▲ 737 ▼ boiling water again (quokk.au) submitted 7 months ago by Deceptichum to c/science_memes@mander.xyz 78 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] NigelFrobisher@aussie.zone 20 points 7 months ago (4 children) Fusion is still five years off, right? permalink fedilink source hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] MajorMajormajormajor@lemmy.ca 16 points 7 months ago N+5 years off, where n is the current year. We'll get there one day! permalink fedilink source parent [–] bss03@infosec.pub 4 points 7 months ago IIRC, most of the people that actually work at ITER don't expect to live to see commercial fusion. We've achieved controlled ignition several times, but there's a lot of steps still between that and delivering fusion power to your local grid, and I don't think I would trust anyone to give a concrete timeline. I really thought Polywell Fusion would be the trick, but Australians (and probably the US DoD) have good evidence it doesn't "scale" in a way that will give a energy-positive/fuel-negative cycle. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polywell#University_of_Sydney_experiments permalink fedilink source parent [–] Noodle07@lemmy.world 2 points 7 months ago It's going to be a hell of a lot faster with all those oil wells burning permalink fedilink source parent [–] rumba@lemmy.zip 1 point 7 months ago no no no, it's 𝑅𝑛=𝑅0(1−𝑓)𝑛 years off. We keep getting closer, but by smaller increments. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] MajorMajormajormajor@lemmy.ca 16 points 7 months ago N+5 years off, where n is the current year. We'll get there one day! permalink fedilink source parent
[–] bss03@infosec.pub 4 points 7 months ago IIRC, most of the people that actually work at ITER don't expect to live to see commercial fusion. We've achieved controlled ignition several times, but there's a lot of steps still between that and delivering fusion power to your local grid, and I don't think I would trust anyone to give a concrete timeline. I really thought Polywell Fusion would be the trick, but Australians (and probably the US DoD) have good evidence it doesn't "scale" in a way that will give a energy-positive/fuel-negative cycle. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polywell#University_of_Sydney_experiments permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Noodle07@lemmy.world 2 points 7 months ago It's going to be a hell of a lot faster with all those oil wells burning permalink fedilink source parent
[–] rumba@lemmy.zip 1 point 7 months ago no no no, it's 𝑅𝑛=𝑅0(1−𝑓)𝑛 years off. We keep getting closer, but by smaller increments. permalink fedilink source parent