Am I the only one here that uses their computer instead of fucking with it?
post
The seventy-tooth
I started on pop!_os and now 6 years later im on... pop!_os
Yeah, I didn't really do any distro hopping :p. Though I've tried a bunch of distros in VMs
Same with endeavour lol. VM test drives before βbuyingβ olβ reliable is the way to go ;)
Although I do use SteamOS on my deck, if that counts as a hop.
A side hop if anything :3 I wouldn't count secondary devices as distro hopping, especially something like the steamdeck, but I suppose someone might
Speaking of steamdecks tho, I've thought about picking one up. I just wish I travelled more to actually be able to justify the price lol. It's a cool piece of kit
Ubuntu -> Debian -> Linux Mint -> Fedora -> Arch -> Manjaro -> EndeavourOS -> SuSE Linux -> NixOS
I'm pretty happy on NixOS now...
Haha, I feel that switch to LTS only releases. I was upgrading to every release in the beginning as well but it started to get old real fast. I run Mint nowdays. In the early days I loved testing new distros and tweaking around with my system, but after over a decade working in tech the last thing I want to do in my free time is have to fix my own computer.
Yep. I do love to play around with my computers (which does risk breaking things)... but when life gets hard, and have too few spoons, it's an important choice for health and sanity, to have something that "just works". It's Devuan for me, when I need[ed] that.
Hell yeah! I was using Ubuntu 10-14 in college and now back on the train with 24, 25 and 26. Everything just works every time and all the professional apps I need are first class citizens and well supported.
Ubuntu Server, FreeBSD and OpenBSD are my server distros of choice as well. FreeBSD for a NAS. Gotta pick the right tools for the job!
Mint > Ubuntu > Lubuntu > Arch (desktop) / Debian (server)
I switched away from Canonical the first time I saw an ad when running apt update & apt upgrade, fuck them forever.
I'm sticking to Arch because its easier to install something myself than to rip apart something prepackaged.
I'm curious about trying Void.
You might find Void too barebones but it's nice like that. When you finish void-installer for the first time, you get a system with 144 packages only.
That's exactly what I ended up with, Arch on my gaming laptop, Debian on the server.
It is weird not having a desktop computer, but the laptop plays all the games and the server does all the rest.
I used Void for a bit. I wouldn't recommend using on your main system unless you really hate systemd for some reason. Try adding the CachyOS kernel and repos on your Arch system. It will be like having a newer better Arch. No reinstall required.
Since when has apt had ads? That's horrendous. How have I never heard of this?!
Since at least 3 years and 9 months ago.
The message I recall was different though, it was advertising Ubuntu Pro for better security updates. All it did was make me feel like I'm using an insecure system.
Big love to void. It was my go-to to install for the longest while. Still always a cornerstone of all my systems. Still my first go-to to get packages from, and is surprisingly well stocked for such a "little"(?) "new"(?) distro.
I started with like, nothing, linux 0.99 on 8 floppies and X11 on like 12 floppies... then some kind of LFS, then Debian, then Ubuntu, then Mint, then MX with Xfce (since almost 10 years)
Can't tell if joking or old or both...?
I started using un*x on mainframe (aix, irix, hpux, etc). On a regular PC you could have SVR4, BSD, Minix, things like this, then linux came, in the 90s we had no CD, we downloaded the floppies images from ftp on the university server, then rushed to home to install linux on a 486, we did a lot of compile ourselves, no choice back in time. I used some distro after, like Mandrake (I'm French) but always liked the DIY thing, but it was more and more complicated and long... this is why I started using Debian in the days...
I'd forgotten about LFS. Not sure if it should even count, for me at least, it's not like I actually used it to daily drive. But I did use the knowledge from it to make a mini bootable "rescue" distro that I would put on backup disks so they'd be self-sufficient.
Do people actually do this serial distro hopping? When such a meme is posted even now most people say they switched only a few times at most
every now and again, I feel the urge to try another distro. I can't help it, it's in my DNA
Probably going to get hate for this and reveal my age a bit, but i've been on Ubuntu since 2006 back when they'd actually mail you CDs for free. My desktop's hardware has been a ship of theseus since then, and no dist-upgrade really ever broke things, and I think the last time I did a full OS reinstall was in like ~2011 when I got an SSD that was a smaller side than my old HDD, so I couldn't just clone the drive with dd. Everything works well for what I need it for, and don't need the bleeding edge.
I just really like exploring. I do also enjoy the feel of a fresh clean install. Getting to set things up again without all the cruft of gradual config tweaks.
It's rly only for ppl who REALLY care about the install process or just have the 'grass is always greener'
Or both
For reasons unknown even to myself, I hoard my old hardware and run it till it won't run anymore. All of my servers are my own old machines, corporate castoffs, and a few that were literally pulled out of a dumpster, so I have a lot of test subjects. I like to experiment with distros and will probably never stop. I like seeing all the cool stuff people make. And driver support has gotten good enough that it's not that painful to switch nowadays. I run through the installer and boot up, and everything more or less works. It's a good time to be a distrohopper.
For my main rig and "important" servers I generally stick with debian; if I need to fix something I don't want to be learning the guts of a new OS while I'm trying to figure out something else. Everything else is frolics.
What are the advantages of nixOS? I have a Ubuntu Server but plan to run Fedora KDE on my desktop when I build it.
Not the same dude, but I assume the Nix reproducible declarative build and deployment system. It's what interested me the most as a former Arch user, though the poor documentation threw me off at the time. Don't know if it improved or not.
Ubuntu -> Mint -> Arch -> NixOS
Ubuntu really drove me away for some time. Only when I got to Mint, I felt that Linux could be a daily driver. Arch made me strangely reinstall it every few days. Not by not working but by having the feeling of dirtying the machine on use.
NixOS is really what I want to use the rest of my life. Very complicated on first use but definitly worth it (for me).
Arch. Would love to find something better but I can't.
I'm a gamer who recently switched to Cachy and honnestly it is by far my favourite yet. It runs so smoothly without feeling bloated and it's perfect for someone like me who feels too noob to try pure Arch.
Pure arch is fine, don't let internet idiots scare you. Just archinstall it, you don't have to do a manual install. I reckon have a crack at a manual install for learning purposes if your curious.
I had a look at cachy in a VM it seems very similar to me. I used that Shelly gui thing I kind of like it but every now and then I like to manually install the vulnerabilities directly from AUR and npm.
Fedora ended that for me. It has mostly what I want and is just kinda comfy to use.
Redhat > fedora > Debian > Ubuntu > mint > fedora. Been there for years now.
At least we can distro-hop. Different needs, different preferences, and we can choose what works best for us. Heck, you can even go hardcore with Yocto and create your own distro!
Compare that to the poor sods on the Apple and Windows side of the fence. They have to cope with whatever some bigwig thought was best for them. A mediocre one size fits all solution, stuffed to the brim with whatever they fancy. Including ads, malware, and AI everywhere.
Linux mint and often LMDE.
is funny, I always end up back at mint.
It just good, it just works yet let's me customize.
CachyOS. Everytime I stray away from Arch, it always finds a way to pull me back in.
I went from Windows to Mint and have been using that for almost a year now. Havenβt run into any issues that would make me want to switch: it does what I want it to now.
I tend to use macOS on the desktop (I know, booo) so Iβve landed on Alpine Linux for just about everything else.
I love that you can be on the bleeding edge but also not have tons of baggage everywhere. The downside is of course a lot of times I find myself doing things from scratch.
I started with Mint. My next and last stop was Alpine. I started trying to host my own website on a Raspberry Pi and ended up switching my laptop over to Alpine so that I could consistently learn on one operating system
I also found a side hobby in making POSIX portable scripts which goes nicely with self-hosting. It's great having a lean and customized desktop just for myself even if it took a long time to learn how to make it all work
Yes! Iβve found myself doing this both personally and professionally. At work weβre using Docker and Kubernetes but the old way of thinking is assuming everything is Debian or Ubuntu so a lot of Bash scripts just break on Alpine-based containers.
But even for those scripts we execute primarily on macOS, Iβve taken the liberty of making them POSIX compliant because you never know whoβs using Bash, zsh, sh or what have you.
I do like the challenge of POSIX scripts.
I've remade a handful of GNU extensions as POSIX scripts/functions. I also just enjoy trying to be as minimal as possible and building my own tools. It helps me understand how operating systems in the process too
Most of my work is on codeberg
It can be a challenge though since all searches default to bash/GNU extensions
No one?? Really?
72nd* time!
Started with Arch, landed on Artix βΊοΈ
What are your thoughts on systemD and wayland?
Systemd: no particular thoughts. It's a PID1 and process manager? π
If I'd had to say something, then perhaps it "hampers" my Linux learning, since instead of having to write config files and scripts and learning to work with symlinks (for instance between config and whatnot templates in /usr/share/ and things you actually apply in /etc/), it has a lot of automation built in with all its -ctl commands.
Wayland: never used. It looks fancy? π
Sorry for boring answers. π«£
That's the truth. The problem with systemd is that it's too good.
Wayland is neat and may reach feature parity with X11 just in time for it to be replaced by the next thing!
Not really. It took a while but it's been solid for a long time. Much as I resent their "our way or the highway" policy, but Ubuntu pulling support for X11 is probably for the best. Solves the adoption problem.
I've tried hundreds, I have a laptop I just use for bare metal distrohopping.. but I've just hit 6 months using NixOS on all my PCs and laptops. I strongly recommend everyone give it a go.
Started with deb based distro, swicht later too arch based, now still on cachyOs
i liked using cachy for a while, but it broke plasma's login manager once so i gave up on it and went to base arch
though it did have snapper which i liked a lot, so i added it to my arch install too
I have this handy little bash function, I think you should use it.
get-english-ordinal-ending() {
case "$1" in
*11 | *12 | *13) printf 'th' ;;
*1) printf 'st' ;;
*2) printf 'nd' ;;
*3) printf 'rd' ;;
*) printf 'th' ;;
esac
}
Open SUSE tumbleweed, KDE plasma.
The update/revert stuff isolated to the os partition is sooooo good. If I hop again it's going to be to another one with similar functionality.
Why settle? Software is a continually evolving ecosystem and grafting yourself to a certain distribution model or distribution team doesn't really make sense when you consider that. Some distribution might have the best things for you, today. Tomorrow, another may come along and do it better, or your current distribution may shift to not be to your liking anymore. Be flexible, but don't change for the sake of change. Change for a good reason.
started in 99.
red hat, slackware, debian, ubuntu, arch, manjaro, nix, cachyos
In 3 years:
Mint > OpenSUSE Tumbleweed > Fedora
Very happy with Fedora right now. If I ever had to switch again, maybe CachyOS. But not worth wiping and reconfiguring everything just for that. If RedHat pulls a Canonical though, definitely.

top 98 comments