top 68 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 32 points 3 months ago*

Getting the federal government to stop doing things like that begins with getting Big Oil's political influence and propaganda out of Alberta.

This is the result of them promoting an astroturf separatist movement which they weaponized to force the federal government to let them pollute the planet unhindered, under threat of destroying the country.

  • source
  • [–] 15 points 3 months ago (2 children)

    Surprise, surprise. Carney is still a neoliberal.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 14 points 3 months ago* (3 children)

    What's a really disturbing red flag for me is he keeps touting carbon capture as a solution to offset the new damage. Feels like marketing strategy to allay the fears of people who don't have the time to look into its effectiveness. I thought CCS was just something he used during the campaign and won't be actually leaning into.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 3 months ago (2 children)

    Best intermediate technological solution while demand keeps increasing. Fossil fuels aren’t going away any time soon, so any investment around CCU and alternatives, together with societal change, will be very welcome.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 3 months ago (14 children)

    Man this sub really hates the guy. Other places I see people praising him, and the other half hating him. No one in the middle even. Last I saw his polling numbers were at their highest peak, not sure where they are at now.

    What makes this place so hostile?

  • source
  • hideshow 14 child comments
  • [–] 33 points 3 months ago (6 children)

    People here lean left more than most other places. Carney is, without a doubt, more right leaning than Trudeau, who many already struggled with his neolib policies. Shifting FURTHER into those policies isn't going to make this place like him

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (5 children)

    Yes. This. Lemmy seems to attract a lot of people who think we are on the brink of an imminent socialist revolution. While I admire many things about socialism, living in SW Ontario way outside Toronto I would just settle for not seeing anti-abortion billboards and F*CK CARNEY stickers everywhere and continuing to resist the right-wing nonsense taking over many other Western countries. (No, not just the US....Le Pen, Meloni, the list goes on...)

    In all reality, we will never be able to get a party in majority that supports eradicating corporate entities, banning ICE (by this I mean gas powered vehicles btw - anything related to the American government agency should absolutely never be present here) vehicles immediately, establishing UBI, etc etc - these things will not happen in extremes that will slowly happen here and there and some won't at all. The goal right now is "least shitty" not "The Great Socialist Revolution" but this is a community with many idealists and that's cool but just remember that when you read some of these posts.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 17 points 3 months ago (3 children)

    To anyone reading this, I'd remind you that local politics are THE MOST important. You can far more easily get local politicians in who are extremely progressive, and begin movement from there. The lack of parties means its much simpler to run, and most people don't even bother voting. Plus those changes can have drastic impacts on what you see and do on a daily basis.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 3 months ago

    This is absolutely true - while my riding is a complete waste and shithole that will always vote Conservative, we have had many progressive people on our town council and in mayoral positions.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 9 points 3 months ago

    Especially so in Canada. The politics that affects like 95% of your daily life is local and provincial. It infuriates me when I hear people blame all their problems on the PM that are actually the responsibility of your local or provincial government. Blaming Trudeau (or now Carney) for Doug Ford’s faults.

    Housing, healthcare, education, public transport, urban planning, welfare, labour standards? It’s all exclusive jurisdiction of the provinces.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

    It may be easier to get socialist (in practice, not labels) politicians elected where the Fuck Carney signs are than a politician that doesn't Fuck Carney themselves. Not a socialist that peddles the whole program a downtown Toronto leftist wants, but an appropriate subset that helps their community in real ways by actually working against corporate interests. After all that's happened before. The real issues affect most of us and I think that's gonna get more obvious to more people in the years to come.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 15 points 3 months ago*

    Some people hate Carney becauae PP's not PM. We hate Carney because of (some of) the shit he does. We're not the same.jpg

    Also plenty of us voted for him and some contributed to his campaign. Even tho we did not expect much more than blocking PP, we still salty when he shits on unions or lays off wildfire experts.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 3 months ago

    It seems like these people have a particular level of privilege not awarded to others.

    Lemmy seems to attract a level of outcast which enables more extreme views.

    It also seems to attract a level of extremism.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 12 points 3 months ago (4 children)

    Carney is a fiscal conservative, so let's get that straight. His concerns are Canadian independence, sovereignty and growth. He's thinking about keeping the country economically viable and strong through this period of turmoil and "new world order" shift as the US is keen to dump its global hegemony.

    Now...... with that said, I'm sure he does care about the climate, but it totally takes a back seat to these other issues which he sees as being essentially existential.

    I think it's an order of priorities and people who service the constant crisis/boom cycle of capitalism will never get correct. Humans are party animals and no amount of good sense is going to change that. It's going to take burning this bitch to the ground and immense loss of life to change tack, and only then it will be because it becomes the predominant existential problem.

    As long as most people can still shit somewhat comfortably, nothing will be done to upset that directly, ever. This is why so many bad things can happen and the average person wont lift a finger, because they still have a nice seat waiting for them at home to shit on.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 17 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

    If Carney cared about the Canadian economy.

    1. He'd seize and rebuild the refineries that Brian Mulroney(also a fiscal con) allowed to be moved to Washington State. As it is, US oil companies get to sell our raw product offshore and worse, then sell it back to us. BC communities assume a risk of annihilation for zero benefit.
    2. He'd put oil pipelines to Ontario/New Bruinswick/Nova Scotia with the intent of shipping oil to Europe. You know, a market that actually wants and needs more.
    3. He'd tell the US lumber lobby to pound sand and help rural BC instead of them being ignored by all except the reform party crazies.
  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 22 points 3 months ago*

    Carney is a fiscal conservative, so let’s get that straight. His concerns are Canadian independence, sovereignty and growth

    for the 1% wealthy Canadians...

    Now… with that said, I’m sure he does care about the climate, but it totally takes a back seat to these other issues which he sees as being essentially existential.

    Then he doesn't care... that is like saying "I care about my second son but will pay no mind to him while my first one needs literally anything". "Business growth" will never take a back seat, and it will never not need tax cuts for the rich or austerity for the poor

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 3 months ago

    If he cared about sovereignty, he wouldn't entertain Alberta separatism and should try to call it out for what it is.

    Mark's concerns are the bottom line. Always have been. Guy's net worth is 10mil - i don't think he even knows what the average Canadian (i.e. 1/4 go hungry) even feel.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 5 points 3 months ago (12 children)

    I admit I voted for this scumbag's party for the first time ever strategically (I thought) in order to prevent an even bigger scumbag in PP from becoming PM. Considering his actions in office re: climate I will NEVER vote Liberal again

  • source
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 3 months ago (1 child)

    This kind of approach is why the NDP hasn't had any presence in Ontario for years. Many people took the attitude of "I'll never vote NDP again" because of Bob Rae. Guess what.... Different people can have different ideas and priorities, even if they belong to the same political party.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 3 months ago

    True. I am an NDP voter generally but faced with the state of the party last election coupled with the spectre of PP as PM (really any position with more authority than dog catcher tbh) I held my nose and voted Liberal. After having lived in Ottawa and meeting a load of Liberals (arrogant scum is an understatement...the stories I could tell) I should have known better. Lesson learned.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] -2 points 3 months ago (9 children)
  • [–] 3 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (6 children)
  • [–] -1 points 3 months ago* (5 children)

    Completely different. We're talking preference - not absolute like/dislike. I was responding to someone saying they'd never vote liberal again. I am not asking if they like PP, just if they'd prefer PP over a liberal. So if the choice is liberal or PP, it is a salient question whether they prefer PP over a liberal. If they'd prefer a liberal over PP when those are the only viable options, then not to vote liberal is confusing, at best. So it's a relevant question.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 3 months ago (4 children)

    You’re still construing said line of questioning out of thin air. There’s nothing concrete in the relevant comment to imply that you need to question whether they would prefer Poilievre over any other candidate, rhetorically or otherwise. (Besides, what is the functional difference between like and dislike vs. personal preference in this case? That’s a pedantic point at best and at worst a completely useless one.)

    Additionally, why are you presuming that Liberals and Conservatives are the only viable options? Isn’t the whole point of having a wide variety of candidates like we do so you never feel pressured into only one or two options? Sure, you can say there would never be enough votes for, say, the NDP or Green Party for them to win a majority; but there’s still no inherent responsibility of any one voter for those parties to choose another because of that, and much more a societally ubiquitous/systemic issue. If one is forced, by circumstance or otherwise, into picking one or the other candidate out of many, then there are much bigger and more “salient” (as you put it) problems at hand than just which of those choices one prefers.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 3 months ago (3 children)

    I'm all for minority governments and voting in greens or ndp etc., but often in a particular riding, there is only liberals or conservatives that have a chance. In that particular (common) case, if the original commenter would 'never vote liberal again' I just want to know if that's because they prefer to help PP's party become the government by not voting against their getting a seat, or if they just haven't thought that through. It's important to think through. It would be really bad to have a PP government.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [+] 1 point 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (2 children)
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • [–] -2 points 3 months ago (1 child)

    career politician.

    ranks somewhere between worm and snake. I guess snake, here, with the snake oil solution.

    delete all of them. left and right.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [+] -9 points 3 months ago (26 children)

    If he loses his day job because of shenanigans like this, I'm sure he'd find a cushy job in the Trump administration.

  • source
  • hideshow 26 child comments
  • [–] 26 points 3 months ago (25 children)

    I am not even remotely a fan of much of the things Carney is doing, but to paint him as a Trump sycophant is just bullshit.

    Most people who voted Liberal in the last election went into it full well knowing Canada was electing a red conservative, but the alternative was way fucking worse.

    We could have ended up with an actual Trump sycophant.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 25 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 3 months ago (11 children)

    Woah, easy there, chief. I didn't mean to light you up this morning. I was simply basing the comment off of his climate "activism" that's destroying your chances of actually protecting your country from it. I'm not sure how you got sycophantic behavior being insinuated but I'm sorry if that's how it came off.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [+] 7 points 3 months ago (8 children)
  • [–] 7 points 3 months ago (7 children)

    Simply that he would make a great head for the US EPA. He definitely is of like mind in that regard.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [+] 2 points 3 months ago (6 children)
  • [–] 4 points 3 months ago (3 children)

    Clearly you don't know how little I care about "ratios".

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [+] 2 points 3 months ago* (2 children)
  • [–] 1 point 3 months ago (10 children)

    No they didn’t. Carney stole a bunch of Kate Raworth talking points and people bought it. “We have become a market society” was what pulled NDP voters and the left flank of the LPC in.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 3 months ago* (9 children)

    As a member of the NDP, who voted specifically AGAINST PP as my MP, I knew exactly what I was doing, and so did all of my friends and neighbours.

    Anyone who didn't see a red conservative wasn't paying attention.

    • Appointed to Governor of BoE under a Conservative.
    • Appointed to Governor of BoC under a Conservative.
    • He wrote a book about markets and stakeholder capitalism.
    • His book said the job of the state is to clear hurdles.
    • He wrote that true prosperity is driven by wealth generation and global trade
    • He worked at Goldman Sachs.
    • He had an article written about him in 2021 that called him a "Bay Street Liberal".
    • At the 2024 Convention, long before Trudeau resigned, he spoke against the financial policies of the Liberals and talked about wealth creation.
    • He worked at Brookfield.

    And so on, and so on.

    Still a thousand times better than the alternative.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] -3 points 3 months ago (8 children)

    So in order to defeat Conservatives you voted for a Conservative? You forgot to mention that his dissertation is heavily based on Game Theory. Weird that the guy with a Doctorate in Game Theory framed an election as a zero sum game.

    Let’s not forget in 2018 when the Conservative's told Paul Wells they were going to do everything possible to get rid of the carbon tax. Then ran over Trudeau for years and years until it finally worked. Even Brown was a victim to this when CTV published slander to get him out of the OPC leadership race. Then the CPC just DQ’d him from Leadership.

    But hey, you really stuck it to the guy you didn’t like by voting for his platform in a different suit.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 3 months ago (7 children)

    I'm sorry that saying the alternative was worse is too difficult to understand.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] -3 points 3 months ago (6 children)

    Don’t really see much of a difference. Which once again was evident during the election when they had the same platforms. But hey, not like there isn’t a third option in Canada.

    At some point this tired talking point needs to be laid to rest. Because it’s essentially speed running Duverger's Law and coming from the same people who bash Trudeau for ER stuff, it’s beyond hypocritical.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 3 months ago (5 children)

    Using technical terminology doesn't make you right. Yes, we need to get rid of FPTP, but that doesn't mean we should have let someone who wants to live up Trump's ass so badly that he has it on a vision board, become PM.

    I would rather have 5 years of sanity with a government I don't like then have have PP become PM. Ask yourself how hated you have to be to have a riding you have held for 20 years hate you so much they boo you at a Christmas parade.

    Given the fact that your account has existed a day, I'm going to assume you are a troll account, paid for by the CPC, an offshore asshole intentionally trying to cause issues, or you are so profoundly naive that you don't understand how utterly fucking awful a PP government would be for us.

    Don’t really see much of a difference.

    This right there is enough for me to be done with you

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] -2 points 3 months ago* (4 children)

    One makes you feel better about yourself than the other? Thats the literal difference. Carney already lives up Trumps ass. He repealed a lot of the Trudeau policy around the environment. He’s passing draconian security legislation. He’s tariffed the shit out of inputs that we cannot produce domestically. He’s pushing O&G to new heights. Bailing out developers. Killed Nate Erskine-Smith’s housing proposals he campaigned on.

    So yeah, they’re the same clown as far as I see. The only difference here is that you like Carney as a person. Which is a completely failing of democracy.

    I grew up being taught to vote for what I believe in, and not to vote against things. But hey, people like you pretend we live in a democracy. 2025 was the perfect illustration of how we have become a two party system with very little differences between the two parties.

    But Liberals need to continue the moral relativism and zero sum electoral game to retain power. So they’re more than happy to keep pushing the narrative. I see more news about Poilievre from them than anyone else. It’s all ad hominem too. You can’t attack his policy because it’s your policy.

    Oh yeah you also let a hard right Conservative into caucus.

    Carney and Poilievre are the same person in terms of governing and ideology. Carney just did the classic liberal thing of campaigning from the left.

    Edit: oh yeah and you’re also isolating people. You really think I’m a troll? You understand people can have different outlooks to you and treating support as a zero sum game does nothing but make you look like the Liberal elitist that you probably are. Maybe you should go read Value(s) again if you can get the pages unstuck.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 3 months ago (2 children)

    You really think I’m a troll?

    Well, the other option was naive.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] -1 points 3 months ago (1 child)

    I wish I could live as simple of a life as you where everyone who has a different opinion than me is simply a troll. Even on a site that checks IP and IMEI data.

    But that tracks because Liberals hate democracy as demonstrated over the last year and a half. Did you help build the overpass over the floor.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 3 months ago

    "Everybody I don't like is exactly the same" is not an opinion, it's a troll. If you seriously cannot see the difference between PP and Carney, then I don't know what to say, other than... sigh.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] -1 points 3 months ago (1 child)

    He wasn't at first but now days I'm confident he just wants more money and someone like Bessent offers enough he'd literally suck Peter Thiel's dick

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 3 months ago

    There’s a quote in his book that I think explains it really well and turned me off of him instantly. “Crisis is not the time for reform” in context to the GFC. So while he was stumping at stating we are in a crisis, I knew he was going to be the worst version of himself.

  • source
  • parent