If you would like additional framing: you have only 30 seconds to prepare and you can talk for 10-30 minutes.

top 99 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 49 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (9 children)

The title of my talk is “Innovation as Rebellion against Complexity.”

I’ll start with my experience studying and teaching music history, and demonstrate how every major musical stylistic shift over the past 1500 years or so can be seen as a revolt against excessive complexity developing in the previous style. One example would be the shift from thick, complex polyphony that had become the norm in late Renaissance music, to the relatively simple and much-easier-on-the-ears style of early homophonic music. But I’d actually touch on all periods of music history.

I’d then challenge my audience to ask themselves and each other if this trend can be seen in other fields as well. Do we see such innovative rebellions in, say, art? Or literature? Architecture? The sciences? And what about technology…

…and are we on the cusp of a new rebellion against the massively complex technology that’s thrust upon us today? What does that look like? What innovations await us at the conclusion of that revolution?

I mean I’d be winging the fuck out of it with only a few seconds to prep but wouldn’t that be great to talk about?

You can see I’ve done a lot of thinking about this lol.

😳 1
  • source
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 3 months ago

    Finally a worthy opponent!

    Do we see such innovative rebellions in, say, art? Or literature? Architecture? The sciences?

    I never thought that music went through a similar rebellion. At least not in the matters of complexity. But it makes sense. I'm very familiar with the art & architecture one. Modernism is one of the most revolutionary movements in human history.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 3 months ago* (3 children)

    So are Gregorian chants more musically complex than modern pop music? Or is it more of a pendulum?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 3 months ago (2 children)

    A pendulum is a good way of looking at it. What you see in the Medieval period is, as an example, musicians writing more and more challenging lines to sing. Wider leaps, rapid-fire phrases…and this is how they show off their skills. You see this more in the secular music of the day, as the church is constantly pushing for sacred music that doesn’t call attention to itself. But, the backlash happens because while those complex, jagged lines might be lots of fun for the singer, not so much for the listener. And so begins a movement toward vocal lines that are easier on the ears - smoother, more melodic, easier to sing, which also lines up nicely with developments in counterpoint and polyphony that allow major forms like the motet to come into being.

    And of course musicians, not being able to help themselves, start competing with each other to write more and more complex motets, which sparks another aesthetic backlash, and it all starts again.

    This is a gross simplification of course but just to give you an idea how this all works.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] 4 points 3 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 child)
  • [–] 5 points 3 months ago

    Modern pop - which I define as what you typically hear on commercial radio, but you could also define as the trending artists on digital platforms - is very safe, very conservative, and very listener friendly.

    But…to use an example that’s relevant to your question, you can look at the rise of punk rock in the 70’s. Punk was a reaction to the growing popularity of Progressive Rock artists like King Crimson, Jethro Tull, Rush, and similar artists that dabbled in complex harmony, polyrhythm, mixed/odd meters, and so on. Punk artists felt that these were becoming too elitist and exclusive and said, hey, how about we just play three chords and say fuck a lot? Let’s make music anyone can pick up a cheap guitar and learn in five minutes!

    In 2026 I’d be hard pressed to identify a popular musical style that’s pushing the boundaries of listenability to the point of sparking a backlash. And we just had a couple of these not that long ago anyway: Minimalism in the 60’s and my aforementioned Punk movement. I’d say we’re in kind of a lull at the moment, though it’s not hard to look at all the styles and genres that sprang out of Punk and see where they’re going. But these patterns span decades, sometimes centuries. It may not happen again in our lifetime.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • [–] 3 points 3 months ago

    Well said and a great point. I do feel, personally, I have already begun a small technological revolt. You should actually make a TED talk video or blog post about this if you have more to say.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 36 points 3 months ago

    How insurance actually works, so dipshits can understand the real value of a single national health care plan.

  • source
  • [–] 33 points 3 months ago (1 child)

    "So you're probably wondering why I'm pissing on the floor".

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 62 points 3 months ago (3 children)

    Optimal crop tables in Stardew Valley.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 28 points 3 months ago

    "Punishment is the wrong way: Why Rehabilitation will always win out, and how it ties in with poverty, crime and mental health"

    I could easily talk half an hour about that thematic complex without getting boring and making a pretty good argument why throwing a substantial portion of your population in jail is just slavery in disguise.

  • source
  • [–] 27 points 3 months ago (2 children)

    The reality of life-saving measures in health care, and why a having a DNR (that isn’t a surprise to your loved ones) is so important.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 3 months ago

    My wife used to work in a nursing home. I've heard a lot about the slings and arrows of end-of-life care, and lifesaving techniques, and no thanks, I'll just die.

    Looking forward to your ted talk.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 25 points 3 months ago (3 children)

    A year ago my cat was living on the street. Today she has enough passive income to hire her own chef and masseuse. Follow her for more advice.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 3 months ago (2 children)
  • [–] 2 points 3 months ago (1 child)

    Thank you for subscribing to cat fact!

    While dogs were domesticated by humans, there's a growing body of evidence that cats were actually domesticated...by cats. The lack of any archaeological evidence that they were ever subject to any intentional or large-scale selective breeding, the seeming change in feline vocalizations to more closely match those of human young, alongside cats' current "partially-domesticated" status and the rapid reemergence of wild behaviors in feral populations, all point to a one-sided decision by ancient felines to settle down around humans.

    This has been your cat fact, and your subscription is therefore concluded. Thank you!

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 3 months ago*

    Ok ok. Bonus fact:

    There is some speculation that, in addition to domesticating themselves, cats have also domesticated some humans.

    The parasite toxoplasma gondii, which is carried by cats and can be contracted from dealing with their waste, causes a disease called toxoplasmosis, even in immunocompetent individuals. While not confirmed in any study, some researchers have suggested that the disease causes mental and social effects which incline the sufferer toward mild antisocial behavior, increasing their likelihood of adopting more cats, which increases their likelihood of being reinfected with toxoplasmosis. Toxoplasma gondii can also be passed from (human) mother to child at birth, meaning that the feline-domesticated human is likely to give birth to a likewise domesticated child.

    This speculation has led to some news outlets breathlessly reporting that toxoplasmosis "causes" people to get more cats (or even to like cats more), and led to the association of toxoplasma gondii with so-called "crazy cat lady syndrome."

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 20 points 3 months ago (2 children)

    At the beginning of my talk, I would have everyone turn off their phones and any other electronics. Then for the rest of the 15 minutes, I would have us all just sit around and veg out.

    No talking, no distractions, no demands. Just day dream about whatever. You can take a nap if you like. You probably need one if you do.

    And then my "talk" would end with "Let's try this every day."

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 3 months ago

    I also add a walk into the mix. No phones, no TVs, no computers… nothing with a screen - I do this every day and it’s easy because I now live in Spain and that’s the life here after 7pm. But in the USA i was the weird one.

    Speaking of, it’s 8am Saturday here. So I’m off to do nothing. See ya

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 18 points 3 months ago

    Probably the experience and implications of non-consensual teleportation. It would definitely be the most notable thing I'd done in my life thusfar.

  • source
  • [–] 18 points 3 months ago* (1 child)

    "The art of improvising a seminar while nude"

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 16 points 3 months ago (7 children)

    Lost art of tatting (lace making) and why is there a space for it in our modern life

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 3 months ago (5 children)
  • [–] 3 points 3 months ago (4 children)

    If I got you interested you can check out Wikipedia on tatting. In the gallery they have couple of contemporary pieces.
    And if I got you hooked, there are tons of resources on this topic. There is a tatting lemmy also (tho it is kinda dead)

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 3 months ago (3 children)

    I've been watching this tatting YouTuber for a bit now, and I'm loving it. I love fiber arts in general, and tatting seems super fun

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (2 children)

    You can look up what russian ladies invented Ankars a very heavily beaded tatted jewelry. Or you can take a look of the modern Japanese tatting with simplicity.
    You can also use shuttles or a needle - personal preference, both techniques have ups and downs.
    The biggest online community with a lot of links to free and paid patterns sources listed is called craftree.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 16 points 3 months ago

    The wonders of nudism.

    I'm naked in my bathroom, so teleporting me right NOW leaves me with limited choices.

    That or 3D printing

  • source
  • [–] 15 points 3 months ago

    Why I'm Not Wearing Any Pants (the starter) followed by Furry BDSM: Roleplay Online and IRL, from Vanilla to CNC. I'm your host, Midnight Wolf.

    (I'm in the bathroom and the title said "right now" so fuck it, I'll do it live!)

  • source
  • [–] 30 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (3 children)

    Crash course on how to have a panic attack/nervous breakdown during a live broadcast

    Edit: uh oh, my stalker null@piefed.nullspace.lol is back

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 3 months ago (2 children)

    Yeah my thought was "Hello I've been teleported here from my perspective so either that's now true and I need to go lay down or I'm having a psychotic break and need to go lay down. Goodbye!" then walk as quickly backstage as possible.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 27 points 3 months ago (1 child)
  • [–] 12 points 3 months ago (2 children)

    The fact I was aiming for a Waffle House.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] [S] 22 points 3 months ago (6 children)

    I was reading a thread where people were talking about Japanese pronouns and remembered that this is my favorite icebreaker question.

    My topic is Japanese pronouns. How they differ from English, a little bit of the history, and broadly why they should make us reinspect how we construct identity and how they complicate the idea of "individualism" vs "collectivism"

    I could fill 25-30 minutes easily with no preparation.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 3 months ago (4 children)

    I'd love to watch a Ted on that, sounds meta interesting. I tried searching for something on the subject on YT but only found grammar/language-oriented videos. The identity construction molding the culture due to their language structure sounds like an amazing rabbit hole to learn about.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] [S] 6 points 3 months ago (3 children)

    @MarieMarion@literature.cafe @OddDeer@lemmy.dbzer0.com thanks for being my audience. Skip to the end for a TL;DR.
    The abbreviated version of the speech follows:

    In English, everybody uses the same personal pronouns (I, my, me). We do have unique pronouns that characterize people based on individual characteristics, but those are all 3rd-person pronouns (he, she, they). What this means is that in English, your pronouns are fundamentally decided by somebody else. Yes, you can still tell somebody your preferred pronouns and request that they use those 3rd-person pronouns to refer to you, but fundamentally it is a decision that is up to them; you cannot force somebody to refer to you in a certain way.

    I bring that up because in Japanese it's actually the opposite. It is the 1st-person pronouns that are unique and characterize people. There are at least 5 personal pronouns that I would say are in common use today but historically there's a lot more, maybe dozens. Do you want to subversively use a more masculine pronoun as a woman? Do you want to use an antiquated formal pronoun at all times? Do you want to use a mildly formal basic pronoun that doesn't really reveal much about yourself? Literally nobody can stop you. Yeah they can judge you for it, but it's different from English in that the language is designed so that you have control over your pronouns.

    This difference between the two languages led me to two conclusions.
    The first is that: pronouns have become such a big "problem" in the Anglosphere. Imagine a conversation between two people where one introduces themselves with "My pronouns are she/they, what are yours?" and the other person responds "I don't really believe in having pronouns. I think it's kinda weird."
    Don't you immediately get the impression that these people are on opposite sides? That there is some serious conflict in their points of view? It's easy to get caught up in that dichotomy, and yes there is a "right" side. It's good to respect people's preferred pronouns. But I want you to realize that this "problem" exists entirely in the language itself. If we had the power to declare our own pronouns without making a request, to "say and therefore be," the problem would largely disappear. People would still judge you. People will still disrespect you. But the English language gives people a tool to do so.

    The second conclusion that I came to is that linguistically, English is actually pretty conformist/collectivist while Japanese is pretty individualistic. It's pretty common knowledge among people who make a distinction between "individualistic" and "collectivist" cultures that Anglosphere countries are considered to be more individual while Asian, particularly Sinosphere countries like Japan, are considered to be more collectivist. But if you told me to compare the pronouns in two languages: one of which has tools for you to put other people into simple boxes and no tools to express yourself, the other has tools to express yourself and you cannot put other people into boxes; I would definitely come to the non-obvious conclusion that Japan is a much more individualistic culture while Anglosphere countries are all collectivist. I could definitely go into more depth here, but I'm sure you already see the broad point: the collectivist/individualist dichotomy is a false one. Cultures all have elements that are one or the other. Everybody universally appreciates some things that are individualist, like art, and other things that are collectivist, like family and school.

    As a last point, I want to address an obvious elephant-in-the-room for people who speak Japanese. You all know I've been ignoring a very important fact about Japanese that punches a big hole in the argument. Japanese already has the exact same 3rd-person gendered pronouns as English: 彼氏 (kareshi, he) and 彼女 (kanojo, she). I would like to counter that observation with two points: first, those words are used FAR less often than they are in English. When speaking in the 2nd- or 3rd-person in Japanese, it is very common to forego pronouns and just use somebody's name. In fact, if you use the 2nd-person pronouns in almost any context, it's a little weird; almost like you forgot their name and have to call them "hey you" instead. In 3rd-person, you also typically will refer to somebody by name as well, and would rarely use kareshi or kanojo.
    A second point: kareshi and kanojo are literally English imports. In the Meiji era of Japan after their long isolationist period, there was a desire to find ways to translate the gendered pronouns in English and French literature, which is where kareshi and kanojo (the latter originally kano'onna) came from in the first place.

    If I wanted to fill more time I would also talk about how honorifics can personalize 2nd- and 3rd-person communication, the implications of using specific Japanese 1st-person pronouns, and I could really go in depth speculating about how English could have a neopronoun revolution in the future not via ones like xe/xim but rather anon, oomfie, homie, bestie, my guy, my brother in christ, girlipop, etc. and that maybe we are seeing that revolution right now.

    TL;DR: English pronouns create some problems because they let you put other people into gendered boxes while Japanese pronouns let you express yourself and your unique relationships with other people. This should make us skeptical any time we hear somebody say that a culture is entirely "individualistic" or "collectivist," and we should also recognize that the problem that some people have with respecting preferred pronouns is almost entirely a linguistic problem (sure, exacerbated by anti-trans outgroup politics) rather than an actual problem in people's viewpoints. Thanks for coming to my Ted Talk.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 3 months ago (2 children)

    Thanks for giving your Ted Talk! It was fascinating. If you waned to discuss the 5 common 1st-person pronouns in more details, I'd be thrilled.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] [S] 2 points 3 months ago (1 child)

    I am not a native or regular speaker, so take my observations with a grain of salt. In this comment I will refer to people as "males" and "females" in order to not imply some characteristics of gender or a certain age.
    There's probably 6 common first-person pronouns (I forgot about one): 私 (watashi), あたし (atashi), うち (uchi), 俺 (ore), 僕 (boku), and 自分 (jibun).

    私 (watashi) is the most common and basic pronoun. This is the one that I meant when I mentioned a "mildly formal basic pronoun that doesn’t really reveal much about yourself." In formal speech, it's basically totally flavorless and generic; anybody can use it. In more casual speech, it's a little more feminine. Males are more likely to use 僕 (boku) or 俺 (ore) casually. This is my pronoun of choice when I speak Japanese.

    あたし (atashi), sometimes also written as 私, is an alternate abbreviated form of 私 (watashi). I'm not very familiar with this one and I don't think I know anybody who uses it, but I've heard that it's more feminine and more casual than 私 (watashi). Males will rarely ever use あたし (atashi). I have also heard that it has a slight rebellious flavor to it.

    うち (uchi) is where we start getting into the interesting ones. In a literal sense, うち (uchi) means house/family. This kind of synecdoche is not uncommon in Japanese, where you can refer to somebody by their house. This is actually where the word "otaku" comes from. In contemporary Japanese, otaku basically means "nerd" but it's originally a second-person pronoun that means "your house," and it was a common formal way for nerds to formally refer to each other. I don't really know much about うち (uchi) usage but it's definitely more feminine. Not quite sure about the level of formality. I quite like this pronoun and I would probably use it if it was a little more neutral.

    俺 (ore) is very casual, very masculine, and I've even heard people call it a little bit aggressive or rude if it's used in the wrong circumstance. This is probably the most common male pronoun in casual settings, though it is not really used in younger speakers. This would be a pretty subversive pronoun to use as a female, but I do know at least one female speaker who uses 俺 (ore) as their primary first-person pronoun.

    僕 (boku) is maybe the most interesting one. It's masculine, but can be quite polite. It's very common among young boys and my male Japanese friend told me he doesn't use it because it sounds childish (幼い). Despite that, it is still used in older male speakers in a professional setting. It's also worth mentioning that there's a falling-pitch 僕 (boku) which is more childish and a rising pitch 僕 (boku) which is more professional. Rising pitch 僕 (boku) personally gives me the vibe of a professor or researcher and it sounds a little more individual than 私 (watashi), though that's just my impression. 僕 (boku) is also commonly used in songs by female singers. Female usage of 僕 (boku) outside of music is, I've heard, very rare. But in fictional media there's definitely a trope that exists of the "boku girl" and it's really cool to hear. Off the top of my head, there's a vtuber Amane Kanata who speaks with 僕 (boku). My favorite fictional "boku girl" is Tsukimiya Ayu from Kanon. Hearing 僕 (boku) from a character who is otherwise not masculine gives off a really complicated vibe. It's a little naive, bold, boyish, cute, childish, etc. But you should probably not expect to hear it in real life.

    自分 (jibun) means "oneself" and is not necessarily a first-person pronoun. You can easily use 自分 (jibun) to refer to "yourself" or "themself" etc. As a first-person pronoun, I think it can be very gender neutral. It also has the quality of slightly distancing yourself from what you say, or trying to imply that you are not imposing yourself on other people. In English, it would be like saying "well, personally" at the beginning of every sentence and "but that's just me" at the end. I do like 自分 (jibun) and it has its use cases. I would say I more often use it as a second- or third-person pronoun though.

    Again, my knowledge of these pronouns is pretty superficial as a non-native non-regular speaker but even if I have some details wrong, the proof of concept is still there. Sometimes I wish that the English pronoun system was more robust and I hope for a distant future in which we abandon our silly he/she pronouns that imply nothing but gender and move towards using a variety of interesting second- and third-person pronouns like girlypop and anon.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 11 points 3 months ago

    So, it turns out teleportation is real ...

  • source
  • [–] 11 points 3 months ago

    The way our urban design influences society and community, and how the loss of third spaces and the dominance of cars in Western society has led to the loneliness epidemic and influence bubbles. I would talk about the movement to reclaim main street and encourage "traditional development", and how that leads to the micro-encounters that help people feel like they belong somewhere. How parks, plazas and pedestrian areas create third places where people can casually encounter diverse individuals and create friends and community connections. Also with a hearty side about public transportation and how efficient it is, and what a better neighbor a tram rail is than a road of similar passenger load. This speech is pretty much 30 seconds away from coming out of me during any conversation anyway and it's a conscious effort to stop myself. Would be nice to let it out.

  • source
  • [–] 10 points 3 months ago

    There are lasers that can cut metal. I used to operate, program, set up, and maintain such lasers.

    I know enough about lasers to make them seem boring and pedestrian.

  • source
  • [–] 9 points 3 months ago (2 children)

    The importance of a social safety system and a good (non employer related) healthcare system in order to have a productive workforce and society, and why everyone should have access to good healthcare, food, and stable, clean, pest free housing, regardless of their physical or mental ability to work.

    The way we treat our sick, injured, disabled and elderly is atrocious and we should all be ashamed that we let this happen.

    I work in EMS and the amount of people I've seen living in the most horrific conditions simply because they got sick or injured and are now permanently disabled absolutely haunts me. I've gone into places that I wouldn't even let an animal exist in and there are people living in absolute squalor. They aren't "lazy" or "looking for handouts" or any other shitty thing that people like to call them to other them, many of them simply had the misfortune to get sick or injured and not have a safety net in place. If you get disabled and aren't lucky enough to have people around you to help support you or haven't been rich enough to be putting money away to live off of for the rest of your life, you are fucked. I have no one in my life and I live paycheck to paycheck on a strict budget, and I see these people and know their life will be my future if I get sick or injured.

    Some of them were always going to be permanently disabled, and some of them could have recovered and lived productive lives except they couldn't access the care they needed because of cost and now they're living in shitty poverty situations, still unable to access what they need, and it's too late to recover.

    I could go on for a long time about this, and I could add in many other subtopics.

    On a slightly related note, I don't in any way shape or form believe that a person's life or value should be linked to the workforce or their ability to labor and I think that's a disgusting concept, but I could also frame a solid argument along those lines and maybe win over some hardcore capitalists who maybe wouldn't give a shit about people otherwise. "Hey those people you don't care about, if you invest some money to ensure they are as healthy as possible and are happy, they'll get back to work creating profit for the company and will be way more productive than if they are sick and unhealthy, which will be way better than spending money paying out disability for the rest of their life."

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 3 months ago

    The worst part is that a rich person hears this and thinks about all they’d have to sacrifice to have empathy for these people. But then there’s the part you mentioned: “could have recovered and lived productive lives”. Many aren’t just going to flip burgers at Burger King, they’d be the one inventing a new burger that tastes better, wins the company tons of money, and makes people happy.

    Productivity is the tide that lifts all ships, and we’re actively firing at the floor of the boat with a machine gun.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 9 points 3 months ago

    random unexplained teleportation of individuals.

  • source
  • [–] 8 points 3 months ago (1 child)

    Gathered friends. We come here once again to recite the tale of Bionicle.

    And then I keep the audience busy for 12 hours.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 7 points 3 months ago

    Climate change and migration. There really isn't such a thing as "illegal" migrants to begin with, let alone that most people don't want to leave their homes but for economic reasons. With climate change destroying the fertility and economic productivity of land, it prompts people to try their luck into more prosperous countries, and they are getting demonised for wanting to have better lives. Most people don't realise this and are distracted by 1% propaganda to blame helpless migrants.

  • source
  • [–] 7 points 3 months ago

    It’d be a bit disorganised but I’d talk about how recipes are not standalone processes but transferable blueprints for how to cook certain ingredients.

  • source
  • [–] 7 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (2 children)

    An extended call for more people to follow women's sports. I'd mostly center it around bringing more queer people who otherwise don't follow sports into the fandom:

    • sports are really not that different from other serials you follow, fictional or otherwise
    • shows are better when the episodes are released week-to-week as appointment viewing
    • women's sports are pretty gay, so your blorbos will date and get married and you will squee
    • there are cute walk-up fits before the game
    • there's a big crafting subculture to make and trade custom apparel like friendship bracelets
    • sports fans are easy to socialize with because there's ongoing narratives that are well-described and well-defined
    • all the cool lesbians go to the games and the gay sports bars and meet each other
    • there is much less corruption and fewer shitty toxic people than men's sports
    • sports look simple but there are a lot of really smart people thinking really hard about tough problems and you can see what they think because they use their bodies to show you
  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 3 months ago (1 child)

    As someone who got into women's sport for the football World Cup in 2023, it was every bit as World Cup-y as the current men's one. Fun fun fun.

    Sorry for sharing ads but this one is great, and a justified use of AI
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X_wLVRYHIS4

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • Nutrition supplementation for the poor via soylent green produced from the highest earners in the world.

  • source
  • Captive audience you say? Time to go over magic the gathering combos in detail.

  • source
  • [–] 7 points 3 months ago*

    I rant about the grasshoppers eating the lettuce in my garden box

  • source
  • [–] 7 points 3 months ago

    Tsukomogami and Patina: In Praise of Old Things

    It's the concept that old mechanical things like typewriters and camera lenses (for example) all age individually. They develop their own quirks and foibles as they are used. They almost (as in Tsukomogami) develop a soul.

    We are fundamentally losing that to a society that is about consumable mass-produced trash, and on a long enough timeline, it's going to mean losing a fundamental piece of who we are as a society.

  • source
  • [–] 6 points 3 months ago

    "How to survive in America with 7 mental health issues, 3 health issues, a bum leg, and being gay."

  • source
  • [–] 6 points 3 months ago (2 children)

    Uncluttering your life by switching all of your home computers to linux.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 3 months ago (2 children)

    How to write and test and deliver high quality software.

    It's... It's what I do.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 3 months ago (2 children)

    I'll talk about world wide wealth caps!

    I want that nobody can have a net worth of more than, say, 10 million dollars. After that, all income over that goes 100% to taxes until you're under it.

    Imagine the same tax brackets that we now have, bit with much more brackets and the last one is 100%

    This simple limit has a huge list of implications. Nobody can be extremely wealthy anymore, governments get so much tax income that they can implement all the socialist rights like free healthcare, free education, universal basic income, etc.

    No more poverty

    No more wealth inequality, meaning that everybody can live a good life

    No more extremely large companies because upu need an incremental amount of shareholders to be able to increase its size..

    Corruption? It's hard to buy someone when henl can't really give you much power and the buyer won't be able to offer that much and the risk of getting caught is still the same

    You can work harder and earn more, but why would you if your life is good and happy? For those that need to innovate, there is still richdoms to get, but with reasonable limits

    This of course needs to be implemented world wide to work well, and the exact limit is for others to function, but I believe this to be possible and extremely positive for humanity.

    Needs a lot more work but for the 30 seconds given...

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 3 months ago

    "Hi everyone, welcome to my talk on fainting from anxiety, as triggered by... this... this... uuuuuuuhhhgg..." [Thud]

  • source
  • [–] 6 points 3 months ago (3 children)

    10 years of experiential observations on why people are violent in institutional environments.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 3 months ago

    Is it because enforcement of systemic bureaucratic hierarchies leads to dehumanization, which creates friction & resentment that build over time until individuals inevitably lash out?

    Or like, something close to that? I'd love to hear more.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 5 points 3 months ago (1 child)

    Idk, extreme metal, its origins, differences between subgenres, and some essential listening.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 5 points 3 months ago

    How to protect yourself from narcissistic abuse

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 3 months ago

    I’ve been reading Gerald Horne’s The Counter-Revolution of 1776, and honestly just summarizing the main points from that book would blow a lot of peoples’ minds.

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 3 months ago

    I'd flex the confidence I've built as a social worker and without any preparation at all, ask the audience what they want to talk about. I would call upon audience members to set the subject matter content as needed and the discussion itself would be about how further incorporating mental health could help advance their industry.

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 3 months ago

    Reverse-engineering of locked-down chinese ARM-SoC game and tv hardware.

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 3 months ago

    Oh Shit! Ok ok. I've got it.

    About the similarities between origamists and musicians.

    Folding a figure is like playing a tune, some are simple enough that anyone can hum it, others require years of practice to execute well. Like in music you are the interpreter of a piece, a piece that someone else has designed or maybe you designed yourself, in that case you're also like a composer.

    I could go on but I would be jumping from one thing to another incoherently, I only had 30 seconds to prepare and that deserves a better planned essay.

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 3 months ago

    I immediately panic run off stage and cry to myself in embarrassment for hours.

  • source
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›