all 61 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 96 points 3 months ago* (17 children)

Shame they didn't call it "the quest for more money."

  • source
  • hideshow 17 child comments
  • [–] 69 points 3 months ago (4 children)

    On the first reveal trailer Mel Brooks explained that he already found the money. The Money

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 51 points 3 months ago (2 children)

    I'd rather "Spaceballs 3: The Search for the Lost Sequel"

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 3 months ago (8 children)

    That's a 40 year old joke at this point. I'm pretty sure Mel Brooks has more pride in his work than to repeatedly himself. Unless it was truly funny.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 32 points 3 months ago (5 children)

    Combing the desert is repeating an old joke too.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 3 months ago (4 children)

    If I were to defend it, I'd say that the joke in this case is that they're still combing the desert 40 years later, which adds a little new humour to it.

    Not sure I really want to defend it, though. Can't say this poster excites me. But it would excite me less if the subtitle were a purely nostalgia driven reference as well.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 3 months ago (3 children)

    Nah, if i hear him personally saying "ain't found shit" for a second time, 40 years older, i will die in peace.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 3 months ago*

    A lot of his later movies were just repeated jokes from his older ones. Men in Tights reused a bunch of old gags, including the title song, which was "Jews in Space" from the epiloge of History of the World Part 1.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 21 points 3 months ago (1 child)
  • [–] 34 points 3 months ago (4 children)

    Remember when the combed tge desert and people found that funny? Anyway, here is the same thing.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 3 months ago (3 children)

    The comb thing was funny in the literal joke sense. It was a joke, subverting expectations, playing off a pun, and had prop/visual comedy, too. It was solid if silly.

    This cover though ... this is just stupid nostalgia bait.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 3 months ago (1 child)

    I knew it. I'm surrounded by assholes!

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 11 points 3 months ago

    Guys they're obviously parodying the Dinsey star wars reboot by reusing the same jokes /s

  • source
  • [–] 16 points 3 months ago (9 children)

    Amazing how many strong opinions exist for something we've got no clue how they're doing it

    I'm worried, too. But this nonsense about how it sucks? We absolutely don't know that. At least not yet. Yeesh

  • source
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 3 months ago (2 children)

    You can't deny it is pretty disheartening that they went with a literal copy-paste of a scene from the first movie as a poster. Pure nostalgia bait.

    Yes, we have no idea what the movie will be like, but this particular poster is definitely an example of a product being done for all the the wrong reasons. Whether it reflects on the movie itself or just the marketing department is another matter.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 3 months ago*

    I mean... that's true. But it's a MARKETING poster, put together by the marketing team - not the writers or creatives on the movie. Its intent is to get people to remember the original so they come to see this one. It's not supposed to be a high concept art piece. They'd be stupid not to lean into nostalgia.

    What matters is the final film, and if it does the same thing.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 8 points 3 months ago (5 children)

    I didn't think we had much iconic sci-fi to parody these days.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 3 months ago (3 children)

    Hell, if they just focused on the SW sequels, I’d consider that enough.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 3 months ago

    Well i dont know about you guys but i am hopeful, theres plenty of material that wasnt covered in the first spaceballs, and thats not including the new disney sequels.
    Wait till its out before i judge.

  • source
  • [–] 6 points 3 months ago

    Whats even to parody at this point?

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 3 months ago (6 children)

    What about history of the world part 2? Jews in space!

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 3 months ago (3 children)

    They actually did that as a Hulu series a few years ago.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 3 months ago (2 children)
  • [–] 9 points 3 months ago (4 children)

    Don't watch it in cinemas. It is pure nostalgiaslop. Vote with your wallet and go see new movies instead. If you are curious, use alternative methods to watch it instead.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 3 months ago (2 children)
  • [–] 0 points 3 months ago (1 child)

    Typing this last to apologize in advance, my response turned into a bit of a rant. I'm gonna leave it as is, tho.

    No, but it is yet another sequel of a movie/franchise that's had no activity for at least 10 years. Just like the new Naked Gun, Star Wars, Gladiator, Meet the Parents, Scary Movie, Toy Story, Shrek, Indiana Jones, The Devil Wears Prada, etc. Hollywood keeps making more stuff of established movies, many of which do not need a(nother) sequel, and I am sick and tired of it. And I'm not alone, but I do seem to be rather rare in actually doing something against it.

    A few years ago, I saw an amazing movie called Juror #2 with a friend. It was within the first week of release in our country, but we were in a rather small room which wasn't even full yet. You know what was drawing a crowd? Gladiator II. Gladiator is an amazing movie, that does not need a fucking sequel. Now I've read some rumours that they are making a third one. I hate that everything good is being franchised to death, and I cannot for the life of me understand why so many people put up with it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 3 months ago
    [–] -2 points 3 months ago (1 child)

    If the new Naked Gun was any indication, this will not go well.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment