you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 0 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 child)

Honestly I never understood why the product was removed/put in storage in the first place?

Would it not have been substantially cheaper for businesses not to purchase any more stock instead?

People then could have choosen not to buy what's left on the shelfs. And governments would not have to pay storage fees using taxpayer funds.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment