started with Arch, landed on Artix ☺️

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 3 months ago (2 children)

    What are your thoughts on systemD and wayland?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 3 months ago (1 child)

    Systemd: no particular thoughts. It's a PID1 and process manager? πŸ˜… If I'd had to say something, then perhaps it "hampers" my Linux learning, since instead of having to write config files and scripts and learning to work with symlinks (for instance between config and whatnot templates in /usr/share/ and things you actually apply in /etc/), it has a lot of automation built in with all its -ctl commands.

    Wayland: never used. It looks fancy? πŸ˜…

    Sorry for boring answers. 🫣

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 3 months ago

    That's the truth. The problem with systemd is that it's too good.
    Wayland is neat and may reach feature parity with X11 just in time for it to be replaced by the next thing!
    Not really. It took a while but it's been solid for a long time. Much as I resent their "our way or the highway" policy, but Ubuntu pulling support for X11 is probably for the best. Solves the adoption problem.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 5 points 3 months ago

    I've tried hundreds, I have a laptop I just use for bare metal distrohopping.. but I've just hit 6 months using NixOS on all my PCs and laptops. I strongly recommend everyone give it a go.

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (2 children)

    Started with deb based distro, swicht later too arch based, now still on cachyOs

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 3 months ago (1 child)

    i liked using cachy for a while, but it broke plasma's login manager once so i gave up on it and went to base arch

    though it did have snapper which i liked a lot, so i added it to my arch install too

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 3 months ago

    I had the same experience a few years ago.

    Now I'm just having trouble with SerialPort access; the Arch Bible didn't offer a solution.

    With Parrot Home as an additional OS on an external SSD, I was able to use WebSerial on Linux.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 5 points 3 months ago* (2 children)

    I have this handy little bash function, I think you should use it.

    get-english-ordinal-ending() {
      case "$1" in
        *11 | *12 | *13) printf 'th' ;;
        *1) printf 'st' ;;
        *2) printf 'nd' ;;
        *3) printf 'rd' ;;
        *) printf 'th' ;;
      esac
    }
    
  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 3 months ago (2 children)

    Open SUSE tumbleweed, KDE plasma.

    The update/revert stuff isolated to the os partition is sooooo good. If I hop again it's going to be to another one with similar functionality.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 3 months ago

    Ubuntu -> Pop!_OS -> EndeavourOS.

    I'm quite happy here :)

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 3 months ago

    Why settle? Software is a continually evolving ecosystem and grafting yourself to a certain distribution model or distribution team doesn't really make sense when you consider that. Some distribution might have the best things for you, today. Tomorrow, another may come along and do it better, or your current distribution may shift to not be to your liking anymore. Be flexible, but don't change for the sake of change. Change for a good reason.

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 3 months ago (1 child)
  • [–] [B] 4 points 3 months ago

    And tomorrow will be the seventy-thirth distro.

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 3 months ago

    started in 99.

    red hat, slackware, debian, ubuntu, arch, manjaro, nix, cachyos

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 3 months ago

    In 3 years:

    Mint > OpenSUSE Tumbleweed > Fedora

    Very happy with Fedora right now. If I ever had to switch again, maybe CachyOS. But not worth wiping and reconfiguring everything just for that. If RedHat pulls a Canonical though, definitely.

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 3 months ago

    Install gentoo

  • source
  • load more comments
    view more: next β€Ί